Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Operational overview of the battle of little bighorn
Operational overview of the battle of little bighorn
Operational overview of the battle of little bighorn
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Operational overview of the battle of little bighorn
As i look onto which can only be described as pure chaos of fervent battle that rages just ahead of me. Im almost simultaneously forced into agony by defining booms of gunfire with the ferocity the most vicious thunderstorms. The smell of freshly burnt gunpowder defusie by the iron smell of blood in the air. As i give the surround area just a glance i'm stricken on how familiar land looks then it hit like train at what my sight has discovered. That this is the beginning of the end of life style and a culture but for now its greatest moment this is the battle of little bighorn.this was Custer's last stand by Edgar S. Paxson for buffalo bill's wild west show.this was a highly romanticized but it does catch the chaos of the battle that i can …show more content…
The smell of the battle field in is overpowering by the burning of gunpowder smells like large raging forest fire that i grown out of control.with hints of blood and guts fermenting on the prairie.The pollen of the spring grassland is nothing in destructive soup burning gunpowder and dead bodies.the smell of industrial war has made its way to the prairie.masking the outside smells.the smell of death is terrifying for both sides but it is even more heartbreaking when you know what making that smell.burnt flesh floods the prairie with the uncommon smell of war.one thing has not changed and that is that iron smell of blood is in the air agian but this time with a more quiker way to spill it wich is guns.the smell of death was not uncomen but not this scale and this wide spread.the praie was alive with action of war and all of the smells it …show more content…
Each gun shot rings out in succession like a marching band of death.Under the the defining sounds of constance gunfire you can hear great shouts of rage and agony as men from both side as they die.The native warcry are but all masked for but the loudest of them in this hail of bullets.sound bullets whizzing past with that classic twang go by. Only until the bone crushing and flesh ripping sounds of a death train whizzing by at breakneck speed.The quietness of the prairie was smothered by the intensity of the fighting in the foreground ahead of me.i can't look away at this battle for the west that is going on in front of me.the sound of battle were not esaly made out in this jaring mess on top of this hill.but you know the body count will be
Panzeri, Peter. 1995. Little Big Horn 1876: Custer's Last Stand. 8th Ed. New York, NY: Osprey Publishing.
The three narratives “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, “Song of Napalm” by Bruce Weigl, and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen all have the same feelings of war and memory, although not everyone experiences the same war. Zabytko, Weigl, and Owen used shifting beats, dramatic descriptions, and intense, painful images, to convince us that the horror of war far outweighs the devoted awareness of those who fantasize war and the memories that support it.
Young men in old, ill-fitted uniforms lay twisted on dried, grassy wheat as we can see them reaching for a weapon that once laid above them or clutching their fists to take the pain away as dawn arises and dense fog hovers the horizon and tiny peaks of mountain peer out above a ruthless and needlessly waste. Tiny horse like figures blend into the background, posing like trees as riders dislodge, seeming to search and strip the bodies of shoes, weapons, anything that can help the next soldier survive.
On June 25, 1876, The Battle of Little Bighorn took place near the Black Hills in Montana. This was one of the most controversial battles of the 20th century and the line between good guys and bad guys was grey at best. Gen. George Armstrong Custer (reduced to LTC after the civil war) had 366 men of the 7thU.S. Cavalry under his command that day. Sitting Bull (A Medicine Man) led 2000 braves of the Lakota, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes (Klos, 2013). At the conclusion of the battle, the stories of the Indians savagery were used to demonize their culture and there were no survivors from the 7thcavalry to tell what really happened.
Today Custer’s last stand is one of the most famous events in American History. Two Thousand Sioux Native Americans slaughtered General George Custer’s army of 600 men armed with guns. Crazy Horse was a very important leader in the Great Sioux War of 1876.
The story of Custer’s Last Stand, formally known as “The Battle of Little Big Horn”(25 June 1876), is one that many would consider a legendary tale of gallantry amongst heroic Cavalry Soldiers gloriously fighting against all odds in the face of certain death, until the last bullet fired atop the hill that is now known as Custer’s Last Stand. Regardless of the mythical inspirational value that it provides to Soldiers aspiring to one day also become legendary heroes, from a military perspective, it also teaches us from the unforgiving realities of battle that re-emphasize the importance of tactical knowledge and it’s adequate application. Within my analysis, I will first explain the historical situation during the Western Expansion, the higher commander’s plan and intent for the operation, LTC Custer’s actions on the objective, resulted conclusion of the battle based on his actions, and the significance of this battle that stemmed in terms of tactical lessons learned.
