Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corporate strategy of dell
Dells business strategy
Corporate strategy of dell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corporate strategy of dell
Dell Analysis
In spite of Dell’s Direct Model strategy, the company had lost any price advantage it had over its competitors. Dell also had an issue with channel inventory availability driven by the fact that their competitors were attempting to replicate their strategy. This was a large threat to the organization because they so heavily relied on just-in-time delivery of parts. Dell’s competitors faced many challenges to the direct distribution method, however. According to Exhibit 8 in the case (“Ratings of PC Vendors by Corporate Mangers with PC-buying Responsibility”), channel based support was rated the lowest on all scales, showing that this was Dell’s riskiest area as well.
Internal Analysis
Strengths and Weaknesses
Dell’s main strength lies in their perfection of the Direct Model, which boasts a production process that lasts only a day and a half so the company is able to serve customers quickly and has the capacity to withstand very large orders. Dell built held no finished goods inventory on hand, which helps to reduce idle assets and risk. The company maintained excellent relations and communication with suppliers who were able to adhere to Dell’s just-in-time inventory management and allowed suppliers to send shipments direct to customers, reducing inefficiency. Dell encouraged suppliers to locate their facilities in close proximity to assembly operations. Additionally, Dell had very high customer service and support satisfaction and maintained some of the best performance metrics in the industry. Finally, their main source of revenue came from businesses and large government institutions and no single customer represented more than 2% of their sales, which lowers their risk of buyer power.
One of the firm’s...
... middle of paper ...
...rosoft operating systems) so if relations between a particular supplier and the firm go awry, the firms can seek other suppliers to do business with. There is also little difference in the supplier’s products.
Overall Analysis of Industry Attractiveness
Overall, the computer industry is relatively attractive. The potential for future growth is high but new competitors must face the threat posed by already established, well-known brands. There are relatively few substitutes for computers and the power of suppliers and buyers is low. New companies would likely be able to successfully yield a profit. Companies have been relatively successful in this industry throughout its history. It is important that all firms in the industry are able to keep up with ever changing cutting edge technology, however.
**paper is based on a case study from Harvard Business Review**
The suppliers bargaining power is generally strong because of the big monopolies and the high importance of purchasing components and operating system, therefore it decreases the profitability of the market players.
A second alternative is a shift in marketing focus towards a new target segment and improved product. A strong and unified market strategy can strengthen synergies through new collaboration. Given the rapid growth, it is essential to reach influential segments that can create a mass appeal over the broader market. Doing so, will also require improving the quality of their product by focusing more on programming and less on hardware sales. A possible benefit would be creating a niche market that enables a rapid brand expansion. On the other hand, a possible drawback would be not being able to handle rapid
First in the new entrants force, one of the main barriers to enter this industry is the scale economy. In the PC industry, many companies need to start investing in very large capitals in the beginning. All the capital will gain towards the scale economies, such as financial economy, marketing economy, technology economy, and many other economies. In addition, this industry will also involve patents and rights in order to protect their own innovations. Patents and rights are very important due to setup another barrier for other competitors to enter this industry. Hence, barriers to entry are so high in this industry that the threat of new entrants entering the PC industry is very low. The second force is the substitute products force. Basically, anything that can replace a personal computer counts as a substitute. There are also many other PC companies that are treated as substitutes for Apple’s computer and it is also goes the other way around. Although the substitutes are threats to the industry, it can be beneficial because these substitutes might not have as many functions as a PC. Therefore, there are many substitutes which have a big impact on each of the company’s sales.
PC Industry - Structural Analysis: (Using Michael Porter's Model) Based on the information provided in the case, we can do a structural analysis of the PC industry which will help us in better analysis of the case. Threat of New Entrants: Entry was easy in the industry due to its huge potential. However, the major market share was held only by a few players. Rivalry: Stiff competition among a few major players having equal strength and potential.
By 1995 the computer industry was a relatively new industry with a history of around 20 years only, a considerable time for a technology based industry, but still not a mature industry. On the other hand, by 2002 the industry was all ready a "$220 billion global industry" showing how "from its earliest days in the mid 1970's, the industry had experienced explosive growth" and presenting the industry as a very attractive industry with capability of even more growth. Even with this growing strength, there was a great presence of economies of scale, if a new company were to enter this industry it would have to face the cost disadvantage of not coming in with a large scale, since competing against IBM and Microsoft, and even Apple in a large scale would be suicide. Following, the industry was characterized also for been very capital intensive, for developing new products and new technologies required and investment on R&D of around $500 to $700 million, representing in Apple's case some what of a 4% to 6% of revenue investment fluctuating through out the years. On the other hand, by 2005 this capital intensive industry changed as
Historically the personal computer (PC) industry has sold its products at reasonably high prices yet garnered only small profit margins. One reason for this is the high competition in the PC industry which led to competitive pricing among producers. Analyzing the competitive environment of the PC industry, it is evident that there is very little barrier to entry in this market. PC's have very low physical uniqueness and are made of standard components that require very little expertise to assemble.
