Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lincoln's abuse of power during the civil war
Analysis on Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War
Abraham Lincoln views on slavery
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lincoln's abuse of power during the civil war
It is widely known that Abraham Lincoln, since his childhood, was never a fan of the south. Additionally, his father was a devout Christian, which played a major role in the development of Lincoln’s moral and ethical beliefs, which manifested themselves more so later on his life and would play a major part in Lincoln’s agenda during the Civil War. The idea that Lincoln may or may not have overstepped his powers during the process of preserving the unity of the United States will be looked at closely in the following paragraphs. This critical analysis will look at various sources with differing views in order to establish a solid conclusion as to why Lincoln was justified in the actions he took as President during the Civil War. Further, it …show more content…
While slavery wasn’t the primary cause of the Civil War, it can be considered to be the main cause, as apart from the Revenue Act, states’ rights were directly related to the Emancipation Proclamation and the public outcry it generated in the South. According to Lincoln, “.…slavery could destroy the nation. A house divided against itself cannot stand." Additionally, he believed “this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free" (Grabowski and Schlesinger 1). Thus, Lincoln signed the Revenue Act, which would ultimately help to provide additional funding for the Civil War, and would be the first federal income-tax in …show more content…
What is called "the right of secession" has no existence. It means the right of revolution, which belongs to every people....If the revolution succeeds, history justifies them; if they fail, it condemns them, even while not condemning their motives of action....If South Carolina should rebel,--and secession is rebellion,--and if other states should join her, it would be the duty of the general government to compel them to observe the law....” ("Secession and the Civil War"). As history has shown us time and time again, Presidents take executive action when they feel it is necessary to maintain order. Lincoln rightfully felt it was more important that the Union remain intact and the Constitution upheld, than it was to honor religious views, slave labor and taxation disagreements, which are some of the fundamental reasons cited for the Confederates rebellion. If Lincoln did not defend the Constitution, it would essentially be worthless pieces of paper, and the integrity and law that it was designed to protect would be
There are numerous instances wherein the Generals are depicted as immature and frightened, and Lincoln as the strong pillar of faith. Williams portrays Lincoln in a very positive light, allowing the reader to realize the greatness of Lincoln, in his compassion, strategy, statesmanship and lack of ego. Williams has provided numerous instances wherein he provides ample support to his arguments and facts. In spite of the unnecessary detail and verbosity that Williams sometimes uses, there is no doubt that this book is a remarkable insight into Lincoln’s persona. Works Cited Dawson, Joseph G. III. -.
Disapproval, the Confederacy, and slavery were amongst the many crises Abraham Lincoln faced when addressing his First Inaugural speech (Lincoln, First Inaugural, p.37). Above all, Lincoln’s speech was stepping on the boundaries of the southern slave states. Once states began to secede, new territories formed and the disapproval of Lincoln grew. Despite Lincoln’s attempts of unifying the antislavery and confederate views, many whites refused to follow his untraditional beliefs. Lincoln encountered hostile and admirable emotions from the people of the Union and the Confederacy. However, despite his representation of the Union, not everyone agreed with his views.
In conclusion the election of Lincoln as president in 1860 caused a civil war because it was falsely perceived by the south that Lincoln would threaten the state’s constitutional right to slavery. This false idea was due to a rift between the northern and southern states in both an economic and ideological manner. That is the north was based on industry and generally was opposed to slavery. But the South was an agricultural society which ran on slavery and, due to Nat Turner’s Insurrection and John Brown’s stand at Harper’s Ferry, was fearful of the north’s involvement in the governing of states as well as being opposed to this on the basis of state’s rights. The election of Lincoln caused the south to succeed from the union causing civil war.
Yes, slavery was the cause of the Civil War, half of the country thought it was wrong, and the other half just could not let it go or continue. The war was fought overall in different places, and the monetary and property loss cannot be calculated. Arguments about the causes and consequences of the Civil War, as well as the reasons for Northern victory, will continue as long as there are historians to wield the pen ? which is, perhaps even for this bloody conflict, mightier than the sword (Oates 388). The Civil War was a great waste in terms of human life and possible accomplishment and should be considered shameful. Before its first centennial, tragedy struck a new country and altered it for an eternity. It will never be forgotten, but adversity builds strength and the United States of America is now a much stronger nation (Oates 388).
