1.0
Literature review means to identify, summarize, evaluate and interpreted the written document and report that provided by those researchers, writers and professionals. (Knopf, 2006；Marshall, 2010；Booth et al., 2012)
Based on the concept of conducting literature review, it should concisely to abstract the sources or finding that existence from the prior research. Besides that, it should be proposed or concluded with trustable evidence. It also should judge the research based on what is the right, what is the wrong, what is uncertain or even what is missing from the original literature. (Knopf, 2006; Zorn & Campbell; 2006)
Literature review consists of two main types which are descriptive review and integrative review. For descriptive review,
The second step is to come out with the themes that based on the overview of the topic while also distinguish the research from the authors. Furthermore, the following steps are providing the brainstorming ideas to criticize on the review and analyzing the data based on the research. (Saunders et al., 2012)
Basically, systematic review is consisted of five steps for conducting literature review. First step is to create the foundation for framing the question and selecting a suitable methods. The second step is to determine the relevant work and execute the findings. Then, the third step is to do the data extraction based on the consequence and quality. The forth step is to compound the evidence of data. The last step is to interpret the intensity of evidence by presenting the results or writing out a review. (Adrian white et al., 2005; LK Henderson et al., 2010; Brown et al.,
In addition, the guideline is involved about what types of study should be addressed and what is the effort has made to evaluate on the particular references that used in the review. (Koretz & Lipman, 2016)
The guideline of meta-analysis represents on is it the writing activities that really more effective or better than reading comprehensive consequence. In addition, the guideline also involved in does writing activities has make better differently compare to reading comprehension or just basically based on the types of the students writing performance. (Hebert et al., 2012)
Based on the guideline of meta-analysis, it consists of seven checklist which is study question, literature search, data abstraction, evaluation of results, evaluation for publication bias, applicability of results and funding resources. According to these checklist, the guidance from the checklist is stated the distinct objectives and execute the overall of literature search. Thus, it also formulate the data while combining the results by using statistical method and lastly generalized the results. (Russo, 2007)
results of my fieldwork take into account the three disciplines that my literature review is
Step 3 is defining the evaluation objective, which is “a general statement that conveys the purpose of the planned study in precise terms” (DiClemente et al., 2013, pp. 300). Goals are more manageable when evaluation objectives are precise and contain applicable information. This ensures that the e...
This systematic review conducted by Takeda A, Taylor SJC, Taylor RS, Khan F, Krum H, Underwood M, (2012) sourced twenty-five trials, and the overall number of people of the collective trials included was 5,942. Interventions were classified and assessed using the following headings.-
It is essential that when using evidence-based practice guidelines to choose a treatment, that variety of research methods are applied so that the best relevant data can be produced. Such methods include qualitative/quantitative research, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. Both qualitative and quantative methods produce valuable data. Quantative research produces numeric evidence that is necessary for practice and can be measured and qualitative research produces descriptive data about the subject by using patients views etc. which can also be applied to clinical practice (Broeder et al, 2010)
...g the criteria noted above in the checklists proved in Houser (2015). It has been noted with evaluation that it appears to have the components of adequate criteria for being a credible source and having credible authors. The design of being a qualitative study has been evaluated and contains most of the components of the noted checklist. There are ethical issues that are well documented and weighed. The problem statement and purpose statement have been noted and the literature review was evaluated thoroughly. The sampling strategy is purposeful and explained in depth. The study was compared and is noted that its methods are of trustworthy quality. To optimize EBP is the ultimate goal in conducting a study of this nature. It has been shown that there is a significant amount of knowledge obtained from the study and there is a probable use for this information.
also point out that: “Literature reviews helps to develop and expand your research ideas, and although you may have some knowledge of your research topic, the literature review ensures you are familiar with recent developments and have a complete understanding of the relevant topics” (Hair et al, 2007, p.94). Even though we already have some knowledge about GBR, a literature review has helped us with expanding our ideas about what areas we needed to focus on, and what to include in the thesis. And in addition we also discovered a great deal of significant material that became crucial for the research.
