Criminal Trial Process

1606 Words4 Pages

Introduction
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-5] (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), anyone diagnosed with “autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, or the catch-all diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified” (p. 1) meets the criteria of having an Autism Spectrum Disorder [ASD]. Individuals with ASD commonly possess communication deficits and have difficulty in building relationships with peers. Communication deficits include interruptions or inappropriate responses during conversations and misinterpreting nonverbal interactions. These individuals may also develop an overdependence on routines, high sensitivity to environmental change, …show more content…

There is still room for improvement when factors, such as assessing whether the individual has ASD and gauging the severity of the ASD, are taken into account.
This essay therefore seeks to discuss the considerations, or lack thereof, given to persons with ASD, during police investigation and the criminal trial process in Singapore. The various viewpoints that will be covered are that of a victim, witness, suspect, and an accused person. This will be explained in terms of how the various individuals have behaviour that will significantly affect the police investigation and criminal trial process. Following that, the considerations that have been given or should have been given will be laid out, with reference to the behaviour impact on the investigation trial process.
Behavioural Impact on Police Investigation and Criminal Trial …show more content…

The HASI test makes use of simple puzzles e.g. a maze to allow an Investigation Officer easy identification of a potential PWID. This test is not meant to act as any concrete assessment, but rather to aid the Investigating Officer in deciding whether to refer the individual for further assessment by a professional or to proceed with sensitivity during the interview.
Another consideration is the Appropriate Adult [AA] Scheme that was launched in 2013. As aforementioned, persons with ASD often experience difficulty with regard to communication. Therefore the AA Scheme seeks to address this issue allowing an AA to sit in when a PWID’s statement is being recorded down by the Investigating Officer. The AA’s role is to aid in facilitating the interview, so that the PWID can communicate more effectively with the police officer. This ensures that there is no misunderstanding on either side, and allow the Investigating Officer to record more reliable statements. Another aspect of this scheme is how the AAs are chosen. The criteria l were that AAs should (a) not be family members of the PWID being questioned, (b) have adequate experience in communicating with PWID, and (c) be available when called to attend an

Open Document