Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of organizational culture
Brief storyline and context of the deepwater horizon film essay
Determinants of organizational culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of organizational culture
Deepwater Horizon is a 2016 movie about American disaster based on the oil spill and explosion in the Gulf of Mexico. An oil drilling rig which was operated on behalf of BP's corporation by Transocean, a private contractor, is set to begin drilling off the Southern coast of Louisiana. In the beginning, the operation process goes easily, but then finally the cement job completely fails which triggering a massive blowout that overpowers and kills people. There is a chain of malfunction equipment coupled with a failed attempt to seal the well and oil ignition which kills more people. When the rig exploded, eleven workers were killed which led to the pressure on the evacuation of the rig. The urgency measures which were taken before the evacuation …show more content…
"Why there was an explosion on Deepwater Horizon oil rig" is the first Why in this case. "Integrity failure" was the issue started with the disaster. This adhered to a loss of control of the stress of the fluid in the well. The gadget "blowout preventer", which ought to automatically seal the well in the situation of a loss of control, neglected to engage. Hydrocarbons inflamed in the well at an intractable rate leading to a progression of explosions on the rig. The second Why is "why stemming the oil flow took so long". They tried to put their efforts using a remotely operated vehicle to close the blowout preventer gadget. Successive efforts included diminishing a "top hat" over to occupy oil spewing from the riser. After that, engineers attempted to inject the mud into the blowout preventer. However, all of these efforts broke down. Finally, engineers were successfully putting a sealing cap on top of the blowout preventer. This equipped a temporary fix until engineers could pump the mud and cement into the well to reduce pressure at the head of the well and permanently seal off the flow paths. The third Why is "why …show more content…
The individuals involved were a BP former senior drilling engineer Kurt Mix, two senior officers on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig Robert Kaluza and Donald Vidrine, and the former vice president for exploration in the Gulf of Mexico David Rainey. The organizational and supply chain/subcontractor dynamics that came into play in decision making were that BP's corporation shaped its organizational culture and attitude towards risk throughout a history of strategic choices and operational failures. BP's corporation had power over Transocean and Halliburton which influenced the decisions making by demonstrating that BP's staffs consistently ignored the best practices in their decision-making process such as several available technical alternatives in the oil industry. Task familiarity and past successes developed their illusion of control being overconfidence in technically complex situations. When making the decisions in each organization, BP's decision-making process was influenced by the cost and duration of each alternative, rather than by the level of protection it offered against the risk of a catastrophic failure. The validity of Halliburton's OptiCem model was considered because of the failure of its output to support the adoption a cheaper and more expeditious well design. Transocean management's overconfidence had led the firm to operate its rigs with a significant number
At the end I come to conclusion that BP was not properly prepared for any disaster like that there risk assessment related to project is very limited and even not considered seriously about it for their own progress and putting live of public and employees in danger by not following the standard SOP of particular project. Even after incident happened they try to close their eyes on reality. The company should take this incident as alarm and should implement proper risk assessment for future and also compensate damages on ethical ground and if they counter this situation in good way their loss of bad reputation will be lesser as it predicted to be they should considered their responsibility towards society as well by doing this they not only making other people lives better but also earning good will to their company.
The BP oil spill began with the explosion of the mobile offshore drilling unit known as the Deepwater Horizon, then operating in the Macondo Prospect Oil Field some 60 kilometers off the coast of the U.S. state of Louisiana, on April 29, 2010. The leak was capped on July 15, 2010, with a repair to the underwater wellhead ruptured by the Deepwater Horizon explosion. Thus, the BP oil spill lasted for about three months. During this time, roughly 5 million barrels of crude oil leaked from the wellhead into the Gulf of Mexico. The flow rate was not uniform, beginning...
The purpose of this research paper was to investigate the news media’s depiction of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. The coverage provided by the newspapers was compared to that of scientific journals to access their validity and insight. The reactions the coverage evoked on the public were also studied. The paper specifically addressed the media’s portrayal of the oil company versus that of environmental groups. It was found that the news media did not include the benefits the oil company had had on the people and economy of Alaska. It was also found that up until 1989, many Alaskans were opposed to environmental groups. Next, the paper followed the role the media played on the public’s emotions and subsequent government policy. In addition, the use of exaggerated statistics in the wake of the spill are examined and corrected. Finally, the debate over the recovery of the area is tackled. And while the debate remains open, the apparent discrepancies in data are discussed.
Most people believe that one man-made natural disaster would teach us to be better, but we have learned that history repeats itself. The Exxon Valdez oil spill (in 1989) and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, or BP oil spill, (in 2010) were both devastating oil spills that shocked the nation. The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred due to a tanker grounding. The BP oil spill was caused by an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil platform. These two oil spills were both disasters and had greater effects in certain categories. In this essay, I will be comparing the cause of both oil spills, the damage/effect of both oil spills, and the cleanup of each oil spill.
for the workers of the company. All the blame is not due to poor design and construction flaws, but to the oil companies for not teaching the employees about the system. This disaster could have been prevented if the engineers and oil companies were not blinded by their ignorant beliefs that the Ocean Ranger was unsinkable. Citations 1. http://www.canadianheritage.org/reproductions/21050.htm.
