Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Language barrier for immigrants
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Language barrier for immigrants
It seems that the accent piece is just one more strand in this entire story of the difficulties that immigrants face in Canada. In the vast of majority of social science research examining issues affecting immigrants in Canada, language is viewed as a sign of the process of racialization and a cultural component of ethnicity. I find it very interesting how accents work as a marker not only of where they come from, but also their ethnic, education background and also their work qualifications. The vast majority of immigrants to Canada have been filtered out of job prospects because of their foreign accents. There are special labels including the terms” language minority”(LM), the “linguistically and culturally diverse”(LCD), the “culturally
Although Quebec is in Canada, a majority of Quebecers do not identify with the national identity of Canada. Both societies create a sense of identity as well as nationalism (Hiller, 295). Hiller mentions two approaches to assessing Canadian identity; the unitary approach and the segmentalist approach (Hiller, 277). The unitary approach suggests that society consists of people who regardless of their ethnic back ground, identify as belonging to the national society, while the segmentalist approach concentrates on groups and communities that share racial, linguistic, occupational, or cultural similarities (Hiller, 28). While most Anglophones are more unitary or pan-Canadian, Quebec heavily identifies with the segmentalist approach. This dissimilarity of identity perspective may be problematic for the country, at the same time however, it can also be viewed as a struggle where contradictory parties find a way to compromise and reshape Canadian society together (Hiller, 277). Canada’s former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau made it his objective to unite Quebec with the rest of Canada. In 1969 Trudeau’s government implemented Bill C-120, otherwise known as the Official Language act, which made French an...
...to identity with at least one of the countries predominate languages, English or French, dictated the degree in which they could participate in Canadian life. According to the Commission, this participation was real under two conditions: “that both societies, the French-speaking as well as the English-speaking, accept[ed] newcomers much more rapidly than they have done in the past; and that the two societies willingly allow other groups to preserve and enrich, if they so desire, the cultural values they prize[d]” (RCBB Book 1 xxv). It creates an interesting take on the acceptance of those “othered” groups, as change was necessary not only on the part of the minorities but also from Canada’s French and English-speakers. The Commissions work remains focused on language and culture, more so than ethnicity amongst a bilingual, bicultural and “othered” Canadian society.
There are more than 1000 people trying to immigrate to Canada. What if Canada contributed more to help the newcomers to Canada? Most of these newcomers are Muslim, and they are mostly coming from Syria, Iraq, and other countries that are at war. They are forced to leave their homes and can barely survive. These people are very vulnerable to almost anything. If Canada inherits these newcomers, it will gain a greater security and become more diverse. This will also become an advantage in the future. The government should help newcomers to Canada because they are vulnerable. It also gives Canada a chance to improve its diversity and safety, and it will benefit Canada in the later years.
The Indian Residential schools and the assimilating of First Nations people are more than a dark spot in Canada’s history. It was a time of racist leaders, bigoted white men who saw no point in working towards a lasting relationship with ingenious people. Recognition of these past mistakes, denunciation, and prevention steps must be taking intensively. They must be held to the same standard that we hold our current government to today. Without that standard, there is no moving forward. There is no bright future for Canada if we allow these injustices to be swept aside, leaving room for similar mistakes to be made again. We must apply our standards whatever century it was, is, or will be to rebuild trust between peoples, to never allow the abuse to be repeated, and to become the great nation we dream ourselves to be,
Canada has continuously served as a home to immigrants and refugees from decade to decade harbouring people from a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The first set of immigrants to settle in the country came from Britain, the United States and from other nationalities mostly including immigrants from Europe who were either desperate to escape from religious or political turmoil or were simply attracted to Canada’s economic promise. Soon after the Canadian confederation in 1867, immigrants from Irish and Chinese backgrounds who occupied most of the country were used as workers and the demand for labourers to develop the country increased rapidly as more Chinese descents were imported to build the Canadian Pacific Railway. Although, Canada opened its doors to immigrants, but the country also intended to gain human resources for work in the farms, in the forests, factories and mines but not everyone was equally welcomed in Canada.
Every year, over 250,000 people make Canada their new home. Attracted by its education system, economy and universal healthcare system, there are few other places in the world like it. All Canadians are guaranteed equality before the law and equality of opportunity, regardless of where they are from. However, some might argue that Canadian policy has not been put into practice as well as it should be. Is the concept of true equality a far-fetched idea? It seems that Canada has taken great measures to promote the integration of immigrants socially, but can the same be said for their integration economically? Politically? To judge whether or not Canada has been successful at promoting the integration of immigrants in these realms, a deeper understanding of Canadian policy must be considered.
