Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Change in womens status in society
Male gender roles 18th century
Society to women over the years
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Change in womens status in society
Sex, smallpox and seraglios: a monument to
Lady Mary Wortley Montagu
Frith's article entitled Sex, smallpox and seraglios: a monument to Lady Mary Wortley Montagu was written in order to show the way life was for a woman in the eighteenth century. Her article illustrates what the role of men and women were during the 18th century. Furthermore, it shows what happened to women when they broke through these societal restrictions. There were three underlying points in Frith's article, she mainly focused on; the restrictions that women had in society, the extreme importance of beauty in western society and the societal differences between western society and eastern society regarding women. Frith is also trying to show that our world has not changed that much in the years since Montagu was alive, and that in the West women are still placed below men in many job situations and beauty is still extremely highly regarded. In the East, the world has changed even less in some ways, where many of the customs from the 18th century are still very predominantly practiced.
The article starts off looking at the limitations and duties of a woman in the 18th century from the point of view of a man. Women were not permitted to do many professions such as law, economics or science related; these professions were reserved for men. Women were meant to be "the object of knowledge rather than its producer" (Frith 1994, 101) meaning that women were not to be educated but were to only of their responsibilities for pleasing a man, staying beautiful, and staying virtuous. Women were believed to be inferior intellectually and were therefore not to be educated and were basically forced to marry if they wished a decent life. However, Montagu feuded t...
... middle of paper ...
...ted based on their physical appearance and not their education, beliefs, or actions. In the East it is a similar situation, women still wear veils to cover themselves which as stated earlier grants them freedom from persecution from other women because they are all equal no matter what their physical appearance. Similarly, it is still permitted for men in the Arab world to take more than one wife, which is still socially unacceptable and illegal in most parts of the West. Frith's essay shows that even with medical advancements social constraints will determine the way people are received and treated in life.
Works Cited
1) Frith, Wendy, "Sex, smallpox and seraglios: a monument to Lady Mary Wortley Montagu," Femininity and Masculinity in the Eighteenth-Century Art and Culture ed. Gill Perry and Michael Rossington, (Manchester University Press, 1994), 99-122.
The English attitudes towards gender are reflected in the literacy works of Margery Kempe and Elizabeth I’s letter to Sir Walter Raleigh. Within these two works, the women, especially, challenge the attitudes towards gender roles. First of all, women were expected to be domesticated, meaning all their duties lied within the home and the marriage. The women were responsible for taking care of the children/family and being obedient to their husband.
Women in society were always put as not being equal to men. During the Renaissance, women were inferior to men; women in different classes had different roles. Low class women were expected to be housewives and take care of everything to do with the house. Working class women were expected to work for their husbands and help them run their business. They would work along side with their husbands and then go home and take care of the household. Upper class women may have had servants and workers working for them but the women were still expected to take care of the house hold.
Literature of the English Restoration offers the example of a number of writers who wrote for a courtly audience: literary production, particularly in learned imitation of classical models, was part of the court culture of King Charles II. The fact of a shared model explains the remarkable similarities between “The Imperfect Enjoyment” by the Earl of Rochester and “The Disappointment” by Aphra Behn—remarkable only because readers are surprised to read one poem about male sexual impotence from the late seventeenth century, let alone two examples of this genre by well-known courtly writers. In fact, Richard Quaintance presents ten more examples by lesser-known poets as he defines the literary sub-genre of the neo-Classical “imperfect enjoyment poem,” written in imitation of Roman poems on the same subject, which is shared by Rochester and Behn (Quaintance 190). Since Rochester and Behn are working along such closely similar lines in terms of the artistic models that their own poems aim to imitate, it is therefore fair to ask the question: what are the main differences in their compositional technique within this tightly-defined literary sub-genre of the neo-Classical “imperfect enjoyment poem”? By examining features of each poem in turn—including form (including this sub-genre they share), but also narrative voice and tone—with some examination of the secondary critical literature on both Rochester and Behn, I hope to demonstrate that there are distinct differences in compositional technique which involve the difference in sex between these two writers. But my conclusion will attempt to problematize the very notion of an authorial sex difference by raising the concept of gender, and in particular the aspect of “performativity”—...
Gender roles were important in the eighteenth century because firmly established roles for each gender helped build and maintain a strong family unit. A family with a strong structure was vital because the family was the basis for all other institutions. Everything from government to church worked through the strong family unit. Women in the eighteenth century were designated to maintain household order and be subservient to the man. Eliza Wharton does not lose her innocence throughout the novel, Foster starts the novel with Eliza already enticed by the idea of freedom. Eliza refuses to cooperate with the domestic and republican ideology that is enforced by the women around her. Eliza challenges those who are happily the voice of domesticity. Eliza has no intention of participating in typical republican motherhood and matrimonial bonds. Eliza’s refusal to accept the normal gender roles of the eighteenth century is a menace to the patriarchy. One of Eliza’s suitors Boyer, ends up getting his heart
In Shakespearean time and even up to the turn of the 20th Century men were expected to be the sole provider of the family, entailing them to be either well educated or hard working. They were also expected to be good with the handling of finances and property. It was also acceptable for them to be barbaric, boisterous and socially well connected. This has given the men of this time an overwhelming sense of power, respect and freedom; rights which were not given to women at this time. Far from what was socially acceptable in regards to men, the gender identity of women was of a somewhat weaker nature. Women during Shakespearean time were regarded as docile, quiet and non-opinionated. Their socially acceptable role in many cases was to be domestic, entailing them to spend countless hours in the home, tending to basic familial needs, such as cooking and cleaning. This position prevented many women to receive an education or to socialize outside of the home. As a result of their inferior social status, they were expected to be submissive and to cater to her husband’s needs at all times. Women in Shakespearean time were also treated as property, either by their husbands or fathers, which diminished any sense of self-worth they may have possessed. This gender ideology ultimately paralyzed women, as the majority were helpless to alter their social standing or designated familial role.
