Crusades Dbq Essay

463 Words1 Page

The crusades were a series of wars between the christians and muslims.Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative. I believe that the results of the crusades were more positive the negative.Some reasons i believe that the effects were more positive than negative were because It allowed people to travel, have and adventure as well as merchant were able to set up market in different places, and how the crusades affected the way the crusaders lived their lives back in england after they returned. To begin with, one reason the effects is because it allowed people ppl to travel, have and adventure as well as merchant were able to set up market in different places Document 2 states that “Merchants in Venice and other northern Italian cities built large fleets to carry crusaders …show more content…

Nobles and merchants enjoyed the new luxuries and wanted more of them.This is interesting because the rich people would have fancy wool clothes that were only meant for the finest and wealthiest people in France which drop in value after silk was brought to France.Document 8 states that “Spices were used to keep food from spoiling.This is relevant because they would just have to eat or let it spoiled. The seasonings made the food taste better and not go bad.In conclusion the technology and ideas from other regions. Were the outcomes of the crusades more positive than positive. I believe that the3 outcomes were more negative than positive.Some reasons i believe that the effects were more positive than negative were because It allowed people to travel, have and adventure as well as merchant were able to set up market in different places. Ontther reason how the crusades affected the way the crusaders lived their lives back in england after they

Show More
Related

  • The First Crusade Sparknotes

    672 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crusades were a number of military expeditions by Europeans of the Christian faith attempting to recover the Holy Land, Jerusalem, which was then controlled by the powerful Muslim Empire. In his book People of The First Crusade, Michael Foss an independent historian tells the story of the first Crusade in vivid detail illustrating the motives behind this historic event, and what had really occurred towards the end of the eleventh century. The Christian lands of Western Europe were slowly deteriorating from invasions of the North, and the passing of corrupt laws from within the clergy and the high lords. However, these were not the only challenges those of European Christian faith had to face. Islam strengthened after the conversion of the

    Read More

  • The Crusades: Review of Thomas F. Madden's The New Concise History of the Crusades

    1519 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Thomas F. Madden’s The New Concise History of the Crusades, he is able to effectively give an accurate depiction of the Crusades in a story-like manner. The expansive and convoluted history of the Crusades has been marred by myths and misconceptions about the true nature of these “holy wars”. In his history, Madden seeks to correct these maladies that plague the Crusades by using concrete evidence to support his claims. Although Madden does an excellent job in condensing the history of the Crusades into 225 pages, there are some improvements that he could have made in his history in order to make it less opinionated and more critical. This paper will criticize the effectiveness of Madden’s arguments and presentation of themes. The doctrine of “holy war”, the place of military leadership and rivalry, and the response of Muslim states and military leaders are all important themes addressed in The New Concise History of the Crusades that will be analyzed to extract Madden’s true intentions, concerns, and assumptions.

    Read More

  • The First Crusades Analysis

    1928 Words  | 4 Pages

    The First Crusade is often cited as one of the most damnable consequences of religious fanaticism. A careful inspection of the circumstances and outcomes, however, will reveal a resultant political restructuring of Europe under the banner of Christendom. The purpose of this investigation is to investigate Pope Urban II’s motives in initiating the First Crusade, with a particular focus on the consolidation of the Western Church’s influence in Europe. Among the primary sources that will be consulted are the letter sent by Patriach Alexios of Constantinople to Urban, and an account of Urban’s speech at Clermont. Relevant excerpts from both of these primary sources, as well as contextual evidence and a wide array of historiography, will be taken

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Crusades

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    The crusades for the most part, are largely misunderstood. The Crusaders were not gullible, or stupid to travel so far, but rather, patriots for Christ. Although Europe was left in poor hands, they were still cheered on. The crusades were, in fact, triggered by Muslim aggression.

    Read More

  • The First Crusade Research Paper

    1076 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first crusade was held only in order to fulfill desire of the Christians of the recapturing the center of the Christian faith-Jerusalem, which has been controlled by the Muslim nation for more than 400 years. This military campaign was followed with severe cruelty and harsh actions against Muslims which cannot be justified with anything but religious and material interest.

    Read More

  • How the Crusades Changed Society

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the crusades were seen as failures during their time, the crusades had a huge impact on the world. This impact can be seen through the many social, political, economic, and religious changes that developed during the crusades. Some of these changes still last to this day.