The secession ordinance from South Carolina rationalizes secession based on law of compact. To begin with a compact is defined as “an agreement between two or more individuals or entities” ("compact"), South Carolina reasoned that compact was not upheld by the United States and therefore South Carolina was within its legal right to leave the Union. Breaking this down further S.C. gives a clear understanding of what the law of compact means to them” mutual obligation, failure to perform material part releases obligation, if an arbiter in not provide each party uses judgment to determine fact or failure, with all consequences” (Perman Michael). South Caroline reasoned that the contract in which they entered into was no longer providing justice, domestic Tranquility, promoting general welfare or securing the prosperity of the south as promised in the opening statement of the Constitution. On the ...
In order for South Carolina to justify their secession from the union, they issue a declaration of constitutional violations by the free states upon them. The “Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify Secession” was primarily centered around the embrace of Northern antislavery principles
The Union was very fragile, one mistake by Lincoln and the border states would leave, and join the confederacy. “He was attacked on all sides: by abolitionist, Negrophobes, states-righters, strict constructionists, radicals, conservatives, armchair strategist, and by people who just did not like his looks or resented his story telling.” He was being pressured from all sides, but was still calm and collective in leading the union against the confederacy. Lincoln was a very reasonable man, he was known for giving a lot of pardons out, but was often criticized by many. A mother came into the White House to ask Lincoln if he could pardon her son from war because he was all she had left. Lincoln did not hesitate, he simply signed the papers and helped save a family. That shows the type of man he was. Even though there was a war going on he still had the compassion not to take a mother only
Furthermore, the secondary source chosen for the final project is a study regarding Abraham Lincoln’s interpretation of the United States Constitution and the impact he had on the Constitution during and after the Civil War. Also, Dr. Dirck masterfully details the chronology of Abraham Lincoln’s role as an antebellum politician, how he became a fervent opponent of slavery and as the President of the United States. Additionally, the author also integrates Lincoln’s value system
In “The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln,” Doris Kerns Goodwin takes in indirect approach towards examining Abraham Lincoln’s character. She looks at his rivals for the 1860 Republican Presidential Nomination, rather than Lincoln’ s character in isolation, in order to gain a better understanding of who Lincoln was.
A common misconception regarding the ideals of President Abraham Lincoln is that many thought that the 16th President of the United States was a true abolitionist from the very beginning of the civil war, however that was not the case since the President was actually more concerned about keeping the Union intact rather than freeing slaves. The New York Times published a letter penned from Lincoln to Horace Greeley who was once editor-in-chief at The New York Tribune as well as a congressman and presidential candidate. This letter is of importance because Lincoln clearly states his intentions of the war to Greeley who may have been mistaken that Lincoln wanted to primarily free slaves. “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy slavery…If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.”
In a country divided, President Abraham Lincoln would face one of the most challenging times in US history. He would task himself with preserving the union of his country and ensuring the blessings of liberty to all those whom he served. The success of these tasks would define President Lincoln to this day. In a valiant effort to persevere the nation, as the it was ripping itself apart, President Lincoln spoke to the people of the United States concerning a recent battle of the Civil War of the United States. This speech became known as the Gettysburg Address; it is one of President Lincoln’s most famous piece. It is famous because it highlights the motif of his Presidency, the importance of equality, liberty, and the preservation of the union. Although this speech was well written, it was powerful and moving, partly due to President
Abraham Lincoln, a great leader, was dedicated to the American people and to solving the issues faced by the United States. He demonstrated his leadership through his actions as President. Lincoln was truly committed to preserving the Union. His wartime leadership proved valuable during the hard years of the Civil War. Lastly, Lincoln’s actions to end slavery, through the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment, showed that he had the best interest of all Americans in mind. Abraham Lincoln’s hard work and perseverance ensured that the Civil War would come to an end and a that the states would reunite.
At such a crucial point in our history, a man by the name of Abraham Lincoln took a stand. But what was most peculiar, was his logical thinking. He did not pick one extremity, nor did he deny the rationality of the other. Why? Because he was committed to uniting the nation, to keep the young United States together.
We generally remember historical figures by what they achieve in their lifetime. Most historical figures had major setbacks before they could succeed. Abraham Lincoln is remembered for his vital role as the leader in preserving the Union during the Civil War and beginning the process that led to the end of slavery in the United States but not many people realize that Lincoln had setbacks also. He is remembered for his character and leadership, his speeches and letters, and as a man of humble origins whose determination and perseverance led him to the nation's highest office.