Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of cultural diversity essay
Effects of cultural diversity essay
An essay about discrimination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Adrienne Johnson Ms. Vetro English 101 9-26-15 Essay Americans Fear Diversity The United States is known as free and diverse country including in race, ethnicity, culture, gender, and religion. People fail to have the good intention of becoming more diverse with other people who are absolutely different. Therefore, segregation still exist in the United States, not just the difference in skin color, but the differences in interests, personalities, and communities. There is solution to this problem because people will not reach out of their comfort zone to others who are not like them. People fail to take advantage to know others because of being rejected and judged. Americans are more interested in others who are mostly like them so diversity …show more content…
does not really exist in the United States. The United States tries to be a good example of diversity.
The United States may look like a diverse country, but, overall it is not because people fail to demonstrate the true meaning of diversity. In David Brooks’ essay “People like Us” notes, “Maybe somewhere in this country there is a truly diverse neighborhood in which a black Pentecostal minister live next to a white anti-globalization activist, who live next to an Asian short-order…(62). Brooks provides a sarcastic quote about a perfectly diverse neighborhood in America, which is a joke. There are not many neighborhoods that are absolutely perfect filled with different occupations and different lifestyle. People usually live in neighborhoods where they can fit in to make their life easier. As Brooks adds: “But in the information age, the late writer James Chapin once told me, every place becomes more like itself”(63). Brooks supports a comment from late writer, James Chapin, that a neighborhood or a community can be like itself, meaning with the same people, personalities, or same lifestyle, and nothing different (62). A community may have its own lifestyle because the people who live in a particular community are similar. As a result, people feel comfortable being around others who are just like them because they will not feel judged or …show more content…
rejected. Diversity can be defined as people joining from different races, nationalities, and genders to form organizations and communities.
People can view diversity as a good matter, but they do not take the chance to experience different aspects outside of what they are normally accustomed to. Instead of people taking the chance, they get too comfortable staying in their own bubble that includes others who are just like them. As Brooks argues, “We are finding places where we are comfortable and where we feel flourish. But the choices we make toward that end lead to the very opposite of diversity”(63). Brooks explains that Americans are most comfortable in places where they can feel wanted and accepted, but accepting people who are similar is the opposite of diversity. People choose to be with their associates with whom that has interests in common. Brooks also expresses that “The United States might be a diverse nation when considered as a whole, but block by block and institution by institution it is a relatively homogeneous nation”(63). The United States may be considered as the only truly diverse country because of all of the different nationalities represented here. However, many American communities and organizations look the same; as a result, it is the opposite of
diversity. The lack of a bond between races, genders, and cultures is due to distrust, stereotyping, and cultural beliefs, and language barriers. When these problems are not supervised people could lead to the inability of agreement, and the inability to take united action. Human nature can be described as characteristics shared by all humans, and Brooks states, “What we are looking at here is human nature. People want to be around others who are roughly like themselves”(65). Human nature means people live in primary groups like communities, and these communities are made up of people who are all the same. They have the same morals, behaviors, and characteristics. People do not realize that communicating with other people who are just like them is the lack of cohesion with other people who are different. Americans do not know the meaning of diversity if they feel comfortable with only people who are the same as they are. Brooks explains, “It is appalling that Americans know so little about one another”(65). Brooks makes a point that Americans do not know so much about other people who are different. Americans know themselves and the people who they associate with mostly. Finally, Americans fear getting rejected or judged of differences. Finally, America became a multi-cultural country, but the people who live in the country do not express this diversity. As a result, American citizens do not know the true meaning of diversity. Diversity should be a positive matter, not something to fear. However, people feel comfortable with people who they can relate with. To fix this solution, instead of being with the same people, people should experience differences, in cultures, beliefs, and perspectives. In this society, though people do not usually choose to experience different aspects from their everyday lives. There is really not a solution to the lack of diversity because people fear getting hurt and rejected so Americans fear diversity. Brooks, David. “People like Us.” Acting out Culture. Ed. James S. Miller. New York: Bedford/St. Martin, 2015. 62-66. Print
Every individual in society and in a community is unique in their own ways, and their diversity shows up in many ways. Some of these ways include: religion, race, socioeconomic status, lifestyle, and so on. Everyone’s backgrounds are different, and this is what creates diversity in people. Even though everyone might not be the same, only by uniting everyone can we create the big picture. It’s like a puzzle—even though people are different, we can come together to create a big picture that couldn’t be created by puzzle pieces of the same shape. To me, diversity symbolizes the unique backgrounds that we come from. Every individual in their communities and in their society are influenced by their background—and this can come from various reasons. If someone comes from a different socioeconomic background, or lifestyle, their thought processes and their view of life might be much more different than mine. Their reaction to a certain situation can be much more different than mine, and it is important for me to see all these viewpoints in order to be a more informed member of my community. Everyone is diverse in their expression, style, and
The roles of diversity and uniqueness are a crucial part of society today. Without these qualities being enforced into the American character, people won't produce thoughtful ideas that could help shape America. Both authors illustrate the evil effect of conformity in society and support how one should be self reliant, not phony, and confident in their own beliefs and ideas.
