Descartes Vs Hume

514 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: David hume vs descartes

Rene Descartes and David Hume are both considered some of the most important philosophers in history, but their beliefs on the origination of ideas oppose each other. Descartes was a seventeenth century philosopher with a distinct opinion on the connection between mind, body, and God and God is where these thoughts and ideas come from. Hume disagreed with Descartes and believed that ideas came solely on our experiences and perceptions, which are classified as either complex or simple. Together these make up impressions and ideas even though he argues these are not the same. Both philosophers have different methods for the creation of ideas, but I agree more with _Fill in______ philosophy of ideas. Rene Descartes is considered the first modern

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Descartes And Alkindi

    303 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alikindi and Descartes are two authors and philosophers who worked very hard to find a way to attain knowledge. The knowledge they sought is a justified true belief. Though their methods are very well developed, there are big differences between Alkindi’s method and Descartes’s method. Alkindi was a devoted Muslim. He worked for the Khalfia Al Mo'tassem Bellah in the translation of books that was written in Greek and other languages. Alkindi uses the method of false contradiction to get to the knowledge he is seeking. He believed that we should attain the truth from wherever it comes and whoever said it. He was one of the Muslim pioneers in term of using philosophy to attain knowledge. Alkindi defined knowledge as “knowledge of the true nature

    Read More

  • Reasoning within Animals

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes and David Hume lived in two completely different time periods, yet they shared interest in some of the same philosophical categories. Could animals have a reason? How did humans expand their knowledge compared to animals? Questions like these were answered by both Descartes and Hume, even though they had two opposing views. Descartes was the first to address the questions about animal instincts, and later on Hume set out to refute some of his ideas.

    Read More

  • Humes' and Descartes' Position on the Existence of the External World

    1321 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ples ideas based on the operations of our own mind. For example, the idea of a unicorn is also a complex idea, along with God, while many of us have seen a picture of a unicorn someone had to invent the original idea of what a unicorn is without seeing a picture. The operations of our own mind have created this idea of God, which rebuts Descartes’ argument that we have knowledge on the external world because of God. Descartes would argue that Humes’ idea of God is natural and never derived from impressions. Hume’ consequently has the better argument claiming that idea of god is actually based on ideas of perfection and infinity is inferred from the ideas of imperfection and finitude.

    Read More

  • Empiricism Versus Rationalism: Descartes and Hume

    541 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rationalism and empiricism have always been on opposite sides of the philosophic spectrum, Rene Descartes and David Hume are the best representative of each school of thought. Descartes’ rationalism posits that deduction, reason and thus innate ideas are the only way to get to true knowledge. Empiricism on the other hand, posits that by induction, and sense perception, we may find that there are in fact no innate ideas, but that truths must be carefully observed to be true.

    Read More

  • John Locke’s Perspective on How We Gain Knowledge and The Exclusion of Innate Ideas

    1483 Words  | 3 Pages

    An idea is what we perceive immediately, the first thing that pops into mental perception. They are the objects of thinking (Locke, 17). According to Locke, our ideas come from two things: experience, which includes sensation and reflection. Simple ideas arise from our basic sensory experiences and cannot be made up. Reflection, to me is built upon this experience. When you are thinking, believing, doubting and so on, you are able to build upon your outer experience and that is how you come to the conclusion of complex ideas. Even the most complex ideas can be traced back to our original experiences. Without experience we would not be able to gain and expand on our knowledge.

    Read More

  • Descartes Proof Of God

    1660 Words  | 4 Pages

    Descartes thinks that we have a very clear and distinct idea of God. He thinks God must exist and Descartes himself must exist. It is a very different way of thinking shown from the six meditations. Descartes uses ideas, experiments, and “proofs” to try and prove God’s existence.

    Read More

  • David Hume And Spinoza

    1816 Words  | 4 Pages

    David Hume in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Benedict De Spinoza in The Ethics run noteworthy parallels in about metaphysics and human nature. Spinoza and Hume share opinions of apriori knowledge and free will. For human nature, similar concepts of the imagination and morality arise. Although both philosophers derive similar conclusions in their philosophy, they could not be further distanced from one another in their concepts of God. Regarded as an atheist, Spinoza argues that God is the simple substance which composes everything and that nothing is outside of this simple substance. Hume rejects this notion completely and claims that nothing in the world can give us a clear picture of God. Hume rejects the argument from design

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of Aristotle And David Hume

    2051 Words  | 5 Pages

    Aristotle and David Hume share very clashing views on morality. Aristotle and Hume both believe in the possibility of being a virtuous person and both emphasize importance when it comes to reason, but their respective definitions of what virtue and reason actually mean differ drastically. Aristotle believes all human actions aim at some good, while Hume believes the reason behind everything is arithmetic and that human passions rule over reason. There is one supreme good according to Aristotle, but Hume believes what is good and bad all depends on perception. Both Aristotle and Hume take on the same topics in regards to morality, but take very different approaches.

