Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Monuments
Monument are created to commemorate a person or event. In order for monuments to effectively pay homage to deep sacrifice, a group or agency must take into consideration; a monument’s location, size, and material.
When a group or agency contemplates the creation of a monument, they must consider the monument’s location. The location should be easily accessible or a place that contributes to the importance of the person or event being commemorated. The monument of Christopher Columbus in Riverside Park, Easton, Pennsylvania, is a perfect example of an easily accessible to the public monument.(Doc B) This accessibility, will effectively increase the appreciation for; Christopher Columbus, the Riverside park and the monument itself. The mislocation of a monument can raise controversy among people.
…show more content…
When a Holocaust museum was planned for construction on The Mall in Washington, D.C, the community was furious at the location. People explained that a “museum dedicated to the memory of the Holocaust would be built in the United States” was in appropriate considering that United States “did little” to stop the holocaust.(Doc E) Therefore, groups or agency must carefully consider: a monument’s location, to avoid raising controversy. After a location is been picked, the group or agency must take into consideration the size of a monument.
The size of a monument is essential in commemorating a person or an event. There is no “one size fits all” for monuments, due to their varying purpose. When a Holocaust museum was being designed for construction in Washington D.C., protesters said that the museum was too large. The purpose for the museum was to remember the Holocaust, not overpower The Mall or its visitors.”(Doc E) By downsizing the museum, they were able to effectively create a place of remembrance, for the holocaust without taking away from other memorials on the Mall. Although downsizing the museum in (Doc E) was the optimal choice to complement and fit other monument in the Washington D.C. mall, downsizing does not apply to every monument. Some monuments are designed to be gigantic, thus their large size contribute to their importance. For example: Mount Rushmore National Memorial is a very large monument, for very important and influential presidents during the history of the U.S. Thus, agency must take into consideration the size of a monument to effectively commemorate a person or
even. The material of a monument can make or break the appreciation for a monument. Thus, a group or agency must take into consideration the monument’s material in order to fully commemorate a person or an event. When designing the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C, May Lin put a lot of thought into the material of the monument. She finally settled for “black granite in order to make the surface reflective and peaceful”(Source G) The mirroring effect of the granite, enhanced the remembrance of those who sacrificed their lives in vietnam by creating another world of reality and remembrance. Choosing the wrong material can result in negligence and total discard of a monument. when planning for “The Maine Lobsterman”(Doc F) Maine run out funding for the monument. The monuments was still made “the artist just slapped a coat of bronze paint over the plaster model”(Doc F) this decision would result in the negligence and vandalization of the plaster statue. It was not until H. Elroy Johnson died, that statue was finally made of brass. Therefore, a group or an agency must take into consideration the material of a monument in order to effectively pay homage to a person or event. In conclusion, when designing a monument to commemorate or give homage to a person or event, an agency or group must take into consideration a monument’s; location, size, and material.
Monuments and museums are arenas of public history and for the formation and articulation of identities and narratives.[1] Decisions taken as to the formation of museums and the selection, display and organisation of exhibits are influenced by criteria which are not necessarily politically neutral; these may especially involve devices of political elites to emphasise aspects of communal togetherness and thus exert control over communities.[2] Memory and commemoration of past events and generations is by its nature a political and contested act, especially in sharply divided societies.[3] It is no surprise that recently established governments and states should particularly concern themselves with the production of such forms of festivities, commemorations, and monuments.[4] As rulers of a sharply divided society, unionist elites in Northern Ireland in the aftermath of its eventful creation in 1920-1 had particular reasons to concern themselves, and did concern themselves, with such strategies of power.[5] The integration of the province's Catholic minority may have been, or may have been felt to be, beyond the rulers of Northern Ireland;[6] but this very fact heightened the importance of preserving the highest possible degree of political unity under unionist hegemony among the Protestant majority.[7]
America’s history-both good and bad-has much to teach us. Taking down, destroying these monuments is erasing, rewriting the physical symbols of the nation. This type of cultural whitewashing is inglorious. We can treat these monuments as a cautionary tool to remind ourselves what we are and what we are not. The cost forebears paid for the freedom of the nation should be remembered; therefore, people should retain these statues to remind of themselves what these monuments represent.
The need to memorialize events or people is complex; in some cases, monuments honor moments of great achievement, while in other cases, monuments pay homage to deep sacrifice. A monument's size, location, and materials are all considerations when planning and creating a memorial to the past. Examples of such feats are the Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial, and even Mount Rushmore. For the latter of the memorials, an entire mountain was dedicated to the faces of four major presidents.