Additionally, women were oppressed by a religious, male dominated law system. In the 17th century, men were the accepted leaders of society. If any one man tried to give women a voice in society, he was severely criticized, and all respect for him was lost. Dimmesdale, even though he loved Hester, was forced to persecute her for fear of being denounced by his colleagues. As shown in this quote by John Wilson, ?What say you to it on...
Poetry serves different purposes and can be used in various different ways; whether it is to describe something as simple as a chair or explore something as complex as the meaning of life. Poets range their poetry to their tastes, finding beauty everywhere they look and scrutinizing the details around them so they can transfer what they sense at those moments onto their readers. Mary Lady Chudleigh used poetry to speak out against the injustices against women and support feminism (Famous Poets). In “To the ladies”, Mary Lady Chudleigh uses poetry as a means of communicating her ideas to the world and persuading her readers. The poem itself works as a warning to women, or as the title puts it “To the ladies”. The warning is simple: stay away
Weber, Harold. The Restoration Rake-Hero: Transformations in Sexual Understanding in Seventeenth-Century England. Madison U of Wisconsin P, 1986.
They are told what role to play in a marriage and this role is about the only thing that defines women in this time period, even though marriage should not be the only basis women are judged on. At this point in time, women are mostly portrayed in a negative light. This might be said to be because they were not the ones who brought the income into the family and because they were not allowed to get involved in public affairs because they were not educated. Women were not allowed to get a higher education because they had to be married and had to take care of the men in the world who worked hard putting food on the table. It could also be said that because women were not allowed to get a higher education, they were not viewed as very intelligent because they got minimal schooling and did not need to be smart to be married as long as they could cook and clean without burning the house down. It may also be seen because of the influence that could be seen on the men in their lives and how there was very little influence because society did not believe that women were capable of everything men were capable of
At this time society was dominated by men, making women’s life extremely challenging and limited. The position and status of a woman ultimately depended on that of her husband. She was not given many rights unless it was allowed by her husband. Women had to withstand arranged marriages and there were times they encountered abuse from their spouse. What many people do not see in this society is that women longed for their own empowerment and they wanted to be given the opportunity to create their own success in life without being overshadowed by their husbands.
...eth Siddall. The paintings of Pre-Raphaelite artists imply that women fell into two categories: the chaste, maternal figure or the harlot. The subjects in Pre-Raphaelite paintings, are often defined by their relation to men, just as women in Victorian society were defined by their fathers, brothers, and sons. Though the feminist movement gained popularity during the Victorian era, women were still expected to be “. . . private and almost anonymous.” Victorian society was extremely preoccupied with controlling its members, as seen by the elaborate protocol governing the behaviour of women, yet at the same time it was also mesmerized by those who deviated from social expectations, like the “fallen women.” In Victorian England, art became a method for artists to express and grapple with a variety of societal problems, such as prostitution and the status of women.
Some upperclass women had the advantage of recieving an education. However, they were forced to give up their studies once married. A women's first priority was to be a good wife and to please her husband. The thoughts and feelings of women in Renaissance society were not expressed, they were not considered important. This is especially evident in the case of rape.
Women’s lifestyles back in Shakespeare’s time period was very different from the modern day women’s lifestyles of today. The characteristics for women of that time was that women should be uneducated, should follow chastity, take care of the home and should not join a profession or get a job. Most women were denied the chance to be schooled beyond the basics of simple reading and very little writing. Some women of the upper class were schooled but they were not looked upon as educated women but were instead welcomed to the company of men. Women would not be able to enter professions because of the lack of education and the fact that they were women. For the poor women their work was spinning and weaving. The best job that they could get was to be an overworked nurse. The only real profession that women at this time could get into was marriage. In marriage women were expected to only take care of the home and anything that would benefit the home. When entering marriage women were further endorsed by the law. The law said that when entering marriage women became property of the men and all their belongings were the mans property now and the man could do whatever he wanted with these belongings such as selling them. A woman was generally fail and soft, which proved their overall weakness. A good woman of that time was supposed to be practice obedience, patience, chastity, modesty, and virtue. Women who didn’t live up to these expectations were considered to be “bad women”. During their free time Elizabethan women would sing, dance, and write letters. (Papp and Kirkland)
Fatal Women of Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. E-book. In this book, Craciun analyses the way that women writers of the 19th century either contributed to or challenged Romantic stereotypes about their own gender. This source was useful to my research because it examined not only Romantic stereotypes about women, but also the real women of the Romantic Period.
Gorham, Deborah. A. A. The Victorian Girl and the Feminine Ideal. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982. Martineau, Harriet.