Dark Age Dbq

1101 Words3 Pages

There are many theories surround the fall of Rome and the descent into the ‘Dark Age”. It was commonly believed for some times that the collapse was due to Germanic invasions. Henri Pirenne argues against this in his book Mohammed and Charlemagne. He claims that the economic and agricultural depression that sent Europe into a ‘Dark Age’ was due to the disruption of a sea based economic system by the rising power in the Middle East, Islam. Michael McCormick supposes that Pirenne was incorrect in his findings. Islam did not disrupt trade, but instead trade flourishes through Islam.
For some time it was believed that Rome fell due to the raiding of barbarian Germanic tribes. Henri Pirenne saw this theory to be flawed. According to Pirenne the Germanic invaders had no desire to destroy the empire. In fact, they want to share in its benefits and integrate into the society. The Germanic people want to …show more content…

McCormick concurs that there was a drop in trade in the beginning of the seventh century but by the second half of the seventh century trading in places like the North Sea was a bustling place of trade. He continues to support his theory on the quick reemergence of trade through a series of documents that show by the middle of the eight-century there were at least six new ways to reach the Middle East. If trade is stagnated by Islam why is there a development of new trade routes? For McCormick the answer is simple, trade is booming.
But we run into a problem here, if trade is booming why is there a shortage of gold minting during this time? McCormick addresses this issue by stating that silver coinage replaces gold coinage in the beginning when trade becomes more localized to fit well into small-scale transactions. So how then are the goods coming in being paid for? According to McCormick the Europeans have something of greater value to the Muslims than silk, spices and gold, they have

Open Document