Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyse how cultural variations can influence communication
Differences in cross-cultural communication
Analyse the impact that cultural differences may have on communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Media, Culture and Credibility: A Theoretical Framework Culture plays a significant part in our daily life from birth to death, so human beings can’t be studied without invoking cultural dimensions of human life. The current research methods treat culture as autonomous individual characteristics that are isolated from daily living and from broader social, economic, and political contexts. Researchers sometimes, assume that concepts are universal across cultural by relying on standard measures to collect data without consideration of their original developmental basis. (Kao Hsueh-fen S et al,2004) Bercovitch and Elgström offer the first systematic analysis of how cultural differences and similarities between society influence credibility: Similar …show more content…
Early research in persuasion operated under the assumption that communicators that are perceived as similar to their audiences are considered more credible, and thus, more likely to persuade. In communication research, there are three areas of study that highlight similarities as influencing factors in credibility judgments: homophile, involvement, and identification. Research has found a relationship between these factors and credibility, sometimes perceived similarities facilitate higher credibility perceptions, other results reveal that identification may result in distrust towards media. Babiker and colleagues developed an index that measured the perceived similarities between two cultures based on the following characteristics: “climate, food, language, religion, educational level, material comfort, family life, marriage and intergroup conflict”. One of the most popular applications of cultural proximity is attributed to Geert Hofstede’s cultural index. It involves five dimensions: individualism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity, and Confucian dynamism. (Arora …show more content…
Its primary objective is to understand how specific cultural and environmental variations are related to individual judgments of communication credibility and to determine the main components of the proposed cultural context credibility model. The processes of globalization have led to a search for media credibility frameworks that can be applicable across cultures. Until now the bulk of scholarship devoted to the quest for universal media credibility measures has come from the West. These frameworks can’t be applied to non-western contexts, and local cultures, sociopolitical issues and histories must be taken into account. (Wasserman Herman,2004). Analyzing cultural aspects requires considering the intensive interaction of cultures that is experienced these days because of the extremely dynamic development and spread of communication technologies. (Demetrovics Zsolt,2012) I propose a final working model of cultural dimensions’ model of media credibility between and within societies, including all the empirical and theoretical dimensions extracted from several cultural and media studies. As previously mentioned, this paper aims to add knowledge to the existing literature regarding media credibility research, which suggest paths for future research and confirm the vital role of the qualitative approach in research
This discussion brings about an interesting view on similarity in relation to persuasion as expressed by O’Keefe (200), “The belief that greater similarity means greater effectiveness is an attractive one and is commonly reflected in recommendations that persuaders emphasize commonalities between themselves and the audience.” O’Keefe concludes
Looking the historical moment we are living at, it is undeniable that the media plays a crucial role on who we are both as individuals and as a society, and how we look at the...
Our media have developed a circuit of electronic media having no order or meaning and to not be taken seriously. Newscasters dedicate a mere 45 seconds to dive into a tragedy or celebration that occurred and then must shift your attention to another piece of news. The world of television has also created a sense of bullying and discrimination against people who aren’t considered “likable” including overweight people, bald men, women over 50, etc. It has also caused gender discrimination as seen with Christine Craft who was fired from her co-anchor position on KMBC-TV because he appearances “hampered viewer acceptance” and believed she lacked credibility (101). Postman also brings up the topic of the variability in the perception of truth based on the acceptability of the newscaster, and the impression of “sincerity, authenticity, vulnerability or attractiveness conveyed by the actor/reporter” (102).
One of the greatest exports of American culture is American media. American media is one of the most widely distributed and consumed cultural forms from the United States. This means that not only do Americans consume large quantities of their own media, but many other countries in the world consume American media, too. People in other countries will not interpret or understand the media in precisely the same ways that Americans will and do, nonetheless, many aspects of American culture and American reality are communicated to numerous viewers as part of the content in the media. The media is an important tool in the discussion of race, class, and gender in America. It takes a savvy viewer to discriminate between and understand what media accurately represents reality, what media does not, or which aspects of experience are fictionalized, and which elements ...
What is a culture? Culture is anything consisting of a group and system. For example, culture consists of art, literature, humans, history, religion, and so on. There are many various cultures placed worldwide here on Earth. Not every culture is the same. Some cultures today still hunt and gather food like their ancestors before them. Some cultures today are more industrial and focus on progress through the world. Culture has shaped individual groups into what they are and become in the world. Although there are different ways in which culture can shape certain groups, there are a few factors that remain the same.
Culture is an aspect of everyone's life. It helps others to understand another person's beliefs and actions. There are multiple cultures in the world which are opposed to their own kind seeking help for a mental illness. There is an infinite number of cultures that are represented in the United States. “Many cultural and religious teachings often influence beliefs about the origins and nature of mental illness, and shape attitudes towards the mentally ill.” (1). One's cultural beliefs can make them think about whether or not they should seek to get help for a mental illness. Among the cultures around the world and particularly in the US, many Asian cultures do not want the community members to be receiving help for their mental illness. In these cultures mental illness is seen as shameful, because these cultures influence the “conformity to norms, emotional self-control, and family recognition through achievement.” (1). There are many cultural factors that play a role in whether or not a person will receive therapy. These factors include: language, level of acculturation, age, gender, occupational issues, family structure, religious beliefs, and traditional beliefs about mental health (2). Language limits the access of therapy. If a person living in the United States does not speak English very well, it could influence them to not seek therapy. There is a large focus on “in-group/out-group” in many Asian cultures, as in everyone who is in the family/community around them are in the “in-group” and everyone else who is not like them are in the “out-group.”
