Dbq Essay On Heightened Security

715 Words2 Pages

Security is the state of being free from danger or threat. The increase of terrorism in America had aroused a legislative request for heightened security. Strengthening security would also lead to invading Americans' privacy. Privacy is the state of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. While numerous people feel that security for the whole nation dominates over the privacy of an individual, many others think that heightened security measures will invade their personal privacy and will allow the government to exceed moral limits. Regardless to the political circumstances or the climate, protecting individual rights is predominant to strengthening security in several ways. Americans constitutional rights would be taken away and people would no longer feel safe anywhere if they believed that someone was always watching them. Also, protecting individual rights is paramount to allowing the government to overstep their boundaries and abuse their power. Documents A, B, …show more content…

"Free societies turn their backs on privacy at their own risk, for privacy is one of the fundamental human rights from which all other human rights are derived, (C)." If you take away individual rights like privacy, there would be no way to tell if someone is listening in on your conversation or watching you. For instance, document C states that "people can't have honest discussions with one another if they think their words are being overheard. The freedom that allows Americans to have their own opinions would be taken away because if people can not trust anything, they will say what everyone else is saying and do whatever everyone else is doing. There would be no individuality and everyone's identity would be

Show More
Related

  • Analysis of Bruce Springsteen's Song Devils & Dust

    2028 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...ty and privacy are essential for it. Also, I am a dual citizen and in my other country, which is Brazil, we are still somewhat haunted by the shadow of a dictatorship that just ended in 1987. So I know people who have suffered the consequences of lack of liberty. Even so sometimes I am doubtful of my opinion, even though I try not to express it often and defend liberty as much as I can. Whenever I see some terrible act, whether terrorist or governments do it, I think if there would be a way to stop that with restrictions on certain liberties and more surveillance. However, if we do that, if we overreact, we destroy our values, destroy a part of ourselves and fill our soul with devils and dust.

    Read More

  • Sacrificing Freedom for Security

    1407 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our nation seems as if it is in a constant battle between freedom and safety. Freedom and security are two integral parts that keep our nation running smoothly, yet they are often seen conflicting with one another. “Tragedies such as Pearl Harbor, 9/11 and the Boston Marathon bombings may invoke feelings of patriotism and a call for unity, but the nation also becomes divided, and vulnerable populations become targets,” (Wootton 1). “After each attack a different group or population would become targets. “The attack on Pearl Harbor notoriously lead to Japanese Americans being imprisoned in internment camps, the attacks on 9/11 sparked hate crimes against those who appeared to be Muslim or Middle Eastern,” (Wootton 1). Often times people wind up taking sides, whether it be for personal freedoms or for national security, and as a nation trying to recover from these disasters we should be leaning on each other for support. Due to these past events the government has launched a series of antiterrorist measures – from ethnic profiling to going through your personal e-mail (Begley 1). Although there are times when personal freedoms are sacrificed for the safety of others, under certain circumstances the government could be doing more harm than good.

    Read More

  • Goffman Self Analysis

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    A clash that arises when we talk about privacy is the question of what should be given preference - our rights or our safety (which the State claims is taken into consideration and is usually the driving force for the creation of surveillance projects). Those who agree with the State assert that they’ve got nothing to hide and therefore have nothing to worry about . Trent Lott, a former Senate majority leader asked rhetorically whether the reason for

    Read More

  • The Patriot Act vs Civil Liberties

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...vil rights and losing protection. Protection is more important but unnecessary spying should not be tolerated. “The sad truth is that most Americans have already lost the battle when it comes to keeping personal information absolutely private.”( Lee, M.Dilascio, Tracey M.4).

    Read More

  • Civil Liberty vs. Security

    2180 Words  | 5 Pages

    Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the United States, once said “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” In America’s society today, some are willing to sacrifice their civil liberties in order to gain protection and security over some potential threat. Especially after the events of September 11th and several attempted bombings in U.S. cities. This sacrifice of individual freedoms such as the freedom of speech, expression, the right to information, to new technologies, and so forth, for additional protection is more of a loss than a gain. Citizens of the United States deserve equal liberty and safety overall, as someone should not have to give up one value in order to gain another. This concept of individual right goes beyond the simple idea of “individual comfort.” Personal liberties cannot be surrendered and are not to be compromised since these liberties are intangible. Individuals should not have their personal liberties exchanged for national security because individuals are guaranteed protection to these rights.

    Read More

  • Our Right to Privacy

    562 Words  | 2 Pages

    The privacy toward each individual is important. Without any privacy the democratic system that we know so well may not exist. It is fundamental to have the right to privacy. The defense and security need the right to privacy due to how they are created. Right to privacy was not an issue when our country was founded. Throughout those times the people knew their neighbors knew what was going on in their community. It was not like how it is now; drunk drivers, terrorist, or any other threats. During those times their only transportation that was used was horses. The government that we have now in place is what organized our society. (Right to Privacy)

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: Against Gun Control

    679 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are a number of reasons why this freedom needs to be protected. The number one and most important is to keep the individuality of the American people from becoming controlled by the Government.

