Deception, Betrayal, and Exaggeration

745 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nixons role in the watergate scandal

While reading the play “Julius Caesar”, deception, betrayal, and exaggeration were perceived throughout. Cassius was the character that fit these qualities the most. He can be compared to the former president, Richard Nixon. He was the United States 37th President of the United States. He was voted into office receiving great admiration for his speeches, and work he had previously done. When he was elected, it was the time during the Vietnam War. His goal as president was to have reconciliation (Sidey and Freidel). He gave great speeches by using rhetoric; a famous speech is 425 - Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam, November 3, 1969 rhetorical devices that he used in that speech was by saying “Good evening, my fellow Americans” (Peters) it gave the audience a sense of familiarity within the audience, and Nixon (Zielenski). In Nixon’s “Checker’s Speech” he tells his side of the story and his role in the Watergate Scandal. In his speech he uses rhetorical devices including repetition and anaphora, “I say that it was morally wrong if any of that $18,000 went to Senator Nixon, for my personal use. I say that it was morally wrong if it was secretly given and secretly handled. And I say that it was morally wrong if any of the contributors got special favors for the contributions that they made” (The History Place ). In the same speech, he uses the rhetorical question, “Well, how do you pay for these and how can you do it legally?” (The History Place ). Lastly, in the “Checker’s Speech” he uses irony when he states “I have a theory, too, that the best and only answer to a smear or an honest misunderstanding of the facts is to tell the truth. And that is why I am here tonight. I want to tell you my side of the case. This is a us...

... middle of paper ...

...DavisAPLanguage - Rhetorical devices used by Richard Nixon." DavisAPLanguage - Rhetorical devices used by Richard Nixon. Tori Zielenski, n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
Freidel, Frank, and Hugh Sidey . "Richard M. Nixon." The White House. The White House, n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
Peters, Gerald , and John T. Wolley . "Richard Nixon: Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam." Richard Nixon: Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam. The American Residency Project, n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
Prentice Hall literature. Penguin ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
"Watergate Scandal." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 11 May 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • The National Security State in the 1970s and 1980s

    3165 Words  | 7 Pages

    Morgan Ruth P. “Nixon, Watergate, and the study of the Presidency”. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, The Nixon Presidency. 1996, pp. 217-238

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of President Nixon's Resignation Speech

    483 Words  | 1 Pages

    President Nixon gave his resignation speech on August 9, 1974. This speech said that he would be resigning from office and stating Gerald Ford as the new president of the United states. He provoked the emotions of the reader in his speech, his words attempting to raise the country’s morale to bring in the new president. He claimed that he had “always tried to do what was best for the nation” (1). This shows emotion and expression as he claims that he has always tried to do his best. Later he states the reasons

    Read More

  • Kent State Shootings

    1512 Words  | 4 Pages

    The day after his Cambodia speech Nixon told a crowd at the Pentagon:"You see these bums, you know, blowing up campuses. Listen, the boys that are on the college campuses today are the luckiest people in th...

    Read More

  • Is Brutus Caesar Guilty

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    Additionally, Cassius shouldn’t be commended for saving Caesar from drowning because he remembrances that deed to convince others that Caesar is feeble than most, yet he is treated like a god. Cassius’s greed for power motivates his murderous motivations, but his ability to manipulate others to his will is also evident in his words. He refers to Caesar’s overwhelming power, similar to a Colossus, while he and the others “.walk under his huge legs. ” or are hidden in his glory. In reality, though, the senators are more esteemed than despised. Another way Cassius misleads others is by faking Caesar’s fascist behavior toward the commoners.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Act III Journal Questions

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... psychology, saying one thing while meaning the opposite. He continuously refers to Brutus as “an honorable man,” all the while implying he is not. He says he is “not an orator,” when clearly he is. He tells the crowd “not to seek vengeance,” all the while knowing they will. He disproves the idea that Caesar was ambitious by reminding them that he refused the crown three times and reading the will which left Caesar’s property to the citizens. In this way, if the conspirators confront him for inciting the riot, he can truthfully say “I told them not to seek vengeance and I told them you were honorable.” It absolves him of responsibility for the riot, when everyone knows his sarcasm is the very thing that sparked it.

    Read More

  • The Nixon Administration

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    DeGregorio, William. The Complete Book of U.S Presidents. Richard M. Nixon. New York: Wing Books, 1997. Print

    Read More

  • Biography of Richard Millhouse Nixon

    2780 Words  | 6 Pages

    Ambrose, Stephen E. Nixon : The Education of a Politician, 1913-1962. Simon and Schuster, 1988.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Selfish Quotes

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Shakespeare’s play, the conspirators are not justified because of their selfish motives. During the beginning of the play, Cassius is depicted as covetous when he tries to convince Casca to join the conspirators by speaking poorly of Caesar. “What trash is Rome, what rubbish and what offal, when it serves for the base matter to illuminate so vile a thing as Caesar” (I.II.108-110). Using a disgusted pattern of diction, Shakespeare helps to convey a bitter tone when Cassius states, “trash”, “rubbish” and “offal” to express his belief that Rome will become a terrible place when Caesar rules. Also, the fact that Cassius says, “a thing”, to describe Caesar shows how disrespectful he is, portraying his revolting attitude as a bad motive. This language characterizes Cassius as jealous and greedy of Caesar’s power,

