Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequentialism vs utilitarianism
Consequentialism vs utilitarianism
Utilitarianism ethical dilemmas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Life seems to get busier and more hectic as each generation passes. As generations continue to age, a common dilemma arises that must be resolved: whether or not to put their aging loved ones into a nursing home. Nursing homes have become excessively more popular as the elderly continue to have longer life expectancies. Nursing homes at first were only for those who were poor and had no family to care for them, but now has become an option for families who simply cannot sacrifice the time and effort to care for their elderly loved ones. Morality and ethics is a huge factor in the difficult decision, which many moral factors are considered. In order to analyze how to effectively decide whether or not to put an elder in a nursing home, two theories …show more content…
cultural relativism and utilitarianism will be utilized in order to reach a moral decision. In order to successfully analyze the correct moral decision for the placement of family members in nursing homes, the benefits and the common negatives must be discussed. Nursing homes provide families with the ability to know their elderly loved ones are being taken care of without sacrificing time from their lives. Those who are in the middle of possibly their career development or their family life in general. Also, rather than family, who may not have the essential experience, taking care of elderly family members, trained professionals will be supervising them around the clock. Also, when you place your loved ones in a nursing home they are essentially put into a community, with other elderly people who can all relate to similar issues with one another. This sense of community cannot be established with family members, due to how in a majority of cases, there is a significant age difference between family members and the elderly. Communities in nursing homes allow the elderly to connect with others that are not necessarily their family. The common negatives of nursing homes are widely known, such as insufficient care, unhygienic conditions and workers taking advantage of the residents. In addition, elderly loved ones feel abandoned by their families and may hold that resentment towards not only their family when they come for visitation, but those around them in the facility. In order to have a correct moral and ethical decision, all factors surrounding the dilemma must be considered, whether it is the positive and negative misconceptions or an outlook of what that moral decision will lead to. The first theory that can be sufficiently used to analyze on whether or not to put an elderly loved one into a nursing home is cultural relativism.
Cultural relativism is a theory, which entails what a culture, believes is what is correct for that particular culture, each culture has different views on moral issues. For example, abortion is permissible by American culture and is tolerated by the majority of the culture. While, Catholic culture is against abortion, and is not tolerated by those who belong to the culture. Cultural relativism is a theory a lot of individuals obey when it comes to making moral decisions. What their culture believes is instilled over generations, and frequently has an enormous influence since their families with those cultural beliefs have raised them. With these beliefs, certain cultures have different answers for different moral dilemmas and at times, it is difficult to decide on a specific moral issue because the individual may belong to multiple …show more content…
cultures. Putting loved ones in a nursing home is an extremely difficult decision individuals with aging parents, grandparents or relatives have to eventually decipher between. They can either take care of them at home or put them in a nursing home. The options are ultimately up to what the family believes. Cultural relativism is typically used in order to make the correct moral decision. A large amount of individuals that have to make this decision rely on what values they were grown up with. For example, the Hispanic culture is most times entirely against putting the elderly in nursing homes due to the negative misconceptions that are rumored to happen in "all nursing homes". Of course, only a small number of nursing homes can be deemed to have horrible conditions, but one must research and tour each one to know which each one has to offer. Most low-income families also tend to not put their loved ones in nursing homes either. Low-income families have a tough time financing the astronomical price that is associated with nursing homes. Also, like Hispanic cultures, low income families tend to be more willing to care for their loved ones due to more time available to care for their loved ones due to either one income families or unemployment. While lower income and Hispanic cultures tend to shy away from nursing homes, the newer generation and also middle to high-income cultures tend to use nursing homes more frequently. The middle class culture most times have extremely limited time to be able to care for their elderly family members. While, high-income cultures tend to lean towards nursing homes due to the sole fact that they can afford it, and it is readily available to them. The issue that arises with cultural relativism is that there are a variety of answers for moral dilemmas.
