Criminal Law Case Study

1386 Words3 Pages

The offence Harry would be charged with is William’s murder. The area of Law that this case is concerned with is criminal law (homicide). The two offences that constitute homicide are murder and manslaughter. The classic definition of murder was set by Sir Edward Coke (Institutes of the Laws of England, 1797). Murder is defined by the Law as causing the death of a human being within the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. It comprises of 2 elements. These are the actus reus (guilty act) and the mens rea (intention). The actus reus and causation are the first elements that need to be satisfied. The defendant, Harry in this case must be proved to have caused the victim’s death. In this instance two matters need to be considered. Whether the defendant in fact caused the victim’s death and if so, if it can he be held to have caused it in the eyes of the law. Regarding causation in law, in R v Smith [1959] 2 QB 35 it was held that ‘the defendant’s act would be regarded as the cause in Law, if it could be shown that it was the operating and substantial cause of death,’ which we see here. It is clearly illustrated that Harry in fact, caused William’s death instantly by driving the lemon slicer into his heart. According to the Court of Appeal in R v Pagett (1983) 76 Cr App R 279 and R v Cheshire [1991] 1 WLR 844 the issue of factual causation is mainly one for the jury once it has been determined by the courts that there is enough evidence to be left to them and this can be established through the ‘but for’ test. However there appears to be no issues regarding causation in this case because William’s death is caused instantly by Harry. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution and in criminal p... ... middle of paper ... ...dy [1989] 1 WLR 350 R v Vickers [1957] 2 QB 664 R v Woollin [1999] AC 82 Secondary Sources Books FINCH E, FAFINSKI S (2007) Criminal Law Pearson Education Unlimited GLAEBROOK P.R (2003) Statutes on Criminal Law 2003-2004 13th Edition, Oxford University Press HERRING, J (2001) Criminal Law 7th Edition, Palgrave Macmillan ORMEROD, D. (2011) Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law 13th Edition, Oxford University Press Online Resources Criminal Evidence (2010) [Online] Available from - http://crimeandevidence.wordpress.com/category/stuart/ [Accessed 7th March 2014] E-Law resources, Causation in Criminal Liability [Online] Available from - http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Causation-in-criminal-liability.php [Accessed 8th March 2014] Law Teacher, Homicide – Murder [Online] Available from - http://www.lawteacher.net/criminal-law/cases/murder.php [Accessed 8th March 2014]

Show More
Related

  • R. V. Charemski Case Study

    1289 Words  | 3 Pages

    Crown must prove the causation of death in order for the charge of murder to be made out. Since, without full awareness of the cause of the death the Crown will have no ability in deciding on to whom and what murder charge should be

    Read More

  • Elements Of Crime And The Murder Of Sarah May Ward

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    Actus Reus: It was never unclear if the accused was responsible for the act occurring. There were several eye witness testimonies placing her as the offender which was backed up by CCTV footage from a camera in the lane. Furthermore, at the beginning of the trial the offender pleaded not guilty of murder but guilty of constructive manslaughter and that it was caused by reckless driving on her behalf. By claiming manslaughter the offender immediately takes full responsibility for the act regardless of what charge they are handed.

    Read More

  • The Model Penal Code (MPC)

    263 Words  | 1 Pages

    Brody, D., & Acker, J. (2010). Criminal Law (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

    Read More

  • Wicked Inusation In Scots Law

    1478 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to be convicted on a criminal charge, proof is required of three things; actus reus, mens rea and causation. The accused must have the criminal state of mind relevant to the crime he is accused of. Intention is a far more blameworthy aspect than recklessness,

    Read More

  • Case Law Case Study

    1560 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nearly every aspect of law enforcement has a court decision that governs criteria. Most court rulings are the result of civil lawsuit towards a police officer and agency. However, currently, there is no law that mandates law enforcement driver training. When it comes to firearms, negligence by officers has resulted in a multitude of court rulings. Popow v. City of Margate, 1979, is a particularly interesting case that outlines failed firearms training by an agency. In this case, an officer chasing a suspect during a foot pursuit fired at the suspect, striking and killing an innocent bystander (Justia.com, 2017). The court ruled that the agency was “grossly negligent” of “failure to train” (Justia.com, 2017). As a result, nearly every agency requires annual firearms training and has written policy concerning the same. Officers must show proficiency in firearms use every year to maintain their certification. Many states even impose fines on officers for

