Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drinking and sexual assault
Sexual assault caused by drinking
Sexual assault caused by drinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drinking and sexual assault
-Classification Daniel Cooper is being charged with one charge of sexual assault against a fellow unnamed junior sailor. The maximum sentences for sexual assault is 10 years in prison if charged as an indictable offense. -Summary Cooper pleads not guilty against his charges of sexual assault with his story being slight different from his junior’s story. Cooper’s story starts off with him and his junior drinking the night before the incident, Cooper told the judge that on the way back to their sleeping quarters he had noticed he had became aroused. He then asked him junior he wanted to get “intimate” and he claimed his junior agreed, he had also claimed that he asked once again while they were in their bunks before he performed oral sex with …show more content…
Then again the law states that when intoxicated one can not give consent and as other crewmates/sailors claimed that the two had been drink consent the junior couldn't of given consent. Cooper also could’t use that he truly thought that his junior had consented as it can’t be a defense if he himself was also intoxicated during the incident.Cooper did have oral sex with his junior and the junior claimed that he had no idea it was happening until he had awaken from his slumber. Now for Cooper’s 22 month sentence I personally think it might be a bit too much as all Cooper had supposedly done to his junior was give him oral sex, onces the junior had an idea of what was going on he quickly/easily stopped Cooper from continuing and Cooper didn't use any essives forces during the whole incident. If I were to give Cooper a sentences It would be closer to 8 months in prison rather than 22. I find it unfair that Cooper would have to go to prison for 22 months for an honest mistake and he didn't even force himself onto the victim, cause any injuries or even tried to continue his sexual assault after the victim had stopped him. Even if it was an honest mistake he was indeed intoxicated thus his sentences would be longer than if he were to receive a sentences while not being
If convicted, he faces up to eight years in prison on the most serious charge, which is a second-degree felony.
I am currently doing an internship with the local police department. I was had a broad selection of different areas I could work for under the local police department. I ultimately chose to work under a small Innocence Project. This team is with four other students and defense attorneys in the local area to look at other cases that were found guilty which they have been convicted of a crime they did not do. After looking at many different cases, we chose to look at one case in particular, his name is Willie Johnson. Willie was convicted at 18 years-old for raping a 16-year-old girl after a school dance. He was convicted over 15 years ago. Willie told the court that he was trying to break into the victim’s car to get a CD player that was out in the open, which explains why Willies fingerprints were all over the car door. Willie explained he left because there was a large man who was in a dark area. After
A forty-six-year-old man named Lawrence M. Bradford had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Syracuse, New York. Bradford claimed that police officers Chad D. Frederick and Shane M. Ryan entered his residence without a warrant, although his roommate Shara Bixby, let the officers into the house. Mr. Bradford said that the officers forced Shara Bixby into letting them into the residence after she had told police that he was not home. The two officers were there to arrest Mr. Bradford for his part in the assault of another man. Bradford pleaded guilty in Jefferson County Court in August 2013 to second-degree assault. Mr. Bradford and another man was accused of stealing money and property from Jeffrey Jewett in Watertown, New York, while striking him on the head and body, causing a cut above the victim’s
Sexual assault and sexual misconduct are other issues that must be addressed and dealt with in law enforcement. Sexual assault of an inmate by an officer should never happen under any circumstance. However, when it does officers should be dealt with immediately. There is never a situation where sexual contact with an inmate should be allowed or over looked. Sexual contact with an inmate should be grounds for immediate termination, as well as charges filed against the officer. In 2008 a court of appeals in Michigan found in favor of ten female inmates who were sexually abused by guards at Michigan's Scott Correctional Facility (Heenan, 2009). These women were awarded $15.4 million. In another case of sexual harassment and rape in another Michigan prison, eight women were awarded $8.5 million for the abuse they sustained while incarcerated (Heenan, 2009).
Finally, the argument about the glasses swayed everyone just enough to withdraw the guilty verdict and set the boy free. My next claim is in regards to the “old man” juror. If it were not for him voting not guilty the second time, the boy would have been found guilty. He said the reason he voted that way was because of one juror standing up to the other 11 jurors. He felt that everyone needed to hear all of the arguments because they were dealing with a man’s life.
After reading The Odyssey people may think Odysseus is a idea hero, Chris Kyle is the real hero. His elite marksmanship allowed him to save many of his brothers in arms. He made good decisions, while still following order given from command. He procured his skills throughout his childhood, his father bought him his first rifle, a bolt-action .30-06 Springfield, when he was 8 years old. Chris Kyle, the “American Sniper”, is a hero because his decisions were based solely on his comrades well-being, and with that he saved many lives.