A memorable monument is a historical structure that represents a significant person or event. They are designed to show the importance of either the person or event. Monuments are intended to last forever so the subject will never be forgotten to society. The factors that should be considered when creating a memorable monument are that the subject must be powerful and meaningful to society and the design should resemble the significance of the subject. These factors help communicate the magnitude of the individual or group’s sacrifice, as well as honor moments of great achievement in history.
Memorials not only remind people about specific events and leaders, but also sets history in stone for future generations. When creating and building a memorial for a specific person or event, many factors should be considered. Sometimes, these memorials honor great achievement while others pay homage to deep sacrifice. However, there are many ways to memorialize people or events, locally or nationally, ranging from pictures to monuments. When considering to memorialize a person or event, agencies and groups should consider purpose, location and size of the monument in order to effectively pay homage to deep sacrifice and great achievements.
Eye catching pieces like a giant reflective bean, or a woman holding a torch with a crown, or four men fighting to hoist our nation's flag. Each different place has it's own cultural viewpoints and personal taste. This shows the importance of history especially to Americans. We value our history and try to captivate it in a form that will be visible for ages. The different aspects going into the creation of buildings or monuments is simply put, monumental. To create a monument, the place, the theme and the response should be gauged beforehand to ensure it's building. Humans are inspired by their own doing just as much as they are by nature. Just who and why a statue is memorialized can be a very difficult topic to discuss, as will be discussed using varying sources.
Americans have often used art to symbolize the relationship between themselves and their history. Therefore, art is used to honor and remember someone or an event where people died, through a memorial. As an example, The National World War II Memorial is a memorial to honor and remember the people who served in World War II. The success or failure of a memorial depends on how well it represents the image that people have of a certain person or event. Especially in America because they find the construction of a national monument so controversial that no memorial has been erected in the National Mall without a discussion. The National World War II Memorial on the National Mall was a poor addition; its location diminishes the formerly open space between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, its design is vague, and it is a poor choice even when compared with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. A very good start.
The buildings that I chose to do were an advert for a powerful civilization. The emperors showed their power that they are the great leaders with a lot of money that could get many workers as they possibly could to erect their pattern of monument. The emperor Augustus used propaganda to ensure a vast base of support leading up to his renunciation in 27BC. The Roman emperors also built all these monuments in regard to public entertainment for their political advertising.
The Holocaust Memorial Museum was built to honor those who were directly affected by the Holocaust. “Never shall I forget these things, even if I am condemned to live as long as God himself. Never” Elie Wiesel (“Holocaust Encyclopedia”). While some believe the building of the museum was a political act for President Carter, others were very optimistic of the outcome. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum was a marvelous achievement for this country and those who dedicated their time and effort to this wonderful building. This museum not only has an interesting history and opening, but exhibits inside are nothing in comparison to the statistics of this grand foundation.
Our country faced a devastating change and the simplicity of the monument was the most ethical way to go about it. While many may disagree with me for whatever reasons my ethical perspective is situational meaning that my decisions or opinions vary given the situation. I have always made loved ones and love in general my top priority in life and I never had a word for my ethical stance until recently in the class. Johnson took into consideration what the family of the president wanted and what the citizens of the United States wanted and created a simple yet beautiful monument. I think that this is a good reflection on responsible use of persuasion because both parties; the viewers and the architect, were actively apart of the creation of the
The need to memorialize events or people can be a complicated task. It is nearly impossible for one person capture all that that event or person meant to the world.In order for a person to be honored with a statue of museum to memorialize them, they must have really made an impact on the world. More often than not, people forget the grave sacrifices that were made by the many people who came before so that we can live how we do today. Three factors that a group or agency should consider when memorializing an event or person and in creating a monument are, respect, sacrifice, and size and location.
and the importance of their history. It is the first monument to be added to the National Park
The Hagia Sophia Built in or around 6th Century AD, the Hagia Sophia which means “Holy Wisdom”, was originally a cathedral in Constantinople (which is now Istanbul Turkey) during the Byzantine Empire. In the beginning it had served as a cathedral for the Constantine. The original was built of wood. During the riots of 404 AD the Hagia Sophia was mostly destroyed by fire and was rebuilt in 405 AD. The second church was destroyed during a revolt in 532 AD.
I‘m not saying that this monument should be taken away and destroyed, I‘m saying that these people who want it on display should spend less time protesting and more time raising money to have a place built for their precious monument.
Monuments are a symbol of a significant time in history. Monuments represent life, death, success, and struggle just to name a few. They have become as important to society as the events they represent. They bring history alive to new generations and memories to those who experience them firsthand. Monuments create a bridge between generations. Many parents feel a certain indescribable joyfulness when they see the look in their child’s eyes they had went they viewed the same monument.