    Read More

  • Crime Case Study

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are multiple crime television shows that are based on a true story or fiction. A well known television show is Law and Order Special Victims Unit, which deals with rape and assault cases. This particular episode deals with a domestic violence case between a retired football star, AJ Martin, and his girlfriend, Paula Bryant. I will be using the National Crime Victimization Survey, which is an interview with the members in a household about reported and unreported crime that occurred within the last six months. “NVCS provides information of characteristics of victims, including age, race, ethnicity, gender, marital status and household income” (Truman and Morgan). Official statistics like the NCVS would be used for comparing its demographics

    Read More

  • Burglary and the Rational Choice Theory

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crime causation is looking at why people commit crimes. There are many theories that have been developed to explain this. The theories can be grouped into eight general categories of which one is the Classical theory (Schmallegar, 2011, p. 79). A subset of this theory, rational choice theory, will be specifically looked at to explain the crime of burglary. Just as no one causation theory explains all crimes committed, the rational choice theory itself does not completely explain why all burglars commit their crimes. Therefore, the pros and cons of the rational choice theory will be discussed in relation to the crime topic of burglary.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice Myths and Facts

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    Daly, Kathleen, Goldsmith, Andrew, and Israel, Mark. 2006, Crime and Justice: A guide to criminology, third addition, Thomson, Lawbook Co.

    Read More

  • Law And Crime Case Study

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are several factors contributing to whether or not certain behaviours are criminalized by law in a society.

    Read More

  • Intention In The Case Hyam V DPP (1975)

    1780 Words  | 4 Pages

    Intention in criminal law is when an individual consciously decides to behave in a particular manner to achieve a certain desired result and in doing so commits a crime. It is the highest form of mens rea as someone who intentionally sets out to commit a criminal offence is typically more culpable then an individual who has behaved in a reckless manner, which has consequently resulted in a crime. Intention can be further split into two categories; these are direct intention and oblique intention.

    Read More

  • Attempted Murder and Criminal Acts

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    A crime consists of an actus reus and a mens rea, in order to obtain a conviction of a criminal charge there must be a concurrence between the actus reus and mens rea. The elements of a criminal act (actus reus) are: act, cause, social harm or omission condemned under a criminal statute (Lippman, 2012). The elements of mens rea: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently (Lippman, 2012). Attempted murder is the failed attempt to kill another human being deliberately, intentionally or recklessly (USLegal, 2014). “Georgia Code Title 16, Section 16-4-1: A person commits the offense of criminal attempt when, with intent to commit a specific crime, he performs any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. Section 16-4-2: A person may be convicted of the offense of criminal attempt if the crime attempted was actually committed in pursuance of the attempt but may not be convicted of both the criminal attempt and the completed crime….” (Young, 2014, para. 1-2).

    Read More

  • Subjective Definition of Recklessness

    1384 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ashworth A and Horder J, Principles of Criminal Law (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2013)

    Read More

  • Direct Intention vs Oblique Intention

    1925 Words  | 4 Pages

    To be criminally liable of any crime in the UK, a jury has to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the Actus Reus and the Mens Rea. The Actus Reus is the physical element of the crime; it is Latin for ‘guilty act’. The defendant’s act must be voluntary, for criminal liability to be proven. The Mens Rea is Latin for guilty mind; it is the most difficult to prove of the two. To be pronounced guilty of a crime, the Mens Rea requires that the defendant planned, his or her actions before enacting them. There are two types of Mens Rea; direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention ‘corresponds with everyday definition of intention, and applies where the accused actually wants the result that occurs, and sets out to achieve it’ (Elliot & Quinn, 2010: 59). Oblique intention is when the ‘accused did not desire a particular result but in acting he or she did realise that it might occur’ (Elliot & Quinn, 2010: 60). I will illustrate, by using relevant case law, the difference between direct intention and oblique intention.

    Read More

  • Criminal Responsibility Case Study

    1661 Words  | 4 Pages

    Urbas, G. (2000) ‘The Age of Criminal Responsibility’, Australian institute of criminology, trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, no.181., viewed 20 March 2015, 1.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Unlawful Killing

    1312 Words  | 3 Pages

    Causation comes in two forms, and both are required. They are factual causation (the "but-for" test), and legal causation. Factual causation asks whether, "but for" the defendant's actions, would the victim have suffered the same result? This is illustrated in the cases of White - where the victim died of natural causes before the poison could take effect; and in the controversial case of Pagett, where it was decided "but for" the defendant's actions the victim would not have died. Legal causation requires that the death be the "operating and substantial" cause of death.

    Read More

More about Criminal Law Case Study

Open Document