Apple’s supply chain is one of the top performing supply chains in the world. According to AMR’s recent findings, Apple was named the best supply chain in the world for a third consecutive year (Apple's Supply Chaing Tops AMR Ranking, 2010). This illustrates that Apple is doing something right with their supply chain. Even when Apple launches a product, they have enough products to meet the demand (Satariano & Burrows, 2011). Since Apple is in the number one spot, there is little room for improvement to their supply
The PC industry is highly competitive and constantly changing as technology evolves and customer needs change. Some of the top competitors in the PC industry are IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Dell and Apple. Theses rivals are constantly jockeying for the top competitor’s position. They compete in prices, product innovation, advertising, etc.
Dell's strengths were oriented around listening to the customers, responding to the customers, and delivering what the customer wanted. The direct relationship was first through telephone calls, then through face-to-face interactions, and now through the internet. It has enabled them to benefit from real-time input from real customers regarding products and future products they would like to see developed. The company also doesn't use reseller or retail channels because every computer is built-to-order, which allows less inventory. The direct model allows them to take the pulse of whatever market and provide the right technology for the right customers.
Dell Inc. has realized that the most efficient path to the customer is through a direct relationship, with no intermediaries to add confusion and cost. With the power of their direct model and their team of talented people, they are able to provide to their customers high-quality, relevant technology, customized systems, superior service and support and products and services that are easy to buy and use.
Dell made the bold decision in 1994 to eliminate their products from retail stores and focused on mail order customers. In 1996 Dell began selling through their website as well. By eliminating the retail store presence Dell was able to reduce costs, reduce inventory, and maximize profit. Dell utilized a built to order system that allowed customers to specify exactly what they did and did not want on their Dell computer. Dell's just in time inventory system lowered inventory to 6 days and storage costs were saved.
This strategy was carried out by selling via phone, fax and direct sales, instead of selling through retail stores. Not only this approach differentiated Dell from other competitors at the time, it also reduced its operating costs as it did not have to rent expensive retail space. In addition, Dell’s strategy of selling customised computers allowed it to hold only a small amount of inventory, which reduce...
Since its launch in the mid '90s, Dell's e-commerce business has been a poster child for the benefits of online sales, says Aberdeen Group analyst Kent Allen. The company's strategy of selling over the Internet -- with no retail outlets and no middleman -- has been as discussed, admired and imitated as any e-commerce model. Dell's online sales channel has proven so successful, says Allen that the computer industry must ask: "Does the consumer need to go to the store to buy a PC anymore?"
Dell Computer have recently announced changes to their business strategy and supporting supply chain. They will no longer focus on a made to order direct sales model for their personal computers. Nor will they continue to refine their renowned supply chain model that supported their sales model. Instead, they will be looking to produce personal computers with fixed configurations at lower prices. This essay looks at why Dell have changed their strategy, and then considers the customer value proposition of the new strategy, as well as lessons that other organisations can learn from the Dell experience.
Introduction and Background The computer service industry can be broken down into several categories ranging from reseller to consultant. Entré Computers / Executive Business Machines Inc. (EBM) was a sales and service organization for typewriters at its inception in 1972. However, as the corporate market shifted its needs from typewriters to word processors to personal computers, so did EBM change its product line to meet that demand. Now they are trying to compete in a very competitive low margin industry. They are a small single location company with annual gross revenues of twenty million (USD). However, as the profit margin and price of their product continually drop at a rate of forty percent annually, it becomes more difficult to show increasing gross revenues. They will need to find a place in the market, a niche, to survive and effectively compete with larger internationally known corporations as well as small local companies that are very much like their own. Industry Structure, Competitors The market is extremely competitive price-searchers market; product is often sold below manufacture's cost just to maintain market share and brand loyalty. It is a competitive price-searcher market because of the low barriers to entry and no regulations in price. Firms in this market are faced with a downward-sloping demand curve. The sellers range from international organizations, which retain over twenty thousand employees, to very small local shops with as few as two workers. The low-end of the market could be considered a Natural Monopoly because the average costs of production are continually decreasing as a result of higher production, improved technology and increased competition. However, there is a high end of market that would be deemed an Oligopoly, because it consists of a small number of sellers due to a very high barrier to entry. Typically the differentiated products are custom-built solutions that can only be provided by companies of the size and stature of a big six consulting firm or an internationally know organization such as Oracle or SAS. There are very high barriers to entry to compete in this market since the clients to this product are looking for large-scale international support. In order to implement a sophisticated differentiated product like Oracle financials or SAP, a company needs to retain an enormous overpaid staff of software engineers to develop, support, and implement such solutions. Very few companies are capable of retaining and / or attracting the staff necessary to provide such solutions.