Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social themes in agatha christie novels
Essay on tragedy in literature
Feminist approach to Agatha Christie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social themes in agatha christie novels
Crooked House Crooked House by Agatha Christie is a mystery novel that contains suspense, suspicion, and a shocking twist at the end. The story is narrated by Charles Hayward, who hopes to marry Sophia Leonides, the granddaughter of a rich businessman, Aristide Leonides. However, his plans are put on hold when Aristide is murdered, almost certainly by someone in his wealthy household. The Leonides family all hope that the killer is Aristide’s much younger wife, Brenda, but it is unclear whether this really is the case. Charles, the son of an Assistant Commissioner of Scotland Yard, is left to find out the truth, ideally to prove that Brenda is the killer, and therefore clear his way to marry Sophia. The narrator, Charles Hayward, is connected …show more content…
He is confused as to why Brenda wouldn’t get rid of the incriminating evidence. He talks to her and she tells him her story of how she met Aristide and how his kindness made her truly fall in love with him, no matter what the rest of the family says. When Charles tells Sophia of his discovery that Brenda doesn’t seem like the killer she responds by saying that Brenda put Charles “under her spell” and that she’s just trying to fool him into believing that she’s innocent. Throughout the interviews Charles couldn’t tell if any one was innocent or guilty. It’s not until he talks to Josephine that he begins to find answers. Josephine Leonides is the youngest member of the family and Sophia’s sister. Just twelve years old, she is described as a strange-looking child with a moon-shaped face and a rather unfortunate personality. Whereas her brother and sister, Eustace and Sophia, are good-looking, Josephine has inherited her grandfather’s ugliness. She is described as not being ‘right in her head’, although everyone seems to attribute this to being hereditary and the direct result of her ugliness: “She had had an authoritarian ruthlessness of her grandmother’s …show more content…
First she put the blame on Brenda, but without any proof so it looked pretty unlikely that she was the killer. Brenda especially made it seem unlikely based on her story of how she met Aristide. She told Charles that she had met Aristide while she was the waitress for his table. Aristide began talking to her and made her feel as though someone truly believed that she could do whatever she wanted to or had ever dreamed of doing. This is what caused her to get married to him, even though she didn’t really love him in that way. She loved him because he was the first person to believe in her in a very long time. Based on this I believed that she was innocent but when her and Laurence’s love letters were discovered I began to have doubts about Brenda. Of course once the nanny was poisoned and Josephine was hurt I knew it wasn’t Brenda or Laurence because they were both in jail when these incidents
The most reasonable belief is that Gary Howard Olivia did it. It sounds reasonable because Olivia is reported to be a sex offender, and child pornographer. Olivia is also known for uploading several sexually explicit pictures of children. When he was arrested in 2000, he was allegedly carrying a picture of Jonbenet Ramsey. The second suspect was John Mark Karr. Many people believe it was him because when Jonbenet was murdered he was able to tell people everything about Jonbenet, he could tell you what type clothes she was wearing to the type of bracelet she had on. He was able to tell the strangulation of Jonbenet in graphic, sexual detail. He has also confessed that he had a sexual fascination with Jonbenet. The last victim that fits the case is Michael Helgoth. Michael Helgoth, known as the electrician, could have had a role in the Jonbenet Ramsey case. Helgoth was mostly referred to as a “hellraiser”. He was tied to an alleged property dispute with the Ramsays. Lots of people believe that could have been his motive seek revenge on the Ramseys, by kidnapping and killing Jonbenet. When officials arrived at the crime scene, they found a boot print that did not belong to anyone in the family. In 1997 Michael Helgoth committed suicide, but when officials checked his home they found a pair of boots that could possibly fit the boot print found that day of the
As the book progresses she tends to get along with her father more and then eventually over time they have a close bond. At the start of the book he is first mentioned on page 15 when a particular Michael Andretti is standing in the room next to them. Josephine bases the relationship with her dad upon what her mum feels about him, she eavesdropped on a conversation where he was explaining how he didn’t want to be apart of her life anymore and that if money was a problem that her mother be reimbursed for his absence. She on page 70, she calls him by his public title not as father or dad but clearly because he is a stranger in her life and she does not want him to be apart of her. The authors intentions were to use language to describe the relationship between her father and herself, showing that Things soon change as the book progresses and Josie is forced to call in her father to help her with a situation where she smacked a girl in the face with a textbook because the victim’s father was attempting to sue Josie. After that incident the relationship quickly starts to grow between Josie and
Charlie was innocent, he didn’t have many social experiences. Think back when the first time Charlie saw Laura’s dead body. “Why would you bring me here? I shouldn’t be here. I have to go back home. You have to tell someone about this.” His anxious shows he didn’t want to participate this mess, in part, he’s smart enough to know it would be a trouble, but he’s also full of fear. After Jasper’s persuasion, Charlie decides to help him find the real murderer. Craig Silvey gives us a huge surprise at the beginning of the book, we might think it’s a story about children’s adventure. On the contrary, as things happened, we come to realize it is not just a simple story, it’s more about a horrific thing. When Charlie run into this horrific thing, he is feared. Maybe, it’s more appropriate to
Josephine Alibrandi, a Catholic girl, narrates the novel in her final year of High school. She attends St Martha's, a wealthy catholic school in Sydney's eastern suburbs. Her academic scholarship ensures her place at the school as she is not as well off as the population of largely wealthy Anglo-Celtic girls that attend the school. Her Italian origin has been the reason for much persecution toward her in her life. Her background against the monied origins of her peers also provides much source of angst for Josie.
