DNA And DNA Fingerprinting

723 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How has DNA helped solve crimes

DNA tells us who we are and what we are and tell us what everything around us are too. The world can't be known if we do not understand what DNA is. DNA is the building life in the living system. Without DNA we would not be able to tell what apart from what. People been trying to find out what DNA look likes for years. It takes people like Freidrich Miescher, Watson, Crick, and many more to find out and put the pieces together on what DNA look like. DNA was able to change court decisions on old cases were they did not have the technologies to find DNA samples as we do today. DNA helps with crime investigation and DNA fingerprinting is the way to go to find better evidences.
Many people build the road of to the DNA structure that it is known today as. Around 1868, Freidrich Miescher isolated something no one have ever seen before from the nuclei of cells during this time. He called the compound "nuclein," which is in today it called nucleic acid. Two years before this a Czech monk Gregor Mendel, was experimenting with peas and was able to show that certain traits within the peas, such as size or color, were inherited in different packages. Today these packages are now called genes.
By the late 1940s , the people who were in the scientific community were aware that DNA was most likely the molecule of life. The scientific community knew that DNA have four bases which are adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine, but one thing they didn't know is what the DNA structure look like. Then come in Sosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins, who were using X-ray to find out and understand the physical structure of the DNA molecule. In 1949, Ervin Chargoff, showed that each organisms have different amounts of DNA, but the amount of adeni...

... middle of paper ...

...eople did not have the technology to find people DNA to see if they did it or not. After 27 years of him being in jail that they did a DNA test and found out he was not the murderer and was free to go.
In November 28, 1994, Lynn DeJac was found guilty of strangling her daughter during a night of drinking. She was later be free because new DNA evidence reveal that it was not her that kill her 13 year old daughter, but Dejac's former boyfriend, Dennis P. Donahue. She was one of the first person in the nation to have her conviction for murder overturned based on DNA evidence.
DNA and crime investigations has come hand to hand on this one. If it was not for DNA crime investigation would be a lot harder because you would not be able to tell if someone actually did the crime or not. Also DNA is what we are today. It last for generation and give us Intel on who we are.

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of DNA Fingerprinting

    1124 Words  | 3 Pages

    Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an acclaimed extraordinary discovery that has contributed great benefits in several fields throughout the world. DNA evidence is accounted for in the majority of cases presented in the criminal justice system. It is known as our very own unique genetic fingerprint; “a chromosome molecule which carries genetic coding unique to each person with the only exception of identical twins (that is why it is also called 'DNA fingerprinting ')” (Duhaime, n.d.). DNA is found in the nuclei of cells of nearly all living things.

    Read More

  • Case of Kirk Noble Bloodsworth

    1714 Words  | 4 Pages

    DNA is the blueprint of life. It stores our genetic information which is what is in charge of how our physical appearance will look like. 99.9% of human DNA is the same in every person yet the remaining .1% is what distinguishes each person (Noble Prize). This small percentage is enough to make each person different and it makes identifying people a lot easier when its necessary. DNA not only serves to test relationships between people it also helps in criminal cases. DNA testing in criminal cases has not been around for many years if fact it was not until the early 1990s when the use of DNA testing for criminal cases was approved and made available. By comparing the DNA of a suspect and that found in the crime scene a person can either be convicted of a crime or they can be exonerated. This method of testing gained more publicity in the 1984 case of Kirk Noble Bloodsworth a man who had been convicted of the rape and first degree murder of a nine year old girl in Maryland. His case was a milestone in the criminal justice system since it involved the use of new technology and it also raised the question of how many people had been wrongly incarcerated for a crime they did not commit.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Dna Evidence In Murder Trial

    2109 Words  | 5 Pages

    Therefore, DNA evidence has help solve cases that could have been closed and no justice would have been performed. Here is an example from Dave Phillips the article “Judge Rules DNA Evidence Admissible in Royal Oak Murder Trial.” presented in the Oakland Press News. Phillips writes that the judge made a rule that DNA evidence should be admissible in a murder trial. A man was accused of killing an elderly woman in her home in Royal Oak. The attorneys of the guilty party, Alan Wood, tried to keep DNA evidence out of this case. In the end of his article he tells the reader that by using DNA evidence in this murder trial man guilty party went to jail when he could’ve been free without the ruling of the judge. The pros of having DNA evidence in murder trials would mean of catching the real killer and having justice for the families of the victims which they

    Read More

  • DNA Testing in Crime Scenes

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    DNA, or deoxyribonucleic exists in all living organisms, is self-replicating and gives a person their unique characteristics. No two people have the same matching DNA. There are many different forms of DNA that are tested for situations such as criminal. Bodily fluids, hair follicles and bone tissues are some of the most common types of DNA that is tested in crime labs today. Although the discovery of DNA dates back to 1866 when Gregor Mendel proved the inheritance of factors in pea plants, DNA testing is relatively new and have been the prime factor when solving crimes in general. In 1966, scientists discovered a genetic code that made it possible to predict characteristics by studying DNA. This lead to genetic engineering and genetic counseling. In 1980, Organ was the first to have a conviction based off DNA fingerprinting and DNA testing in forensics cases became famous in 1995 during the O.J. Simpson trial (SMC History , 2011).

