Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of self - reliance
Purpose of self-reliance
The importance of self - reliance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Nothing can bring to a man so much of happiness or so much of misery as man himself.” – Frederick Douglass
Since the dawn of the creation of man until our present day, we have pondered on the idea of being in control of our destiny. However, an answer to such a difficult proposition did not present itself until the late 19th century. This era gave birth to the Lyceum movement, which sparked belief in individualism amongst Americans. The two men known to be the catalyst of this theory were Frederick Douglas and Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Moreover, this concept of free will and becoming financially self-reliant is still prevalent in modern society. The mid-twentieth (20th) to the early twenty-first (21st) century has become the age of entrepreneurship, where peoples from all nations no longer desire to work “for the man” but create their own legacy of prosperity. Likewise, it is a period in time that has redefined the way in which those from all walks of life can obtain success and wealth. Hence, the evolution of reality TV stars, YouTube sensations and rappers from being ordinary individuals to becoming fashion designers, actors and CEOs. However, our definition of success is not only defined by wealth it also includes having a life of meaning that is similar to that of Dr. Martin Luther king Jr. and Malcolm X. Certainly, I am speaking of a life that encompasses the ability to change our world for the better.
Correspondingly, in his excerpt entitled “Self-Made Men” Frederick Douglas enlightens us about the theory behind the success of these individuals. According to Douglas, the best, if not the only explanation of their success is that they are men/women of work. He believes that although there may be other factors in soci...
... middle of paper ...
...r if God decides to rewrite your fate. As a result, this is the reason why as humans we will never completely be in control of our destiny.
In summary, the idea of self-reliance will continue to bewilder the minds of our current and future generations. In fact, this is due to the lack of a definite answer to the question. Nevertheless, I am persuaded that whether an individual be a believer or non-believer in having control of their destiny, there are forces or uncontrollable factors in life that have the ability to control a minute percentage of one’s destiny.
Works Cited
1. Ralph Waldo Emerson – “Self Reliance” (1841) http://www.emersoncentral.com/selfreliant.htm
2. Frederick Douglas – “Self-Made Men” (1872) http://www.monadock.net/douglass/self-made-men.html
3. New King James Version. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1982. Bible Gateway. Sat. Oct. 8, 2011.
... understanding amongst his audience and enhancing his instructive tone. When the speaker meditatively states, "As the Yuppie was to the 80s... maybe Abraham Lincoln could be for the coming decade" he utilizes his academic tone as well as the analogy of Lincoln to the Yuppie, to effectively emphasize the fact that he views Lincoln as paragon of his own definition success, as arising from hard work, which further develops ethos through his allusion to the prominent historical figure that is Abraham Lincoln. By employing both an illustrative allusion as well as a thought provoking analogy as well as his scholastic tone the author is able to make the audience more likely to accept his definition of success as deriving from hard work and sound work ethics due to his development of common ground which results in general understanding of his assertion within his audience.
After reading both “Self Reliance,” by Ralph Waldo Emerson and “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave,” by Frederick Douglass, one might notice a trend in what both writers regard as the key to happiness or self-fulfillment. Emerson and Douglass both imply that acquiring knowledge is what people should strive for throughout their lives. However, their perceptions on the kind of knowledge should be attained is where their ideas diverge; Emerson is the one that encourages one to develop the soul whereas with Douglass, it is the mind.
Nearly everyone has the desire to be successful in their lives, whether it be measured in the amount of wealth a man owns or the accomplishments he has made in his life. Therein lies the most common, the success in a man's profession. There are multiple approaches to this connotation of success where a wide range of techniques can be applied. One might think that the only way to reach a particular level of success is to take on a competitive nature and achieve that coveted position of number 1. However, being competitive does not necessarily insure that a person is ‘successful.’ They must be competent in their field to reach the top spot. An example of these two sides can be found within Arthur Miller’s Death of A Salesman using the characters Willy and Bernard.
“Ralph Waldo Emerson's Self-reliance is one of the major writings that helped carve the ethnic American individualism and form the intellectual basis of today's writers.” (Liang) What is self-reliance you ask? As Emerson puts it, it’s relying on yourself instead of others. I believe in self-reliance because I believe in individuality. If people were to be more self-reliant they would stop worrying about other people and just focus on themselves. I strongly believe if people did that there would be less drama, and less rumors going around about people.
