Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theme in a lamb to the slaughter
The character of Mary Maloney
Essay on lamb to the slaughter
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1) Would lie to save yourself from punishment , or tell the truth regardless of the consequence?
If, someday, I committed a horrible crime and was going to be punished for it I would definitely lie to save myself. I might tell the truth if I was being eaten by guilt and didn’t care about anything anymore, but definitely if I didn’t care very much. If anybody says they would tell the truth, I’m sure if something really happened they would lie too. It’s human nature to want to survive and thrive, and there’s nothing wrong with wanting to stay out of prison or not get the death penalty. In a real situation, where I would die if I were found guilty of your crime, I would definitely lie to save myself.
3) Choose either “Cask” or “Lamb,” find
…show more content…
at least three examples of foreshadowing that hinted towards the tragic ending. Explain your examples. (I chose to write about “Lamb”) In “A Lamb to Slaughter” there is lots of foreshadowing, even in the beginning of the story, that hinted towards the tragic ending. For example, “She loves to luxuriate in the presence of this man, and feel- almost as a sunbather feels the sun- the warm male glow that came out of him to her when they were alone together. She loved him for the was he sat loosely in a chair, for the way he came in a door, or moved slowly across the room in long strides.” page 1. This scene sounds very loving, in an almost creepy way. Looking past the creepy loving tone, Roald Dahl might be hinting at a tragic future, by making things seem overly perfect at one movement. Another example of foreshadowing is: “She watched him sip the dark yellow drink, and she could see little oily swirls in the liquid because it was so strong.” page 1. This quote is obvious foreshadowing to something happening between Mr. and Mrs. Maloney. When someone is drinking strong alcohol, something is definitely bugging them (at least in stories.) One more piece of evidence that suggests a dark future is, in the story, Mr. Maloney kept saying that he didn't want dinner, or food, or anything from Mrs. Maloney. This hinted that Mr. Maloney was angry at Mrs. Maloney, or that he didn’t want to see her. 4) Is Mary Maloney and/or Montresor a sympathetic character?
What evidence is there to support you claim? (I chose to write about Mary)
Mary Maloney, in “A Lamb to Slaughter,” can be called a sympathetic character. Since Mary is the protagonist of the story she is, almost by definition, a sympathetic character. Even if doesn’t behave like a traditional protagonist, her actions and traits leave the reader sympathizing with her. In the story, the first two pages tell how much she loves her husband, and then shows her husband breaking her heart. Even, as readers, we know what she did was wrong, we still sympathize with her because we almost feel as if her actions were justified.
7) You will be placed on either defense or prosecution. Respond according to your placement. (I am prosecution)
Mary Maloney is guilty of murder. Even if she did commit her crime while temporarily insane, she still must serve a lengthy prison sentence. Temporary insanity is no excuse to not go to prison for murder, murder is murder and Mary Maloney committed it. Somebody as dangerous as Mary Maloney cannot remain free, and around the public. If the act was a moment of temporary insanity, the Maloney is very dangerous. That “temporary” insanity could easily emerge again, and Maloney could harm another innocent member of the public. Maloney’s husband, the reason for her moment of insanity, legally, did nothing wrong. Maloney’s harm to him has no legal justification. As for the fetus, it has no effect on whether she will go to prison or not. Pregnant criminals are treated the same way ordinary prisoners, they don’t get a get out of jail free card just because they’re
pregnant.
In a handful of occasions such as in an interrogation it seems reasonable enough to lie to an individual in order for them to confess to a crime. A case law that shows this was Frazier v. Cupp in which according to Police Link, “ The case involved the interrogation of a homicide suspect who was falsely told that an accomplice had already implicated the suspect in the killing.” In the case of Frazier v. Cupp kept on getting integrated even after he asked to speak to a lawyer so as a result he ended up doing a written confession where he confessed about being part of the murder that was later used as evidence against him.
