Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical fiction civil war essay
History of Abraham Lincoln and his achievements
What was the contribution of Abraham Lincoln
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical fiction civil war essay
Lincoln and His Generals by T. Harry Williams
Harry T. Williams was born on May 19, 1909. When in college, he was encouraged by a professor to study history. This professor's main interest was the Civil War era and had a great effect on Williams. He attended Platteville State Teachers College (later Wisconsin State University at Platteville) where he received a B.Ed in 1931. Williams continued education into graduate school was mainly due to the lack of work during the Great Depression. He went on to earn a Ph.M. in 1932, and Ph.D. in 1937, from the University of Wisconsin (Dawson 431).
Lincoln and His Generals was the breakthrough book for Williams who had only written one book previously. This book provided him with many national and local acclaims. He book was on the best seller list, he received rave reviews in national publications, and scholarly awards where he was teaching at the time, L.S.U. He would go on to become a very respected writer during his forty-year career. He would also win the Pulitzer Prize in 1970 for his book Huey Long (437).
Williams main theme in Lincoln and His Generals is about the Civil War being the first modern war and Lincoln’s function in the position of President. He introduces the state of the Union army as one that has no shape to it. This includes the lack of any plan of attack, as the thought of war had not been translated into any type of scheme. The armies lacked organization and communication, and existing qualified generals were old and inept. The first task that Lincoln had was the immediate selection of Generals. Lincoln’s selection process was sometimes based on political and personal grounds, and he was in the position of selecting from a pool of generals that had no experience leading a large army. Williams tells us that even if the selection was for political reasons, Lincoln had the ‘national cohesion’ in mind. It appears that control was an important factor in Lincoln’s selections, however, Williams continually argues that if Lincoln had had generals who were more competent he would not have interfered as much. In Lincoln, one sees a willing amateur, one who had the ability to bring out the best in some men, and also learn from them (Williams 11).
Williams gives us insight into Lincoln’s thought process into who Lincoln really was. Williams superbly supports this with various examples and...
... middle of paper ...
...of Grant, that some of the other Generals start feeling unattended to (336). Lincoln becomes understanding and does his job of keeping the big picture of the war in mind by soothing the bruised egos. Williams has done wonders showing Lincoln as one devoid of any ego. This is one of the subtle tones of the passages, but yet always make the reader draw this inference. I found this subtle reiteration very well timed and placed. There are numerous instances wherein the Generals are depicted as immature and frightened, and Lincoln as the strong pillar of faith.
Williams portrays Lincoln in a very positive light, allowing the reader to realize the greatness of Lincoln, in his compassion, strategy, statesmanship and lack of ego. Williams has provided numerous instances wherein he provides ample support to his arguments and facts. In spite of the unnecessary detail and verbosity that Williams sometimes uses, there is no doubt that this book is a remarkable insight into Lincoln’s persona.
Works Cited
Dawson, Joseph G. III. “T. Harry Williams.” Dictionary of American Biography. Vol. 17, 431-446
Williams, T. Harry. Lincoln and His Generals. New York: Dorset Press, 1952.
