Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Declaration of the rights of man and the citizen
Napoleon's reforms in France
Enlightenment and the french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Declaration of the rights of man and the citizen
Sarandeep Singh
History 102
In 1789, the representatives of the French people organized together as a National Assembly to adopt a way to guarantee and protect the rights of individuals in their new nation. They put together the Declaration of The Rights of Man, which contained the ideas and principles from the French revolution and Enlightenment. The Declaration of the Rights of Man was in many ways similar to the recently adopted Bill of Rights in the United Sates and other documents expressing the rights of individuals. The Declaration of The Rights of Man served as the basis for future constitutions, movements, and governments. However, during the violent phases of the French revolution, the basis of the declaration were ignored and replaced during Napoleons reign.
…show more content…
The Declaration was an embodiment of many enlightenment ideas espoused from people the likes of John Locke and Montesquieu, specifically the idea of “natural rights”.
The basic and most important principle of the Declaration was that it declared that all men are born free and have equality of rights. These rights include “liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.” This is contradictory to the divide that existed in France before the revolution where people who born into nobility or other groups received different privileges and rights. The declaration also emphasizes the importance of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as one of the most precious rights of man. It also asserts that the government and law existed to serve and protect the public as opposed to controlling and suppressing it. It’s clear that the declaration was an explicit attack on the absolute monarchial, privileged based regimes that existed during the pre-revolution periods of
France. Despite it being a major basis for human rights, the Declaration of the Rights of Men was not without its shortcomings. The declaration was supposed to be based on principles fundamental to all human beings and thus should be universally accepted. However, one of the most glaring gaps is that it doesn’t say anything about the rights of women, slaves, indentured servants etc. The failure to recognize the rights of these women specifically led to the famous book “The Declaration of the Rights of Women” by Olympe De Gouges in which she asserted that women have the natural, inalienable rights as men. However, it wasn’t until many years later where women’s rights would finally be recognized by a constitution. Unlike the Declaration in the United States at the time, The Declaration of the Rights of Man holds back from affirming that the natural, inalienable rights of man are given by God and not the state when it says “in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being”. However, The United States declaration makes it clear that natural human rights are endowed to the people by God and that the purpose of the state is to protect these rights. The declaration is also weak in guaranteeing and mentioning freedom of religion, right to bear arms, and the freedom of assembly. These differences seem to stem from the fact that France was more concerned with eliminating class issues and establishing strong individual rights as opposed to the issues the Americans dealt with during colonization. However, these issues in the Declaration would eventually need to be addressed. Despite some shortcomings of the Declaration, it was still influential and important for progressing forward unlike the Carlsbad Resolutions in1819. Unlike the Declarations of The Rights of Man, The Carlsbad Resolutions were used as an instrument to restore the old social order and suppress national and liberal ideas in Germany. One of the architects of this, Metternich, used the murder Kotzebue(a critic of the movement) by a student, Karl Sand to establish strict limitations and impose control on academic freedom. At this time, the ideas of liberal and national movements inspired from the French Revolution were flourishing in school environments. Therefore, once a student committed a murder on the basis of defending the ideas of the French revolution, the government in the leading states of Germany figured they must do something to prevent it from getting out of hand. The Carlsbad Resolutions made it so that there was strict censorship of the press, surveillance of universities, bans on revolutionary/liberal professors and even bans on student groups/fraternities. As a result, there is a mass restriction on cultural and political life and caused a restoration to old monarchial regime system, a complete contrast to the ideals and goals that the Declaration of The Rights of Man had set. Metternich had now created a landscape once again that pushes away from the basic rights of freedom of speech and press and turns back into the pre-revolutionary days of strict government control. The consequences of the Carlsbad Resolutions would be felt later in 1948. Because of the Carlsbad resolutions, Liberal and national movements were forced to move underground. As a result of the strict government control which also led to a greater desire for a unified Germany. It would all build up until the revolutions of 1948 where full scale uprisings took place against the monarchies. The Carlsbad decrees were repealed by Federal convention during the March revolution. It took a lot needless violence and death for some of the basic principles of the French Revolution and Declaration of Rights of Man to become accepted as they are today. Despite some of the shortcomings and limited aims of the Declaration of The Rights of Man, it’s principles and ideas have stood the test of time. Its ideas were meant to push the nation into a new political/social democracy landscape. The declaration influenced and paved the path for many more right based democracies throughout Europe and the others parts of the world. It served as one of the tools that led to the death of absolute monarchies in Europe albeit it would take years of more revolutions and violence to do so. The revolutions of 1948, a series of revolts against European monarchies including Sicily, France, Germany, the Austrian empire etc. lead to a lot of further economic distress, death, and failure to achieve its ultimate goals. Europe was still vastly under the conservative regimes with only some states with successful progressive regimes. Although the ideas from the French revolution and enlightenment that were reflected in the Declaration if the Rights of Man are prominent in most of the western world, they were initially limited in who they protected and not widely accepted by the rest of Europe. It took years of failure and countless movements to finally establish the ideas from the French revolution as accepted . If wasn’t until the 1900s and the end of the second world war where women and slaves rights were finally recognized and liberal democracies finally began to spread throughout the western world. In order for Europe to establish what are seemingly basic human rights and principles, it actually required decades of violent revolutions and oppression among certain groups of people until change finally occurred.
