Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of student engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of student engagement
1. Describe the context of the incident.
There has been an incident that is ongoing since the beginning of the second week of school that has made me worried, concerned, and confused about a specific student. This student has been prevented by his parents from doing a variety of different things that are typical for the school day. The students’ parents have refused to sign a consent form for the student to participate in “Summit,” which is the main source of the fifth grade curriculum for the school. Since the remainder of the class has signed the form, and summit is a necessary part of the fifth grade curriculum, a meeting was scheduled. Even after having a sit down meeting with my cooperating teacher, the principal, and the social worker (who could also translate) to further explain the issue and explain what summit is and its benefits, they refused. They are going to have a family advocate and lawyer look at it before signing. They are concerned about privacy, but summit results are only shared with the classroom teacher, and the summit website used anonymous information to learn about the students taking assessments and using references. The only other option for the father if he doesn’t sign the paper, is to have the student change schools.
In addition to the father’s refusal to sign the summit form, and allow the student to participate in a main part of fifth grade, the father is also pushing for his son to have an IEP. After reviewing test scores and observing the student interact with other students, it is clear that he does not need one. The student is an English Language Learner, but he is doing well in reading and writing and receives ELL services twice a week. The family also refuses to let him go outside for recess, ...
... middle of paper ...
...g to see that the student has to stay inside for recess and lessons that we often conduct outside, because of the unnecessary restrictions placed on him. The student is missing out of valuable opportunities for his developmental level, including interacting with peers. He is being left out of things like gym class and daily recess when we go outside. It would be unfair to the other students to stay inside for recess every day, as it is important for them to get a chance to get fresh air and run around for a bit to break up the day. The co-teachers in the room I am placed in, as well as other teachers that have had this student all feel a similar way about this issue and the ongoing incident. We have all recognized that this student is a great kid, and strong academically, yet the father is set in his ways that his son needs an IEP and cannot use the summit platform.
2.Facts: This case was originally presented before the district court of Colorado in 1993 on behalf of the parents of Gregory Urban, a seventeen-year-old teen with severe mental disabilities. Gregory and his parents moved to Evergreen, Colorado in 1991. The parents wanted Gregory to go to Evergreen High School but the school district placed him at Golden High School where he participated in support services for children with severe disabilities. The support services at Golden High School were not available at Evergreen High. After the development of Gregory’s IEP his parents voiced objections to what they believed constituted violations of Gregory’s right to a free and appropriate public education. These violations included placement of Gregory outside his neighborhood school and failure to stipulate transition services in his IEP. After initially participating in the IDEA administrative process the parents filed a case with the district court claiming the school district violated Gregory’s rights under IDEA and ADA. The court ruled in favor of the school district by rejecting
General education high school teacher, Michael Withers, failed to comply with his student’s Individual Education Plan (IEP). D.D. Doe’s IEP required tests to be read orally. Despite knowledge of this IEP and being instructed to follow the IEP by the superintendent, school principal, special education director, and special education teacher, Withers still refused to make the accommodations for D.D.’s handicapping condition. As a result, D.D. failed the history class. His parents filed charges against Withers, arguing that D.D was not afforded the right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) promised to all students by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). They also filed a claim for injuctive relief against the Taylor County Board of Education to enforce the laws that protect handicapped students.
Facts: The Louise Lombard School is a developmental center for disabled children in the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD). It is here that seventeen-year-old John Doe, an emotionally-disturbed student assaulted another student. According to his April 1980 IEP, Doe had several goals set for coping with frustrating situations and relating to his peers. During the incident in November, Doe reacted to the taunts of other students by choking another student and leaving abrasions on the child’s neck. While being escorted to the principal’s office, Doe also kicked out a school window. The principal suspended Doe for five days. During his suspension, the Student Placement
My research paper is on Dugway Proving Ground incident of 1969. The incident actually took place in March of 1968. What happened in 1969 was that President Nixon reaffirmed the “no first use, retaliate in kind” which became a national policy for the employment of chemical weapons. (Mauroni, Al, p. 33) The incident involved the killing of 6,000 sheep according to The Salt Lake Tribune. A deadly nerve agent known as VX had drifted off the reservation contaminating the sheep feeding area. The Army conducted investigations to show that they had nothing to do with the death of those sheep. At the end of the investigation it showed that they were not responsible for the incident. I am going to talk about the history of Dugway Proving Ground, and what cause the sheep to die. The people are blame the government for the death of the sheep, and the government is blaming ranchers. The government said the sheep died from the pesticides they sprayed to protect their crops.
Based on the information provided in case 8, Crashing Planes and Tranquil Dreams, Richard is a 4 years old boy, who is experiencing challenging behaviors at school, as well as at home. Richard lives with both parents, and two older brothers. Richard has been attending the YMCA’s full-day preschool program for the past 2 years. He is described as a “good kid” by parents and teacher, however, he is constantly active, impulsive, and frequently becoming involved in conflicts with adults. Parents are continuously working, and as mentioned in this case, they have to spend most of the time at home yelling at Richard or putting him in time-out as part of his consequences for not listening or misbehaving.
