Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the lightning thief percy jackson
An essay about percy jackson the lightning thief
Percy jackson movie vs book literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the lightning thief percy jackson
The Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief movie only brings shame to the book. The movie was awful, the two are so different that it’s hard to believe the writers even read the book before writing the movie. For instance, the plot was watered down and changed, the way they showed the characters was inaccurate. Additionally, the movie is missing many details and events that were included in the book. For instance, some the actors age or physical description didn't match the ones in the book. The main villain throughout the book series wasn't even included in the movie. The producers didn't even include one of the major Greek Gods. The movie writers changed the movie plot too much. For instance: In the book, Percy was told to go find the lightning …show more content…
bolt that was stolen, or else the gods would start WWIII. Although Percy takes on the quest, low key, he is only doing it in to save his mom.
On Percy's adventure to find the bolt, Ares gives him a way to get into the Tartarus. Ares also gives Percy a bag that has Zeus weapon. Although percy didn't know it at the time, the bolt was inside the bag he was given. Now, once Percy uses the pearls given to him from ares to get inside Tartarus, Percy pushes through monsters and hell to get to Hades. Once Percy has a little chat with Hades, he discovers that that Hades had no involvement in the stealing of the bolt, Percy realizes that the the bolt was in the bag Ares had given him and that he is being framed for the for the heist. Knowing this, Percy knows he has to get to Olympus to return the bolt to Zeus and to explain what happened. Now jump ahead a few chapters, it's revealed that Luke had been the one who had taken the Bolt. Also,Kronos powers allowed him to manipulate Ares into framing Percy. If Percy somehow managed to escape from from Hades and Tartarus, Ares was tasked to kill Percy in order to prevent the truth from being told to Zeus. Now, in the movie, Luke was made the main villain and the writers completely blew Kronos out the water by not …show more content…
including or mentioning him. In the book, Kronos the lord of time, was the main villain. Kronos used his powers to manipulate people in order to help him escape the darkest pits of Tartarus. All Kronos wanted was revenge, he wanted to kill his three sons and to destroy olympus brick by brick. Now, The movie makers did not include Kronos in the movie at all. Instead, the writers made Luke the villain. This act alone removed the possibility of a good trilogy from being created. Back to the movie, Luke’s goal was to dethrone the gods because of their selfishness. Luke believed that Olympus wouldn't last without the the help of the demigods. Why was Luke considered a villain? What made the book series possible was the great prophecy in the beginning. In the Percy Jackson series, everything was tied to that one prophecy. Which by the way wasn’t even mentioned in the movie. One is left to ask themselves, how will the producers follow up a movie series without the one thing that made the book series mend together? This movie didn't live up to the hype and it shows just how different the movie plot was from the book plot. Not only was the plot a disaster, but also the way the characters were shown was different than in the book.
For starters, Grover was wrecked in the movie. In the book, he was a thoughtful satyr that had one goal in life, he wanted to find his god, Pan. Who by the way has been missing for thousands of years, presumed dead. Grover has a bad history and rep due to failing in a mission to bring a demi-god back to camp alive. Him wanting to prove himself, determined him to ride along with Percy on the quest.Further in the book, Grover matures physically and emotionally. In the film, Grover was turned into that one ‘black guy’ who always had some stupid thing to say. The sad thing is, Grover legit represented a lot of kids in elementary and middle school. Shy, scared and being afraid to speak up for oneself. But in the movie Gover was just trying to get laid. Fast forward the end end of the book when the crew return from the quest. Grover was awarded senior protector. Now, In the book series it took 3 whole books in for Grover to get this title along with his searchers license. Why rush through so much? As for Annabeth, in the book she had NZT like powers from the movie Limitless. Genius level intellect, due to her mother being Athena. In the movie, Annabeth was basically Wonder Woman. Thats a huge change from the
book. Changing the characters was not enough, the producers left out a lot of key details which had big parts parts in the book and the sequels. To begin with, the writers did not include the Titans, which were the main antagonists in the series. Their goal was take over and to kill the Olympian Gods. A huge mistake was to not include Ares, Dionysus and Clarisse. Ares played a big part in the book by being manipulated into fighting for Kronos. Also, the fight between Percy and Ares was probably one of the best parts of the book, completely badass. Definitely being one of the strongest demigods in camp Clarisse was left out, why? Because her father the god of war Ares was left out. Ooh, no appearance of Dionysus? He is the one in the book who runs camp Half-Blood. Overall, the book obliterates the movie, not only does the book have a better portrayal of the characters, but the plot makes sense and there are plenty of details and mysteries which would leave one wondering’“what happens next?’