... believed in the innocence of the young man and convinced the others to view the evidence and examine the true events that occurred. He struggled with the other jurors because he became the deviant one in the group, not willing to follow along with the rest. His reasoning and his need to examine things prevailed because one by one, the jurors started to see his perspective and they voted not guilty. Some jurors were not convinced, no matter how much evidence was there, especially Juror #3. His issues with his son affected his decision-making but in the end, he only examined the evidence and concluded that the young man was not guilty.
Were there any instances featured in the film where a plea deal was offered by the prosecution, but not accepted by the defendant, resulting in a significant prison term? If so, explain the case. Do you think the amount of time served in this instance would have been fewer years had the defendant accepted the plea deal? Explain your response. In the case of Patsy Kelly Jarret, she rejected a plea offer offered by the prosecution that resulted in a significant prison term. “In 1973, 23-year-old Kelly Jarrett, a North Carolina resident, drove to Utica, New York with a friend, Billy Ronald Kelly, for a summer-long vacation. It was only when the police showed up at her door three years later, Jarrett says, that she learned that during their New
Douglas W. Curtis was indicted on four counts of Rape of a Child, a Class A felony. This case arose after the victim, who was twenty-nine years old at the time of trial, came forward with allegations that the petitioner, her father, raped her when she was a young girl. At his trial, Petitioner was represented by John.
The crime of indecent assault and battery occurs when an attacker, has non-consensual physical contact with a person in a sexual manner. This could be any unwarranted physical contact to a person’s private body. This assault is punishable to up to five years in prison.
Now as a part of his sentencing there is also a mandatory curfew that he must maintain or he will be sent to the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ). Furthermore, he received this form of sentencing because he had not been in any form of major trouble in the past and his council argued that issue. There is also the fact that he will have to take a drug test every time he goes to see his probation officer for his mandatory visit. Now this was one of Jason options when he went to court because he was looking at facing an indeterminate commitment which means he would have been committed to a juvenile facility for an indefinite time but it would not exceed his 21st birthday. He could have also been advised or sentenced to perform community service, supervised visits, a drug rehabilitation program, a marine institute or group home program as well as school attendance program. Now all of these programs could have been one of his required sentences if he had no other offenses or referrals and maintain his curfew for his previous crimes and even though, he did not receive any of these options the judge also stated that because of the simple assault charge. He could have placed him in a Placement Boot Camp for youth which, is a form of military basic training program for juvenile, a Violence Prevention Program, retail theft program for the shop-lifting and community based probation.
In 2004 BJS developed uniform definition of sexual violence. Incidents on inmate-on-inmate sexual violence were classified as either nonconsensual sexual acts or abusive sexual contacts. Incidents involving staff were separated into staff sexual misconduct or staff sexual harassment. In 2006, it was found that about 36% of the reported allegations of sexual violence involved staff sexual misconduct, 34%, inmate-on-inmate nonconsensual sexual acts, 17%, staff sexual harassment, and 13%, inmate-on-inmate abusive sexual contacts. It was found that these percentages were nearly unchanged from those reported in 2005. Upon investigation, most allegations were unsubstantiated or unfounded. Sadly, the most common outcome of investigations is that there is no...
On June 28, 1990, Mark E. Jones, a public school teacher from California, was charged with twenty-eight counts of lewd (lustful) conduct with four boys under the age of fourteen. Two of those boys, Sammy and Bobby, were his adopted sons and the other two boys, Andrew and Kenny, resided in the same neighborhood as him. Jones had oral intercourses with these children for two years before being arrested. In his trial, Jones denied the allegations and said that his two sons and Andrew were trying to accuse him of the molestation because he caught them performing the acts on each other (Jones). At the end of the trial, Jones was found guilty on twelve counts of lewd conduct, found not guilty of twelve counts, hung jury on three counts, and one count was dismissed before the trial. Jones was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
PER REPORTER: Marcel said he is concerned about his son (Landon Myles) because his mother has not been allowing him to see the child. He said this is not his first time making a report in regards to this situation. He said most of the time he does not know how his son is doing because Conesha want answer his calls. He said he understands that as a father he has to find out what is going on with his son for himself. However, he said Conesha makes it hard for him to do so when she uses their child against him. He said he pays child support and is supposed to have visitation rights to see his son every other week. However, he said that he has not seen his son in three weeks and he has no idea how to get in contact with Conesha. He said she will
After reading the letter, he heard knocks at his door. Agent Weber stood there and explained to Michael every question he had. When Michael was done asking question, Agent Weber told him that the VNS still needs him to locate Kaine once again. Michael gladly accepts the invitation and asked for food.