Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emotional intelligence introduction
Emotional intelligence
Emotional Intelligence Assessment Overview
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emotional intelligence introduction
The Personal Styles Inventory (PSI-120) was developed with the purpose of assessing individual behaviors in both clinical and nonclinical settings. It measures your overall personality as well as your personality in specific areas of your life (Educational & Psychological Consultants, Inc.). Counselors can use the PSI-120 in career counseling, general counseling and organizational consultation services to identify any areas which may require attention. Counseling applications as discussed in Personal Styles Inventory by Kunce, Cope, and Newton, are: enhancing self-awareness, identifying sources of stress, counseling about careers, understanding interpersonal relations, providing consultation, and individualizing interventions (Kunce, Cope, & Newton, 1991). This test is intended for adults aged 16 and up and measures three major aspects of personality: emotions, action, and thinking (Medway & Smith, 1999). The PSI has scales to measure eight emotional styles, eight activity styles, and eight cognitive styles. This test can be used in individual or group settings. As explained in Personal Styles Inventory, the inventory uses a circumplex format to integrate data on personality characteristics in relation to two basic bipolar dimensions: (a) extroversion versus introversion and (b) the need for stability versus change. Style scores indicate strength of a characteristic only; scores are unrelated to either mental health or psychopathology (Kunce, Cope, & Newton, 1991). A lack of diversity in the norm group was identified by both Medway and Smith and they suggested future research should include a broader range of participants from multiple demographics considering that the current research is solely based on university students. Acco... ... middle of paper ... ...iver, NJ: The Merrill Counseling Series. Educational & Psychological Consultants, Inc. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2014, from The Personal Styles Inventory: http://new.epc-psi.com/home Kunce, J. T., Cope, C. S., & Newton, R. M. (1991). Personal Styles Inventory. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(November/December), 334-341. Medway, F., & Smith, J. (1999). Test Review of Personal Styles Inventory. The fifteenth mental measurementsyearbook [electronic version](17). Retrieved from Buros Institute of Mental Measurements Yearbook online database. Shahar, G. (2006). An Investigation of the Perfectionism/Self-criticism Domain of the Personal Style Inventory. Cogn Ther Res. Sturman, E. D., Mongrain, M., & Kohn, P. M. (2006). Attributional Style as a Predictor of Hopelessness Depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 20(4), 447-457.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Sweeny, P. D., Anderson, K., & Bailey, S. (1986). Attributional style in depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 974-991.
Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., Chen, S., Nisbett, R. E. (2013). Social psychology. New York, NY:
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
The Life Styles Inventory (LSI) is a self-assessment diagnostic instrument that measures 12 key thinking patterns, or "styles". The LSI promotes performance change and improvement by increasing personal understanding of one's thinking and behavior. By responding to these 240 inventory items, individuals learn exactly where they need to focus their development efforts, without ambiguity or guesswork. The results of the self-description are plotted on a circular graph for easy visualization of how the individual thinks and behaves in the 12 LSI styles. This profile acts as a personalized developmental needs assessment, calling attention to the individual's strengths as well as areas needing improvement.
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2009). Theories of personality. New York:
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Journal of personality and social psychology and. Retrieved from http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~broberts/Hazan & Shaver, 1987.pdf
Retrieved December 7, 2013. Gilovich, T., & Gilovich, T. (2013). Chapter 12 / Groups /. Social psychology in the United States. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Piotrowski, Nancy A., and Tracy Georges. Magill's encyclopedia of social science: psychology Volume 3. Pasadena, Calif.: Salem Press, 2003. Print.
Its purpose is to give the participant a 4-letter formula which describes strength preferences of the participant’s personality type. The formula comes from four different sections; Extraversion or Introversion, Sensing or iNtuition, Thinking or Feeling, and Judging or Perceiving. Based on the 4-letter formula, one will also receive a two-letter Temperament, which offers a good prediction of one’s behavior (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002).
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hergehhahn, B. R. and Olson, M. H. (1999). An Introduction to Theories of Personality. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson
Jones, J. M. (2010, May). What Do You Know about Cultural Styles? National Association of School Psychologists, 38(7), p. 1.
Trait approach covers the big five personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. These five traits have been identified as the most identifiable personality traits, even across cultures and societies. According to McCrae, Costa, and Busch’s (1986) study on personality system comprehensiveness, the big five personality model included the five traits most identified with by individuals asked to describe themselves and others. I found this segment of the class especially intriguing as it helped me not only learn so much about myself, but also take a deeper look into the personality of my family, peers, and even strangers. I am also more conscious of how I self-monitor my personality traits. For example, I am very much so an introverted person but at times I try to be extroverted based off the environment. In highly social environments, I consciously smile and try to talk to people because I want to be perceived in a favorable light, not actually because I feel the need to be sociable. In other words, I don’t want to be perceived as odd. I believe I developed this form of self-monitoring because when I am introverted at social events people will constantly ask me if I’m ok since I’m quiet, which makes me uncomfortable as they make me the focus. Being the center of attention makes me anxious, and therefore to prevent that I have developed being a fake-extrovert to avoid it. This exemplified how I apply self-monitoring to my everyday life. Trait approach gave me insight into how to identify vastly accepted personality traits, as well as, how each of these traits can be influenced and