The enlightenment ideas affected politics for both the French and the American peoples through the form of government and individual rights. Thinkers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, believed in the individual right of man as a citizen of a sovereign nation. In 1789, Marquis de Lafayette used Rousseau and other free thinker’s ideas to draft his Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen to the National Constituent Assembly in France (http://www.pbs.org/marieantoinette/revolution/america_france.html). This established universal rights for individuals that always existed at all times. The document shows many similarities to American documents such as the declaration of Human Rights in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. For instance, they all show a relationship through the declaration of individual rights such as free speech and freedom of religion. However, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen focuses more on individualism while American documents focus more on a community “We the People” (http://www.pbs.org/marieantoin...
The English Bill of Rights is an Act of the Parliament of England that deals with constitutional matters and sets out certain basic civil rights. This constitution was passed on December 16, 1689.The Bill was passed to declare laws and liberties of the people. Also the people wanted separation of powers and limits the of power to the king and queen. It guarantees the rights of enhancing the democratic election and to get more freedom of speech. No armies should be raised in peacetime, no taxes can be levied, without the authority of parliament. Laws should not be dispensed with, or suspended, without the consent of parliament and no excessive fines should imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. King James the 2nd, had abused his
The Declaration of the Rights of Man was formed and intended in 1789 by the National Assembly of France to be the very backbone for the constitution. This allowed the nation of France to become liberated and achieve a more secure and structured society by changing from that of an absolute monarchy to a more constitutional democracy. France sought to gain equality and freedom for all individuals; after being fed up with the constant corruption for so long. France managed to successfully obtain an equal nation and government, in which power was given to the people and not to some tyrannical or dictatorial figure.
The citizens of France, inspired by the enlightenment, desired a government run by the people. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness” (de Lafayette 783). The French wanted to bring equality to all classes. The French revolution brought much more social change than the American revolution. Inspired by Lafayette’s declaration that, “no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom” (de Lafayette 783), the class system was destroyed. The revolutionaries were open to ending slavery, however women remained marginalized within the social structure of France. Similarly to the American revolution, the enlightenment ideas that drove the French revolution were not applied to society as a
In one corner we have a nation, fed up with the corruption and constant bullying of their big brother nation, seeking the approval of the world for a revolution. In the other corner we have a nation, bent on gaining the equality among all individuals in their state, coming together to lay down the law to their king. Both America and France had a thirst for a new equal nation and government in which power was given to the people and not to a tyrannical figure. Individuals from both of these countries sat down and wrote up a letter of declaration in demand of the freedom that they so rightfully deserved. Both of them won that freedom, as the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen flourished with success in the late 18th century. ‘How did these two important documents come about’ is the question we should be asking ourselves. What separated these two monumental letters from each other? What gave each of them their fire, their spark to gain their rights to liberty? America’s Declaration of Independence focused more on America gaining sole ownership of their nation, abolishing their connections with the British and their tyrant King George, and setting up their own government based on Natural law and equality among all men. France’s Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen confronted the king on his neglect to the equal rights of man, laid down the basic principles of how the nation should be run, and proclaimed that the nation should be and is going to be run by the people for the people. With those key differences stated as well as several other small values, such as taxation, oppression, and security, my concern is how both methods worked so efficiently given their varianc...
The French Revolution was a tumultuous period, with France exhibiting a more fractured social structure than the United States. In response, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen proposed that “ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities, and of the corruption of governments” (National Assembly). This language indicates that the document, like its counterpart in the United States, sought to state the rights of men explicitly, so no doubt existed as to the nature of these rights. As France was the center of the Enlightenment, so the Enlightenment ideals of individuality and deism are clearly expressed in the language of the document. The National Assembly stated its case “in
According to Thomas Jefferson, all men are created equal with certain unalienable rights. Unalienable rights are rights given to the people by their Creator rather than by government. These rights are inseparable from us and can’t be altered, denied, nullified or taken away by any government, except in extremely rare circumstances in which the government can take action against a particular right as long as it is in favor of the people’s safety. The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America mentions three examples of unalienable rights: “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. I believe these rights, since they are acquired by every human being from the day they are conceived, should always be respected, but being realistic, most of the time, the government intervenes and either diminishes or
Today America is country where everything and everyone are unique and united and unique nation make a union. Thomas Paine, an intellectual from the 18th century, wrote a famous piece called the Rights of Man where he listed points in which hold partially true and untrue today. In a passage Paine specifically wrote that are held untrue today is that the poor and the rich are treated fairly and equally, that there are no riots nor tumults, and that taxes are low for everybody. The only two statements that Paine describes the United States correctly is that the government is just and different people make it hard to form a union. Paine is trying to interpret that the country is united and just in his time and that it will continue to be like that; if Paine somehow traveled into the future and saw what America is today he might would 've not have written that passage since today there a things in America that are extremely different compared to the late 18th century.
