Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversies around panpsychism
Controversies around panpsychism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For as long as they have existed, humans have had ideas about what the universe holds. Through the millennia they have come to know quite a bit about what is out there, yet the universe is so vast, the greatest human minds have not been able to find everything. However, thanks to a relatively new theory called panpsychism, there may just be an answer. David J Chalmers, an Australian philosopher and cognitive scientist, has written a research paper titled, “Panpsychism and Panportopsychism,” that may allow some more understanding on what really is out there, through his use of ethos, logos, and diction. Chalmers has an extensive background in consciousness, issues in the philosophy of the mind and language, metaphysics and epistemology, and …show more content…
This is the first sentence of Chalmers’ aforementioned research paper. Chalmers’ introduction goes over a bit of the history of panpsychism, as well as provides the name of a second research paper titled, “The Combination Problem for Panpsychism.” This second research paper is written as an anti-thesis to his focused thesis. This shows not only that he has no issue in finding evidence to support theories, but he can view a subject with intellect rather than emotion. This is not to say Chalmers has the mind of a machine. On the contrary, reading through his website, it is found Chalmers has quite the sense of humor, which adds to his likability as a …show more content…
His vernacular is quite high. However, there are a few examples specifically that show this. The first example comes in the third section of his paper titled, “Synthesis: Panpsychism.” According to Chalmers, “Macroexperience involves the instantiation of macrophenominal properties…” (Chalmers 7). His use of instantiation instead of simply saying evidence, shows a certain knack for language. Another example in the same section is as follows: “Type-A constitutive panpsychism holds that there in an a priori entailment from microphenomenal truths…” (Chalmers 8). A priori entailment means simply, an independent reaction, however a priori is the focus here. This phrase is 16th century Latin. Knowing a second language, especially a dead one, shows tremendous dedication, and adds a level of beauty to diction that is rarely seen
that he was insane and that "a person with a normal background who was brought
Not only is human connection vital to live a happy and joyful life, but it is necessary to create a legacy, and thus live on through others. But in order to do this, one must first overcome their ego and their sense of self. Once all of the “I” thoughts are gone, one can relate, but fully understand, the higher powers as well as other human beings around us. However, it is important to accept that we may never fully understand the driving force of this universe. While it can be experienced, and we can briefly get an idea of what it is, it is impossible to define these concepts in words, because we don’t have a language that transcends what we can understand. And though many recognize that these concepts could never be fully understood by the human brain, determined minds continue to ask questions that will never have an answer, “pushing their minds to the limits of what we can know” (Armstrong,
Chalmers, David John, comp. Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. New York: Oxford UP, 2002. Print.
Throughout history there has always been discussions and theories as to how the universe came to be. Where did it come from? How did it happen? Was it through God that the universe was made? These philosophies have been discussed and rejected and new theories have been created. I will discuss three theories from our studies, Kalam’s Cosmological Argument, Aquinas’s Design Argument, and Paley’s Design Argument. In this article, I will discuss the arguments and what these arguments state as their belief. A common belief from these three theories is that the universe is not infinite, meaning that the universe was created and has a beginning date. Each believe that there was a God, deity, or master creator that created the universe for a reason. They also believe that
"Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness." Encyclopedia of Consciousness. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2009. Credo Reference. Web. 26 April 2011.
Rosenthal D 2002, 'Explaining Consciousness', in Philosophy of mind classical and contemporary readings,Chalmers D J (eds), Oxford University press, New York
For instance, his view is strong in the way that utilizes empiricism to provide a skeptical insight on causality. It is refreshing to see an alternative perspective such as empiricism after reading Descartes and Leibniz. Yet, his use of empiricism may be his downfall as well, since even he states “simple ideas are not always…derived from the correspondent impressions.” Also, his argument that thought is bounded senses and experiences do not take into account metaphysical concepts like malleability.
An underlying theme present throughout the series is the possibility that our existence is not the only one. According to current theories in physics, it is entirely possible that our universe is just one of many universes f...
Renner, T., Feldman, R., Majors, M., Morrissey, J., & Mae, L. (2011). States of Consciousness. Psychsmart (pp. 99-107). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[4] Guven Guzeldere (1995) 'Consciousness: What it is & how to study it' Journal of Consciousness Studies vol.2, no.1; pp. 30-51
To respond to this shortcoming of consciousness, some might attempt to find an absolute absolved from one-sidedness, from sheer relativity to the knowing subject. Others will not respond this way, however, instead spinning off into apathy, subjectivism, or nihilism (59). Those who do attempt to find an objective truth most often turn to science. Some have suggested that the intellect is an ...
...own to “There is an x such that x is a present king of France, nothing other than x is a present king of France, and x is bald,” (On Denoting Mind 1905). This is an example of how his views of senses affect his view on knowledge, we cannot take the originally quote at face value of what it is, just like we cannot truly accept the fact that something is a couch and not a bed, we must break it down and use our logic of other things and infer a conclusion from this information. We need to make sure each individual facet of the statement is true before concluding the whole statement is true, or else we could be misled to believe something that is not true.
Davis, Tom. The Theories of the Mind Lectures. Ed. G. Baston. Birmingham University. 9 Nov. 2000
Gardner, H. The Mind's New Science: A History of Cognitive Revolution. New York, Basic Books, 1987.
Thus, in our search to understand that which is intangible, we come to realize that the definitions that we seek are further than meets the eye. For although many may say they understand what is and is not real, they often rely on a surface level of understanding. Yet when the curious seek out a deeper grasp of the words real, surreal, and reality, many would discover that they are, in fact, unsolvable. Thus we will never know the ultimate truth, we only can get closer and closer to