Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetoric in David Foster Wallace commencement speech
Rhetoric in David Foster Wallace commencement speech
Rhetoric in David Foster Wallace commencement speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rhetoric in David Foster Wallace commencement speech
In the words attributed to Socrates in Plato’s Apology, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” David Foster Wallace expands on this idea in his “Kenyon College 2005 Commencement Address,” pointing out the importance of awareness and escaping the natural, default-setting of an unconscious, self-centred life. While commencement speeches are typically epideictic—celebratory—in nature, Wallace takes a deliberative rhetorical stance. According to Fahnestock, deliberative discourse is used in order to persuade in “the best possible course of future action” (1998, p. 333). Abizadeh argues that character and emotion are “constitutive features of deliberation,” and that deliberation cannot be “reduced to logical demonstration” (2002, p. 267). In his speech, Wallace uses a blend of Aristotle’s persuasive appeals—logos, pathos, and ethos—in order to effectively persuade his audience. The most obvious appeal used by Wallace is Aristotle’s logos. Logos is an appeal that is perceived by the audience as logical or rational. Connors (1979) maintains that there is a difference between the presentation of logical arguments in writing and in speech. According to Connors, in speech, each word is “shaped, sent, and given up forever” (p. 288) after it is spoken. The audience has no way of returning to hear part of the message again, and therefore the message must be understood at the time of delivery or “the speech is a failure” (p. 288). In order for speakers to avoid this failure, Connors proposes that speakers must be repetitious of logical concepts. Wallace uses repetition to add to the effectiveness of his speech in a few ways. The words unconscious and conscious are repeated throughout the speech, as the message of the speech reli... ... middle of paper ... ...1) are what help Wallace establish his credibility since, of course, the ability to connect knowledge to lived experience is a persuasive resource (Myers, 2003). Deliberative discourse is used to persuade an audience in the best course of action and Wallace effectively does so with his “Kenyon College 2005 Commencement Address.” The speech given by David Foster Wallace is widely discussed and analyzed. It is thought provoking and leads to higher ontological questions such as “Isn’t questioning everything the essence of what it means to be alive?” (Roiland, 2009, p. 97). Wallace clearly states and restates his thesis as the important of awareness and self-reflexivity—of choosing to think consciously. Wallace’s thesis is essentially his logos appeal, but it is his clever entwining of pathos and ethos appeals that enable him to effectively persuade his audience.
Edlund, John R. Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade.” Cal Poly Pomona, n.d. Web. 6
In the argument that college is not for everyone, Reeves establishes his ethos through both extrinsic and intrinsic support while maintaining clarity using the logos approach. Pathos, however, lacked the same amount of control. By using an excess amount of pathos while approaching rhetoric with a condescending tone, the author diminished the persuasiveness achieved by combining the techniques. This resulted in a limited audience due to the insulting nature of the closing remarks geared to the very audience he was trying to reach.
One of the many types of rhetorical strategies present in the speech is Logos. Logos is a type of rhetorical appeal that utilizes information to persuade the reader into believing the author’s argument. King utilized Logos in the speech as an effort to persuade the
In his essay, “Deciderization; 2007,” David Foster Wallace Argues: Part of our emergency is that it’s so tempting to do this sort of thing now, to retreat to narrow arrogance, pre-formed positions, rigid filter, the ‘moral clarity’ of the immature. The alternative is dealing with massive, high- entropy amounts of info and ambiguity and conflict and flux; its continually discovering new areas of personal ignorance and delusion. In sum, to really try to be informed and literate today is to feel stupid nearly all the time, and to need help. That’s about as clear as I can put it. What Wallace is trying to say that the people of today’s world are either Objective or subjective and nothing in between; therefore, the objective type of people are all
During the debate, we covered all three elements of the rhetorical appeals: pathos, logos and ethos. In the beginning, Jiale talked about the Second Amendment, stating that United States citizens have the right to keep and bear arms. She then applied this concept with a historical event of the independence war with Britain. From referring to the history, this established the ethos of our group. Audience knew that we have done research about the topic and our arguments are reliable. During the debate, we paid close attention to other
It is common for human beings, as a race, to fall into the comforts of routine – living each day similar to days before and days to come. Unfortunately, it is often too late before one even realizes that they have fallen into this mundane way of living in which each day is completed rather than lived, as explained by David Foster Wallace in “This Is Water”. This commencement speech warned graduating students of the dangers of submitting to our “default settings” of unconscious decisions and beliefs (Wallace 234). However, this dangerous way of living is no new disability of today’s human race. Socrates warned the people of his time: “A life unaware is a life not worth living” and who is to say he wasn’t completely right? A topic of long debate also includes the kind of influence that consciously-controlled thoughts can have on the physical body. A year after Wallace’s speech, neurobiologist Helen Pilcher, published “The New Witch Doctor: How Belief Can Kill”, which explains the influence of the mind and individual beliefs on the quality of one’s life. Together, both authors illustrate how detrimental a life lived unaware of one’s own thoughts and beliefs can be on the body and spirit. And though it is easy to live by