Each culture has a different solution for a moral issue and there is an often conflict between cultures which leads to intolerance. Also, if the individuals deliberating are a part of two cultures, then an ultimate decision to decide on whether or not to put elderly loved ones in nursing homes will come about with some conflict and differences with the culture they belong to. For example, a high-income Hispanic has the income in order to finance the costs of the nursing home, but their Hispanic culture tells them that it is not right to abandon their family just because they are now older. In this case, one would have to rely on a different method in order to reach a moral decision without the consideration of their cultures values and views involved. Cultural relativism tends to be flawed when more than one culture is involved in deliberation, in order to successfully make a correct moral decision, we will compare cultural relativism's various solutions based on its cultures against utilitarianism's principle of
utility. Utilitarianism is a theory that relies on the principle of utility in order to evaluate moral situations. The principle of utility is a concept in which attempts to maximize the most people’s utility as possible when making a decision. Utilitarianism is extremely popular because it considers the effects on others rather than focusing on the effects on just yourself. Placing the elderly in a nursing home in a utilitarian's view can be permissible. By putting these elderly relatives in nursing homes you're relieving the stress one may obtain from the constant struggle one may have to endure from taking on such an enormous responsibility. Admitting elderly relatives that cannot live on their own will make their family a lot happier, because they now will know their loved one will be under surveillance and will be assisted by professionals rather than be in danger on their own. Also although, it may seem selfish, family members also may be happier that they do not have to sacrifice a lot of time and take on a lot of burden in order to care for their elder relatives. An elderly person at first may not be happy when they are put into a nursing home, which may defeat utilitarianism's purpose, but as they become accustomed then their happiness may regress due to the new community they will be exposed to. With utilitarianism, utilizing nursing homes is permissible due to the fact that most people will have satisfaction, all of the family members will be at ease about the safety and well-being of their loved ones, and their elder family member, although, will not necessarily always be happy about being put into a nursing home, they will eventually become accustomed to living at one. An issue that may arise with utilitarianism is that it does not always necessarily consider what is right; rather it considers what will bring the most pleasure to those involved. Simply sticking an aging family member into a nursing home would make them unhappy, and isn't necessarily always the right thing to do. According to utilitarianism, it is the right thing to do just because of the amount of pleasure you'll experience compared to caring for the old family member on your own. In addition, disregarding the actual older persons feelings since they would necessarily be the only person experiencing disutility from this situation, is also not right to do. This family member will be resentful towards their family and be extremely unhappy for some time if they are aware of what their family is doing to them. When cultural relativism's solutions and utilitarianism's solutions are compared, one theory is more superior compared to the other. Cultural relativism, although popular amongst many around the world, is less efficient when applying its principles to the nursing home dilemma. What a culture believes isn't necessarily as important as the immediate needs of a family member that needs professional care. Although, many use cultural relativism as a guideline to their actions, it should not be the sole answer for this dilemma. Utilitarianism, although has some flaws, is a better theory to handle this situation. It analyzes what the satisfaction will be from admitting a family member into a nursing home and the well being of everyone involved. Although, utilitarianism disregards what necessarily realistically will be right to do in regards to the feelings of the older person, but the most people will be satisfied, and their utility outweighs the elder’s disutility. In order to develop a correct moral decision in the nursing home dilemma, the better theory to utilize is utilitarianism. Cultural relativism should be used as a guideline, but not necessarily as a solid method of answering this solution. If cultural relativism were to be used, it should be used to sway one way or another after an analysis of the situation by a more suitable theory, such as utilitarianism.
This ethical scenario presents an 86 year old female with numerous health issues and chronic illnesses. Mrs. Boswell’s advancing Alzheimer’s disease makes it extremely difficult to initiate dialysis, leading her physician to conclude a poor quality of life. The ethical dilemma portrayed in this case is between non-maleficence and autonomy. Health care workers should focus on promoting the patient’s overall wellbeing and weigh the benefits and risks of the course of action, while also considering what the family declares they want done. Since the patient is deemed unable to make decisions, the goal is to collaborate with family, assess patient quality of life, address prognosis, and establish realistic care goals.
By looking further into this dilemma using various ethical standpoints allows for a broad understanding of principles and complexity in a specific situation with these paradigms. The focuses are three prominent ethical paradigms such as: teleological utilitarianism, deontological duty theories and virtue based ethics. Each of these three paradigms will be applied to the aforementioned dilemma, each will be evaluated and the best option will be revealed.
Ethical principles is focused on the morals and values of the individual who has dementia (Cribb and Duncan, 2002) Decision made by family to have a person who has dementia to live in a residential home from their personal home can be seen as inconsiderate to the individual values. It is for the best for the decision to be made before the individual was ill, the family members will feel less guilty. In the event that circumstances of the family members are not capable of caring it is understandable (Curthbert and Quallington, 2008). On the other hand this could be the best decision as cares in residential homes have skills development to provide professional care (Nice, 2010). Naidoo and Willis (2009) stated that the consequential theory is there to measure the end result of action in this case considering the health and wellbeing of people with dementia. The pr...
Culture change in long-term care is a set of guiding principles based on person-centered care tailored to each elder’s care while treating them with dignity and respect. Core values include relationship, personal choice, self-determination, and purposeful living (“Defining Culture Change”, n.d.). In person-centered care, quality of life is recognized to be as important as the quality of care. It is also recognized that every person has the right to be allowed to make their own decisions, even if those decisions may not always be safe. Finally, at the very heart of person-centered care is the relationship between the elder and their caregivers in which the way a task is done is as important, if not more, than the task itself (Jones, 2011).
Virginia Held brings up many criticisms of traditional ethical theories in her essay. The ethics of care can be considered as a suitable substitution for other widely accepted ethical theories such as Kantian ethics. The ethics of care recognizes the importance of interpersonal relationships, especially those within the family unit. All people need care at some point during their life, be it at birth or old age. Caring for people that can not provide sufficient care for themselves is a fundamental part of a moral society. Ethical theories based on the importance of a rational and independent individual excludes the importance of interpersonal reliance.
