Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Us history the cuban missile crisis
World conflict and wars caused by religion (essay)
The cause and effect of the Cuban missile crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Us history the cuban missile crisis
Culture is an essential part of conflict and conflict resolution. Cultures are what shapes our perceptions, attributions, judgments, and ideas of self and other. We are all born individuals; then we are raised, socialized and sensitized to the norms of our respective civilizations which led us to identify consciously and unconsciously to our societies. In 1993, Samuel Huntington wrote an influential paper that was published in Foreign Affairs titled “ Clash of the Civilizations.” Huntington states, “The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural (Huntington 1993, 1).” According to Huntington, cultural identities bind people together more fastidiously than those identities of nation state citizenship. Religion and culture are huge factors in people’s motivations from business, to politics, down to personal interactions. At the macro level Huntington adds, “Differences in religion and culture create difference over policy issues ranging from human rights to immigration to trade and commerce to the environment (Huntington 1993, 5).” Huntington describes the current riffs between civilizations as fault lines, elaborating “fault lines between civilizations are replacing the political and ideological boundaries of the Cold War as the flash point for crisis and bloodshed (Huntington 1993, 29).” The fault line between Christianity and Islam has seen conflict for 1,300 years but today we are witnessing the fault lines reemerge and deepen. In this paper I will discuss what historical events and policies led to the current conditions in Sudan, how the conflict in Sudan illustrates and supports Huntington’s theory, and I will examine how this conflict has effected United States foreign policy.
Wh...
... middle of paper ...
...Economist - World News, Politics, Economics, Business & Finance. http://www.economist.com/node/347120 (accessed November 4, 2011).
Pakenham, Thomas. The scramble for Africa, 1876-1912. New York: Random House, 1991.
Pillar, Paul. "Sudan and the Sanctions Trap." The National Interest. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/sudan-the-sanctions-trap-5591 (accessed November 4, 2011).
Public Broadcasting Service. 2011. "Sahel." PBS. www.pbs.org/wnet/africa/explore/sahel/sahel_overview.html. (accessed November 4, 2011).
Salopek, Paul. “Lost in the Sahel.” National Geographic. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/04/sahel/paul-salopek-text.html. (accessed November 5, 2011).
“Context: Why the Conflict? Why in Sudan?” World Savvy Monitor. http://worldsavvy.org/monitor/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=71. (accessed November 4, 2011).
In his essay, Rodriguez believes that the diplomatic affairs we see on the evening news are merely being disguised as a religious war. The fight over oil or land when in reality it is the fight between whose side God is on, the attacks under the control of Al Qaeda when perhaps it’s the greed for power or world domination. According to Richard, these religious wars are allowing terrorism to become prevalent; often times within the same culture (147).
Religion is a part of society that is so closely bound to the rest of one’s life it becomes hard to distinguish what part of religion is actually being portrayed through themselves, or what is being portrayed through their culture and the rest of their society. In Holy Terrors, Bruce Lincoln states that religion is used as a justifiable mean of supporting violence and war throughout time (Lincoln 2). This becomes truly visible in times such as the practice of Jihad, the Reformation, and 9/11. The purpose of this essay is to show that as long as religion is bound to a political and cultural aspect of a community, religious war and destruction will always occur throughout the world. A historical methodology will be deployed in order to gain
The lost boys of Sudan did not only show courage but also perseverance when they were forced to flee their home, leaving everything behind to find safety, after their village and all their loved ones were destroyed by the war.
In the years since the early 90’s, Huntington’s premise has not been proven wrong. Along the years, various conflicts occurred around the world which can be identified as the examples of the clash of civilizations. Certainly, other factors such as politics, economics and military also contribute to many conflicts, yet the most catastrophic and chaotic ones inevitably occur in the dispute between civilizations. Between Orthodoxy and Islam there was wars in Bosnia, Kosovo and the Caucuses, between Islam and Africa there was Boko Haram, between Islam and the Hindu civilization there was perpetual terrorism, between Orthodoxy and the West there was wars in Croatia and Slovenia and the current crisis in Ukraine, and of course, between the West and Islam, there was the phenomenon of Charlie Hebdo, not to mention the widely-known 9/11 tragedy.
