Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dimensions of transactional leadership
The importance of managing diversity in the work place
Importance of managing cultural diversity in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dimensions of transactional leadership
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Objective of this report is to evaluate the factors for dealing with culturally diverse and geographically disperse team, advantage of diverse team and challenges. This report is presented to chief executive office of the company. Report contain factor for managing diverse team, managerial traits for managing culturally diverse team, style of leadership and leadership trait which are required by the company manager to achieve the objectives on time, research and findings, some recommendations and conclusion. TABLE OF CONTENT Executive summary 01 Introduction 03 Culturally and geographically diverse team 04 Factor for managing diverse team 04 Managerial …show more content…
He communicates that level 5 power is one of the key determinants of legitimate importance. The epitome of "staggering" organization is effective organization of oneself and other individuals in view of a blended pack of circumstances. In this way it is significant that leader make sense of how to manage their eager response to an accumulation of circumstances and others' …show more content…
Participative power encourages agent soul in light of the way that members settle on responsibilities to the decision making technique. It makes them feel just as their hypotheses matter. Right when an association needs to take off upgrades inside the affiliation, the just initiative style helps delegates recognize changes successfully in light of the way that they accept a part at the same time. This style meets challenges when associations need to settle on a decision in a brief time. Transactional: Leader using the value-based power style get certain frills to perform and give prizes or controls to associates in perspective of execution results. Heads and associates set destined targets together, and specialists agree to take after the course and activity of the supervisor to satisfy those goals. The supervisor has vitality to overview comes about and get ready or right delegates when partners disregard to meet goals. Specialists get prizes, for instance, rewards, when they perform targets.
Executive A can be described as having a “Level 5” leadership style. Shying away from attention and giving credit to others shows “greatness through a paradoxical combination of personal humility plus professional will.” (Collins, 2005) Accepting responsibility for mistakes and poor results, along with having pride in developing strong leaders, further supports the definition and actions of a “Level 5” leader. The scenario describes the will of Executive A is described as driven, ambitious and focused on the success of the company. With the scenario information this is a full description of the “Level 5” type leader.
Transactional leader accomplishes goals by bounties workers UN agency convene potential (Bass, 1990). These rewards are available the form of recognition pay will increase and advancement. Such transactions the promise of reward permanently performance and restraint for poor performance.
Giltinane (2013) identifies three leadership styles. The first is transactional leadership in which a leader is controlling and functions in a reward and punishment environment. In transactional leadership style, leaders give little room for employees to express ingenuity. Decisions are passed laterally from top down and the form of leadership is to stress obedience rather than loyalty. Transactional leadership is closely related to autocratic style (Giltinane, 2013).
Attaining results from a team consisting of members likely spread across vast distances is an increasingly difficult task without taking advantage of the necessary resources available for distance collaboration. Several factors are taken into consideration when building an effective team. Creating a team out of a group of people who come from a variety of backgrounds is not an easy task because group members must first learn how to collaborate as a team before they can even consider completing a project together. Teams have a clear purpose with defined roles for each of its participants. Collaboration with the use of technological resources comes into play when a team consists of members spread out geographically. Realizing the strengths of each team member as well as the resources that are available is essential to a team’s success.
A leader that uses this approach relies on their own knowledge to manage employees and situations using poer and control (Fradsen, 2014). These leaders are the ones who will use negative reinforcement and punishment to punish you for bad performance or to enforce the rules. McGuire and Kennery (2006) define the behaviors of a transactional leader as being punitive, giving contingent rewards, managing by active exception, or managing by passive
Hyun, Jane. “Leadership Principles for Capitalizing on Culturally Diverse Teams: The Bamboo Ceiling Revisited.” Leader to Leader. 16 Mar. 2012: 14-19. Web. 2 Apr. 2014 < http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ltl.20017/abstract >
Cultural diversity is an essential piece of the team-building puzzle. As stated earlier, a heterogeneous team usually equals a successful team. A culturally diverse team brings the obvious cultural differences in language, dress and traditions to the table. In addition, less tangible characteristic such as moral values are equally, if not more important. These different methodologies and teachings help influence the team's direction. Persons of Western culture will have a different set of beliefs and methodologies from those of Middle Eastern or Eastern ethnicity. When team members take the time to learn and understand each culture's moral value, the result is a strong team foundation. High performance teams take and incorporate these cultural differences and use these different beliefs and values to attain the team goal.