    Read More

  • Weaknesses of Descartes' Arguments

    1636 Words  | 4 Pages

    Descartes was incorrect and made mistakes in his philosophical analysis concerning understanding the Soul and the foundation of knowledge.  Yes, he coined the famous phrase, “I think therefore I am,” but the rest of his philosophical conclusions fail to be as solid (Meditation 4; 32). Descartes knew that if he has a mind and is thinking thoughts then he must be something that has the ability to think. While he did prove that he is a thinking thing that thinks (Meditation 3; 28), he was unable to formulate correct and true philosophical arguments and claims.  For instance, his argument for faith that a non-deceiving God exists and allows us to clearly reason and perceive was a circular argument.  Another issue with Descartes' philosophy is that he wanted to reconcile scientific and religious views, which is wrong since the two maintain completely different foundational beliefs and they should exist exclusively- without relation to the other.  Thirdly, he believed that the mind was the Self and the Soul, failing to recognize that humans have bodies and the outside world exists, and through which we gain our knowledgeable. Lastly, Descartes argues that ideas are all innate while they actually are not- we gain knowledge through experience.

    Read More

  • Descartes' Wax Passage

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    The teaching of Descartes has influenced many minds since his writings. Descartes' belief that clear and distinct perceptions come from the intellect and not the senses was critical to his ultimate goal in Meditations on First Philosophy, for now he has successfully created a foundation of true and certain facts on which to base a sold, scientific belief structure. He has proven himself to exist in some form, to think and therefore feel, and explains how he knows objects or concepts to be real.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Descartes And Aristotle

    1509 Words  | 4 Pages

    The pursuit of knowledge has led many a philosopher to wonder what the purpose of life truly is, and how the material and immaterial are connected. The simple fact is, we can never know for certain. Arguments can be made, words can be thrown around, and rationale can be supported, but we as mere humans are not capable of arriving at the perfect understanding of life. Nonetheless, in the war against our own ignorance, we seek possible explanations to explain that which science and math cannot. Philosopher 's such as Plato and Aristotle have made notable contributions to our idea of the soul and its role in the grand scheme of life, while some, such as Descartes, have taken a more metaphysical view by pondering the impact one 's mind has on

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

    1247 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes and Hume may have both come from Europe, but there ideas concerning self are opposing. They do both hold similar ideas in some form but their philosophical methodologies lead to conflicting viewpoints.

    Read More

  • Newton Vs Descartes Research Paper

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    Descartes and Newton differ in their conception of theology and cosmology. Newton’s world is ruled by mechanics and Descartes’ is based on cartesian mechanics. For Newton, nature is a machine that works together in a larger scheme. Newton’s natural philosophy begins with his study of phenomena, followed by the study of motion then moves into the forces of nature. His philosophy rests on simple, general rules. He then applies those rules back to motion and nature to further analyze his studies. His method aims to understand how forces and motion work with one another. Descartes notion of theology begins with radical doubt, a belief that God would not deceive him and finally, that the entire cosmos is a plan created by God, himself. In this essay I will compare Newton’s notion of theology to

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes and the Source of Knowledge

    2129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes, a 17th century French philosopher believed that the origin of knowledge comes from within the mind, a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. His Discourse on Method (1637) and Meditations (1641) contain his important philosophical theories. Intending to extend mathematical method to all areas of human knowledge, Descartes discarded the authoritarian systems of the scholastic philosophers and began with universal doubt. Only one thing cannot be doubted: doubt itself. Therefore, the doubter must exist. This is the kernel of his famous assertion Cogito, ergo sum (I am thinking, therefore I am existing). From this certainty Descartes expanded knowledge, step by step, to admit the existence of God (as the first cause) and the reality of the physical world, which he held to be mechanistic and entirely divorced from the mind; the only connection between the two is the intervention of God.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Theory of Knowledge

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    Remember that according to Descartes, what I know first and foremost are my ideas. It is only later that he seeks to know if the extramental world exists, and so he begins with his ideas and then moves towards real being (rather than vice versa). Somewhere along the line the notion of idea undergoes a transformation. Soon an idea becomes a sense impression or an image. Remember that for the Greeks and Mediaeval thinkers, an idea is not reducible to an image. An idea cannot be imagined, but is an essence abstracted from the phantasm and understood. But this gets confused after Descartes. For example, John Locke says that ideas "...stand for whatsoever is the object of the understanding when a man thinks, I have used it to express whatever is meant by phantasm, notion, species, or whatever it is which the mind can be employed about in thinking..."

    Read More

More about Descartes Vs Hume

Open Document