"Center Update: Case Studies on Religion and Conflict." The Berkley Center. Georgetown University, n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2012.
After the withdraw of Egypt and Britain, Sudan has been run by a number rickety / unstable government groups and milit...
"Sudan Backgrounder | United to End Genocide." United to End Genocide. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Apr. 2014.
Religion can be viewed from many different perspectives. People throughout the world hold different religious values. One person’s religious value will not match the religious values of another person. Globalization as a whole has affected the way we view the different religions and our feelings towards them; it has moved towards a more symbolic representation of ideologies. Many have come to believe that the west is more superior to others. Martha Crenshaw argues that globalization is a key driver of terrorism because there is a comparison between countries having less access to means of production and others having more access. Furthermore, most religions go against each other’s beliefs and as for Islam; they have neglected the ideologies of the west. In order to understand how religious values are interconnected is through language games; we think in certain ways because of issues of power.
Tadesse, Debay. Post-independence South Sudan: the challenges ahead. ISPI-ISTITUTO PER GU STUDI DI POLITICA INTERNAZIONALE. February 2012.no.46.
Most importantly it is cited that the most severe and dangerous conflicts will arise between none other than people with different cultural entities, specifically those along the fault lines between civilizations. Reason for this being that they are all in search of the identities and as Huntington has already said that there is no way you can love what you are if you do not hate what you are not , hence the arousal of the conflicts. In their search of identities they hate what they are not so that they can have a deeper love for what they are.
If you recall my main point in “The Clash of Civilizations?”, I argued that the conflicts of the future will dominantly be due to cultural differences (Huntington, 1993). However, Said argues that instead of cultural differences, conflicts will stem from the ignorance that different cultures have when it comes to the other (Said, 2001). I defend my argument by pointing out that although Said believes the conflicts will stem from ignorance, the conflicts are still between civilizations. For Said’s argument to make sense, he has to admit that there are and always will be differences between these cultures that are of a sufficient scale, in order for one side to be ignorant about the beliefs and values of the other. The result of either civilization not understanding or accepting the practices of the other side’s culture is their eventual conflict (Huntington, 1993). Therefore, the basis of Said’s point supports my hypothesis that future conflicts will firstly, be between civilizations, and secondly, be due to their differences in culture.
In conclusion, Huntington's approach of outlining the cultural differences between the West and Islam doesn't entirely explain the present world Jihadist terrorism and response of the US and its allies to it. The inclination of his paradigm is that one culture must win and another must lose. His hypothesis thus promotes political actors, policy makers and citizens to understand cultural dissimilarities as devastating and to support such differences. Consequently, his civilizations approach may not provide a standard paradigm, but it may add to realist and liberal approaches to explain international relations. – 3
In “Faith and Diplomacy” by Madeline Albright, the author suggests that while we may divide the “religious” from the “political” here, they are intertwined in nations abroad. Thus, we should take this into consideration when dealing with foreign policy. In her essay, Albright shows the powerful force religion can entail depending on who wields it. She sets up her writing through three stories in order to show that while people will die for their religion, they will also kill for it, hence further proving the stakes people will go through for their faith. While religion continues to affect people everywhere, it is shown that in order for us to thrive, we must have compassion for our faith.
The rise of this conflict can be traced back to European colonialism. As the British Empire continued to expand it incorporated Sudan into it’s empire in the 1890s. However at the time, Sudan was not the Sudan that is knew pre-2011. There were two a North and a South Sudan. The north was predominatingly a Arabic speaking Muslim North, and the south an English speaking Christian South. To prevent Egypt claiming North Sudan, the British combined the two regions into one. It can be classified as this being the start of the conflict. The two regions, were culturally,religiously, and ethnically different. Tensions were bound to rise based on these issues. When the British colonialism ended and Sudan declared independence in 1956, the borders were not altered. The country was still united into one Sudan. The British like most Colonial powers left the nation with an unstable government structure. The British supported the North more than it did the South, thus creating resentment and tensions between the two after the end of colonialism.
Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler . Bringing Religion into International Relations. (June 2004) Palgrave Macmillan. 22 March 2014