John Locke’s Perspective on How We Gain Knowledge and The Exclusion of Innate Ideas

1483 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The role of environment on early child development

My aim in this paper is to elucidate Locke’s beliefs in order to portray how I have experienced them in my life thus far. Locke’s ideals that he released to society caused many people in his time to second guess where ideas originate and the foundation of knowledge. A lot of critics arose on this topic of Locke’s interest as well as people who were in agreement with Locke’s views. John Locke’s perspective on how we gain knowledge and the exclusion of innate ideas is a primary way of thinking that can be depicted throughout modern life. I think that if you read and gain a firm understanding of his philosophical standpoint, there should be no reason for you to not come to an agreement with John Locke. An idea is what we perceive immediately, the first thing that pops into mental perception. They are the objects of thinking (Locke, 17). According to Locke, our ideas come from two things: experience, which includes sensation and reflection. Simple ideas arise from our basic sensory experiences and cannot be made up. Reflection, to me is built upon this experience. When you are thinking, believing, doubting and so on, you are able to build upon your outer experience and that is how you come to the conclusion of complex ideas. Even the most complex ideas can be traced back to our original experiences. Without experience we would not be able to gain and expand on our knowledge. We have all been groomed to believe that we are born with instincts or innate ideas. Locke puts this topic into question and does not immediately reject it but does so with evidence. He believes that innate ideas- something that has been there from the beginning- are non existent. His argument that supports this, in Book I of An Essay Concerning Human Understan... ... middle of paper ... ... combining my ideas I retained in memory about the defender and the sensation I felt when she had stopped me from scoring an entire 60 minute game; I was able to than use these ideas of reflection to come up with a plan to beat her, and I was successful. John Locke’s perspective on how we gain knowledge and the exclusion of innate ideas is a primary way of thinking that can be depicted throughout modern life. I think that if you read and fully understand his philosophical standpoint, there should be no reason for you to not come to an agreement with Locke. The way we grow up and the way we view the world is a direct result of our experiences. Works Cited Ariew, Roger, and Eric Watkins. Readings in Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000. Print. Mccarthy, Laura F. "What Babies Learn In the Womb." Parenting. Meredith Corporation, 2014. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Mencius, Hs�n Tzu, And Thomas Hobbes

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of Locke’s largest points is "All ideas come from sensation or reflection” (Locke 101). He thinks that man is completely blank when they are born and that their basic senses are what gives them knowledge. Locke states, “Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper” (Locke 101). Locke is basically saying that human nature is like a blank slate, and how men experience life in their own ways is what makes them good or evil. Overall, Locke believes that any and all knowledge is only gained through life

    Read More

  • Good vs Evil in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locke, John Essay concerning Humane Understanding, Book II ("Of Ideas"), Chapter 1 ("Of Ideas in General, and Their Original")

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes 'From Skepticism To Conviction'

    786 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our principals and beliefs people choose to follow in life are based on experiences, sensations, and reflections, they are not innate in nature. Even though our knowledge and ideas come from experience, sensation, and reflections, Socrates states in “The Allegory of the Cave”, our minds can create false realities that we may perceive as being the truth. Locke’s beliefs in this essay are very similar to mine, almost exact. I do not believe that we have innate ideas. I believe that everybody has different minds and opinions. At the top of this essay there is a quote that states, rationalist are like spiders who ‘spin webs out of themselves’ while empiricist are more like bees who ‘collect material from the outside world and turn it into something valuable’”(qtd. in Thompson). The way I see it, everybody learns from experience. For example, in lacrosse everybody sucks in the beginning because they lack the experience of playing but with practice, they gain knowledge and experience of the game. Another aspect that I agree with Locke on is how nobody has the same principles and can change and form their own. I think that everybody has the freedom and the consciousness to make there own principles and ideas, which is one thing that make us

    Read More

  • John Locke's Influence on the Founding Fathers

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Founding Fathers of the United States relied heavily on many of the principles taught by John Locke. Many of the principles of Locke’s Second Treatise of Government may easily be discovered in the Declaration of Independence with some minor differences in wording and order. Many of the ideas of the proper role of government, as found in the Constitution of the United States, may be discovered in the study of Locke. In order to understand the foundation of the United States, it is vital that one studies Locke. A few ideas from Hume may be found but the real influence was from Locke. Rousseau, on the other hand, had none.

    Read More

  • Locke Primary And Secondary Qualities Analysis

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locke, an indirect realist, explores our immediate perceptions and with this attempts to draw a line between ideas and qualities, just how these are different entities. Sometimes referred to as Representative Theory, according to Locke, we are aware only of our ideas, these being things existing “in our minds”, sensations created. Our perceptions are indirect and their qualities, these are the causal properties of physical objects that then cause those sensations. This dualistic account

    Read More

  • John Locke: America’s Forgotten Founding Father

    1721 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Locke is the most influential character in American history, thought, and practice. Without the influence of his writings, America would not have the same foundation of unalienable Rights, stable governance, and quality of life. However, Locke remains widely unknown and unstudied by the newer generations of Americans. His most influential work, the Second Treatises of Government, laid the ground, both theoretically and institutionally, for the American system of government that has been enjoyed for over two centuries. His influence on the American way of thinking is made evident when examining the text of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.