Parents have the right to be included in placement decisions, IEP developments, and evaluations. Schools should collaborate and communicate consistently with family members due to the fact they know their child better than anyone else and can be a powerful resource, as well as an advocate, for their development and education (American Foundation for the Blind, 2015). Furthermore, information regarding a student’s disability is highly confidential. IDEA clarifies that such information may be shared with only individuals who are working directly with the student (Friend, 2014).
One of the issues that were brought up was an upset parent who mentioned that his child suffers from narcolepsy. He was addressing that he wants the school board to help him because he feels as if the principal is penalizing his daughter. He mentioned that the principal mentioned that he will penalize the girl because of her lateness. He also mentioned that the principal refused to acknowledge his daughter’s sickness and how the principal bullied him. Following this one of the members from the board address this issue by mentioning that this issue that the parent has addressed is a personal issue that really should not be mentioned in this meeting. The school board member also mentioned that this should not be acceptable from a principal to be uninvolved. And how no child should be treated like this. He would also mention that this issue will be
District personnel must ensure that the IEP is implemented; they must coordinate the agreed-upon placement and services that are listed in the IEP; and they must obtain parental consent before providing special education services. If parents refuse to consent, the district is not obligated to provide the student with a FAPE or to convene future IEP meetings. Additionally, the district cannot challenge parental refusal through due process. In other words, parents have the right to insist that their child is not provided special education and related services even after an evaluation has confirmed that the student is in need of these
Novels are valuable because they share important insights like how Curiosity could lead to consequences, how people are not as they seem, and how a big part of trust is gone, when lies are used. The novel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, by Mark Haddon is a great example. This book shows how curiosity could lead to consequences, how people are not always as they seem to be, and how a big part of trust is gone, when lies are used. The novel is about a boy named Christopher Boone, who has minor disabilities but very intelligent. He goes on a quest to find out who kills one of the dogs in the neighborhood. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time is valuable because it shows important insights.
Bosher, William, Kate Kaminski, and Richard Vacca. The School Law Handbook: What Every Leader Needs to Know. Alexandria: ASCD. 2003. Brown, Frank, et al. Key Legal Issues for Schools.
The Gaskin Settlement Agreement is an agreement between a group of families and advocacy organizations who filed a class action lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) on behalf of a group of children with disabilities in 1994. This agreement does not change a student’s placement, program, or IEP in any manner. Only the IEP team has the authority to make modifications that will impact a student’s IEP. The main goal of this settlement is to make sure that IEP teams will determine if the goals in a student’s IEP may be implemented in a general education setting with supplementary aids and services prior to considering an environment that is more restrictive in nature. The elements of this case were designed to help increase the capacity of school districts to provide related services, SDI that is appropriate, supplementary aids and services, and supports to students who have disabilities that are placed in general education classrooms. The PDE lists many important elements of the Settlement Agreement to be aware of...
The defendant Rachel Holland was at the time a nine-year old girl with an intellectual disability with an I.Q. of 44 and an academic functioning level of a four-year old child. Rachel was described as being well behaved and popular with her second grade classmates. She enjoyed school and was motivated to learn. The plaintiff Sacramento Unified School District proposed to educate Rachel half time in a special education class, and half-time placement in a regular classroom. Rachel’s core classes such as Reading and Math services would be rendered in a special education class and classes such as PE, Music, Lunch, and Recess would be rendered in a general education classroom. Rachel’s Individual Education Plan (IEP) stressed language and communication goals such as speaking in four or five word sentences, initiating and terminating conversations, verbally stating name, developing twenty-four word sight vocabulary, counting to twenty-five, and printing first and last
The individualized educational plan (IEP) for Steve indicated that he was learning disabled, but did not specify the extent of his disability. Steve had an IEP for four years and each had indicated a counseling requirement. Upon conception the objective of counseling sessions was to provide Steve with someone to talk to because as per the IEP, Steve was voluntarily isolating himself from social interactions. Matters became awry last school year, when Steve presented with increasingly low attendance and constant arguments when he was present at school. As in Wood and Hollis (2000), “Not only are initial goals modified as treatment proceeds, but also others problems emerge; clients raise these problems for discussion, thus broadening the scope of treatment” (p. 327).
Public Law 94-142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, now called Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), requires states to provide free, appropriate public education (FAPE) for every child regardless of disability. This federal law was the first to clearly define the rights of disabled children to receive special education services if their disability affects their educational performance. A parent of a special education student also has basic rights under IDEA including the right to have their child evaluated by the school district and to be included when the school district meets about the child or makes decisions about his or her education. If a child is identified as in need of special education services, the school district must devise a written individual education program (IEP) for the child, which includes related services. An IEP is a statement of a student’s special education and related services including speech services, psychological services, physical and occupational therapy, counseling and assistive technology and transportation. In addition, this legally binding, individualized plan outlines reasonable educational goals for the student and is reviewed and updated yearly.
People face conflicts every day of their lives. We all come across at least one incident in our lives that is challenging and we are baffled on what decision is to be made. Such conflicts may be an inner-conflict, a conflict between oneself and nature, a conflict between oneself and another person, oneself and God, or one and society. This paper will describe an incident in my life involving a conflict.