Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Security vs privacy personal rights
Surveillance and privacy concerns
Essays on the concept of surveillance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Security vs privacy personal rights
A friend once told me, “It is so ironic that I have a powerful job, but I can’t really take control of my actions”. As a supervisor in a gigantic company, he could not take control because his boss was watching him the entire time from the tiny camera installed in his office. Everyone dreams of his position, but the pressure of surveillance and mistrust lead him to quit. Closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs) are becoming increasingly common in major cities around the world. Closed-circuit televisions are TV systems in which records are not publicly distributed, but are watched mainly for surveillance and security purposes. According to James Vlahos from the Popular Mechanics’ Magazine, “There are an estimated 30 million surveillance cameras now …show more content…
Terror is becoming a major threat to the security in the United States following the September 11 attack. The government has increased its security, and one way to do this is to increase surveillance. Now, part of the citizens believes that the government has gone too far in the use of these cameras. The surveillance cameras are now being used for many other purposes, some of which are not related to security in any way. Top government officials can now monitor actions of people they suspect to be a threat to the country, but others think that this action is spying on the innocent citizens who are busy developing the country in their own private ways. There is a limit to which this security measures become a public pain. As much as people may want to feel secure at all times in every place they go, they also value their privacy. That is one of the essentials that define a human being. Even wild animals in the forest enjoy this right to be private. No one wants to be monitored at all times because it creates a psychological feeling that he or she is in a prison. One feels that their world has been narrowed to the corners of their own house. In fact, some members of the society claim that this privacy inside one’s house is lost as soon as the curtains on the window are removed due to the presence of …show more content…
There is a growing feeling that the presence of surveillance cameras within the country is the best way of combating crime, terrorism, and other acts that are prohibited by law. Surveillance cameras are also finding a new role in workplaces. During agricultural and industrial revolutions, there was a popular practice where supervisors were appointed to monitor employees and ensure that they did not engage in non-work related activities. This culture of close supervision came to an end in the twentieth century. In the twenty-first century, a new concept has emerged; leading to the creation of the performance contract where an employee’s worth is measured by their productivity. This new concept has gained popularity because employees are aware that they will be paid based on how well they work. They were aware that the top management trusts them, hence why they work with very minimal supervision. However, some companies are now using surveillance cameras to monitor their employees’ activities, which directly challenges this new popular concept. According to Welsh and Farrington, assistant professors in the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell, “many people no longer trust in the use of surveillance cameras in various institutions” (110). The lack of honesty and clarity between customers and sellers made surveillance
Adam Penenberg’s “The Surveillance Society” reminds Americans of the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and the instant effects the that attacks on the World Trade Center had on security in the United States. Penenberg discusses how the airports were shut down and federal officials began to plot a military response. Although those were necessary actions, they were not as long lasting as some of the other safety precautions that were taken. The Patriot Act, which makes it easier for the government to access cell phones and pagers and monitor email and web browsing, was proposed. Politicians agreed that during a war civil liberties are treated differently. From there, Penenberg explains that for years before September 11th, Americans were comfortable with cameras monitoring them doing everyday activities.
“There are about 3 billion phone calls made within the USA every day” (Romano). Now picture you’re calling your friend on the phone. Sometimes we can take small privilege like this for granted. Now imagine that the government is listening to every single phone conversation that we make. Why wouldn’t this scare you? I know it terrifies me. Wiretaps are a problem that concerns every single person in the country. But it isn’t just wiretaps; with a program called Prism the NSA has obtained direct access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple, and other US internet giants (Glenn). Everything we search for on Google, every message sent or received on Facebook, every item purchased on Apple is all seen by the NSA. The government is overusing their power to spy on its citizens and it needs to stop.
One of the sources used to disprove that body camera isn’t the answer includes Jamelle Bouie article, Keeping the Police honest. Mr. Bouie is the chief political correspondent at Slate who graduated from the University of Virginia with a political and social thought degree (Tumblr.com). His work consists of issues relating to national politics, public policies and racial inequality. His work has also been published in Slate online magazine, the New Yorker, the Washington Post and TIME Magazine (Tumblr.com). Slate is an online magazine that post about the news, politics, business, technology and culture (slate.com). In Jamelle article, Keeping the Police honest he talks about incidents where police officers were being recorded and took excessive
The constant eye of Big Brother invades the privacy of its members. The inevitable, looming screens at every turn, in every room, serve as a reminder that every move one makes is watched. Then when it is least expected, the voice behind the screen singles out a person and screams at them; the results lead to jumpiness and high levels of stress. A study shows that being watched “can change your behaviour and choices without you realising it.” (Goldman, “How Being Watched Changes You- Without You Knowing) insomuch, the telescreens work as a deterrent against breaking the rules. Everyone is far less likely to commit crimes since subconsciously they know that Big Brother is observant and they will have very little success in escaping should they be found guilty. This guarantees that the people will be wary of their speech, behaviour and facial expressions at all times. In fact the telescreens cannot be turned off, save for some special privileges given to the Inner Party which, turn into the catalysts for arrests for nothing but supposed delusions against the government. Taking away the privacy, makes the members feel vulnerable and therefore, easier to mold to Party
The feeling that someone is always watching, develops the inevitable, uncomfortable feeling that is displeasing to the mind. For years, the National Security Agency (NSA) has been monitoring people for what they call, “the greater good of the people” (Cole, February 2014). A program designed to protect the nation while it protects the walls within as it singles people out, sometimes by accident. Whether you are a normal citizen or a possible terrorist, the NSA can monitor you in a variation of ways. The privacy of technology has sparked debates across the world as to if the NSA is violating personal rights to privacy by collecting personal data such as, phone calls and text messages without reason or authorization (Wicker, 2011). Technology plays a key role in society’s day to day life. In life, humans expect privacy, even with their technology. In recent news, Edward Snowden leaked huge pieces from the NSA to the public, igniting these new controversies. Now, reforms are being pressed against the government’s throat as citizens fight for their rights. However, American citizens are slammed with the counterargument of the innocent forte the NSA tries to pass off in claims of good doing, such as how the NSA prevents terrorism. In fear of privacy violations, limitations should be put on the NSA to better protect the privacy of our honest citizens.