leading up to and surrounding President Abraham Lincoln’s death. The purpose of this book is to
Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, showed weaknesses within his leadership which may have contributed to the confederacy’s loss and the unions win . Davis failed in three vital ways. These ways were: his relations with other confederate authorities and with the people, as well as in his fundamental concept of his job as president and in his organization and specific handling of his role as commander in chief . Davis failed in maintaining communication with leaders and with his people, often unable to admit when he is wrong which led to lack organization in his role . In addition, Davis was a conservative leader, not a revolutionary one which meant that his strength was often in protocol and convention rather than in innovation . Studying each of these aspects that represented a weakness in Jefferson Davis’s leadership, Lincoln in comparison provided more admirable and outstanding qualities within his leadership which in many ways affected the outcome of the war
Therefore, neither of the generals exceeded the other when it comes to military strategies, which rather debunks Shaara’s depiction of Longstreet’s advanced knowledge of modern warfare. Despite of the importance of the Battle of Gettysburg, often marked as the turning point of the war, General Longstreet should not obey an order that results in a significant loss of men that would be extremely difficult to replace at this time. Already limited by the amount of men still able to fight, pushing additional forces in an open battle would just nearly deplete the confederate soldiers completely. Since this battle was one that went on until a majority of ones sided were depleted, the south should have played it safe against the Unions nearly surplus supply of
[Separation of powers is where the government divides power between 3 branches of government so no one branch becomes too power.][ Document B was written by James Madison in His federalist paper 47.] According to James Madison in document B “Liberty requires that the three departments of power should be separate and distinct this means that each branch should have its own unique and separate jobs.” This quote clearly explains that each branch should have there own separate and distinct jobs so no one branch becomes too powerful.*This quote guard against tyranny because the quote is saying the branches will all have their own powers but can control all the others
This includes those who are willing to risk their lives for their own country. It’s not uncommon for people to refer to this when they are thinking about justice. However, the concept of self-sacrifice is absent from Hobbes’s view on justice. Hobbes’s view only considers the element of self-interest. This is problematic because the commonwealth requires its citizens to risk their lives in order to defend the commonwealth. One would face terrible consequences for avoiding military service so they would be willing to take their chances on the battlefield. Therefore, the obligations to the commonwealth conflicts with the concept of civic obligations. Although Hobbes does provide a valid, coherent argument in reply to the fool about justice that attempts to avoids the concept of conventionalism, logical consistency is not enough to prove his
DiLorenzo was very successful in writing this book, Alexander Marriott states that he “reached a relatively wide audience of libertarians and conservatives.”(Marriott) DiLorenzo is very convincing in his book “The Real Lincoln” because of the many quotes and questions he presents to his audience. By persuading his readers to question all their formal beliefs of Lincoln he gets them to think Lincoln might be this monster that he portrays him to be. Lincoln probably was not a saint like many have made him out to be but he was still the man who demolished slavery and held the United States together during a tough period. By making such a historical figure look like a freud many refuted him, one article by Ken Masugi tells of how DiLorenzo misused quotes and made people believe they meant something by it that they did not. Masugi states DiLorenzo “frequently distorts the meaning of the primary sources he cites, Lincoln most of all.”(Masugi) Masugi then gives examples of how Dilorenzo misused quotes in his book. DiLorenzo’s book had strengths such as its persuasiveness, but also had weaknesses like his misuse of primary sources, and not only diminishing a few of Lincoln’s accomplishments but continuing by degrading his who he was as a
After the second Battle of Manassas, the Army of the Potomac was demoralized and President Lincoln needed someone that could reorganize it. President Lincoln liked General McClellan personally and admired his strengths as an administrator, organizer, and drillmaster. Lincoln was aware that the soldiers loved General McClellan and had nicknamed him “Little Mac.” Knowing this, President Lincoln ordered General McClellan to “assume command of Washington, its defenses and all forces in the immediate vicinity.”1 This was not a field command but intended for General McClellan to take the returning demoralized Army and the new soldiers coming into Washington and make them a fighting force, nothing more. Lincoln knew as well that although Ge...
. .’, concludes James Oakes’ book with the aftermath of the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination. Oakes discussed the respect Douglass gathered for Lincoln over the years and the affect his assassination had on both himself and America as a whole. Oakes even brushed over Douglass’ relationship with Andrew Johnson, the president succeeding Lincoln. Analyzing his experience with the new president, it was safe to say that Andrew Johnson had no consideration as to what Douglass and Lincoln previously fought for. Johnson did not have the same political skills as Lincoln did, and he did not retain the same view for America that Lincoln did. It was obvious that Douglass held Lincoln at a higher standard than Andrew Johnson, stating that he was a “progressive man, a humane man, an honorable man, and at heart an anti-slavery man” (p. 269). Oakes even gave his own stance on Andrew Jackson, “It was a legacy that Andrew Johnson could ever match. When all of Lincoln’s attributes were taken into consideration - his ascent from the obscurity to greatness, his congenial temperament, his moral courage - it was easy for Douglass to imagine how much better things would be ‘had Mr. Lincoln been living today’.” (p. 262). It is hard to imagine the pre-war Douglass to have said something like that as opposed to an older, much more reserved Douglass. With the abolishment of slavery, so came much discrimination. Without
David Herbert Donald's Lincoln is a biography of our sixteenth President, Abraham Lincoln. At the age of twenty one, he was sure he did not want to be like his father Thomas Lincoln, an uneducated farmer, so he left his fathers house permanently. He had many jobs, learned many lessons, and made both friends and enemies, all which helped him to become one of the greatest presidents of the United States of America during the time the country had split, the Civil War. Thoroughly researched and excellently written, this biography comes alive and shows us what really happened during the early to mid-nineteenth century and it still puts us in the point of view of our former president, using the information and ideas available to him.