In the story Lamb to the Slaughter written by Roald Dahl, the writer emphasizes the woman's loyalty to her husbands will, despite the constraint in her social life. Mary Maloney obeyed her husband's commands forgetting her own, making sure he had everything he needed. Offering to grab her husband whiskey, he commanded her to sit down insisting that he get it himself. (Dahl 1) Although she could have taken time to do stuff for herself she did as her husband told her to without question. Another scenario of Mary's loyalty to her husband was proved to him as she selflessly asked him about his day rather than putting the spotlight on herself. For instance, she asked him if he was tired forgetting her own concerns. (Dahl 1) In place of telling him
Lying is bad but the fear that can come from it is worse. Fear can rule a person which drives them to extreme and irrational acts that can shape society in a negative way. We as people are so accustomed to how we should act that during times of fear and crisis our vision is blurred and sometimes our decision making abilities are impaired. We often look past at how much fear can affect us and our society. Starting from Salem 1692 and going to the McCarthy era fear ruled the people and even now in present time America we are constantly living in fear.
If you were in this situation how would you feel? If you're patiently waiting for your husband to come home and you give him a kiss as he returns. As he walks and talks little to you then he puts it out there like it’s nothing. Would you cry or would you be shocked? would you fight or would you fall ? tell how you would feel if you were like mary maloney were your husband's going to leave you like he left her. I think that mary maloney is innocent because her husband was a cruel and not very kind man. Not only was he having an affair with another woman he was disrespectful to her he yelled at her and how do we not know he wasn't abusive to her. His fellow officers called him a “lady's man”. I think that mary should not be convicted of murder.
In literature, a dynamic character changes significantly as a result of events, conflicts, or other forces. In the play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Mary Warren, the young servant of the Proctor’s is a dynamic character. Throughout the play, Mary’s personality takes a turn for the better. At the beginning of the play, Mary is shy, timid girl who hides in the shadows of Abigail Williams and lets people walk all over her. As the play develops, Mary realizes that what Abigail is doing isn’t right and rebels against Abby. Instead of following Abby, she follows in the footsteps of John Proctor to bring justice to the girl’s accusing innocent people of witchcraft.
Have you ever told a lie to protect yourself or someone you love? People lie for their own purposes. Some people lie for themselves or for their close one. They depend on the lies so much that they do not care that their lies might hurt others. In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, almost all the characters lie for their own desires and to protect their own interests. Even though lies are forbidden in their religion, some people are blind to understand the punishment of lying. The concept of lying to save oneself is also evident in “Fear Was Reason For Lying About Shooting, Woman Says” by Mary Spicuzza. The article highlights how a woman hid the truth about witnessing a murder just for the sake of her own life. Another article, “The Truth
When confronted with a problem, why does the human brain default to lying? Dishonesty is never a solution, although it may seem like the best option in the spur of a moment. My grandma always gave the example of her youth: she avoided and deceived her friend’s sister because the little girl riled everyone. Come to find out, the sister passed the following month due to an illness. I could never imagine the guilt she experienced. Nevertheless, everyone has been deceitful before and many characters were in the tragedy, The Crucible, by playwright Arthur Miller. Reasons for lying are understandable, but most people will admit that mendacity has only caused pain. Lying’s outcome is never positive: it may seem like a good option, for falsehood can save a person’s life, benefit someone, and it eases stress, but these are all transitory.