Indonesia and Canada are two countries that are highly different in Power distance. Firstly, power distance deals with how do less powerful members will tolerate and accept the big gaps that is distributed unequally between different social groups in a culture. Indonesia is one of the countries that is high on this dimension as it scores 78 unlike Canada which has a relatively low score of 39. This shows that Indonesia mainly depends on hierarchy power as there are unequal rights between power holders and non power holders. Moreover, power is centralized as managers are required to communicate in an indirect way and obey their team members without sharing any negative feedback. Employees are expected to be always guided and told what to do
Canada's immigration policies changed many times after the end of WWII. Before WWII the immigration policies were "picky" on the people who wanted to come to Canada, but after, it was fair and equal to everyone. Canada's immigration policies changed drastically from being discriminative to being fair and equal to everyone, every country and race after WWII. This act to eliminating discrimination was successful because of; the introduction of the Point System, the introduction of New Immigration acts/policies, and finally the changes made in accepting Refugees. These action completely changed the immigration policies.
In conclusion, because immigrants are choosing new life place and style change moving to Canada it is their responsibility to adopt Canadian culture, workplace rules and use all of that in their life. Canada is great country with many possibilities and perspectives for everyone in one condition: immigrants have to adjust and accept rules which Canadians respect and which make Canada such a peaceful, people friendly place. All changes can be just good and after few years all newcomers can ask themselves how they could live before they made such a big decision about immigration.
When looking at these countries a couple of things stuck out to me. The first thing that stuck out to me was that Canada and Australia are very similar regarding numbers in all three categories. The second thing I picked up on was that China, Algeria, and Spain all have scary low numbers in the biocapacity per capita measurement. Another key thing I noticed is that Canada from the North performed very well and Austrailia from the South performed very well. Altogether these numbers are very concerning in particular for the countries in the red because they are so highly populated.
“We still have a lot of work to do,” says Faith Tull, Randstand Canada’s senior vice-president of human resources speaking about Canada’s workplace discrimination. Discrimination is a distinction, exclusion or preference based on one of the prohibited grounds that has the effect of nullifying or impairing the right of a person to full and equal recognition and exercise this individual’s human rights and freedoms. Discrimination is definitely still an issue in workplaces throughout the world, even though it has improved slightly through the years. This essay will talk about workplace discrimination in Canada, workplace discrimination in the United States, and the effects of workplace discrimination.
There are many barriers, however, one that I will discuss barrier to sexual health is Language barrier. Although the United States and Canada are considered the melting pot, there is still a language barrier that prevents individual from getting the appropriate sexual health care needed. For instance, the multilevel barriers to counseling and testing services especially in the Latino community that exist to the lack of bilingual and bicultural counseling, testing, and treatment services, in particular among the southern states. Also, Canada' two official language French and English, which make it problematic for non-Engish and non-French speaking individuals to receive appropriate care. Rhodes et al. (2007), contend that the current rate of
The Second World War was the most important event that shaped Canada today. During the war, not only the English and Frenches people contributed themselves to the war, the minorities groups who despite begin treated with disrespect and contempt also contributed themselves. Their action has brought recognition and equality for themselves and advanced the idea of multicultural in Canada. Since WWII, Canada had changed in various ways towards immigration and different cultural groups. Injustice action and laws against racial groups such as the Head Tax are eliminated and apologized by the government. Although small prejudice and discrimination are yet a slight concern. Overall, Canada and its people have revolutionized the country in a more multicultural
Canada has been ranked one of the most multicultural countries in the world (CBC, 2015). Thus, on a world stage Canada has a reputation that is often characterized as ‘one to aspire to,’ as multiculturalism has become a defining aspect of Canadian culture, essentially portraying Canada as a so-called ‘post racial society.’ Multiculturalism refers to the existence, acceptance and promotion of various cultural traditions. Thus, what is the need for anti-racist education in a nation that accepts and promotes different cultures? Even within the discourse surrounding multiculturalism, race relations in Canada still continue to gain social currency, and race continues to be a marker for the unequal distribution of power, privilege, social prestige,
One of the largest success stories to come out of Canadian immigration in the past century is that of Filipino immigrants who have been coming into Canada from the Philippines for over sixty years. The Philippines tends to be one of the top four countries for immigration into Canada on a yearly basis. The large number of college graduates (under three-quarters of a million) from the Philippines has an economy that is struggling and has only a small chance of finding employment in their home nation, making immigration an attractive option.