Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary impacts of world war 1
The history and purpose of war poetry
Literary impacts of world war 1
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary impacts of world war 1
Different Views of War in Poets
I will explain the different view of war I have, from the poems
written by 4 different poets.
The poems I will be writing about are "INTO BATTLE, WHO'S FOR THE
GAME, PEACE AND SPRING OFFENSIVE AND FUTILITY".
All these poems are based on the 1st World War.
"Into Battle by Julian Grenfell. This poem was written at the start of
the war, hence the title Into Battle.
It starts off with the out look of nature.
The naked earth is warm with spring,
And with green grass and bursting trees
Leans to the sun's gaze glorying
And quivers in the sunny breeze
These quotes show that nature is positive and is blossoming.
The quoting of these lines,
And life is colour and warmth and light
And striving evermore for these.
The author very powerfully uses these lines.
It is stating that the soldiers are taking the light for their life,
their grabbing it, they are going to take each day as it comes hoping
to be alive.
The poems strengths are the description of nature.
Julian Grenfell emphasises on this by describing nature in depth.
Speed with the light-foot winds to run,
And with the trees to newer birth,
The woodland trees that stand together,
They stand to him each one a friend,
They gently speak in the windly weather,
They guide to valley and ridge's sight.
The author explains them, like they are humans on earth.
The poem is based as a springboard of confidence for the soldiers.
That springboard is the coming of spring. It seems that spring is
giving the soldiers hope.
The soldiers enter the war under God's guidance.
They belie...
... middle of paper ...
...horror of war but is caught up
in the struggle between nature and humanity.
It is in this last stanza that the speaker realises that nothing will
save his comrade from death and questions
'Was it for this the clay grew tall?'
Concluding my coursework I think war changed England.
This is because as these poems were written, they were the views most
people had to war.
These views were their own views but I am sure the most of the country
shared the same different views as the authors I have written about.
People took an outlook to war as being a bad thing that would turn out
good if there was a strong participation in it and if victory was
claimed.
I think These poets , Wilfred Owen, Julian Grenfell, Rupert Brooke and
Jessie pope share the views of the people of England during the 1st
world war.
According to Christopher and James Collier,”War turns men into beasts.” It is true because many people are willing to
In war many people had a fixed view of how war was. In the book All Quiet On the Western Front the main character Paul went home and listened to his father talk to his friends about how good the war truly was. Paul sat and watched and didn't say anything because he didn't want to ruin the perspectives of the men and it was simply too hard for him to talk about.”I realise
While some characters were just blatantly Anti-War, some were Pro Army and attempted to maintain a degree of military bearing and discipline in a world of chaos. The other side just rolled with the situation and accepted the day to day existence in whatever capacity they had to in order to get through it.
Portrayal of War in the Pre 1900 Poetry Before 1900, war was always seen as a glorious thing. People truly believed in the words of the ancient writer Horace, "Dulce et decorum est, pro patria mori. " This phrase can be translated, as "It is a lovely and honourable thing; to die for one's country". Pre 1900 war poetry was strongly patriotic and glossed over the grim reality of death, preferring instead to display the heroic aspects of fighting. If death was mentioned, it was only in a noble and glorious context.
The two poems, 'Dulce et decorum est' and 'Who's for the game?' are both very different war poems. Although they were both written about the First World War, they both had different purposes. The poems have aspects in which they are similar, but they also have very big differences.
are not free in service, you do what you are told and this is the same
War has always been a negative social issue among the citizens of America. Some believe we should be involved in everything so we can to show our dominance around the world and others see it as a big problem. War World Two is a different story. After we realized that Hitler was close to succeeding in his plan of imperialism most people were on board to going to war.
...e a better place if everyone would stop and think before making a decision base on their theories and image. Misperception may be coincidental to-rather than determinative of-the occurrence of war, because war can be an equilibrium outcome that results from specific configurations of actor preferences. Even if misperception does sometimes play a causal role in the outbreak of war, its impact is situational circumscribed.
told he was out of action for six months. It was here that he first
The next line expresses the way in which he has no grave stone, just a
Considered the leading English poet of the First World War, Owen is remembered for realistic poems depicting the horrors of war, which were inspired by his experiences at the Western Front in 1916 and 1917. Owen considered the true subject of his poems to be "the pity of war," and attempted to present the true horror and realities of battle and its effects on the human spirit. His unique voice, which is less passionate and idealistic than those of other war poets, is complemented by his unusual and experimental style of writing. He is recognized as the first English poet to successfully use pararhyme, in which the rhyme is made through altered vowel sounds. Owen’s distinct way of both writing and reading poems led to influence other poets in the 1920s and 1930s.
How Wilfred Owen Uses Language and Imagery in His Poetry to Communicate his Attitudes of War
World War I impacted poetry profoundly. Poets who served in the war were using poetry to share their horrific stories about the hardships they faced. These poets became known as “war poets.” They wrote about the traumatic, life changing experiences that haunted them once the war was over. Intense poems started emerging that portrayed the mental and physical struggles soldiers faced. Two examples of the impact that World War I had on poetry is seen in the poems “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen and “Repression of War Experience” by Siegfried Sassoon.
Demolished cities, torn families and decimated countries are a few of the destructive properties of war. Throughout history, the world has been through war after war, never ceasing. Two of the greatest and most destructive wars were World War I and World War II. These wars involved most of the world’s countries and ended with tragic results. The wars also left many soldiers with various mental and physical problems that ruined their social lives. John F. Kennedy once said that “Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.” For the most part, he is right; if war does not end, it will end humankind. The main problem with this is that most people barely even know how destructive war can be; people believe war is the only way to solve problems with other countries. The problem with that is that war often uncovers or starts new problems that can affect others more than the past problems. Literature has helped people grasp at the understanding of what happens during wars and the problems that it can create. Some go into deep aspects of significant wars while others go into wars that everyone fights within themselves. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Beowulf and John Milton’s Paradise Lost are a few pieces of the thousands of works of literatures that capture the tragic, destructive power of war, global and small.
War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.