...ct. Even if the fool does not believe in justice, Hobbes believes he will be cast out of society, which makes the promise for anyone's survival bleak.21
As a social worker, I can see that Marcel may be using drugs and alcohol to cover up some of the emotions that he has, and I believe that he is hiding some depression issues with abusing alcohol and drugs. I would like to use cognitive behavioral therapy in our intervention as well to address some of the underlying issues that Marcel has with depression. CBT works well with individuals who have some type of mental issue. In Marcels case, he happens to have some depression issues, so I believe that CBT will work well to solve some of those issues or to see where these issues are coming from. Cognitive behavioral therapy is a therapy that can be used to achieve a short-term or a long-term goal. It is a problem-solving therapy that focuses on how to solve the current problem that the client may have. It doesn’t put much emphasis on the past and past situations, it focuses more on the here and not. According to the article “Staff Expectations and Views of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities” has some information that state the same thing. “There is an assumption in CBT that an individual will develop new understanding regarding their cognitive processes and acquire cognitive and behavioral skills during the therapy session which they can then apply independently and successfully in their ‘real world’. This allows the newly
This is why our government consists of three branches including the Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches. If one person was given all of the powers of the different branches we would have a tyranny. This is why our founding fathers made this decision. To give an example of the separation importance, if someone working at the House of Representatives was also working at the Supreme Court, they would have too much power. Lawmakers and judges must be separated or power could be abused. (Doc. B)
Abraham Lincoln (12 Feb. 1809-15 Apr. 1865) the 16th president (civilwar.org) of the United States of America was one of the main public persons that influence the civil war in many aspects. Even though the civil war may have been the last resource the nation had, it could be argue that Lincoln’s governments try its best to find a different solution. The civil war was a conflict that destroyed the nation; it perhaps could have been avoided if the second party had work for a solution. But it is true that maybe both parts could have looked out for the benefits of the people as a whole instead of their personal benefits. Lincoln principal positive effect on the civil war was actually before and during the war when Lincoln’s government had many attempts to prevent the confrontation, and when this one began he took the right decisions to win the war. One of the biggest effects on the civil war was the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, which gave the slaves their liberty. Many would agree is that Abraham’s Lincoln effect on the civil war was positive but Lincoln made many mistakes or misjudgments during the war as well. Perhaps the biggest mistake Lincoln did was underestimating the South what caused many unnecessary deaths. He also did had misjudgments that cause many causalities. Since the beginning of time humanity has fought for what they thought was right. In April 12 of 1861(civilwar.org) The US would begin a fight for civic and moral rights, a civil war that perhaps was the last option for a country to reunite its values. Abraham Lincoln was the president of the time and the person the influence the most the course the war took. I strongly believe that Lincoln’s decisions influence or had more positive effects on the country. Being the president at times like the civil war is without doubt it is one of the toughest jobs, and one way or another there is going to be correct and incorrect decisions but I can agree president Lincoln did what he thought it was the best at that moment.
In the Civil War, the cavalry flourished due to the various types of mounted forces they established, their skilled tactics, and their outstanding selection of horse breeds to accomplish their military tasks. Although the cavalry of World War 1 tried to implement the same effective tactics and also used exceptional horse breeds, the new inventions of modern artillery surpassed these mounted forces. Even though cavalry might not have been as successful in World War 1 as it was in the Civil War, it still proves to be as significant part of history today.
Nike is special and one of a kind because of the fact that they have an extremely targeted demographic. Nike’s mission statement is as follows “To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete* in the world.” (Nike) Their target market is to all athletes, but they also use market segmentation to help specify certain parts of the market. Nike’s primary target audience is between the ages of 15-40. Both men and women are accommodated equally. Nike is beginning to place an increased focus on tweens and teens. This is in hope of building long-term brand loyalty. Nike places a lot of importance behind marketing campaigns about people living up to and striving to be their athlete idols. Nike doesn’t market or target based