Dbq Miss Strangeworth's Letter

After Miss Strangeworth failed to mail the letter, and left too soon, the Harris boy had noticed the letter on the ground and pick it up. After reading the address and receiver for the letter, the Harris boy suggested the idea of delivering the letter himself with the intention for delivering the news from Miss Strangeworth. Although this seemed like a grand idea to the Harris boy, Linda was contrasting of it and did not care for the letter. So the Harris boy suggested that he deliver the letter himself, for the purpose of, their being excellent news within the letter. When Don Craine received the letter, he perhaps presumed that Miss Strangeworth should receive one back, since the information given in her letter was unpleasant, and harsh.

After writing his letter, Doc Craine probably went back and mailed the letter before morning, so that, Miss Strangeworth would receive it by morning (page 214, lines 307-326).
During that night the letter from Miss Strangeworth was noticed by Doc Craine, he would have had many emotions and feelings hurt after reading the letter.

After pondering on the hurtful letter, Doc Craine would have took actions into his own hands, and also, would have written the green letter back to Miss Strangeworth. Moreover, he would’ve been so angry that he revealed the truth to the town about the unlabeled letters. Whenever Doc Craine finished writing the letter, he would have mailed it back to her hoping that Miss Strangeworth would read it, and then, he appeared to her house to ruin her roses. Which would give purpose and reasoning to who ruined the flowers of Miss Strangeworth and why. Consequently, Miss Strangeworth had received what she deserved, and Doc Craine got justice for the

letter.
Yes, I do agree that the title, “The Possibility of Evil” is a more powerful title than “The Existence of Evil.” Having there be the existence of evil present already does not supply suspense, henceforth, the knowing of their being evil present. If there is evil present already, the plot would not be as suspenseful and intimidating as it should be. If there is a possibility of evil, it supplies information that there might be evil, unknowing where it is from. In the story, the old lady, Miss Strangeworth, is foreseen as a bright lady, but is later revealed to be the town’s blackmailer (page 210, lines 176-193). And also when Miss Strangeworth received the letter from an unknown source, directing that her roses were ruined, it was tragic, harsh, and evil action (page 214, lines 341-344). When you want to supply suspense, it would be exceptional to make the evil questionable, or unknown. It’s better to be unsuspecting of the evil that to be known to the presence of evil, especially when describing such evils like these.
In a real life scenario, it would be alarming to be unknown of the evil to be known of it. If I walk into a situation knowing of the evil I might comply with, it would not be as intimidating or suspenseful. However, if I walked into a situation with their being a possibility of evil, I would unsure of what I was going to receive, which would make the given situation vivid, and unnerving. A situation in relation to my expression is when I was punished for my terrible grades. Instead of knowing of what I was going to be lectured about when I arrived home, despite of the given situation, I was unknown of what I would face when I walked into my home after coming home from school. So yes, I do agree that “The Possibility of Evil,” is a better title than “The Existence of Evil” for this reason. The title can also set the tone for the book or story, as well as the plot, depending on what the story is about. If it had the title of “The Existence of Evil,” I would have expected there to be evil, and also, the plot would not have been admirable, and moreover, as thrilling as any other suspenseful book.
No, her motives were valid, and yet despite of her terrible demise, she only intended good intention by her letters.

In the beginning, Miss Strangeworth presents herself as elder of the town, and furthermore, considered herself to be superior compared to the rest of her town. Yet despite this, Miss Strangeworth never intended to be a tyrant, but rather, a strong symbol of mannerism for her town (page 204, lines 9-14). After having confrontations with other townspeople, we later find out that, in the home of Miss Strangeworth, that she was the town’s blackmailer (page 210, lines 176-193). Yet her only intention was to inform her people to always be alert, and also, to keep their eyes open for the evils that may be lurking in the town. Although these could have prevented evil to arise in the town, the evil finally had met Miss Strangeworth in the end, leading to her roses’ demise (page 214, lines

341-344).
Yes, in my definition should be en evil person, compared to the people I know and do, she does label as corrupt to me. Despite who she appears to be, and seems to be, on the inside, she is a wicked lady who would hurt others with harmful letters just to inform them of the bad surrounds, or involves them. If I were to have somebody be caring to be, I would like them to be sincere about themselves, or moreover, to show me who they really are. So if I do cross paths with somebody alike Miss Strangeworth, I could avoid being hurt or troubled, by their destructive letters, words, or actions. Allowing somebody like Miss Strangeworth into your life would be very inconsiderate if you understood who she really was. So yes, I would consider Miss Strangeworth to be the definition of evil, based on who she tries or pretends to be.