There is an association between the development of mass media and social change, although the degree and direction of this association is still debated upon even after years of study into media influence. Many of the consequences, either detrimental or beneficial, which have been attributed to the mass media, are almost undoubtedly due to other tendencies within society. Few sociologists would refute the importance of the mass media, and mass communications as a whole, as being a major factor in the construction and circulation of social understanding and social imagery in modern societies. Therefore it is argued that the mass media is used as “an instrument”, both more powerful and more flexible than anything in previous existence, for influencing people into certain modes of belief and understanding within society.
Television is a vital source from which most Americans receive information. News and media delegates on television have abused theirs powers over society through the airing of appealing news shows that misinform the public. Through literary research and experimentation, it has been proven that people's perception of reality has been altered by the information they receive from such programs. Manipulation, misinterpretation, word arrangement, picture placement and timing are all factors and tricks that play a major role in the case. Research, experimentation, and actual media coverage has pinpointed actual methods used for deceptive advertising. Television influences society in many ways. People are easily swayed to accept a belief that they may not normally have unless expressed on television, since many people think that everything they hear on television is true. This, however, is not always the case. It has been observed that over the past twenty to thirty years, normal social behavior, even actual life roles of men and women and media, regulatory policies have all been altered (Browne 1998). Media has changed with time, along with quality and respectability. Many Americans receive and accept false information that is merely used as an attention grabber that better the show's ratings and popularity. Many magazines and Journal reviews have periodically discussed the "muckraking" that many tabloid shows rely on to draw in their viewers. This involves sensationalizing a story to make it more interesting, therefore increasing the interest of the audience. "Along the way, all sorts of scandalous substance and goofy tricks appear, but not much mystery in the logic," (Garnson 1997). People often know that these shows aim to deceive them, but still accept the information as truth. Many times, people have strong opinions on certain topics. Yet, when they are exposed to the other side of the argument, they may be likely to agree with the opposite view. As Leon Festinger said, "If I chose to do it (or say it), I must believe in it," (Myers 1997). This is an example of Festinger's cognitive dissonance theory, which pertains to acting contrary to our beliefs. Television influences many people to change their original beliefs. It has the viewers think that the majority of other people hold the contrary idea. Once these views are presented, people have the option to hol...
Listeners perceive sources as credible for a variety of reasons, but most listeners have an opinion on the topic before the source even appears. This is commonly defined as surface credibility, and as credibility that derives from initial judgments based on surface traits such as a person’s appearance (Fogg, 2003). B.J. Fogg also discusses transactional credibility, which he defines as the credibility that is established during the time of interaction (Fogg, 2003). Social conformity plays a role in source credibility, and five characteristics have the greatest impact on an audience: expertness, reliability, intentions, dynamism, and personal attractiveness. When an audience finds the five characteristics in a source, the source is then perceived as more credible (Griffin, 1967).
One problem that plagues us everyday without us even realizing it is media bias. We see it in the news. We see it on our favorite sitcoms. We read it everyday in the paper. Yet, we really don't recognize it when we hear it or see it. Media bias is evident in every aspect of the media, yet the problem is that we don't even recognize it when it is right in front of our faces. Are the impressions that we form about individuals a product of the media? Do we form certain opinions about particular types of people based solely on the things we see and hear in the media everyday without even realizing it? The problem is not only that there is media bias present, but also that we can't recognize it when we see it.
While Williams (2003) emphasizes how media audiences in different regions decode media texts based on myths, they may give different feedback to the same media texts, which can lead to new cultural forms due to distinct interpretations. Rantanen (2004) argues that the power of media tends to alter audience interest and behaviour. Therefore, local cultures may be gradually wiped out due to a reduced interaction on the part of local audiences. With the development of globalization, local media products are beginning feel the impact of Western media products. In order to reduce this impact, some governments take measures mainly in relation to two aspects.
Secondly, the Powerful Effects Theory shows the effect of media on its audience and is another reason why journalistic integrity is important. It is presumed that the media and its contents “have significant and substantial effects” (Perse 3). There is also the “hypodermic needle theory” in which the media injects “values, ideas and attitudes” into its viewers (Fourie 294). Keeping this in mind, it becomes imperative that the media only publish the truth to the public and not fabricate any stories that they may present to society.
It goes without saying that media is gaining currency in these modern days; however, the influence of this prevalent mass communication on aspects of life is often a subject of debate in society. While many people have raised questions regarding the ways media negatively misconstrue our perception of different communities in the world, others claim about its significant role in social and political engagement. This essay is focusing on by what means media can formulating our misconception of people from various cultures or groups, but simultaneously come into use in social and political action. Media is broadly characterized as a powerful medium of communication functioning in the provision of information. It contributes to demonstrate factual
The power of the mass media has once become so powerful that its undoubtedly significant role in the world today stays beyond any questions. It is so strong that even politics uses it as a means of governing in any country around the world. The mass media has not only political meaning but also it conveys wide knowledge concerning all possible aspects of human beings’ lives and, what is utterly true, influences on people’s points of view and their attitude to the surrounding environment. It is completely agreeable about what kind of virtues the mass media is supposed to accent. Nevertheless, it is not frequent at all that the media provides societies with such a content, which is doubtful in terms of the role consigned to it. Presenting violence and intolerance as well as shaping and manipulating public are only a few examples of how the role of mass media is misunderstood by those who define themselves as leading media makers.
In our daily basis we are bombarded with millions of images, but we rarely stop to think, what those images mean, or are persuading us to do. Images can be found in many forms, newspapers, magazines, and television. Modern day technology has forever revolutionized the form people receive media. It has become an easier form to access information and messages through a high speed connection. As technology expands and becomes the prime form of communication, individuals need to understand the messages being sent to them. Mass media is an important part in our daily lives because it provides us with information and entertainment. Many people may believe the media is simply transmitting information. We often think it is neutral information