Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast books and movies
Compare movie book examples
Comparison of books and movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
To begin, there were many similarities and differences in the tone of the book Jumanji by Chris Van Allsburg and the movie based on this book. Both the book and the movie were suspenseful, dramatic, and exciting. Throughout each they were faced with many challenges and hardships. They had differences too. The movie was romantic and personal, but the book was funny and cute considering the alteration of characters. First of all, the movie’s tone was suspenseful, mysterious, dramatic, and exciting. Based on the movie, there were giant mosquitos busting through glass and trying to attack the characters. Not only that they were causing people to wreck their vehicles and having to be rushed to hospitals. Also, Allen, the later adult character, was sucked into the board game for 26 years, trying to survive in the jungle. Lastly, a hunter was chasing them throughout the to trying to hunt and kill Allen. At the very end of the movie, the hunter had a gun pointing at Allen, but thankfully he had finished the board game in time. …show more content…
Next, the book’s tone was also suspenseful, mysterious, dramatic, and exciting.
The author of the book states that the male character was almost eaten by a lion. It was sitting on the dresser behind him licking his lips when he finished rolling the dice. It chased him around the house until it got stuck under his parent’s bed. Then, a giant 8 feet snake coiled around the mantle after another unlucky roll. Near the end of the book, it even started to come towards them. Lastly, there was a rhino stampede in there house! They heard thumping, furniture crashing, and wood splintering as the ferocious beasts fled from their
house, Finally, although they were alike, the tones had slight differences. In the movie the tone was more romantic, due to the to the adults, Sarah and Allen, that had once been friends as kids. Throughout the movie they had been a little flirtatious and at the very end it shows them as married, but the book doesn’t even introduce us to the adult characters. The book had a tone that was a little less creepy and was more cute and comical. The children were always making ironic obvious comments. It wasn’t nearly as scary and was less eventful. Also, the movie was more intense. Not only were the kids in danger, the whole town was greatly affected by the game so even more lied on their shoulders. The monsoon had completed flooded the town, monkeys and stampedes ran wild, and a hunter ran about trying to kill Allen! To conclude, the movie and book, Jumanji, has many differences and similarities. They were both mysterious, suspenseful, dramatic, and exciting. Although the book was more comical and playful, but the movie was romantic and intense. The challenges, hardships, dialogue, and actions make the tone the way it is. Each thing they faced and how they handled it affected the story and how the viewers heard it.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
The story of Rikki-tikki by Rudyard Kipling is a great one, so great that there is a movie made after the book. The Movie follows the story of the book, but there are differences. The differences are very small, and don’t change the story’s theme. There are more similarities between the story and the movie them there are differences, however.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
Overall this movie was exciting. It had lots of important information about the Salem Witch Trails. The director of this movie knew exactly who his audience would be and hit it out of the park by adding things that the audience would understand. The writer also had made this appeal to a very special audience. He knew who would most likely see the film and tried to stay true to that.
After watching the movie and then reading the book American Sniper I noticed a few different things. Comparing the two and thinking about the similarities and differences. There are not many differences from the movie American sniper and the book American Sniper except that the book talks about his childhood life more. The comparison between the two is interesting because Chris Kyle wrote one while other people directed the other.
So many books or pieces of literature have been made into films. At times the films can mirror exactly what the author wrote and hoped to convey, but often films can either create this sense of enhancement of the book or distort it completely due to more or less background information and a change the perspective of the main character. The book Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer was one of those movies that was recreated into film by director Sean Penn. This is a story of a young man who is unsettled with the poisoned ways of society. He goes on to destroy his previous identity and creates a new one, he abandons his home, car, life-savings, and family life to live on the road and in the wilderness of Alaska. It was mentioned he was trying to escape society as a whole and find himself and happiness. Both the book and the film follow a pretty consistent plot that correlate with each other, both making it evident that Chris was a polarizing subject. So, why does the book portray Chis McCandles as a charismatic, outgoing, well-educated nice kid, as where the movie portrays him more as foolish, immature, unprepared boy biting off more than he can chew? It all depends on your interpretation of both sources within the given information. The following comparison will address the book versus film version of Into the Wild and raise the issue of the amount of background information given in the book versus the film and the change in perspective of the main character Christoper Johnson McCandles.
To begin with, there are many similarities between the book and movie To Kill A Mockingbird. For example, Tom Robinson died in an attempt to escape from prison in both the book and the movie. In my opinion Tom's death was crucial to the original story, and I believe the movie would have been seen as over-sentimental if the scriptwriters had let him live. Another important similarity between the book and movie, is the mutual fascination between Arthur Radley and the children. Arthur, or Boo as the children called him, left them gifts such as dolls, a watch, and chewing gum in the hollow of a tree in his yard.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
This movie was a tale of an immigrant seeking money and power who untimely set up his own demise. The producers did a good job at pointing out certain features that let you into the life of an organized crime leader. He tells of his humble beginnings and shows you in details how he rose to the top. The producer had a point to make and I took that point as being you can never get and stay someone good while being bad. The sound effects and graphics also makes this movie. They show just enough to intrigue you but yet not to completely make you sick to your stomach. The music is very telling and
because it made me became very curious about what is going to happen next. The play’s beginning was no as interesting as the movie’s. I also liked the acting in the movie.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
Although the movie missed an important scene, it managed to pull the audience back in through the action scenes and one charming main character. The treasure hunting really would have tied together all the characters and actions together without leaving the movie unsettled. The scary scenes with Injun Joe really brought the evil character to life all the way from his beginning to his dying end. Then to top off the whole movie, they brought in a curly haired Tom Sawyer. He was like a vision from the book with perfect attitude and slyness that keep you grinning. The movie is an engrossing film with points that leave you anxious and a saucy boy that you can’t help but love.
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.