Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media on the democratic processes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media on the democratic processes
In “Digital Citizenship” Simon Lindgren, discusses Digital citizenship looking at how people have an active role in using the internet and social media to engage in political conversation. Lindgren presents the idea of the ‘public sphere’ from the 1962 theory by Jürgen Habermas, by analysing the transformations and developments in media, specifically in social media platforms and how they have altered how politics and news are discussed in today’s society. Arguing that the internet and social media may have created the emergence of a new public sphere. Developed from the work of sociologists ‘Hargittai and Paul DiMaggio’, Lindgren demonstrates the five digital divisions that can affect the access and usage one may have when engaging online. They consist of technical means, the autonomy of use, skill (internet competence), social support and different …show more content…
Using Twitter as an example, he describes the social network as a “user-driven social realm for conversations and exchange.” (Lindgren, 2017) However, he argues that twitter, is mainly for entertainment due to celebrity culture, and further also criticises the limitations in word count. Twitter follows a 140-character limit which does not give enough freedom to express and develop thought out political discussion. This does not coincide with Habermas’ model of the public sphere in that “…everyone has access, and second, that participants can confer in an unrestricted way.” (Lindgren, 2017). Lindgren further develops his argument, in stating that ‘the private is public’. Meaning that what one may communicate on private social media accounts can have a “public political effect” (Lindgren, 2017) as the complexity of and developments within media can blur the lines between what is private and
Rosen makes the argument that people surrender all privacy through “self-revelation” (Rosen), they destroy their privacy to fit in with society and to join the naked crowd. Rosen defines social media as a place where people surrender privacy to “achieve trust through self-exposure” (Rosen). In his eyes, people are simply giving away privacy to become transparent within society. I believe that people are actually exchanging one type of power for another. Foucault’s complex analysis of power can be simplified into “Power is everywhere” (Foucault). People exchange the power of privacy for the power of connection. The author of the journal article agrees with the exchange of power, “Trust is indeed achieved within Facebook in the way Rosen argues; however, this trust is the product of an exchange of power.” (Brittany). Social media allows us to connect instantly with people all over the world. As with any situation, humans assess the risk factors and the benefits of any decision they have to make, they will...
In Nicholas Carr’s article “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics”, Carr writes about the effects that social media has on politics. In his article, Carr focuses more on the negative effect that social media has when it comes to politics. Some points that he makes about social media include specific examples like the recent presidential campaigns, how other technological advances over the years have effected politics, and the effectiveness that social media has on politics
For instance, Edmond asks his audience to consider the concept “public vs. private” before sharing anything on social media (Edmond Jr. 134). Encouraging the audience to think, rather than just follow what others in society do, causes them to feel like the author, Edmond Jr., is looking out for their best interests. Edmond’s statement supports his purpose by reiterating that the Internet is not safe, and truly private details should not be shared. Overall, he succeeds in convincing his audience of the general public that they should be cautious in regards to what they post on the world wide
“Nothing is perfect.” Though social media brings us uncountable convenience, there is a trade-off with the convenience. Due to the advanced technology we have, social media has become part of our life, which it means that social media could determine our sociability. In Peggy Orenstein’s “I Tweet, Therefore I Am,” though she praises Tweeter for its convenience, at the same time, she also worries that “(Tweeter) makes the greasepaint permanent, blurring the lines not only between public and private but also between the authentic and contrived self.” Since we don’t care about who we talk to, we might act abnormally due to our feelings, and
Using the informal tone he enhances his argument by providing several thought-provoking statements that allow the reader to see the logic in the article, “Social media is designed for the information shared on it to be searched, and shared- and mined for profit… When considering what to share via social media, don 't think business vs. personal. Think public vs. private. And if something is truly private, do not share it on social media out of a misplaced faith in the expectation of privacy” (134). The reader should agree with Edmond that when posting or being a part of the social media bandwagon, you’re life and decisions will be up for display. Moreover, the business vs. personal and public vs. private point is accurate and logical, because evidently if you post something on any social media outlet you should expect that anyone and everyone can see it, regardless of your privacy settings. Edmond highlights that Facebook along with other social networking sites change their privacy settings whenever they please without