“Not Guilty” doesn’t mean the person didn’t commit the crime, it just mean that when the person committed the crime he/she could not tell right from wrong. I believe that Andrea profile does not fit the profile of legally insane. Yes, Andrea has major mental issues and suffers from many mental diseases, however, at the time of the murder I believe she was at the right state of mind. Under the definition of law a person can only be declared insane if at the time of the crime the person was unable to understand right from wrong and knew the consequences of his/her actions. She knew that it was legally wrong to kill another human being thus waiting to do it when her husband was not home who was of solid mind. She also planned out which child to kill first because of them alerting the other children and risking them escaping. She was found guilty but ended up having a second trial which she was found not guilty by reason of insanity. According to a juror, during the time of the Yates case, the Insanity Law in the state of Texas stated, "As a result of severe mental disease or defect, did not know that his/her conduct was wrong", this would be changed to, "as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, the defendant was unable to appreciate the nature and
In the story “Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl, Mary Maloney is shown to have a very sinister and manipulative character. In the beginning of the story, Mary Maloney was a normal, loving and caring pregnant housewife that loved and cared for her husband, Patrick Maloney, very much. Earlier at the start of the story we see Mary was waiting for her husband to come home from work. She had set up the house with two table lights lit and plates on the dining table so they can have a very romantic dinner when Patrick comes home. When Patrick came home, Mary was very excited to see him. She would try to offer him some drinks and insisted she would get things in the house he needed so he didn’t have to get up himself. The countless times that Patrick said no to her offers and helpful doings, she still tried to serve and tried to make him feel comfortable and relax after work.
I would rather take my punishment and die than to live a guilty life filled with lies and dishonor. People would lie to save themselves because they don't wanna die and they do not want to face reality and equality so they just lie and live a sinful life. Another thing is that I
We lie all the time, lying is not something new to our culture. We lie to our parents, we lie to our friends, we even lie to our significant other, but why do we do it? There is not one set reason on why we lie but they can vary from an insignificant reason to something more nefarious. A good operational definition of a lie is “A lie is a false statement to a person or group made by another person or group who knows it is not the whole truth, intentionally.” (Freitas-Magalhães) We have been raised to know that lying is usually a bad thing, and it’s better to tell the truth, not to mention the circumstances get exponentially worse if you are caught lying. No one wants to be labeled as a liar, or untrustworthy. This may sound unorthodox but I personally think lying is perfectly fine; depending on the situation. If you have a prima-facie duty to be dishonest it’s perfectly acceptable. Ross says a prima facie duty or obligation is an actual duty. “One’s actual duty is what one ought to do all things considered.” (Carson) I’m not the only one who finds this too be true. Ross would also agree with me, He says “Lying is permissible or obligatory when the duty not to lie conflicts with a more important or equal important prima facie duty.” (Carson) As I was doing research on this topic I did read one extremely compelling argument on why we ought not to lie. Aristotle basically said a person who makes a defense for lying could never be trusted. (King.)
Telling the truth teaches one person self- respect for themselves and others as well. Telling the truth also sets a good example for others to do the same thing and make a “chain reaction”. People can make a “chain reaction” by passing on what they have done from one person to another, and before you know it, everyone is changing greatly, and the world is progressing tremendously. Lies are told all around the world, and they are told every day. One lie can often lead to another lie and cause you to be caught up in one big lie that will be hard to get out of if people do not tell the truth. If a person thinks that is okay to lie, they better think again, the truth always comes out no matter how hard a person tries to keep it in, or how much someone thinks that they can get away with lying. No person can keep in or hold a grudge with what they have done. After all, telling the truth is the right thing to do, and everyone should do it. Telling the truth is always much easier than the trouble of a
The reason I agree with the statement is because telling the truth and being honest is much more accurate than telling a lie. Lying can cause you many trouble and can lose trust from someone that really trust you. If someone loses trust in you it will take time for them to trust you again. Once you tell a lie to someone you are really close to they would not believe one word you say. It’s always a good option to tell the truth instead of lying to someone you really trust.
It's actually easier to just tell the truth. There are many reasons for this. One reason is, people don't have to think of lame excuses, making it much faster. Another reason is, people who tell the truth won't get in as much trouble when someone finds out that they lied to them.
Secondly, it is okay to be untruthful if you are trying to protect people. In certain situations, it is safer, and more practical for you to tell a lie rather than putting a loved one in jeopardy. To illustrate you may be in a situation where you are in a serious or dangerous situation, and you do not what anyone else involved, to keep them safe. For example, if you are getting held up for ransom, would you tell the truth to a loved one and get them involved, or lie and keep them safe? The obvious answer is to keep them safe at all costs, even if it means lying. Also, you do not want to put someone in harm’s way, so it would be ...