Dialogical ethics states that, “ethics can be judged by the attitude and behaviors demonstrated by each participant in a communication transaction” (Neher & Sandin, 2017, pg. 90). Our personal definition of what is ethical develops as we continue to create dialogue with others. Dialogue relies on the individuals in the conversing relationship to strive for openness in which they can fully understand the views, beliefs, and experiences of the other (Neher & Sandin, 2017, pg. 90). Each person in a dialogical exchange is treated equally, but they are also valued for their uniqueness (Neher & Sandin, 2017, pg. 90). However, Carl Rogers contribution to dialogical ethics and psychology will be the focus of this concept for this dilemma.
Previously
Utilitarianism’s focus on outcomes inevitably leads to a lack of concern with the means used to accomplish a given outcome. This allows for a process in which the rules of conduct are vague, open to interpretation, and less important than one’s objective. This lack of absolute standards clearly violates several key standards of Martin Buber’s Dialogic values, which I believe are essential to ethical communication. These standards stress the importance of the authenticity and honesty of one’s me...
Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. (1999). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most. New York, NY: Viking Press.
Johnannesen, R. L. (1990). Ethics in human communication (3rd ed.) Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
The field of clinical mental health is one of great reward, but also one of grave responsibility. It is the duty of the counselor to provide the client with a safe environment and an open mind, in order to foster a healthy therapeutic relationship. The majority of mental health counselors would never intentionally harm their clients; however; good intentions are not enough to ensure that wrong will not occur. The ethical expectations and boundaries are regulated by both laws and professional codes. When discussing ethics, one must realize there are two categories, mandatory and aspirational. (Corey, Corey & Callanan, 2007)
Pitta, A. D., Fung H., Isberg S. (1999). Ethical Issues Across Cultures: managing the differing
In the case study of Gwen, there is one major problem presented. That problem is whether it is ethical for a supervisor to counsel his supervisee. I think that Gwen is going through the grieving process after learning about her mother’s condition and is in a vulnerable spot. She feels like she cannot continue her work with hospice patients because of personal feelings. Ken thinks that Gwen is a great therapist and does not want to see her give up. He also feels like he would be the most effective person to give Gwen counseling, because of their trusting relationship. I think that this would be a bad idea and could cross professional boundaries. The Ethical Guidelines for Counseling Supervisors strongly suggest against a supervisor entering in a psychotherapeutic relationship with supervisees. It is important to limit the possibilities of a dual relationship. Dual relationships can easily become unethical and present problems or possible harm to the client, which in this case is the supervisee. They can also create dependency or have unfavorable symbolic meanings. I also do not think it was a good idea that the counseling happened in the supervision sessions. This time should be spent on improving knowledge and helping clients. Spending most of the supervisor sessions working on personal problems could potentially harm the progress and well-being of the supervisee’s clients. My reaction to Ken blending the roles of supervisor and counselor is that it was not a good, professional, decision. He has entered a dual relationship with Gwen that could potentially cause harm to her or create a conflict of interest. Since Ken is Gwen’s supervisor, he has more power over the relationship than Gwen does. This power can easily be abused by Ken...
How can research done in the past, teach psychologists anything that we can use today? Today therapists know more, and are more intelligent than past psychologists, right? Therapists learn by building on what past psychologists have taught us. The studies began long ago and each time we go back to the past to understand more of what we are learning in the present. Some experiments that psychologists have learned about ethics is John Watson’s tests on Albert, Mary Cover Jones and her test on Peter, and The Monster Study, these research tests teach us about some bad ethical decisions and what needs to be done to change the outcome of these violations.
Ethics play a vital role in day-to-day living from work to home. The ability to recognize ethical dilemmas and apply ethical theories to resolve ethical dilemmas is essential part of an individual 's psychological, physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. The purpose of this paper is to explore the strengths and weakness of the American Psychological Association (APA) code of ethics, apply and evaluate the eight-step ethical decision-making model, discuss the role of deontology in ethical reasoning, resolution, and multicultural issues in the case study.
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
The Importance of Ethical Guidelines When Conducting Psychological Research Ethical guidelines are concerns about the impact that research has on the subjects. The effects can be both beneficial and harmful and so the researcher must always think very carefully about how they ought to behave so that no harm comes to the subjects. In the 1960's the ethical aspect of research was barely considered they were accepted as a way in which research was conducted. The need to have some sort of guidelines to protect research subjects was recognised in the 1970's, but it wasn't until 1990's that the first set of ethical guidelines were published.
Over the past ten years I have been faced with many ethical dilemmas. One in particular is standing out to discuss with others. It has taken many years to face. In 2008, I went through a breakup that had many different options and a range of many emotions, all at the same time. I lost the love of my life, my children’s father and my friend. In 2010, we went to family court for a custody battle, I will never forget. At that time I was not ready to face a break up, but I had to do what was best for me and my children.
Working with clients can present a diverse collection of ethical issues. However when you are a rehabilitation counselor working with clients the ethical issues could be immensely challenging when you are trying your best to assist the client. In this specific can based on a client named Bill there are several ethical issues are prominent throughout, however it is clear that several of ethical issues do conflict with each other. In addition, in knowing that that is several of ethical issues do conflict with each other the way to handle the situation with Bill can be extremely daunting nonetheless it can be handled in a simplistic manner. Furthermore handling this client will from time to time need use life experiences instead of using the CRCC
Despite the passion that speech language pathologists have for their patients and careers, there are some who feel stronger in other areas such as, greed, pride, or envy. This may cause a great therapist or employer to react unethically in a tough situation. In turn, the authoritative figure pushes their employees to commit illegal actions. Once a company, or a supervisor within a company begins to pursue unethical actions, she is then teaching every person under her supervision to also pursue these situations unethically. The people who jump into their careers as SLP-Assistants are excited and willing to get out there and put their degree to use. Employers know this and take advantage of these types of people
In this case, the psychologist is presented with several ethical issues which could cause harm to the client. The first ethical issue that arose in this case is the potential for a role conflict. The psychologist and Mr. Hartwig had contact prior to the development of a therapeutic relationship when the psychologist bought a car from Mr. Hartwig. It may not be enough that the brief, informal relationship ended. The psychologist must assess the dimensions of the previous relationship from the viewpoint of the client as well as his/her own personal feelings (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2008). For example, the client could feel that he gave the psychologist a good deal and that the psychologist was indebted to him. This could leave the psychologist vulnerable to being manipulated by the client. Or, what if the car broke down? This could leave the psychologist feeling cheated and resulted in hostile feelings toward the client. The psychologist has an ethical responsibility to examine both relationships for role incompatibility prior to forming a therapeutic relationship. The psychologist seemed to be aware that there was the potential role conflict resulting from their initial meeting, and he acted ethically by attempting to refer Mr. Hartwig to a Psychology Registry.
After a thorough review the concept of ethics reffers to an act or conduct which is not based solely on traditional , learned or practiced rules, norms and values , but also always on the situation and especially the people taken into account. The ethical consciousness of an individual person is based on experiences that must be subjected to critical and rational choice, as they simply can not be logically derived from principles.