For instance, Brooks himself confesses that he has himself in the past gravitated towards places where he believed he could be most comfortable in and where he also felt he could be his true self. He further states, that the majority of his friends are middle-income level Caucasians and conservative Christians. Brooks’ main argument in the essay is that many individuals in the United States often do not even bother to show that they would like to build diverse communities. The essay, Brook says, is about the public discourse on race and is meant to make us ponder about the stereotypes and assumptions we have when we think about diversity or people from other ethnicities. It is also meant to make us look where we fit in the diversity debate? Are we truly for the integration of
This essay will discuss the intrinsic relationship between diversity conceptualization and social integration presenting a response against David Brooks’ essay entitled “People Like Us.” In order to do this I will discuss four crucial elements: the influences of different definitions of diversity in cultural unification, Brook’s ideas about social groups working together and social groups coexisting together, the importance of diversity, and the influence of diversity in social changes. I will examine why some people have the perception that our American society ignore or see as unworthy diversity. Thus, I will dispute Brook’s view stating that our society disregards diversity, and Americans just pretend that it is important to them.
Despite what many may say Segregation is not always associated with a negative connotation. The New Book Of Knowledge defines segregation as the “separateness of two or more groups living within the same society.” However, Segregation could refer to the separation of salt and water. However, segregation can also be derogatory and racist. Throughout American History one would hardly have to search hard to find any civil rights movements that fought for the equality of races. Segregation was used as a way to make people of color seem inferior to whites and keep people of color from rising in an economic or social standpoint. The source of segregation is prejudice felt by a dominant group that feels superior to the other. Segregation usually
Diversity is part of the American lifestyle. America is a country built on capitalistic principles, where a countries’ economy is controlled by a small number of people. People who tend to have power in the society tend to separate themselves from the rest. Looking back at different time period of American history diversity has shaped up the lives we live as Americans, whether it is because of gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, socioeconomic background, and capabilities/ disabilities, there is always diversity in society. Although, diversity is increasingly being viewed positively, and as much as people are proud of their differences. There will always be a way for human beings to diversify themselves into groups in which share similar interests.
Embracing your diversity, or the presence of it, creates unity in America because so many different cultures are present. Eric Liu from The Washington Post supports this notion with a statement taken out of one of his articles, “The world is white no longer and will never be white again.” This quote shows that the culture of America has been blended so much that there is no singular race’s culture that is dominant. “Only when I was able to think of myself as an American, no longer an alien in gringo society, could I seek the rights and opportunities necessary for public individuality.” As soon as he embraced that he could be an individual but still flow with everyone he discovered unity between him and all
Forty-seven years ago the Civil Rights Act was passed to end racial discrimination in America. And later on the 24th Amendment to poll taxes, then the Voting Rights Act to allow every man to vote and not be discriminated against. Black Power, the Nation of Islam, and the Southern Christian Leadership conference were just some of the groups that tried to end segregation and promote the African American race. Although these groups did help end it, it still exists in today’s world and many studies have been done to prove it in the past couple of years.
