Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self defense in criminal cases
Criminal justice court system
Criminal justice court system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self defense in criminal cases
In chapter 5 of Criminal Law Today, the author explains the purpose of a defense to a criminal charge and differentiates both factual and legal defenses. The author also explains the nature of affirmative defenses. Not only the author explains these terms, but he also distinguishes between both justifications and excuses. A defense consists of evidence and arguments that are offered by the defendant and their attorneys in order to demonstrate why the defendant must not be held liable for a criminal charge. There articles two types of defenses, which are legal and factual. A legal defense may shield the defendant from conviction and punishment even if they did commit an illegal act. There are two forms of legal defense, which are justifications and excuses. Justifications are a type of legal …show more content…
Self-defense is a defense to a criminal charge that is based on the recognition that an individual has the right to self-protection. However, there is a very significant requirement for self-defense. This requirement is that the person must show that he or she is a reasonable person. A reasonable person is a person who acts with common sense and who has the mental capacity of an average and sensible human being. If an individual who commits an unlawful act, and they have special needs, they may find that self-defense is not available to them. A concept that is associated with self-defense is apparent danger. Apparent danger is a form of danger that is said to exist when the behavior of the attacker makes the threat of danger. The law of self-defense holds that the use of force upon another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is necessary for the purpose of protecting himself or herself. Deadly force, the highest degree of force, can only be used to counter an immediate threat of death. However, the claim of self-defense is unavailable to those who actually precipitated the attack on
The use of reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if defender has reason to believe He/She/is/are in danger. Self-defense is a common defense by a person accused of assault battery
In the Model Penal Code, section 2.01 discussed are the requirements of voluntary act; Omission as Basis of Liability; and Possesion as an Act. Mainly focusing on the “Voluntary” and “Involunatary” sections, first, stated is that “A person is not guilty of an offense unless his liability is based on conduct which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act of which he is physically capable. Secondly, stated are acts that are not voluntary wihin the meaning of this section following as, “A reflex or convulsion; a bodily movement during unconsciousness or sleep; conduct during hypnosis or resulting from hypnotic suggestion; and a bodily movement that otherwise is not a product of the effort or determination of the actor, either conscious or habitual.” These requirements correspond with the Latin term “Actus Reus” which is a term used to describe a criminal act. Actus Reus is the wrongful dead that compromises the physical components of a crime. There is a fundamental principle stated in the case textbook that criminal liability always entails an “Actus Reus”, that is, “the commission of some voluntary act that is prohibited by law.”
States that have stand-your ground laws remove a common law requirement to retreat if a person is able to do so before using reasonable force outside of one’s home (Randall and DeBoer). This allows individuals in states with these laws to use force in self-defense when there is a reasonable belief of a threat (Randall and DeBoer). Under certain circumstances, such as a threat of imminent serious bodily harm or death, deadly force is considered reasonable under stand your ground laws (Randall and DeBoer). In Florida the stand-your ground law states “a person has the right to stand his or her ground if he or she (1) reasonably believes it is necessary to d...
Self-defense is not something that should be taken lightly. Its dictionary definition is, “the act of defending one's person when physically
You will be placed on either defense or prosecution. Respond according to your placement. (I am prosecution)
Dostoevsky uses Lebezyatnikov as another way to talk about his own opinion on the ideas of such “progressives” (376). His argument against the ideas of progressives is intensified with Lebezyatnikov because his actions don’t seem to be congruent with his stances. Lebezyatnikov’s treatment of Katerina Ivanovna and Sonya do not comply with his ideas of free love and the equality of women. Dostoevsky does not agree with the progressive “‘younger generation’” (378) as he characterizes Lebezyatnikov as belonging to “[a] varied legion of semi-literate half wits”(378). Clearly Dostoevsky is not fond of these people. Progressive ideas can be beneficial when actually acted upon. Perhaps he is not arguing that the ideas themselves are bad but that the people who “vulgarize them” (378) are the reason why these ideas make no actual progress.