Since the terrorist attacks at Sept. 11, 2001, the surveillance issue often has turned away the table in the debate of individual privacy or counterterrorism. By passing the Patriot Act, Congress gave President Bush an immense law enforcement authority to boost U.S's counterterrorism, and the President used his enlarged powers to forward specific programs in order to reduce the threat of terrorism and defend the country’s safety.
The government has total control: every room has telescreens with hidden cameras, everywhere people look, propaganda posters are hung with the slogan “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU,” (Orwell, 1) and Thought Police snoop through people’s
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”-Benjamin Franklin. We live in an age where governments invade the private lives of its citizens in the name of safety. Ironically, anyone who displaying a hint of paranoia when it comes to government surveillance or secrecy is automatically labeled a conspiracy theorist or a kook. It seems that in the U.S., it has become frowned upon to believe that our government would ever infringe on our rights, unintentionally or deliberately. After all, they can’t, it says so in the constitution! But, alas, it turns out “Big Brother” has been very busy the past decade. It seems as though every year new government scandals arise, from cover ups to spying on U.S. citizens. Law enforcement and government agencies are slowly finding “loopholes” through problematic areas of the constitution, with little regard for citizens’ rights. It is our duty as citizens, to not tolerate violations of the law that our nation was founded upon. By examining history and other countries’ policies regarding privacy and freedoms, it becomes clear that if these breaches of our rights are allowed to go on, we will be living in a country of fear and oppression.
The breath-taking expansion of police power that the United States government took after 9/11 now poses as a troubling issue. Americans need to address the issues of government surveillance because it affects t...
Due to recent cases of police brutality in America, activists are urging police departments across the country to start using body worn cameras, or BWCs. BWCs are devices that can be worn by police officers to collect video evidence while they are at work. There are numerous studies proving the effectiveness of these devices, but many critics claim that they risk the citizens’ privacy by opening the possibility of tapes being released without their consent. Although many activists claim that there are already strict standards set for the release of BWC tapes, some worry that the current standards are insufficient for securely protecting the privacy of citizens.
People are exposed severally on the government gallery, and they are little things they can always do to protect them from such. Unregulated surveillance could in a greater manner strip individuals of their privacy rights, and by addition, restrict coming together of people, organizations and in such a comprehensive way that could vindicate us back to the most grievous errors in history swinging back to the present day (Boghosian 89). People, non-governmental institutions are living under such oppressive realms but cannot clearly articulate their concerns and issues that affect the society for fear of state cameras (Song
Surveillance is the monitoring of behaviour. In addition, surveillance system is the process of monitoring the behaviour of people, objects or processes within systems for conformity to expected or desired norms in trusted systems for security control (Cohen and Medioni, 1999). Video surveillance systems have existed 25 years ago whereby it started with 100% analogue system and gradually becoming digital system. The closed-circuit television (CCTV) camera is the most popular video surveillance because of its reliability and low price. The camera does not broadcast images but it records them, so that user can always check to see what occurred while they were away. It is widely used at public spaces and residences for security purposes.
Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place. ”(“5 Myths about Privacy”). The fight for privacy rights is by no means a recent conflict.
Theories of social control can also extend into the surveillance mechanisms of criminal and self-disciplinary actions by individuals in the workplace (Grey 1994; 479). An analysis of Michel Foucault’s theory on Panoptic techniques in the workplace, can be heavily related to the surveillance mechanisms of CCTV and the desired outcome of what these surveillance mechanisms seek to achieve. The Panoptic technique seeks to draw attention to the use of surveillance to bring attention to anti-social behaviours of people in society. This surveillance mechanism is relatable to CCTV, as CCTV is used to deter potential offenders from committing crimes and to promote a safe working environment, and to promote self-discipline. The panoptic surveillance
Along with Privacy and security comes the issue of terrorism, Constitutional rights, and Prisoners of War (POW). The privacy vs security debate has two sides to it. Many think that it has influenced governmental interaction with citizens. Sometimes the law focuses on the wrong interests. Just as security cameras are made for thief’s, there come along violations within a person’s workspace or personal life. Privacy emerged early on including Jewish and Roman laws safeguarding against surveillance. Once populations began to grow citizens around the world started filing complaints about noise and unlawful search and seizures. Security and Privacy become an internationally growing issue that affected the world. Security is known as a sort of Independence from danger. Privacy is a freedom from the Undesirable. “He noticed that the needle on his gas gauge was getting low and decides to pull over. As he walks into the gas station he pays for the gas with his credit card, steals a pack of cigarettes and a newspaper without the clerk knowing. B Horton proceeds out the doors and recognizes a security camera as he walks to his car. Later he is contacted and tried for theft. Some believe the camera was an invasion of his privacy but others say that Horton took from society” Webster 21) In America this was and still is a serious issue. The founders saw it coming and implanted laws against home invasions based on national security or to protect others. The fourth amendment in the Bill of Rights is one plan of action that the founding fathers implemented into the United States Constitution to give people a sense of privacy from law enforcement. Also the Fifth Amendment placed a specific procedure on how police go about arresting an individual. ...