One of the most significant issues which the United States has dealt with for decades is the issue of racial segregation. In a post-Civil Rights era, there is a common tendency to assume that racism is no longer a pressing social concern in America due to the gradual erosion of whiteness. During the late 1800s and much of the 1900s, segregation had been a controversial and divisive issue throughout the country. This issue stemmed from the separation of African Americans and whites during a period when slavery was recently abolished and Blacks were still looked down upon. This was the era of repressive Jim Crow laws, where strict segregation was mandated and racial segregation was regulated. After the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of racial segregation as long as it was “separate but equal.” However, most facilities and services provided to African Americans were inferior and substandard compared to those offered to whites. This led to a massive uproar among the African American community, which paved the way for the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was created which fought for civil rights among African Americans. Although after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed any form of discrimination and segregation, the topic of segregation and integration still remains a contentious debate in America. Three writers who have opposing ideas on this topic are Daniel T. Lichter, Michael S. Murray, and Danielle Holley-Walker. Daniel Lichter opposes the idea of integration in his article “Integration or Fragmentation? Racial Diversity and the American Future.” He explains the Third Demographic T...
The United States used racial formation and relied on segregation that was essentially applied to all of their social structures and culture. As we can see, race and the process of racial formation have important political and economic implications. Racial formation concept seeks to connect and give meaning to how race is shaped by social structure and how certain racial categories are given meaning our lives or what they say as “common sense” Omi and Winant seek to further explain their theory through racial
Legal segregation may have ended more than 50 years ago, but in many parts of the country Americans of different races are not neighbors. According to a recent State University of New York at Stony Brook census ranks Long Island as the third most racially segregated suburban region in the country, behind the suburbs of Newark and Cleveland. America learned a long time ago that separate is not equal. Racial uprising in U.S. cities in the late 1960s revealed what many blacks already knew, the country was moving toward two different society. One black and one white, separate and unequal.
Make no mistake—we are increasing our happiness by segmenting off so rigorously." Brooks goes on with, "But the choices we make toward that end lead to the very opposite of diversity." Which is actually relatively profound. True diversity is hardly ever reached by natural means as all life seems to operate on a pendulum. True diversity can only be inculcated by a governing body, be it with laws regarding diversity in the workplace, schooling, or ever government agencies. True diversity will never occur naturally in these fields because we as individuals all fall victim to a sense of
Modern American culture praises the concept and thought of diversity through cultural awareness, but fails to actually follow through with the act of diversifying within the society. This is due to the fact that people want to be around other people who think, act, look, and behave in ways that are very similar to their own. Americans are not only drawn towards people who look like them, but they are also drawn towards those who hold similar values and positions. This desire to be near others who share similar traits and values goes against the desire to be diverse. Today's society is constantly calling for more diversity, yet no one desires to act upon this call and put it into practice correctly. Instead of truly being a diverse society, Americans prefer to surround themselves with others who share similar traits and values. It can be hard to truly grasp just how badly Americans do not want to live in a diverse community. Michael Jonas provided s an essay that includes a study conducted that can be used to explain this American desire. Jonas does this by introducing Robert Putnam, a Harvard political scientist, who conducted a study based on data collected from interviews of around 30,000 people from all over America. Putnam's study raises question concerning why the diverse communities have less people willing to help in their community. Putnam concluded that the communities with "higher diversity" also experienced "lower social capital" (Jonas,18). Putnam explains that the more diverse a community is the less trusting and involved are its members. This distrust in people is rooted in the concentration on the idea that has been repeated since childhood that focused on what makes people different. Jonas makes the point that in Putnam’s study the seemed to be no connection between distrust
Thus, powerful institutions have given power to perpetuate segregation and racist ideals. These laws are ingrained into our society, leaving little room for minorities to be able to challenge
When most people think “Diversity” they think of the most communal characteristics: such as: Age, race, gender, sexual orientation, body type, ethnicity, and a person’s