The Bill of Rights and Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen are based on the same principles of natural rights; therefore each document is similar in protecting the people's natural rights. However, despite their similarities, their differences are apparent due to the social situations in which they were adopted. The Bill of Rights stood to protect the freedoms of each individual by establishing a democratic government. The French Revolution eliminated the hierarchy of class and established equality among men with the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen. Several influences from past philosophers and documents assisted the frame work of the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Rights and Citizen.
The First part for the declaration is the intent. The intent gives the people’s rationale for why they are writing this document, the right of individuals, and the purpose of government. The second part of the Declaration in the list of grievances . the list of grievance explains all of the unjust things that king George had done such as taxation without representation, his refusal to do things in the common good of the people, and his allowing of soldiers live in citizen's home without consent. The third part is the declaration. the declaration is basically just stating that they were then breaking away from great
What is the Declaration of Independence? The declaration of independence states that all individuals have inalienable rights, requiring life, liberty, and property, a document by which the thirteen colonies proclaimed their independence from Great Britain. If these rights are not protected, people have the right to abolish the government and institute a new one that is willing to secure those rights and their happiness. The declaration was written by Jefferson when he had the vision that America should be liberal. While liberals wanted to over through the government, conservatives believed that not every person should receive the same privilege, not every person is the same and therefore, not every person should be created equal. America is viewed as a liberal state. Thomas Jefferson once said, “When the people fear the government, there is tyranny, when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” This was the strongest reason for the people to bear arms, so that they can be protected from tyranny in the government. People wanted their independence.
The French Revolution was a period of time in which France underwent many changes, many which could be considered revolutionary. France’s whole system and way of being was completely changed. New ideas were proposed everyday. An idea is revolutionary when it is a new idea, when it is something that has never been thought of before. The Declaration of the Rights of Women written by Olympe de Gouges on September 1791, was one of the ideas proposed to the National Assembly (Hunt, Web 1). The document proposed that since the French Revolution was all about finding equality for all people, women should be equal to men and therefore, should have the same rights as men did. Women at the time live in terrible conditions. They had little access to education, and therefore could not enter professional occupations that required advanced education, were legally deprived of the right to vote, and were not considered citizens (Class Discussion Notes). If equal rights were not given to women, the French Revolution had not reached its full potential, according to Gouges. She expressed this idea in her document, saying, “This revolution will only take effect when all women become fully aware of their deplorable condition, and of the rights they have lost in society” (Gouges, Web). Anyone that questioned the Revolution was immediately put to death (Class Discussion Notes). If Gouges’ document and ideas were important enough to catch the attention of the National Assembly and for her to be put to death, her ideas could be considered important and revolutionary (Britannica, Web 1) But, the document was not revolutionary. The Declaration of the Rights of Women was not a revolutionary document because its ideas were taken from other people and were no...
On August 26, 1789, the assembly issued the “Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.” Through judicial matters, this document was written in order to secure due process and to create self-government among the French citizens. This document offered to the world and especially to the French citizens a summary of the morals and values of the Revolution, while in turn justifying the destruction of a government; especially in this case the French government, based upon autocracy of the ruler and advantage. The formation of a new government based upon the indisputable rights of the individuals of France through liberty and political uniformity.
World Studies Summer Homework Analytic Essay The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen has tremendous importance to the French History, as well as the Declaration of Independence has significant importance to the history of the United States of America. The Declaration of Independence had a huge significance to the United States, as the document declared our independence from Great Britain. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen limits the power of the crown, and authority of the government, and gives more freedom to citizens from the government and crown. Both documents have great importance, in both the United States, and French history.
On December 10th in 1948, the general assembly adopted a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This declaration, although not legally binding, created “a common standard of achievement of all people and all nations…to promote respect for those rights and freedoms” (Goodhart, 379). However, many cultures assert that the human rights policies outlined in the declaration undermine cultural beliefs and practices. This assertion makes the search for universal human rights very difficult to achieve. I would like to focus on articles 3, 14 and 25 to address how these articles could be modified to incorporate cultural differences, without completely undermining the search for human rights practices.