Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Masculinity and feminism
Note on the influence of media on gender Stereotyping
Boundaries of gender in sport
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Masculinity and feminism
Tony Porter, author, educator and activist, makes a call to men all over, and refers to the “Man Box” and all the negative gender socialization messages they learn at a young age, while reflecting back to his personal experiences from his own life. In reference to the ‘Man Box,” he points out the unspoken rules of what makes a man, and those rules are what he calls “straight up twisted.” Some of those are: do not be “like a woman” or “like a gay man,”” you have to be heterosexual, view women as property/objects, and you cannot cry or openly express emotions with the exception of anger. This “Man Box,” does not allow a man to step out of it without risking their masculinity, and to many men, that is the worst thing you can ever do. This all …show more content…
Like in the insult scene from the Sandlot, when Ham tells Phillips that he plays ball like a girl, everyone in that scene gasped and stood in shock, because it was as if Ham took it too far. When it comes to the “Man Box,” there is no acting like a woman. Porter brings up when he spoke to a 12-year-old football player, and when he asked him, “How would you feel if, in front of all the players, your couch told you were playing like a girl?” Porter had expected that boy to say he would have felt mad or sad, but instead he said that “it would destroy me.” But what is wrong with being a girl or a gay man? We have been around a world where gender inequality exists and have subconsciously and consciously accepted and enforce a set sexuality and gender roles that we have been influenced to follow. Men have to be tough, masculine, and straight because society says they have to be; they cannot act like a sissy or a woman, which is referencing to all women and gay men being sensitive, dainty, and weak. It pulls men towards a homophobia, which Michael Kimmel has said it is more than just an irrational fear of gay men, it is the “fear that other men will unmask us, emasculate us, reveal to us and the world that we do not measure up, that we are not real men. We are afraid to let other men see that. Fear makes us ashamed, because the recognition of fear in ourselves is proof to …show more content…
Porter brings up the day his family had to bury his teenage brother, and ten minutes after they buried him and all the women had left out of the vehicle, that was when his father started to cry. He knew his father did not want to cry in front of him, but he also knew that it would have been better to cry in front of his son than in front of the women. If his father were to do so, it would have left his manliness out of the box and breaking that rule of showing emotion. It is the same for women. They have to stay “pure,” in regards to their virginity, and they cannot wear anything that can lead them to getting rape, but they have to be sexy, and that they have to be second to men if not than they are not a real woman. It goes back to gender inequality in the world and how these set gender roles are to be fulfilled. C.J. Pascoe mentions about Judith Butler’s way to challenge this gender inequality, and that is if “individuals who deliberately engage in gender practices that render them culturally unintelligible, such as practices that are at odds with their apparent sex category, challenge the naturalness and inevitability of a rigid gender order,” if girls can engage in “masculinizing processes,”
The topics that Joe Ehrmann uses as framework for his Building Men for Others program are quite intriguing and make you really question masculinity. The first topic, rejecting false masculinity, can be interpreted a few different ways. In the book, it states: “As young boys, we’re told to be men, or to act like men” soon followed with “we’ve got all these parents say ‘be a man’ to boys that have no concept of what that means. I completely agree with the statement of Joe Ehrmann and often question the definition of ‘being a man’. Many boys and men will reject the idea of a man being anything other than being big and strong or having power.
Another issue that the writer seemed to have swept below the carpet is the morality of women. First, women seemed to have been despised until they started excelling in mass advertising. Also, the author seems to peg the success of the modern woman to clothing and design. This means that women and cloths are but the same thing. In fact, it seems that a woman’s sex appeal determine her future endeavours, according to the author. It is through this that I believe that the author would have used other good virtues of women to explain
The concept of masculinity is considered as the qualities and characteristics of a man, typical what is appropriate to a man. In this article, A Community Psychology of Men and Masculinity: Historical and Conceptual Review, The author Eric S. Mankowski and Kenneth I. Maton, analyze four main themes: "Men as gendered beings, the privilege and damage of being a masculine man, men as a privileged group, and men’s power and subjective powerlessness. The second and fourth themes are described as
Jensen believes that ideology of manliness is dangerous to both men and women. Manliness is seen as something that needs to be eradicated from society, like the black plague. Jensen is directly addressing the demands on men under the notion of manliness. Jensen lays out the key traits that are associated with the idea of manliness. Control, conquest, aggression, domination, and more. He admits that men can sometimes have traits that are predominately associated with females, such as caring and compassion, but states that the only traits that really counts in the end is the traits that over power the female like aspects. Culturally society has predetermined
As a society there are a lot of qualities that men have been socialized to uphold when it comes to how they act or react, what they support, and what they suppress. This movie produces a harsh critique of male socialization early on and continues
Aaron Devor’s essay “Becoming Members of Society: Learning the Social Meanings of Gender” describes how despite popular belief, gender and sex are not directly related and how social norms affect individual’s choice of gender. Devor‘s main argument is that gender is not determined by genitalia, but instead by the individual's own choices. Michael Kimmel’s essay “Masculinity as Homophobia” claims that gender equality is a positive thing for males and that social norms force men to act a certain way. Kimmel’s main argument is that men are always having to protect their masculinity in order to prevent themselves from appearing weak. Both authors present compelling arguments for both gender equality and for how social norms influence individuals’ gender choice. However, the two authors approach the same topic in different ways. Kimmel takes a more laid-back approach to the topic by using simple words and a conversational tone that relates to the casual gender sociologist. Devor writes a more sophisticated essay using complex terms and a more formal tone that relates to the serious sociologist that research gender studies.