There are several factors that are important if a culturally diverse business team is to flourish and realize its vast potential. Di Stefano and Maznevski (2000) claim that there are three imperative steps to achieving multicultural team success; namely, mapping the team; where the team members need to clearly understand their cultural differences in how they work and view success. This is often led by the team leader. Next, the team must bridge, that is, to communicate with one another, bearing in mind their cultural differences. Finally, the team must integrate, meaning that they bring together these differences and leverage on them to succeed.
Recent years, organisation are much more relay on diversity teams to developing products, making decisions and also gain the business success (When and how), therefore diversity team are becoming a very important element for the organisations. In USA, diversity usually refer to demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and ethnicity, however, diversity is not only refer to demographics, it also means the diversity in psychological characteristics like skills, personality, abilities, and education backgrounds (book diversity). Although team diversity leads to some benefits like the positive organisational cooperation, share the knowledge and experience, it can also leads some problems to the organisation, such as the tension between members
). Burke et al (2006) suggested that transactional leadership, based on contingent rewards, can have a positive effect on followers' satisfaction and performance. However, a transactional leader focuses on management tasks, and will not identify shared values of a team. By contrast, transformational leaders inspire others with their vision and work together with their team to identify common values (Marquis and Huston 2009). The transactional approach is task-orientated and can be effective when meeting deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on the task they need to complete, rather than the patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).
This method implies that leaders and follower have combine motives that can be beneficial to both parties. When theses task are assigned, there is a designed reward or punishment for the followers. This method of leadership can also be associated with managing in a sense. Transactional leadership in a sense is like management in that it does not look to inspire or promote change, it is in fact more about ensuring a particular process, and procedure meets the desired results.
In the workplace, it is common to encounter individuals of different cultures, ethnicities, and genders. This diversity can either lead to an introduction of new work methods, or it can lead to conflict between coworkers. In order to avoid conflict, and have all employees work as a cohesive team, managers must educate themselves, and their employees on the topic of cultural diversity. In order for your practices to be considered effective, you must not only respect and recognize an employee’s diversity, you must use their difference to benefit them.
In the same vein as the theories of classical Scientific Management, Transactional Leadership operates under the assumption that people are motivated to meet goals by tangible rewards such as money. As the name suggests, transactional leaders bargain with employees to give them X (a certain number of hours worked, for example) in exchange for Y (i.e. a bonus check). Transactional leaders very often employ punishments to discourage undesirable behaviors, due again to the belief that workers are driven by a clear set of returns and by the threat of loss of potential rewards. Transactional leaders are characterized as “generally passive” (Gennaro 2) and reactive, preferring to establish this relationship and to then step back and allow employees to carry on, managed by the expectation of rewards or punishments based on their performance; this requires less day-to-day active management beyond establishing and reinforcing
The transaction leader differs approach differs from the transformational leader. In general it is motivated by a change taking place. According to McLaurin and Almiri, transactional leadership is a bargaining exchange process between the leader and the follower, lead to the expected or planned outcomes, focus on maintaining the status quo, does not consider the needs of the followers on an individual basis, and the flow of power is more stable than the transformational leader.
In today’s globalized world, multicultural teams accomplish a significant proportion of organizational work. Multicultural teams are formed because they improve organizational effectiveness in the global business environment. As such, multicultural teams offer huge potential to organizations. The most critical and practical challenge multicultural teams face is managing conflicts across members’ national cultural boundaries. Other cultural challenges in multicultural teams include dealing with coordination and control issues, maintaining communication richness, and developing and maintaining team cohesiveness. For multicultural teams to be effective, members must learn to address the challenges that arise from team members’ differing nationalities and cultural backgrounds.