    Read More

  • The Forensic Science: The History Of DNA In Forensic Science

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    DNA in forensic science has been around for a long time. DNA has had help in solving almost every crime committed. There have been a lot of crimes where people are raped or murdered and the person who did it runs free. Scientists can collect the littlest item they see at the scene, such as a cigarette butt or coffee cup and check it for DNA. People have spent years in jail for a crime they didn’t commit till DNA testing came into effect. People are getting out of jail after 20 years for a crime they didn’t commit, cause of the DNA testing. DNA has helped medical researchers develop vaccines for disease causing microbe. DNA has become a standard tool of forensics in many murders and rapes.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of DNA Fingerprinting

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    DNA samples from hair, blood, skin cells etc. found at the scene of a crime can be manipulated and DNA fingerprints produced. These can be linked to that of a supposed criminal, through a database, providing scientific evidence, which can be used in courtrooms in order to help determine the guilt (Brendan McGuigan, 2015). The other main benefit is that it is used for linking paternal relationships. The DNA is inherited from the offspring’s parents, half from mother and the other half from father. DNA fingerprinting can be used in legal cases involving adoption and parenthood issues to solve the rightful parent (Lovekar, 2011). Another benefit that DNA fingerprinting brings is personal identification. It could be used in identifying bodies, which are unidentifiable due to a natural disaster or battle. If a DNA database was formed, a DNA fingerprint could be created and then the body identified through comparison on the database (Thomas Menino,

    Read More

  • James Watson and his Contributions DNA and Genetics

    956 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1951, Watson attended a meeting at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, where he heard the outcomes of the Hershey-Chase experiment. He was then convinced that DNA was the genetic material. He realized that if the structure of the DNA molecule was understood, it would be possible to suggest that ge...

    Read More

  • sss

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    DNA testing is one of forensic sciences core techniques. Everyone has there own individual DNA profile, even identical twins. DNA is in every cell of our body. In the 1980s, a British scientist named Sir Alec Jeffery's, developed DNA profiling. Our DNA can be separated from human cells found at a Crime Scene, with perspiration, blood, skin, the roots of hair, semen, mucus, and saliva. The Colin Pitchfork case was the first murder conviction established on DNA profiling evidence.

    Read More

  • DNA Profiling

    817 Words  | 2 Pages

    DNA profiling is used in a variety of ways, such as establishing proof of paternity, or identifying siblings. While DNA contains material common to all humans, some portions are unique to each individual; thus, DNA testing can help solve crimes by comparing the DNA profiles of suspects to offender samples.

    Read More

  • Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations

    2857 Words  | 6 Pages

    "Using DNA to Solve Crimes." U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice. (September 9, 2014). Web. 29 May 2015.

    Read More

  • Overview of the Importance of DNA

    1575 Words  | 4 Pages

    Simply put, DNA contains the instructions needed for an organism to develop, survive, and reproduce. The discovery and use of DNA has seen many changes and made great progress over many years. James Watson was a pioneer molecular biologist who is credited, along with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, with discovering the double helix structure of the DNA molecule. The three won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1962 for their work (Bagley, 2013). Scientists use the term “double helix” to describe DNA’s winding, two-stranded chemical structure.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of DNA Profiling Process

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    DNA profiling is a process used to identify individuals. Usually we hear about law enforcement officials utilizing DNA testing to apprehend and eliminate individuals from a case. However, there are several pros and cons of DNA testing. This process helps “clear the name of the innocent” to help those who have been wrongfully accused of a crime. This evidence can also help those who have been accused of a crime and put behind bars. DNA testing proved to solve many cases that have went unsolved, this is better known as cold cases. In Illinois, Governor George Ryan in the year 1988 gave DNA testing to inmates who were on death row, which led to 13 of the 25 being cleared from death row. DNA evidence from the crime scene (even cases many years

    Read More

  • James Watson Research Paper

    265 Words  | 1 Pages

    The DNA molecule is shaped like a twisted ladder. James Watson and Francis Crick solved the structure of DNA.Scientists, like Rosalind Franklin also helped to make this discovery.The model is called a double helix because two long strands twist around each other like a twisted ladder.

    Read More

  • Problems With Dna Research Paper

    538 Words  | 2 Pages

    Deoxyribonucleic acid or as it has become known DNA is defined in our text as “The basic building code for all of the human body’s chromosomes” it also states that DNA is found in every cell in a person’s body and is unique as fingerprints to each individual. The first time DNA was used according to “History of DNA Testing in Criminal Cases” written by J. Hirby. “DNA was first used in a criminal case in England in 1986. DNA samples collected from the men living and working within the neighborhood of two rape and murder scenes resulted in two positive outcomes. The one man original convicted was proved to be innocent and the guilty criminal was caught. One year later, DNA was first used in a United States criminal case in Florida. The forensic evidence collected from a rape victim was positively matched to a suspect’s DNA and when presented in court, the suspect was found guilty of the crime.” DNA, over the last twenty years has become one of the most well-known types of forensic evidence tools.

    Read More

  • DNA Fingerprinting

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    DNA, short for deoxyribonucleic acid, determines the function and structure of all living things. The molecule is made up of many nucleotides, structures that consist of a deoxyribose sugar, a phosphate group and a nitrogen base (either adenine, cytosine, thymine or guanine). The nucleotide...

    Read More

More about DNA And DNA Fingerprinting

Open Document