As young men grow up, they would generally learn and integrate within a box of codes which shows them how to be a man, known as the Guy Code. The Guy Code is a set of rules prevalently applied among men groups about how a man behaves with other men and his girlfriend. It mainly teaches guys to be dominant, aggressive and fearless. In Michael Kimmel’s “ Bros Before Hos: The Guy Code”, he indicates that men disguise their emotions and inner beings to be like a man, particularly among their peers. It imposes a consciousness that timidity is not a characteristic that men should have.
Men are allegedly competitive, aggressive, dominant, and strong and if these attributes are not acquired a man is not a man. When other men recognize a man failing in those four areas of “manliness” they compare him to a female with negative connotation as expressed in the following quote, “The worst insult one man can hurl at another-whether its boys on the playground or CEOs in the boardroom-is the accusation that a man is like a woman.” These actions create perceptions that women are unworthy and pitiful. Jensen mentions that because of masculinity men are thought to seek control over women resulting in an increase of physical violence towards women. However, masculinity has harsh effects on men as well. Men are constantly trying to prove their dominance to each other, while competing against one another for ultimate dominance. This creates a never ending cycle of competition and unease for
We’re all familiar with the stereotypes and myths about what it means to “be a man.” The victorious leader gets what he wants using aggression and does not accept failure; he is smooth with the ladies, and he is often good with a gun. He is usually rich and in control, especially in control of women, like a father who loves his daughter dearly but will be damned if she’s going to go out dressed like that. The list could go on and on with the stereotypes. But the Coen Brothers’ cult-classic film, The Big Lebowsk (1998), with its hero “The Dude,” contradicts these notions of masculinity. The Coen brothers offer several familiar stereotypes of masculinity (the Vietnam vet, the successful capitalist, an oversexed bowler, some aggressive German nihilists), yet it is these characters that throughout the film are shown to be absurd, insecure, and even impotent. It is these stereotype men that the Coen brothers criticize. “Sometimes there’s a man,” says the narrator over and over again, pointing out the Dude’s non-stereotypical masculinity as the true representation of what it means to be a man. The brothers then illustrate that the men who give no thought to their identity, who ignore the pressure to conform to cultural expectations, are to be regarded as “real men.”
The Bro Code breaks down the establishment and encouragement of sexism into four “steps” that society uses to form sexist men (Keith). These steps are: “1. Train Men to Womanize, 2. Immerse Men in Porn, 3. Make Rape Jokes 4. Obey the Masculinity Cops”(Keith). Thomas Keith begins by addressing the fact that he grew up in this “bro culture” and that men today are continually taught to have the same mentality that Keith had when he was younger. However, he claims that “bro culture” has changed and has become a more “dangerous sexist” (Keith). Our culture continually promotes this behavior through music, television and media, all which tell men that in order to be successful and true men they must be rich, strong and surrounded by women.
When someone is thinking of a man, what do they think? Strong? Brave? That’s what most people think; in reality that is a very false image. In “Bros Before Hos: The Guy Code,” Michael Kimmel, talks about what it means to be a man and what it takes to be a man in today’s world. Men are pressured into what they “should” be. If they don’t follow certain unwritten rules, which include: not asking for directions, not giving up, not showing fear, or any signs of emotional weakness, such as tears; they are considered less than a man, a wimp. A real man must be aggressive and brave, he must defend his territory: status, family, possessions. Men blindly follow the Guy Code, they believe in order to fit in, they must comply and be part of the pack.
...Bodies 10). The very act of saying something about sex ends up imposing cultural or ideological norms, according to Butler. As she puts it, "'sex' becomes something like a fiction, perhaps a fantasy, retroactively installed at a prelinguistic site to which there is no direct access" (Bodies 5). Nonetheless, that fiction is central to the establishment of subjectivity and human society, which is to say that, even so, it has material effects: "the 'I' neither precedes nor follows the process of this gendering, but emerges only within and as the matrix of gender relations themselves" (Bodies 7). Overall, I really liked butlers voice and articulation of certain dilemmas and her theme and reiteration of important facts. I leave you with a quote in which i like from her because you can interpret it in so many ways. It read “more lives are grievable than others” (Butler).
Every culture has different social expectations for men and women. Most of the time traditional norms or stereotypical gender roles are created by society. What they observe seem to be true and convince others to believe it; as a result, the “script” come from stereotypical gender roles about masculine and feminine nature: Hamilton McCubbin and Barbara Blum Dahl states clearly, “men should be brave, strong, ambitious, and aggressive, while keeping the...
We shape how masculinity works with our individual selves and with our public selves. The roles that we play on and off the courts dictate slowly mold the fluid that is understanding what masculinity actually is. Taking a new look at gendered norms on an intuition level will help create safe places where people can explore, without repercussions, a new identity, whether that identity is sexual or social, that is left up to personal choice.
The differences between women and men are not solely biological. Our society’s culture has established a set of unwritten cultural laws of how each gender should act, or in other words society has ascribed a stereotype. Men’s gender identity has been one of masculinity, and masculinity is defined as referring to a man or things described as manly. What does manly mean though? Is a male manly if he is “Mr. Fix-it”, or the jock, or if he sits on the couch on Sunday watching football? This latter statement is a stereotype of men, that has been around for decades, and is current as well, but starting with the 1960’s a man’s role started to change, despite the stereotype not changing to accommodate it. For the past 40 years one can see how men have taken on roles stereotypically ascribed to women, such roles including being the “stay-at-home mom”, which we can find an excellent example of in the 1980’s film “Mr.