The literature review is important to find credible, reliable, and relevant sources that fit the research problem. “To achieve its purpose, the literature review may examine issues of theory, methodology, policy, and evaluation that relate to the effectiveness of a policy or intervention” (Krysik & Finn, 2013, p.66). Annotated bibliographies and abstracts also provide information about different sources and this can be helpful for evaluating sources when doing a literature review. “An annotated bibliography includes a summary or evaluation of each of the sources” and when writing one it can help to establish if the sources used are relevant and apply to the research topic that is being investigated. (Stacks, Karper, Bisignani, & Brizee, 2013).
The research question is the first and foremost initial step in the research process, because it defines the expected outcomes and drives the project design. So it should be clear and concise once the research question is formulated, the next is defining the terms and concepts used in the research process. A literature review is needed to clarify issues, gives an understanding to the researcher how others have formulated similar research questions and defines concepts.
Polly Beam, J. S. (n.d.). Levy Library. Evidence Based Medicine Tutorial. 1.3 What’s Best: The Evidence Hierarchy. Retrieved April 9, 2014, from http://libguides.mssm.edu/hierarchy
A literature review is a study written by someone on a specific topic by researching relevant literature available and interpreting it (Aveyard, 2010). A research question is developed and by using relevant literature the question is analysed in detail (Aveyard, 2010). The literature review is important because it gives you a shorter version of all relevant literature on the topic chosen, this is so the reader does not have to access the number of literatures used (Aveyard, 2010).
The critique will focus on issues like, title, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, data collection, methods, data analysis, rigour, findings, ethics, generalisability and flexibility.
If they decide that there is ample material on the specific topic at hand, the team moves on to the next phase of the Iowa model. If sufficient amounts of research do not exist on the subject, a research study may need to be carried out (Brown, 2014). This stage also consists of the research team evaluating the rigor of the research that they have collected (Doody & Doody, 2011). It is important to have an analysis procedure in place for all members of the research team to follow when evaluating research studies to ensure consistency in the appraisal of the quality and precision of each research study found (Doody & Doody, 2011). According to Doody & Doody (2011), “effectiveness, appropriateness, and feasibility” (p. 663) are three of the grading standards that researchers can use in evaluating research studies.
The authors have not needed ethical approval to carry out this study as only published data that were in public domain were used. However, certain ethical considerations have been adhered to. Wager and Wiffen (2011) identified some ethical considerations authors of literature reviews need to adhere to. Whilst their primary focus was on authors writing systematic review for Cochrane journals, the suggestions are applicable to all authors of any form of literature review. The six suggestions are as follows:
The articles found during the search four were chosen for use in this report. The articles chosen were critically appraised to establish the validity and relevancy of the reports. The articles were selected based on the outline given in Richardson-Tench, Taylor, Kermode & Roberts (2014, pg 53-54) which aims to assess the question and the topic, the abstract, the methodology, the findings or conclusions and an overall evaluation. It was essential that all articles chosen were peer reviewed. This is a process maintains high standards in research and involves the review of articles by subject matter expert’s (Richardson-Tench, Taylor, Kermode & Roberts 2014, pg 53). The authors of the papers were also assessed for credibility. All articles were found to be of authority in the field, authors included nurses with Phd and fellowships, and associations to institutions in high regard. Each abstract of each article was evaluated Richardson-Tench, Taylor, Kermode & Roberts (2014, pg 67) state the abstract should be a clear and brief overview of the report and should include information on the “problems, methods, design, results, conclusions and implications” Richardson-Tench, Taylor, Kermode & Roberts (2014, pg 67). All chosen reports provide an acceptable abstract, for example Mathers
Striating from the research idea to the culmination of the findings, the research process entails many segments, all of which are imperative. By choosing the research methodology, the researchers can formulate the path to be used in conducting the study and reporting the findings. The methodology helps in the search of literature, development of research questions and the creation of the most suitable study design. It also assists in the interpretation of the results and the publication of the findings in journals.