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Vietnam War

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Nixon attempts to persuade the public of his nation by the methods of bandwagon, oversimplification, scapegoating, virtue words and euphoria in propaganda techniques. Specifically, Nixon takes on the bandwagon method because he is appealing to keep the concept alive and stop the division of the country and keep the idea alive of creating peace to end this war. Although he was a strong believer in the ability to turn to oversimplification, because of the military and political setting during this time based on setting up a timetable for peace. Meanwhile, he still blamed passed past presidents before him to justify the length of this war and how he planned to make changes because of scapegoating. To illustrate his ideal method of virtue words, he overstressed the word of making peace to end the war. Overall the end result of Nixon’s address was not effective, because of the leak of the Pentagon papers in 1971 when 20 newspapers printed articles about the lies of Vietnam. Based on this leak by Daniel Ellsberg who was a former military report for the Vietnam

    Read More

  • Was Julius Caesar Honorable

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cassius is a manipulative, envious, squirming, power-hungry politician who is the leader of the conspirators. He is obliviously not noble or honorable. In “Act I, Scene 2” he says, “I will this night, In several hands, in at his windows throw, As if they came from several citizens, Writings, all tending to the great opinion That Rome holds of his name; wherein obscurely And after this, let Caesar seat him sure; For we will shake him, or worse days endure” (Shakespeare 858-859). Cassius is scheming to throw forged letters as if they were from citizens of Rome and giving them to Brutus to convince him to kill Caesar. Being dishonorable, Cassius used Brutus’s own integrity against him. Later, in “Act III, Scene 1”, on the conspirators’ way to the capital with Caesar, Cassius almost backed out of the whole charade because of his own dishonorable cowardice. “Casca, be sudden, for we fear prevention. Brutus, what shall be done? If this be known, Cassius or Caesar never shall turn back, For I will slay myself” (Shakespeare

    Read More

  • Richard Nixon: Was He Truly Conservative?

    1090 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nixon’s run as an international crook finally caught up to him in 1972, when burglars were caught and arrested inside the Democratic national headquarters at the Watergate hotel complex in Washington. Nixon attempted to cover it up, but eventually he was found caught in his own web of lies, and was forced to resign in 1974 (Lecture 30, December 12). Nixon’s promises of a return to normalcy were shattered with these revelations. The confidence in the Presidency that he had hoped to restore was even lower than it was when he entered office. If the 1960’s were defined by political and social instability, then Richard Nixon did nothing but further the sixties into the 1970’s.

    Read More

  • Brutus and Antony’s Use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the beginning of the Book Cassius uses anecdotes of Caesar’s weakness and faults, argumentum ad antiquatum, and ethos on Brutus to persuade him to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar, this works on Brutus and shows that anyone, even people as stoic as Brutus, can be persuaded by appealing to their motivations. Cassius, a very suspicious character thru ought the play tells Brutus to “be not jealous on me” (827), in the quote he tells Brutus to not be suspicious of him because he is just a friend who genuinely cares. Cassius does this to put himself on Brutus’ side and not seem like a distant person, this allows him to criticize Caesar and suggest that he is a bad influence on Rome which appeals to Brutus’ desire to keeping Rome safe. After setting himself up as a friend to Brutus, Cassius uses harsh anecdotes on the weakness of Caesar to show that he isn’t fit to rule Rome. Cassius recollects on a time when he and Caesar went swimming in the river Tiber and Caesar screamed “Help me, Cassius or I sink” (828) to de...

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Why Cassius is the Greatest Manipulator in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    818 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cassius is the greatest manipulator in the play, Julius Caesar. Cassius, an envious and ambitious man, believed that the ruler of Rome, Julius Caesar, had too much power over the senate and the people. To put an end to what he considered to be conspiracy, he fabricated a plan to eradicate Caesar for the sake of Rome. Cassius uses manipulation as his weapon of attack using Brutus as the target. Cassius succeeds in persuading Brutus, one of Caesar’s good friends, to join their plot. Cassius uses flattery, self-gain, and the people of Rome to manipulate Brutus into his likings.

    Read More

  • Character Motives in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this play, Cassius’ motivation is completely inspired by evil and hatred. His jealousy of Caesar and greed for power drives him to create the conspiracy and start plotting the death of Caesar. While talking to Casca, he says, “What trash is Rome, / What rubbish and what offal, when is serves / For the bas matter to illuminate / So vile a thing as Caesar!” (I.iii.109-112). This shows some of the true feelings Cassius has about Caesar. He believes that Caesar is not worthy of his power and does not want anyone to hold more power than him. Although he justifies the killing of Caesar as an act for freedom from tyranny, his motivation is full of bad intent. In an attempt to disguise his true motives, Cassius convinces Brutus, an honorable and well-respected man, to join the conspiracy. He tells Brutus, “Brutus and Caesar-what should be in that “Caesar”? / Why should that name be sounded more than yours? / Write them together, yours is as fair a name. / Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well. / ...

    Read More

More about Deception, Betrayal, and Exaggeration

Open Document