    Read More

  • DBQ On The Crusades

    327 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the end of the eleventh and middle of the thirteenth century there were nine wars between muslims and christians that are now called the crusades. All nine wars were meant to take over the holy land (what is now israel) from the muslims. The most successful of those battles was the first and second. The worst of the crusades was the fourth crusade. The Crusades didn’t have a positive effect on trying to take over the holy land.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Crusades

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    Obviously the largest problem that came out of the war was the many deaths that were sacrificed for the wrong reasons. Since the crusades had finished because they finally realized it was a lost cause, some may say that those people died for no reason. Other instances where the crusades were bad were the now broken relationship between Jews and Christians and the bitterness between Christians and Muslims. On the first crusade, Christians went through Jewish communities on their way to Jerusalem. Forcefully baptizing them and killing them if they did not convert was not the best way to make the Jews care for the Christians. Christians after the crusades saw them as sacred religious movements, while the Muslims thought of them as the christians trying to expand their territory and rule as much land as they possibly

    Read More

  • Violence in The Crusades

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crusades were a bloody time period. They were a military campaign by the pope and the Roman Catholic Church to take back Jerusalem from the Muslims. They lasted from the 11th- 13th century. They were catastrophic and left Europe in ruins. Although the Crusades were such a violent period of time, they had a positive impact in history because of their role in the renaissance and exposing the Western world to the Eastern.

    Read More

  • First Crusades: The First Crusades

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.

    Read More

  • The Crusades: A Successful Failure

    1423 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...could even be argued that it also provoked such Atlantic powers as Spain and Portugal to seek trade routes to India and China. Efforts that helped open most of the world to European trade dominance and colonization and to shift the center of commercial activity from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic. Nonetheless the Crusades failed in ending the split between the Church, but ultimately succeeded in strengthening the Roman Catholic Church and accelerating trade which brought new economic and cultural wealth.

    Read More

  • The Crusades: Short Term and Long Term Effects

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1095, the conflict between the Christians and the Muslims started a crusade (a military campaign in defense of Christianity) for the battle of Jerusalem. This crusade involved people of other religions besides Christianity such as the Jews but they did not play a major role during this time. The Crusades lasted almost two decades and consisted of eight different crusades. With all of the events and actions that took during the Crusades, it led too many effects throughout years. There were short term effects and long term effects from the crusades that effected people of all different cultures. Two places which have had many effects from the Crusades are Europe and Islam. The Crusades has had short term and long term effects on power, economic and classical knowledge throughout Europe and Islam.

    Read More

  • The Purpose of Christian Crusades - Different Points of View

    1525 Words  | 4 Pages

    Christian crusades took place between the years 1095 and 1500. According to the Britannica Concise Encyclopedia, crusades were military expeditions, beginning in the late 11th century, that were organized by Western Christians in response to centuries of Muslim wars of expansion. Their main objectives were to check the spread of Islam, retake control of the Holy Land, and to recapture formerly Christian territories. The objectives of crusades were often different for Christian authorities, crusaders and their families. Crusades were centered on religious beliefs and freedoms so their primary purpose was to take back religious freedom for Christianity from the Muslim control. Is it true for all the parties that contributed in the crusade movement? According to Jonathan Riley-Smith the crusaders came from all classes; what motivated them to sell their possessions and travel thousands of miles?

    Read More

  • The Crusades: Deus Vult

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first cause of the crusades was the shift in Medieval European society. Up until the eleventh century Europe was in what many historians call the “Dark Ages”. It was during this time that Europe was under constant Viking raids from the North, Saracens from the South and Magyar’s from the East. Europe survived these and came out stronger than ever. With these threats gone, Europe’s society recovered quickly. The Italian City States built large trade fleets and took to the sea trading in ports all over the Mediterranean(Nelson 1). In the mainland, farmers began producing more food and raw materials that before now had been looted or burned by Vikings and other raiders. Religion also became more important as pilgrimages to holy places became more common. Europeans were no longer accepting their faith passively but had an urge to act on their beliefs and do something positive for their God(Nelson 2). Well Europe was having a comeback from centuries of raids and violence there was one problem. Europe wa...

    Read More

  • Social Consequences Of The Crusades

    2290 Words  | 5 Pages

    The First Crusade was considered a success in that the Holy Land was recovered and pilgrim routes became passable. This might be where the positive effects of the Crusades ends. Many critics agree that the Crusades were little more than vicious. Henry Smith claims that no other wars have been as destructive as the Crusades. He claims that on principles, morals, and politics, the Crusades “cannot be justified” (Smith 1909, 468). War was a “sacred duty” (468) and, as a result, the Crusades “encouraged the most horrible violences of fanaticism” (468). Politically, the Crusades were “hostile to the advancement of knowledge and liberty” (469). As a consequence, there was literally no improvement in the social conditions of the kingdoms. Smith asserts that the pope was the “only monarch who mixed politics with his piety” (469). The political changes that occurred in England cannot be attributed to the Crusades, in Smith’s opinion, and the “great political circumstance’ (470) of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries had very little to do with the Crusades. Smith goes on to claim that on in Italy is there any “indisputable influence” (471) of the Crusades. Trade increased dramatically. Charanis agrees with the notion that the Crusades left behind more damage than they did anything good. He does admit the “crusading, as a historical phenomenon, was a significant movement” (Charanis 1952, 131). Along

    Read More

More about Crusades Dbq Essay

Open Document