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
The movie lacks a lot of insight onto the other characters in the book, it mostly focuses on Ponyboy. For example, in the movie there was a lack of detail on characters such as Darry and Sodapop even Dally. Dally was a major character in the book but his death in the movie seemed a bit minor because there wasn’t much detail for viewers to get attached to his character. I felt as if his death was glazed over and easily forgotten in the movie while in the book it was described for at least two pages.
In the movie, it is told in a third person point of view and the characters look a lot more different than how they do in the book. The movie goes by much quicker than the book. Also Pony goes straight home after the church burns down.
When you get to the beginning, middle, or end u realize they are both very different. The movie and book have a lot in common like they both have the same characters .
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
The book is some what different from the movie. There are many differences between the book and the movie. Like when PonyBoy and Johnny went to the movie theater Pony wished that he was big and buff like the guy in the movie. “I was wishing I looked like Paul Newman-he looks tough and I don’t
...th head towards the underworld were Percy’s mother is held in a cave. The reader is able to obverse that Percy as walking in to the most unsafe place and this could potentially be the most danger they have ever encountered. As they enter the secrete path to Hades layer Percy and his allies come across a guard with a boat man who does not allow any living people into the underworld. A problem is created as the man blocks the entrance to the underworld on the other hand Percy explains that nothing will stop him from get his mother back as he is will to do anything to obtain his mothers love. However Annabeth come up with an idea to gives him money. Her plan is successful as the man agrees to give them a ride over the underworld. The next step is get his mother back and return Zeus’s lightning bolt but in order to do that he must meet the god of the underworld hades.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
This is the true start to Percy’s quest. He made a few friends in the camp and they agreed to go on this journey with him. Those accompanying him were his protector Grover and Athena’s daughter Annabeth. They also get some helpful tools fro...
Of the many changes made between the book and the movie, most were made to keep the audience interested in the story. Most people who watch TV don’t have a long attention span. Executives at NBC didn’t want to spend millions to produce a movie and then have nobody watch it. The screenwriters had to throw in some clever plot twists to keep people interested. Another reason the movie was different from the book was the material in the book was a little too racy for network TV. Take the ending, for example, nobody wants to see a grown man hang himself. This was a reason the producers had to change some material in the movie.
Percy is immensely brave. He is not afraid to do anything if it meant he could save another's life, like he
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Percy Jackson is the main character in this story, who is a demi god, who mortals are after. His name is short for Perseus and his father is one of the big three gods, Poseidon. He is suffering from dyslexia and ADHD, which could be deliberately added to the character by Riordan, to show he is meant to be a hero, and not to do well in school. This shows that school is not what he is good at, and he is destined to be a hero and save people. The character Grover, who plays Percy’s best friend, parallels a Satyr who is human from the waist up and goat from the waist down and is a companion of wine God, Dionysus, who we later learn, is the camp director for Half-Blood Camp.
Over the course of this novel, Percy must embark on a quest to clear his name, much like Hercules had to endure his Twelve Labors. These Twelve Labors would prove to be a recurring theme for Percy throughout the entirety of his five-part series. While Hercules abandoned his quest with Jason for the Golden Fleece, Percy did not, and succeeded where the ancient hero had failed. Hercules was also directly referenced in Titan’s Curse in a flashback by Percy’s new friend and Hesperide Zoe, a goddess entrusted with protecting Hera’s apples which Hercules had stolen. Over the long chain of events throughout the entire series, Percy and his friends encountered and battled numerous monsters that Hercules had originally slain in his Twelve Labors, such as Cerberus, a hydra, the Nemean Lion, the Erymanthian Boar, and cleaning the Aegean stables, home to flesh-eating horses.
Imagine if your work was to be published, but the publishers required you to change even the most minute detail to fit their need. This work would be unrecognizable, not at all what you wanted to convey with your story. This is essentially what happens with every movie adaptation of a popular novel, and readers are always enraged. One such case is The Book Thief, by Markus Zusak, which was unnecessarily changed. The lack of many important details in the movie adaptation of The Book Thief shows how obvious it is that movies must stay true to the book for full effect.