    Read More

  • Locke's Theory Of Knowledge By Descartes

    766 Words  | 2 Pages

    Descartes argues in favor of human reasoning, involving innate ideas and subsequent deductions, as the sole avenue toward reaching this certain knowledge. On the other hand, Locke does not invest himself in the possibility of achieving any knowledge that can be claimed as a universal truth. Rather than this, Locke favored the idea that experience can lead individuals to knowledge that is most probable. Ultimately, these two philosophies cannot reconcile themselves together because of a core divergence on the question of the origins of knowledge. As Locke’s argument finds itself dependent on the concept of the mind as a “tabula rasa” at birth, this doctrine surpasses Descartes’ assertion of innate knowledge and, by extension, systematic doubt. For readers, the acceptance of the mind as a blank slate invariably leads to an acceptance of Locke’s reasoning above Descartes’. The argument propelling Locke’s essay and the improbability of innate knowledge favors the idea that there can be no universal truths and that, since individuals are born without any truths evident to them, they must depend entirely on sensory perception of the external world on which to base the beginnings of their knowledge. To support this, Locke considers how children gain knowledge of the world in small increments, as opposed to possessing an extensive knowledge from the time of their birth. Locke discusses that an individual with exposure solely to black and white would be absolutely unaware of scarlet or green, just like children are ignorant of the taste or texture of pineapples and oysters until they first taste

    Read More

  • John Locke's Argument For Innate Ideas

    467 Words  | 1 Pages

    From this essay it is obvious there is much disagreement between two of philosophy’s powerhouse thinkers. Rene Descartes, an advocate for the existence of innate knowledge, claiming that there are ideas which we are born with such as infinity and existence and John Locke, an advocate for the concept of “tabula rasa”, claiming that humans are born blank slates and acquire all knowledge through experience and our senses. Although both theories are very thought provoking and interesting, I find Descartes argument for innate knowledge to be the most accurate on the basis that there ideas we possess that are engraved on our minds at

    Read More

  • Nature Vs. Nurture: Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our mind then processes that perception into an idea. A great example I can give is from my childhood. I was playing outside by my elderly neighbor and she said, “Stop,” and I did, which made her tell me I was very obedient. I didn’t know what that word meant so I looked it up and did not like the definition. Ever since that day I tried to not be obedient unless I wanted to be or absolutely needed to be. I heard something I didn’t know anything about, researched it and reflected on it and decided I didn’t want to be that. My experience makes me agree with Locke because I was able to process what happened to me and decide for

    Read More

  • Quotes In John Locke's Choices And Innate Ideas

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his observations Locke concluded that errors and false perceptions arouse from the belief in innate ideas. Locke says “ There is nothing more commonly taken for granted than that there are certain principles, both speculative and practical, universally agreed upon by all mankind, which, therefore, they argue, must necessarily be the constant impressions which the souls of men receive in their first being”. (EssayI.2.ii) He believes that individuals are all born with a blank slate or tabula rasa. One of his arguments versus innate ideas positions that children and idiots don’t have the least apprehension or thought of inborn ideas. This element alone, he trusts is enough to discard the notion of a universal assent. For children and idiots to have things imprinted into their minds they would’ve had to observe them. To have an impression to the mind without perceiving it seems incomprehensible. If children and idiots have souls and minds with those impressions they must unquestionably know and assent to those truths. Yet, these truths

    Read More

  • David Hume 's Copy Principle

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even so, there was an instance Hume’s copy principle was questioned. In the case of the man that goes blind after thirty years, who has never had the impression of a certain shade of blue, may be able to have an idea of what it would look like. At the time, Hume did not think it was something of significance that could go against this idea of the copy principle. Nancy Kendrick uses this missing shade of blue to show that this counter example actually provides Hume with an empiricist and non-nativist example of an idea’s priority to experience and, therefore, vitalizes, rather than diminishes his most key empiricist purposes. Moreover, Kendrick also uses John Lock as a reference in support to Hume’s claims in rejecting innate ideas, and in turn understanding the mi...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Monism And Dualism

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke possesses many characteristics of an idealist. However, he also believes that we were created by God and that we our morally obligated to preserve ourselves and the rest of humankind. How he can come to this conclusion when he believes we have no pre-knowledge of anything is somewhat disturbing. If we only perceive things with our senses, or though our own mind reflection how is this logic possible? It seems to be a contradiction in th...

    Read More

  • John Locke's Argument Against The Will Being Free

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    This essay discussed John Locke’s view about the Will’s being Free and how he concluded that the Will was not free. This is an outcome that he discovered while writing On Power on An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. I have offered reasons for why this is an argument that seems to contradict itself, which makes it inconsistent and unstable.

    Read More

  • John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first philosopher, John Locke, laid the foundations of modern empiricism. Locke is a representational realist who touches reality through feelings. He believes that experience gives us knowledge (ideas) that makes us able to deal with the world external to our minds. His meaning of ideas is "the immediate object of perception, thought, or understanding." Locke's ideas consist of simply ideas which turn into complex ideas. Simple ideas are the thoughts that the mind cannot know an idea that it has not experienced. The two types of simple ideas are; sensation and reflection. Sensation is the idea that we have such qualities as yellow, white, heat, cold, soft, hard, bitter, and sweet. Reflection ideas are gained from our experience of our own mental operations. Complex ideas are combinations of simple ideas that can be handled as joined objects and given their own names. These ideas are manufactured in the human mind by the application of its higher powers. Locke believes in two kinds of qualities that an object must have; primary and secondary. Primary qualities o...

    Read More

  • John Locke Research Paper

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke and René Descartes were both early seventeenth century philosophers striving to explain or answer the great questions of their time. What is the mind or self and how does it relate to the brain? How can we gain knowledge? Are we the same person we were several years ago? These two great philosophers had similar and conflicting views on these various questions of life. Locke was influenced by his readings of Descartes and adopted some of his philosophical terminology and thought. Considering this influence they still present different philosophies. These different philosophies stem from the two original schools of thought in epistemology; the study of knowledge.

    Read More

More about John Locke’s Perspective on How We Gain Knowledge and The Exclusion of Innate Ideas

Open Document