She believes that no one understands her and that she has had it worse in her family. Her personality could be described as melodramatic, witty, and self-centred. Josephine comes from an Italian background and is raised in a single parent home by her mother Christina Alibrandi. Although Josie’s grandmother Katia Alibrandi lives close by, she is reluctant to visit everyday after school as her grandmother’s nagging, meddling and Italian traditions stifle her.
The night Laura Wishart was found dead, Charlie changed as a person: he started to see everything in a different light, even his home life. He comes to terms with his mother; he realises that her personal issues are being taken out on him and dominating their family life. Ruth Buc...
having Gene as the narrator. The reader was allowed to see inside the mind of
Fifteen years separate Washington Irving’s short story “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” with Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short story, “Young Goodman Brown.” The two share an eerie connection because of the trepidation the two protagonists endure throughout the story. The style of writing between the two is not similar because of the different literary elements they choose to exploit. Irving’s “Sleepy Hollow” chronicles Ichabod Crane’s failed courtship of Katrina Van Tassel as well as his obsession over the legend of the Headless Horseman. Hawthorne’s story follows the spiritual journey of the protagonist, Young Goodman Brown, through the woods of Puritan New England where he looses his religious faith. However, Hawthorne’s work with “Young Goodman Brown” is of higher quality than Irving’s “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” because Hawthorne succeeds in exploiting symbols, developing characters, and incorporating worthwhile themes.
The misfortunes Jane was given early in life didn’t alter her passionate thinking. As a child she ...
Erdrich’s intent of this novel, The Round House is to reveal the lack of justice for Native Americans even on their own tribal land. She does this by using the example of a thinly-veiled fictional reservation in North Dakota, representing the real Ojibwe reservation. The legal theme and its impacts on the lives of the men and women trapped within a Kafka-esque legal system results in a young boy acting as a vigilante to enact a tragic form of justice. Conflicts of jurisdiction and sovereignty have long made it difficult to prosecute non-Native men for the rape of Native American women. The novel operates as a mythic vessel for the beliefs and actions of a Native American, Ojibwe ethical system nearly stamped out of existence. The novel acts
...of all responsibility (for, of course, there is no way that a normal person could ever kill.) In keeping with this principle the film attempts to absolve Young Charlie from all responsibility in her Uncle's death, for it is seen as an accident that occurred when Young Charlie was fighting her Uncle in self-defence. In the final stages of the film we are brought back to the small town introduced to us in the beginning, this time, however, it is in morning for a beloved son. Charlie's death has brought Graham back to Young Charlie. We can see the good side has won the battle for her. As in early situational Charlie has learned her moral lesson and the episode may end.
...he seemed to be unfazed by it unless you had a part in the death, which Grace obviously did. Her lack of consistency in recounting what had happened casts doubt upon her honesty and character. How can it be believed when Grace changes her story to fit her needs? They cannot, and therefore she is guilty.
During the court, there is no one who can help him to prove that he is not guilty and his friends seems to think that he is guilty for killing his wife. It is really tragic that he is guilty in a second without evidence, but his tone seems brave that he didn’t lose faith. “During this whole ordeal, he never fell apart,” Allison told me. “He wanted people to see him as strong. And I think in the end, that very trait worked against him.” shown the readers that Morton is confident because he knew the truth. When someone asked him questions about his wife’s death, he kept saying that he didn’t do it. He was waiting for the truth to come out because he endure all go pain, false accusations, and lost a family. He shown everyone that he will keep his faith and keep moving forward with confident.
not know is that his aunt molested him when he was little. Charlie does not realize this till his
a dull grey colour as if it had lost the will to live and stopped