This is not the first time that BP is at fault. They have had criminal convictions in places such as Endicott Bay in Alaska, Texas City and Prudhoe Bay. Jeanne Pascal was a part of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and was assigned to watch over BP. Pascal was watching over companies such as BP that were facing debarment. Under her watch, BP was charged with four federal crimes. Over the past twelve years, Pascal’s seen BP patterns as misconducts. She attempted to warn the government about BP’s safety and environmental issues that would most likely lead to another disaster. While she was watching over BP, the company misinformed and misled her about things that resulted to the felonies that they have committed. Sensing that some things were not right about the company, she presented a case of their unsafe working environments.
Another problem that Pacific Oil Company faced was their own internal research and development of expanding the ...
“On March 23, 2005, at 1:20 pm, the BP Texas City Refinery suffered one of the worst industrial disasters in recent U.S. history. Explosions and fires killed 15 people and injured another 180, alarmed the community, and resulted in financial losses exceeding $1.5 billion.” (U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, 2007) There are many small and big decisions and oversights that led to the incident. Underneath all the specific actions or inaction is a blatant disregard for addressing safety violations and procedures that had been pointed out to BP even years before this event. The use of outdated equipment and budget cuts also contributed to the circumstances that allowed this accident to happen.
BP’s “Gulf of Mexico Restoration” website, uses pictures of new employees to show BP’s dedication to creating more jobs and ensuring the safety in the company. In “back to work in the Gulf of Mexico” page, BP provides a picture of its three rig workers who are working on a rig floor in the Gulf of Mexico. In the picture we can see workers focusing on building its new deep water oil and gas development. BP claims that the company created more than 2300 jobs in Gulf of Mexico and supported ten thousand additional jobs in the region. In another picture we can see an employee practicing with a Hi- tech simulator with the help of an instructor. The picture is conveys the message that the company is putting effort into providing training for its employees and implements surrounding new technology in order to avoid future damages. BP used these pictures to show the public that it trying to ensure safety in future by employing additional workers. By hiring new peo...
"Soon the 4-inch drill pipe…shot skyward. After the mud, water, and pipe were blown out, gas followed, but only for a short time. Then the well was very quiet. We ventured back, after our wild scramble for safety, to find things in a terrible mess...We started shoveling the mud away-when, without warning, a lot of heavy mud shot out of the well with the report of a cannon…In a very short time oil was going up through the top of the derricks, and rocks were being shot hundreds of feet into the air. Within a very few minutes, the oil was holding a steady flow at more than twice the height of the derrick…”
This paper describes equipment and techniques for responding to oil spills. Various techniques for the containment, cleanup and recovery of oil spills are examined; advantages and disadvantages of each are considered. Along with providing insight for oil spill response, this paper discusses environmental factors which can contribute to the success or failure of a cleanup operation.
On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, located in the Gulf of Mexico exploded killing 11 workers and injuring 17. The oil rig sank a day-and-a-half later. The spill was referred to as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP oil spill, Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and BP oil disaster. It was first said that little oil had actually leaked into the ocean but a little over a month later the estimate was 12,000-19,000 barrels of crude oil being leaked per day. Many attempts were made to stop the leak but all failed until they capped the leak on July 15, 2010, and on September 19 the federal government declared the well “effectively dead.” In the three months that it took to finally put a stop the leak, 4.9 million barrels of oil were released into the ocean. The spill caused considerable damage to marine and wildlife habitats and the Gulf’s fishing and tourism industries. The White House energy advisor, Carol Browner, goes as far to say that the Deepwater oil spill is the “worst environmental disaster the US has faced.”
Business risk management has been a widely crucial tool for firms to include in their operations and its importance cannot be overlooked. In the case of British Petroleum (BP) Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill in 2010, there was negligence and lack in the contingency plan and response of the company to the risks that arose. It became evident in this analysis that BP’s manner of handling the incident had a massive financial implication that ensued negative public perception and company reputation and value.
On a Monday afternoon, A couple of friends and I drove about forty-five minutes to El Dorado to see a movie. A movie in which we didn’t know anything about. None of us had even seen the trailer. I sent my friend a link to the movies that were showing at the cinema in El Dorado, and she had chosen Deepwater Horizon solely on the fact she liked the actors that had been cast for the movie. A few of these actors included Mark Wahlberg and Kate Hudson. Deepwater Horizon, as I came to find out on the car ride there, is about the most devastating oil spill in United States history. Since this event occurred only roughly six years ago, I recognized it after my friend called it the BP oil spill. Growing up in south Arkansas, I know many people that work on oil rigs so the spill was something that came close to home. The movie portrays the events leading up to the rig explosion and the aftermath concerning the people aboard the rig.
The BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill accident of April 20th 2010 that caused a gas release followed by the explosion that took place causing hydro carbons to leak into the Gulf of Mexico posed a lot of strategic implications in the competence, capabilities, internal resources and Corporate Social Responsibility of BP. The implications of the Oil Spill underscores the Icarus paradox, which holds that the very capabilities that give an organization its source of competitive advantage can become constraining with changes to the external context. Teece (2009) emphasised that dynamic capabilities revolve around three generic types namely: Sensing (ability to scan, search and explore the external