“The standards of what we want to keep private and what we make public are constantly evolving. Over the course of Western history, we’ve developed a desire for more privacy, quite possibly as a status symbol…”(Singer) Technological change leads to new abuses, creating new challenges to security, but society adapts to those challenges. To meet the innate need for privacy, we learn what to reveal and where, and how to keep secret what we don't want to disclose. “Whether Facebook and similar sites are reflecting a change in social norms about privacy or are actually driving that change, that half a billion people are now on Facebook suggests that people believe the benefits of connecting with others, sharing information, networking, self-promoting, flirting, and bragging outweigh breaches of privacy that accompany such behaviours,”(Singer) This is obvious by the continuous and unceasing use of social media platforms, but what needs to be considered is that this information is being provided willingly. “More difficult questions arise when the loss of privacy is not in any sense a choice.”(Singer) When the choice to be anonymous it taken away through social media, the person loses the ability to keep their personal information
It has become comfortably accepted, without any regard to tact, to divulge even the most sensitive information to a complete stranger. For example, in her article, “Friending: The Changing Definition of Friendship in the Social Media Era,” Xinran states, “I think I know most of them, but I actually don’t,” after thoroughly examining her many cyber relationships (Xinran 208). With no consideration of discretion for public reveal “social media relationships take place on display” forsaking all privacy (Vatel 2). The cloak of social media has allowed for these interactions to take place in our own comfort zones; thus, falsely allowing the sense of protection from damaging or even dangerous
Jeff Jarvis is a journalist, professor, and public speaker. In his book, “Public Parts”, Jarvis’s own opinions on “publicness” are stated plainly. He sees both social and personal benefits to living a totally public life on the internet. David Kirkpatrick is a technology journalist and author. He offers no opinion of his own on subject of total public disclosure. He has written two books on the social media giant Facebook. Kirkpatrick’s book “The Facebook Effect” was reviewed by David Pogue in The New York Times, Sunday Book Review. Pogue wrote, “You come away with a creepy new awareness of how a directory of college students is fast becoming a directory of all humanity — one that’s in the hands of a somewhat strange 26-year-old wearing a T-shirt and rubber Adidas sandals.” His book may leave readers more cautious than ever about what information they themselves are uploading to the
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35-
As case and point, “the impact of the Internet is far greater than any other communicative tool in the history of mass communications” (Elliot, 2008, para. 1). With an expansive, yet extremely convenient means to electronically join people through business, relationships, education and more, Sociology assumes the ...
The political atmosphere has significantly changed over the years, along with the developments in the area of technology and mass media communication. The advances in this area have provided the opportunity for the civil society to get politically involved and the ability to engage in debate about the current issues. This will be discussed using Clay Shirky’s article The Political Power of Social Media – Technology, the Public Sphere and Political Change, as a lens to look at media communication and technology influence on a particular political movement of high current interest and importance, the gun control debate. However, this influence and impact is only possible when the population has complete freedom to use the Internet, which is not
... altered concepts of “how to share information” and “what is public or private”. This is valuable because it connects the Social Penetration theory to social media. It also outlines the effects Facebook has on relationships.
The purpose of this essay is to develop a further understanding of the impact of social media in regards to the political debate. By looking at the topic of social media and the use of rhetoric in response to politics in the 21st century, a deeper understanding of the issue can be established. Social media has become a primary source for the discussion of politics by the average citizen whether through the sharing of articles, “memes”, advertisements or personal expository statements. As a result, large sums of information and ideas are spread rapidly across a wide variety of subjects. However, much of this information may not be accurate and could be misinterpreted.
The use of social media has risen exponentially in the past decade, and with it the impact of its ubiquity has become evident. Although social media can undoubtedly be a positive vehicle for self expression and social interaction, it is largely restrictive of personal liberty and subsequently does more harm than good. Though this applies primarily to the individual, the negative effects of social media on personal freedom extends to interpersonal relationships and can therefore negatively affect groups as well. The convergence of audiences and associated privacy concerns on social media sites like Facebook can result in self-censorship, while the inbuilt filtering systems create a sense of censorship. Data collection and surveillance make it
Internet has been acknowledged as one of the most efficient way to collect and reflect public opinions, for that people with different classes and races can express their opinions with no obstacles in virtual network spaces. People can speak out whatever they want just by typing on the keyboard within a second. Dr. Heather Savigny mentions in her article “Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet” that “The expansion of the internet as a new method of communication provides a potential challenge to the primacy of the traditional media and political parties as formers of public opinion” (1). People realized that the power of internet public opinion in the focus on social issues can be used as a weapon to affect government decision-makings. However, does public opinion only brings positive effects?