    Read More

  • Tension between Freedom and Security

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    Tension between freedom and security has been prevalent in America since its founding. In 1798, President Adams responded to the threat of war with France with the Sedition Act, which made opposition to the government practically illegal. During the Civil War, President Lincoln suspended the writ of Habeas Corpus to prevent disputes regarding the legality of arrests. President Roosevelt authorized Japanese internment during World War II. Clearly, our government has often felt at liberty to put personal freedoms on hold for safety and control.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Surveillance Cameras

    1926 Words  | 4 Pages

    Terror is becoming a major threat to the security in the United States following the September 11 attack. The government has increased its security, and one way to do this is to increase surveillance. Now, part of the citizens believes that the government has gone too far in the use of these cameras. The surveillance cameras are now being used for many other purposes, some of which are not related to security in any way. Top government officials can now monitor actions of people they suspect to be a threat to the country, but others think that this action is spying on the innocent citizens who are busy developing the country in their own private ways. There is a limit to which this security measures become a public pain. As much as people may want to feel secure at all times in every place they go, they also value their privacy. That is one of the essentials that define a human being. Even wild animals in the forest enjoy this right to be private. No one wants to be monitored at all times because it creates a psychological feeling that he or she is in a prison. One feels that their world has been narrowed to the corners of their own house. In fact, some members of the society claim that this privacy inside one’s house is lost as soon as the curtains on the window are removed due to the presence of

    Read More

  • Personal Essay On Security

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    Security is only a personal psychological feeling that we can only feel for ourselves. I believe it is an idealistic illusion we can only pursue. You may feel safe from threats because you live in a neighborhood with a low crime rate, safe drivers, a security system, but your neighbor could feel exactly the opposite. If it were an unsafe neighborhood, you could feel secure even though the crime rates are at an all time high, it's all a matter of personal feelings.

    Read More

  • Essay On Surveillance Privacy

    1195 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, the modern use of surveillance assists public safety, but not as much as they are an invasion of privacy. Americans should be aware of their civil liberties and protect them. There should not be a fine line between public safety and an invasion of privacy. NSA programs are illegal and overbroad. Do not let the U.S. constitution be un-followed. Remember wherever you are, “Big Brother is watching you.”

    Read More

  • Edward Snowden: The Pervasiveness Of Mass Surveillance

    2279 Words  | 5 Pages

    First of all, mass surveillance can invade personal privacy. Snowden eloquently says, “arguing that you do not care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is equal to saying you do not care about free speech because you have nothing to say” (Kleeman, “In One Quote, Snowden Just Destroyed the Biggest Myth About Privacy”). In other words, the right to privacy, just like the right to speak freely, is essential for all people. He added that people who think in such a way do not really understand the basic foundation of human rights. Basic and innate rights mean that nobody should be required to justify why they need the rights : one person agreeing to disregard one’s right to privacy does not mean everyone should follow suit. Also, Rand Paul, who conducted a filibuster about the renewal of the Patriot Act, claims that the majority of American people want to see mass surveillance reformed or ended (Kleemman, “In One Quote

    Read More

  • Privacy Vs Federalism

    244 Words  | 1 Pages

    When we think of privacy the first thing that pops into an individual’s head is normally independence, or the ability to do what one pleases without someone else controlling the situation. When it comes to the constitution a lot of the amendments have to do with privacy and what can or cannot happen when it comes to invading it. Some may not be familiar, but federalism is a very important fact when referring to privacy rights and the constitution. Currently, this country has a different way of working the federal system. Different laws are applied when it comes to state and the actual national government. Privacy in my eyes, is one of the most important pieces when it comes to rights of the people. Without the system that we have set

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Government Surveillance

    801 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin with, most Americans do not realize how much the government trespasses on their privacy. Some might argue government surveillance is necessary to control terrorists and harmful information exposed at the government. However, there needs to be a boundary between oppressing personal freedoms of citizens and protecting the well-being of our nation. The United States is a country that represents freedom around the world.

    Read More

  • Security Essay: What Is Human Security?

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    Security is what helps us, as individuals, to be individuals. It helps us sleep at night without a worry; it provides us food and keeps us healthy; it protects us from harm, be it internal, external or even Mother Nature’s wrath. It is something that gives us a sense of belonging and ownership. What is regarded as ‘security’ by each individual, translates to that of a community, a town, a city, a state, a nation and eventually the whole world.

    Read More

More about Dbq Essay On Heightened Security

Open Document