Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Performance Measurement Theory
Performance Measurement Theory
Performance Measurement Theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Performance Measurement Theory
Performance metrics are used to determine and quantity improvement in processes. To develop performance metrics, it is important to collect data pertaining to critical work processes, understand the desired results and the development of realistic measurements to be used to quantify the process improvements. The goal of lean is to help in comparing performance levels with the benchmarks or established standards. In order to successfully develop project metric, it is it advisable to first define the project metrics. These include the goals, objectives, and project benchmarks. For example, if the process is to produce four inch rods. The upper limits and lower limit must be set probably 4m plus or minus 0.5m. Any deviation bellows 3.5m or beyond 4.5metres shall be considered out of control (Nicoletti, 2013). Process should always be within control. Collecting data is mainly to help in quantifying process improvement and not reduce products variability. The most commonly used metrics include speed, time, quality, quantity. In lean, both primary and secondary metrics must be defined. …show more content…
Process metrics such as primary metrics must define the overall project goals such as improving time or process efficiency.
The primary metrics are used to measure and conjure the benchmark level ad improvement level. The benchmarked level is the target level. Primary metrics include time metrics such as Lead-time, processing time or Value added time (Found & Harrison, 2012). Costs metrics include total process cost, Cost per transaction, Cost savings and labor costs Finally, Quality metrics such as Customer satisfaction, Defect rate, and Rework time are
used. Those secondary metrics such as quality or deviation are used to capture and validate the process outcomes including the process variation (Stone, 2012). The secondary metrics are used to measure and compare the baseline targets with the actual data. This will determine if there is an improvement after the process was improved. Finally, the company can also use the consequential metrics. These are the metrics used to validate or quantify the deviations data are collected before and after the process impairment to determine if there any changes in the values (Corbett, 2011) Right metrics for quantifying the process improvement are mainly determined by the company’s data collection efforts and capacity. Metrics can be developed easily by analysing the whole process and keeping data to be reviewed for deviations. While most companies currently use the balance scorecard. The process improvement goals are always to make an improvement on the secondary metrics. For example, primary metrics may include improving process and analyse the changes in the process after first improvement. A company may start by registering changes in the other metrics. The balanced score card is used to develop primary metrics which is mostly associated with target production volume, targeted production duration or quality. References Corbett, L. (2011). Lean Six Sigma: the contribution to business excellence. Lean Six Sigma Journal,2(2), 118-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20401461111135019 Corbett, L. (2011). Lean Six Sigma: the contribution to business excellence. Lean Six Sigma Journal,2(2), 118-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20401461111135019 Found, P., & Harrison, R. (2012). Understanding the lean voice of the customer. Lean Six Sigma Journal, 3(3), 251-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20401461211282736
TONI, A.D.,TONCHIA, S. (1996) “Lean orgnanisation, management by process and performance measurement”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(2), pp. 221-236. [Online}. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com (Accessed: 08 December 2011)
Benchmarking should not be considered simply a tool of management, but rather an integral part of the business strategy of a firm. When implementing benchmarking, management must consider the overall issues of performance and process re-engineering.
Two of these limitations are that there are no basic guidelines for selecting performance measures, and that feedback from the financial perspective to the customer and process perspectives is unnecessarily complex (Dror, 2008).
Continuous improvement (CI) refers to a philosophy consisting of improvement activities that increase successes and reduce failures in a production process (Bhuiyan & Baghel 2005, p. 761). It involves activities and processes that focus on continuous and incremental innovation (Bessant et al., 1994, p.17). CI is a new approach that enhances productivity, performance, and achieves competitive advantage needed in the highly competitive industries. It may also serve as a complementary approach to other quality improvement initiatives such as total quality management (TQM) (Pike, Barnes, & Barnes 1995, p. 23; Larson 2003; Lassen, Gertsen, & Riis 2006; Oakland 2007, p. 227). The purpose of this research is to explore the application of production systems engineering methods in the CI at manufacturing plants.
Criteria and process performance indicators that allow for a science and risk based decision about the ability of the process to consistently produce quality products. The criteria should include descriptions of the statistical methods to be used in analysing all collected data.
The simple measures to assess the progress of goal are Throughput, Inventory Management and
The function of Human Resources in corporations usually includes the use of metrics and analytics through collection of data on the employees’ efficiency. HR metrics are used to quantify the cost and the impact of employee programs and HR processes and measure the success or failure of HR initiatives (Missildine, 2013). The company is able to track trends and changes with the data collected as it provides for measurement function that helps with HR planning. HR metrics measure the value of the time and money spent on HR activities in the company and together with HR metrics is the HR analytics which is the process of combining data mining with business analytics techniques to analyze human resources data (Missildine, 2013) and provide an organization with considerations for the effective management of employees and quickly and efficiently reach organizational goals. The main issue lies on whether the managers know what to measure and how measurement must be conducted.
Chip Conley ideas can fit into the behavior measurement aspect of a performance management system because he speaks about culture; which applies to the culture of the organization as well as individual perspectives (Conley, 2010). This applies to the behavior aspects of the performance measurement because the behaviors, the make-up and the values that the organization have in place can help them achieve their goal (Aguinis, 2013). In order for an organization to be successful they have to not only provide a safe working environment they also need to know what they want to achieve and how to achieve them. This includes having the right managers in place that is committed to the success of their employees which leads to the success of themselves
For Key Performance Indicators (KPI) to be successful, it needs to have the following characteristics:
Lean management is not restricted to the actions that take place in the manufacturing function of a company, rather it relates to activities range from product development, procurement and manufacturing over to distribution. Together these areas create the lean enterprise. The ultimate goal of implementing lean production in an organization is to have the customer in focus when improving productivity, enhancing quality, shortening lead times, reducing costs etc. These are factors representing the performance of a lean production system. The determinants of a lean production system are the actions taken, the principles implemented and the changes made to the organization to achieve the desired performance (Karlsson & Ahlstrom, 1996)
Preview: This book provides a lengthy indoctrination of the what and why of performance management. This summary will cover both the pragmatic and practical pieces of the text; while excluding some of the specific instruction for those who oversee the overall orchestration of performance management in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to allow its readers to grasp some main themes of performance management and develop a vocabulary for discussion and debate of the topic.
Establishing metrics is crucial to any organization, especially in technology related company projects. Metrics permit organizations to measure its performance against industry sectors to determine how well the company is doing. Furthermore, metrics allow organizations to evaluate and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its processes. Metrics are designated in different categories. The categories identified in this document include output, in-process, and people. (Duris 2003) The organization must first determine exactly what the company is trying to accomplish or determine. Metrics are then identified based on what is relative to the subject matter. Finally, metrics are verified when tracking progress against previous records or a company given standards or goals.
‘If you can’t measure it, you can’t management it’, [Dan vesset and Brian, M. 2009]. Performance management is concerned with the measurement of results and with studying progress to achieving objectives base on the results. Managing performance can tell you what you’re doing well in, and also reveal areas where you need to make adjustments. Measuring performance tells you how far you’ve gone achieving your ultimate
race begins. A flare gun or a horn usually starts a race. In case of a
There are several reasons organizations initiate performance evaluations, however the standard purpose for performance evaluations is to discuss performance expectations; not only from the employers perspective but to engage in a formal collaboration where the employee and the manager are both able to provide feedback in a formal discourse. There are many different processes an organization should follow when developing its performance evaluation tool; in addition essential characteristics that must accompany an effective performance appraisal process. I will discuss in detail the intent of a performance evaluation, the process an organization should follow in using its performance evaluation tool, along with the characteristics of an effective