1.	The essay that I elected to read and analyze was "Self-Reliance" by Ralph Waldo Emerson.
The ideas of both of these 21st century authors corresponds with Emerson’s notion of success based on leaving the world a better place, not simply acquiring more things. Likewise, the empty relationship with my mother’s materialistic family versus the rewarding bond I share with my father’s family clearly illustrates the fundamental truth in Emerson’s quote. Measuring success by wealth and gain only serves to drive people apart and perpetuate a shallow, incomplete view of the world focusing on the high minded ideals Emerson espouses; genuine affection, finding the best in one another, and appreciating beauty, that is the true measure of success.
In his essay “Self-Reliance,” Ralph Waldo Emerson uses a range of rhetorical strategies to guide and inspire his 19th century American readers. For example, Emerson begins his piece with a personal anecdote. He says that he “read the other day some verses written by an eminent painter which were original and not conventional” (549). By sharing his personal experience, Emerson establishes his credibility and makes his work relatable to his readers. It is as if Emerson is suggesting that his anecdote of reading “some verses written by an eminent painter” is the model behavior that everyone should follow (549). Emerson also references authority to inspire his 19th century readers. He claims that “the highest merit we ascribe to Moses, Plato,
“The belief that events in one’s life, whether good or bad, are caused by controllable factors such as one’s attitude, preparation,
Freewill has been thoroughly discussed by ancient philosophers and modern scientist alike yet no conclusion has ever been reached. With the issue that whether freewill is consistent or inconsistent with the idea that everything happens out of mechanistically that is deemed appropriate by the universe. There are three common camps of thoughts on the matter of free will. Determinism and Libertarianism and Compatibilism. This essay argues the fact that freewill is indeed not an illusion and attempts to redress the balance between these camps of thoughts by offering an overview of strategy via that of a Compatibilism point of view.
Is how we act is predetermined by a number of factors beyond our control or are we simply able to make choices that are not determined by our dispositions or desirers. This notion of freewill has been debated by theorists for centuries. Hard Determinists say that how we act is due to a combination of genetic factors and the environment around us. A similar notion is Fatalism where how is act is predetermined by a higher power. However Compatabalists think that how we act is a combination of freewill and what environmental and genetic endowments have been bestowed to us. This paper will critically discuss these theories and how human beings are capable of freewill.
International law recognizes that all peoples have the right to self-determination. Independence of peoples from colonialism and alien authority in order to determine their political status is manifestation of this right. In international law, self-determination is the legal right of the people to decide by their own wills in the international order. Self-determination is a core principle of international law which is derived from customary international law.
Trusting Thyself. Why do you need to be a member? “Trust thyself.” Emerson’s central message seems to resonate with us Americans. After all, the value of self-reliance has long been a part of the American spirit.
The Transcendentalist movement flourished in New England, and proposed a revolutionarily new philosophy of life. This new philosophy drew upon old ideas of Romanticism, Unitarianism, and German Idealism. Some of these ideas pertained closely to the values of America at the time. These values included nature, individualism, and reform, and can be noted in the essay “Self Reliance,” by Ralph Waldo Emerson. In this essay, Emerson states his values and incorporates them into his philosophy of self-reliance.
The self is an important component of free will. It can be assumed that the self is the entity within a person making a decision without having causal determination (Gomes, 2007). The self can be described as the entity that gives one the sense that they are making a free choice. One of the limitations to many free will studies is that the definition of freedom is broad. For researchers, it is hard to decipher between a free choice and a random choice. Gomes (2007) explains that an action is considered free when one decides on A when they could have chosen otherwise. When faced with a choice there are internal and external factors that can influence the chooser, however, this does not mean that these factors cause or determine what
“Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself.” Philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre attempts to convey that the effects of individuals’ actions effects their future. He indicates their free will to make themselves. However, how this occurs is unclear. Who or what determines destiny? Is it a supreme being like God? Does the individual hold the key to their own fate? Do previous actions cause one’s actions and future? Throughout the history of time, various philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Pierre Laplace have created theories to prove or disprove the existence of free will. For instance, existentialism claims that decisions and free will establish outcomes. Contrary to this, determinism states that there is no free will