“I am obsessed with silence because of the silence of the world. I do not understand why the world was silent when we needed its outcry. I always come back to that problem. Where were the humanists, the leaders, the liberals, the spokesmen for mankind? The victims needed them. If they had spoken up, the slaughtered would not have succeeded in his task.” - Elie Wiesel
David Foster Wallace, author of the essay “Authority and American Usage*,” praises and advocates for “good” writers who have a strong rhetorical ability, which he defines as “the persuasive use of language to influence the thoughts and actions of an audience” (Wallace 628). To have a strong rhetorical ability, an author needs to be aware of whom their audience is, in order to present their information in a way that will be influential on their audience. Wallace recognizes that an author who applies a strong rhetorical ability will be able to connect with the audience so that they respond “not just to [their] utterance but also to [them]” (Wallace 641). An author needs to take into consideration not just content, syntax and grammatical structure (their “utterance”) but also how their character will be perceived by their audience. A positive tone will make the author seem more pleasant and relatable, whereas a negative tone connotes arrogance and pretentiousness. That is why it is crucial for an author to recognize that an audience will respond to “them” and not just their “utterance,” as an author’s appearance to their readers can also shape how impactful their writing is.
Aristotle believed that rhetoric is a skill habit of mind that is, in itself, morally neutral and can be used for good or ill. He believed th...
In This is Water, Wallace effectively uses logical reasoning and the parable of the religious man and the atheist man to explain how consciousness is a choice, not an unalterable state. To do this, Wallace states that in many cases, “A huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong and deluded.” Using logical reasoning, Wallace’s own admission reminds his audience that they are also often wrong, as, logically, humans are not perfect and make periodic mistakes. Once he establishes that people can be wrong, he returns to the parable of the two men and claims “…the exact same experience can mean two totally different things to two different people, given those people's two different belief templates and two different ways of constructing meaning from experience.” This idea is familiar to his educated audience, as he claims it is one of the primary foundations of a liberal arts education. Thus, Wallace uses his audienc...
-If you were in the same class I was in 2017 you may know why I named this like this. Also if you read The Things They Carried or know your vocabulary. Not just the name are familiar but the the whole story was about, WAR!!!. But this is much toxic and less world wide.
During a commencement ceremony, David Foster Wallace addresses graduating students with a query of how to think critically, away from their default parameters of thought. The challenge laid by Wallace was to begin learning how to break away from an egocentric method of thought--away from being able to narrowly look at a situation and observe how it may have a personal effect, in preference for a train of thought that looks at “why is this happening and how does it affect everyone involved”? This is supported by multiple analogies that Wallace covers, such as trying to comprehend why someone is driving defensively in an SUV, or why someone is driving recklessly and in a hurry. Wallace goes as far as to reverse the egocentric train of thought
In David Foster Wallace's Kenyon Commencement Speech, he speaks towards the graduating class of 2005 about the benefits in having liberal arts major, but that is not the only topic he talks about. David Foster Wallace also points out reasons as to why routine is extremely difficult, dreary, tiring, boring, time consuming, and frustrating. In Mike Rose's, "Blue-Collar Brilliance," he is conversing to the audience the true definition of intelligence and how to gain it. Mike Rose is fond of the idea of routine and believes that routine has a lot to offer to individuals. Mike Rose is able to extend this idea by relating it to his mother, Rose Meraglio Rose, and his uncle, Joe Meraglio. Even though David Foster Wallace and Mike Rose take two different
With this idea of critical awareness and critical thinking, Wallace’s speech makes a lot of good points about life and being able to enjoy life, despite the reality of it. His speech, while it is presented in this somber
When trying to persuade others, it’s important to think about the natural instinct of a person and their decision making process. I believe humans use rhetoric to purposefully communicate with each other. The way that one goes about this persuasion varies, however, whether it’s through the heart, the mind, the intellect, or the purpose of one’s life, it must come across to the recipient in a way that will appeal to their human nature. Recently, I was introduced to the art of rhetoric. I was shown many of the examples and definitions from great historians such as Aristotle, George Campbell, and Kenneth Burke. While reading Rhetorical approaches to college writing, the essay written by Jacob Babb introduced me to the art of rhetoric. In his essay, he gave the definitions and views of the three historians. All of the definitions were in agreement that “the primary motives of rhetoric is to ‘induce action’ or to persuade” (pg. 4), however, George Campbell’s definition