Within the Federal Government there are three main branches; “the Legislative, the Judicial, and Executive” (Phaedra Trethan, 2013). They have the same basic shape and the same basic roles were written in the Constitution in 1787.
With the rapid increase in crime rates, the defendants must act recklessly or intentionally to be held guilty. Crimes can be classified into two types of intents; general, and specific intent.
“ Criminal law is the body of law that relates to crime.” (Wikipedia, 2014) This law encompasses several different aspects of our government and the ways used to regulate them. Maintaining the peace and order of the public is one aspect. Law enforcement officers also try to keep good conduct of the public. Anyone who places the safety of the public in jeopardy, is in violation of this law. Punishment is used in a variety of ways to discipline any person who breaks these laws. There are four main sources used in today’s criminal law:
The four criminal law elements of self-defense are nonaggressor, necessity, proportionality, and reasonable belief. Nonaggressor is when the defender did not in any way provoke or stray an attack. When it comes to self-defense it is only available when it comes to unprovoked attacks. If one provokes someone they cannot use self-defense to defend themselves from the attack because they provoked it. However there is one exception and that is the withdrawal exception. The withdrawal exception is when the initial aggressor withdrawals completely from the attack they provoked they can defend themselves against their initial victims. An example of nonaggressor self-defense is Melody hanging out at the bar by herself and Samantha comes up to her trying
The section titled The Commonsense Picture, gives a scenario where a middle-aged man is awakened by a loud banging on his front door. Before hand, a young African American woman, had crashed her car, walked out, and wandered for hours in a state of shock and confusion. She ended up at this middle-aged man’s door, most likely looking for help. However, this middle-aged man thought his house was being attacked. He proceeded to take his shot gun, opened the door, and fired, which resulted in this young girls death. On trial, he explained his action by saying that he had been afraid for his life and had shot in what he thought was self-defense. This reading states, that in any case, even if the fear someone felt was reasonable, the reasonable response would have been not open the door but to lock the door and call the police. Therefore, the middle-aged man was found guilty of second-degree murder.
While the use of the gun has become an integral cultural element in contemporary American society, at what extent does self-defense become simply unjustifiable violence? Stand Your Ground laws are simply an expansion of the Castle Doctrine. The set of legislation serve to completely eliminate the need to double think prior to using lethal force on a threatening individual. Furthermore, they provide a backwards reasoning that lethal force is justified. The Stand Your Ground laws have completely shifted the underpinnings of law enforcement one-hundred and eighty degrees.
The offence Harry would be charged with is William’s murder. The area of Law that this case is concerned with is criminal law (homicide). The two offences that constitute homicide are murder and manslaughter. The classic definition of murder was set by Sir Edward Coke (Institutes of the Laws of England, 1797). Murder is defined by the Law as causing the death of a human being within the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. It comprises of 2 elements. These are the actus reus (guilty act) and the mens rea (intention).
The defense of necessity is on the principle of “necessity, and not emergency”. As a justificatory defense, it stresses on the actor choosing an option between two “evils” and engaging the lesser of them. Basically, significance of the defense of necessity involves a balancing of evils. The criminal offence committed by the defendant must involve a lesser evil. Basically, necessity is a defense when the defendant kills one person in order to save the lives of many others . Brooke LJ in the case of Re A stated that there are three requirements for the application of the defense of necessity. Firstly, the act is needed to avoid the unavoidable and irreparable evil. Second, no more should be done than is reasonably necessary for the objective to be attained. Lastly, the evil inflicted must be proportionate to the evil avoided.
In Intro to Criminal Justice class, I had the opportunity to learn about the Criminal Justice System more thoroughly. I learned that there are three components that make up the Criminal Justice System such as the courts, law enforcement, and corrections. Each component has its own role in making sure the the Criminal Justice System is functioning properly. If one of these components are not efficient the Criminal Justice system will not be as strong as it could be.