More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of forensic science in investigation
DNA and crime investigation
Forensic techniques that use chemistry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of forensic science in investigation
There are many techniques in the Criminal Justice field that are used to solve cases. DNA testing is one of the best ways to solve cases. Each individual has there own unique DNA profile. Also, in this case DNA testing proved that an innocent person did not do the crimes. Furthermore, I feel that Colin Pitchfork deserves life in prison without a chance of parole. DNA testing is one of forensic sciences core techniques. Everyone has there own individual DNA profile, even identical twins. DNA is in every cell of our body. In the 1980s, a British scientist named Sir Alec Jeffery's, developed DNA profiling. Our DNA can be separated from human cells found at a Crime Scene, with perspiration, blood, skin, the roots of hair, semen, mucus, and saliva. The Colin Pitchfork case was the first murder conviction established on DNA profiling evidence. A fifteen year old girl named Lynda Mann was raped and murdered, after going missing on the grounds of Carlton Hayes psychiatric hospital in Narborough, Leicestershire, in November 1983. A semen sample was taken and showed it was a type only in ten percent of men. Also, the sample was from someone with type A blood. Although, a suspect was not able to be found. Three years later, another fifteen year old girl, Dawn Ashworth, was similarly sexually assaulted and strangled. This occurred in a nearby village of Enderby. Semen samples were taken and showed the same blood type. A seventeen year old named Richard Buckland, with learning disabilities who worked at Carlton Hayes psychiatric hospital, was spotted near Dawn Ashworth's crime scene and new unreleased information about the body. In 1986, Buckland confessed to Ashworth's murder but not Mann's. Scientists used Sir Alec Jeffery's new techniq... ... middle of paper ... ...ide evidence to a jury. The jury discusses the evidence that was provided and make a decision, which all have to agree on. The evidence has to be beyond a reasonable doubt. I just can not believe that people can get convicted of a crime if their DNA is not present at a crime. With that being said, I feel that DNA profiling is a great technique to use to convict a guilty person for the crime they committed or to exonerate an innocent person for the crime they did not commit. In conclusion, I feel that my opinion is justified because I can not believe that our society would falsely convict innocent people. Every human being is unique and does not have DNA like any other person. Forensic scientists use DNA profiling to help find criminals. If no two people have DNA alike, I feel that this is one of the most accurate ways to convict a criminal beyond a reasonable doubt.