In its entirety, moral relativism is comprised of the belief that, as members of various and countless cultures, we cannot judge each other’s morality. If this theory stands true, then “we have no basis for judging other cultures or values,” according to Professor McCombs’ Ethics 2. Our moral theories cannot extend throughout cultures, as we do not all share similar values. For instance, the Catholic tradition believes in the sacrament of Reconciliation. This sacrament holds that confessing one’s sins to a priest and
After analyzing cultural relativism over the semester, I have come to the conclusion that cultural relativism under anthropological analysis defines every single culture with some aspect of worth as viewed by an individual within that society. Franz Boas, termed the “Father of American Anthropology”, first introduced the concept of cultural relativism. He wanted people to understand the way certain cultures conditioned people to interact with the world around them, which created a necessity to understand the culture being studied. In my words, cultural relativism is the concept that cultures should be viewed from the people among that culture. When studied by anthropologists, cultural relativism is employed to give all cultures an equal
Elderly Culture and Nursing Homes Nursing homes offer a wide range of long-term care assistance for older adults to be able to meet their everyday needs. Older adults from different cultural backgrounds experience conflict with their decision to participate in a nursing home, catalyzing the underlying stigma different cultures hold towards nursing homes. In many cultures, older adults look for family as their primary source of care. However, when their needs cannot be met due to disability and mental health issues, it begins to take a toll on the person’s instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). IADLs are complex daily actions that are needed to live (Cavanaugh & Blanchard-Fields, 2015).
Cultural Relativism is a moral theory which states that due to the vastly differing cultural norms held by people across the globe, morality cannot be judged objectively, and must instead be judged subjectively through the lense of an individuals own cultural norms. Because it is obvious that there are many different beliefs that are held by people around the world, cultural relativism can easily be seen as answer to the question of how to accurately and fairly judge the cultural morality of others, by not doing so at all. However Cultural Relativism is a lazy way to avoid the difficult task of evaluating one’s own values and weighing them against the values of other cultures. Many Cultural Relativist might abstain from making moral judgments about other cultures based on an assumed lack of understanding of other cultures, but I would argue that they do no favors to the cultures of others by assuming them to be so firmly ‘other’ that they would be unable to comprehend their moral decisions. Cultural Relativism as a moral theory fails to allow for critical thoughts on the nature of morality and encourages the stagnation
Moral relativism maintains that objective moral truth does not exist, and there need not be any contradiction in saying a single action is both moral and immoral depending on the relative vantage point of the judge. Moral relativism, by denying the existence of any absolute moral truths, both allows for differing moral opinions to exist and withholds assent to any moral position even if universally or nearly universally shared. Strictly speaking, moral relativism and only evaluates an action’s moral worth in the context of a particular group or perspective. The basic logical formulation for the moral relativist position states that different societies have empirically different moral codes that govern each respective society, and because there does not exist an objective moral standard of judgment, no society’s moral code possesses any special status or maintains any moral superiority over any other society’s moral code. The moral relativist concludes that cultures cannot evaluate or criticize other cultural perspectives in the absence of any objective standard of morality, essentially leveling all moral systems and limiting their scope to within a given society.
Various factors are associated with the development of ethical dilemmas, including advances in medical technology, increased life expectancy, the high cost of healthcare in an environment of limited resources, lack of time to provide care and conflicting values and cultures among patients, nurses and other healthcare professionals. All of which, including the growth of the nursing profession, have brought an increase in the nurses’ participation in human rights and life and death decision-making situations (Kim et al.,
In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in understanding how morality comes to be culturally defined. However, the formulation is quite different in that from a wide range of human habits, individual opinions drive the culture toward distinguishing normal “good” habits from abnormal “bad” habits. The takeaway is that both theories share the guiding principle that morality is bounded by culture or society.
Culture Relativism; what is it? Culture Relativism states that we cannot absolute say what is right and what is wrong because it all depends in the society we live in. James Rachels however, does not believe that we cannot absolute know that there is no right and wrong for the mere reason that cultures are different. Rachels as well believes that “certain basic values are common to all cultures.” I agree with Rachels in that culture relativism cannot assure us that there is no knowledge of what is right or wrong. I believe that different cultures must know what is right and what is wrong to do. Cultures are said to be different but if we look at them closely we can actually find that they are not so much different from one’s own culture. Religion for example is a right given to us and that many cultures around the world practices. Of course there are different types of religion but they all are worshipped and practice among the different culture.
The practices of many cultures are varied from one another, considering we live in a diverse environment. For example, some cultures may be viewed as similar in comparison while others may have significant differences. The concept of Cultural Relativism can be best viewed as our ideas, morals, and decisions being dependent on the individual itself and how we have been culturally influenced. This leads to many conflict in where it prompts us to believe there is no objectivity when it comes to morality. Some questions pertaining to Cultural Relativism may consists of, “Are there universal truths of morality?” “Can we judge
Strong cultural relativism means culture is the primary source of the legitimacy of moral values and rules. They believe that only culture can determine the rights of people. Therefore, they welcome only a few fundamental rights of universal process and allow only a slightly number of overlapping rights. Weak cultural relativism assumes that culture may be a substantial source of moral values and rules. Their belief on the relation of culture and rights is not very strong like the former one. Consequently, they realize difference types of universal human rights and welcome other rights except some which are strictly limited by their local norms (Donnelly 1984, p.401). The concept of fundamentalism may be the product of strong cultural