This time it was different than sandy creak because the United States Army had attacked Shoshones. The story was left untold for many years. This was until many monuments and events were thought to the people about the events. The United States Army literally punished the tribes for being in the way. They attacked with 300 military men. This proved tobe one of the bloodiest days that America would ever see. Especially for a Masacare. More than 300 hundred people were killed. These murders of theput upon Indian Shoshones tribes by the army proved to be brutal as they shot the children one by one, and even raped all of the helpless women of the tribe. The story puts out reasons as to why they attacked the tribe. This include the Leade Colonel Patricks thoughts that the natives, the Shoshones Bannock village, were being blamed for the attacking of people all along the Oregon Trail and todeaths of innocent Miners. Although the Oregon Trail was now said to be safe, still many ment were being taken down, and Colonel Patrick’s wanted to do something about it. As the action pursued many American’s didn’t take notice to the Massacre, due to the fact like they didn’t lik Native American’s. As time passed it wasn’t about good of the Massacre it was about the lives and culture of the people that lived there was destroyed or threatened. Their story still lives on today thanks to public historians in the area. This book shows the
The Battle of Little Bighorn is one of the most, maybe even the most, controversial battle in American history. General George Armstrong Custer led his 210 troops into battle and never came out. Miscalculations, blunders, and personal glory led Custer not only to his death, but also being the most talked about soldier in this battle. But all the blame doesn’t just go on Custer’s shoulders; it also goes on Captain Frederick Benteen and Major Marcus Reno, who both fought in the battle. Both the Captain and the Major both made serious mistakes during the fight, most notable Major Marcus Reno being flat out drunk during the course of the battle. All of these factors have led The Battle of Little Bighorn to being the worst lost to any Plains Indian group in American history.
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...
The journey of exploration to the western territories brought the white man many great things, but they did face some opposition. The US government made plans to explore the Black Hills, after hearing of the gold it contained. This was not an easy task. The Sioux, with strong force, were not giving up their sacred land easily. The only way to gain the territory of the Black Hills was to wage war against the Sioux. The Battle of the Little Big Horn was one battle that the US will never forget. General George Custer led an army of men to take out the Sioux, one of the battalions was completely wiped out including Custer. The Sioux were very strong, but US had a lot more power and technology. Why did we get massacred? This question has been a mystery to many people throughout the years. Sergeant Windolph, of Benteen’s cavalry, and John F. Finerty, from General Crooks cavalry, bring us some personal accounts and memories of this tragedy.
Subsequently, the language in the poem reflects that of military use: “reinforcements” and “disrupting blockade” represent conflict and furthermore, colourful and textural imagery evokes within the reader a deeper understanding of the destructive nature of war; “crimped petals”, “yellow bias” and “spasms of paper red” support the colourful imagery used by the poet. The metaphors used by the speaker, moreover, show how the mother cannot escape from an awareness of her son’s violent death: “spasms” and “bandaged” suggest that the son’s death was exceedingly heartless and brutal. The speaker’s memories enable her to maintain a connection with her son but she is unable to avoid think of injury and death. The use of colours and texture ...
Then the uproar begins, and you with many other student start yelling at the soldiers and throwing rocks. This continues until you finally hear a shot pierce through the air. This happens in the passage of A Letter Home, when protestors against the Vietnam War use acts of violence to express their disagreement, and how it turns in the wrong direction when the fight gets too far. The main character is passionate about the event, and witnesses the uproar of violence, as expressed in the letter she writes to her parents have the shooting.
The depiction of soldiers marching downward on the retreating masses of people is a contrasting one from the previous segment where the people are marching and celebrating as one. In addition, the accompanying music change of up-tempo happy, horns with varying wide shots of the boats in the harbor contrasts to the dramatic marching, angry tempo...
Warfare and fire share a similar outcome related to death and destruction. Ernest Hemingway wrote “Big Two-Hearted River: Part 1”, with the protagonist Nick Adams on a hiking excursion along a tributary leading to Lake Superior. Once Nick fully understands that he is unable to forget his violent past in war, he must change his disposition on life and start a full body transformation similar to the nature around him. Even though devastation and death are prominent in “Big Two-Hearted River: Part 1”, Hemingway conveys a theme of hope and recovering from the suffering.
Warfare and fire share a similar outcome related to death and destruction. Ernest Hemingway wrote “Big Two-Hearted River: Part 1”, with the protagonist Nick Adams on a hiking excursion along a tributary leading to Lake Superior. Once Nick comprehends that he is unable to forget his violent past in war, he must change his disposition on life and start a full body transformation similar to the nature around him. Even though devastation and death are prominent in “Big Two-Hearted River: Part 1”, Hemingway conveys a theme of hope and recovery from the suffering.