Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crimes and Criminals
The problems with honor killings
Crimes and Criminals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crimes and Criminals
Crimes of honor are defined as crimes committed against a person that has ‘brought shame’ upon his family. These honor killings are usually, if not most of the time, targeted towards women. Women have been raped, tortured, and even killed for refusing to marry someone the family has chosen, committing what the family would define as adultery, or for simply being in a relationship with a person who displeases the relatives. Why are women being constantly targeted in these crimes and where are the laws protecting them? Honor killings are said to be a matter of the past, however it will shock you to find out that they are very well hidden and are affecting women on a worldwide horizon.
To begin with, crimes of honor occur all over the world. It is mostly practiced in all the Middle Eastern countries, mostly in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Morocco and Turkey. Honors killings even exist in North America; in Canada and in The United States, also in parts of India and South Asia. What causes family members to commit such hideous crimes against their own female members of their family? Many reasons have been stated yet the result is one. To state a few, refusing to enter into an arranged marriage, choosing to marry by her own choice, seeking a divorce even if her husband is abusive, wearing unacceptable dress code, committing adultery; which sometimes in these closed communities might simply be defined as a simple holding of a hand, getting pregnant outside wedlock, victim of rape, talking to or seeing a man who is not a family member and finally, prostitution. It is important to state that in some countries, these reasons are not even valid, for instance, in 1997, a report of 5000 Indian women were mur...
... middle of paper ...
...lowing, a lot of people may believe that honor killings are related to religion. However, none of the world’s major religions accept honor related crimes, but perpetrators have sometimes tried to justify their actions on religious grounds. In addition to the latter, leaders of the world’s faiths have also strongly denounced a connection between religion and honor killings.
As a conclusion, crimes of honor are social in the full sense of the word. They are very strong cultural issues that still exist even though the image on the outside of a certain country is not portrayed as such. For a woman to be killed because she refused a marriage, or because she was seen with another man and hence has brought disgrace to her family is blasphemy. It is sad to think that even with laws protecting these women are still around; these laws are not regarded as something credible.
Honour went hand in hand with how reputable a family was considered to be within the community. There were two types of honour; “honor” which symbolized the honour brought to an individual by their family or their birth right, and “honra” which represented ones virtue in the sense of morality and piety or their saintliness. Honour killings would occasionally be performed (most often by men) on women who took lovers behind their husband’s backs. To restore his honour, the husband would be legally allowed to kill both his wife and her lover. Women would also resort to violent tendencies if anyone threatened their families’ honour and reputation. High class woman were known to protect both their own honour and the households by filing lawsuits and beating other women they saw as treats, making women more likely than men to act out in defence. In the “Scandal at the Church” case, Mr. de Alfaro indirectly refers to his wife’s and his family’s honour multiple times as his wife was attacked in the daylight crowds after mass. With so many people present to witness his wife’s beating and Mrs. Bravo’s insulting words, Mr. de Alfaro’s family honour was tarnished as a direct result from the scandal. Even as a man of a lower class, honour is still incredibly important as other families within the community base their perceptions on how honourable and thus reputable a family is. Mrs.
“Honor is the value of a person in his or her own eyes. Honor is a claim to worth along with social acknowledgement of worth.” (Malina 31) This phrase tells us that honor was extremely important to the ancient people. Honor is a value that was present during many occasions in the play. This value can be seen in Oedipus. He promised the citizens of Thebes that he would find the murderer of Laius and free the lands from the plague. The murderer was to be exiled from Thebes. Oedipus later found out that he himself was the murderer. Even though he was king, he honored the punishment and exiled himself from Thebes. The New Testament states that honor in women meant positive shame. Positive shame is the sensitivity of one 's own reputation. A shameless person is considered a dishonorable woman. Women have to be ashamed and remain shy to avoid human contacts that might expose her to dishonor. (Malina 50) This value can be seen in Jocasta. She feels ashamed when she finds out that her husband Oedipus turned out to be her son. In order to remain honorable, her shame led her to commit
In The Saga of the Volsungs, a paradoxical notion of the value of life emerges from almost every action that the characters perform. One’s corporeal death is almost of no concern in the sometimes harsh and cruel society of the saga. The importance of honor over almost anything else can explain many of the seemingly contradictory and nonsensical actions of characters in the saga. This obsession with honor constitutes the basis for an honor society—a culture where pain, death, and other earthly concerns fall short in significance to one’s good name and honor. Many of the actions inspired by this fixation with honor seem foolish, but considered within the context of how the culture in the saga views reputations and honor make perfect sense.
The story of “Killings” by Andre Dubus looked into the themes of crime, revenge and morality. The crime committed in the story depicted the father’s love for his son and the desire to avenge his son’s death. However, his own crime led to his own destruction as he was faced with questions of morality. The character found himself in a difficult position after taking his revenge. He failed to anticipate the guilt associated with the crime he committed. Feelings of anger and righteousness are illustrated by the character throughout the story.
Honor, just as today, is the way your name is viewed by others in the public. Threats toward ones honor might be defended differently in the public view. Honor varied between genders. Males felt it necessary to defend their honor when another slighted their masculinity, family, or physical ability. Females felt honor too. They often saw it important to defend their honor like did the males. Usually it was defended by gossip or name-calling but on occasion did result in physical violence as well. Females saw honor in a moral sense. Ones sexual activity or lack thereof before marriage, fidelity in marriage and celibacy after marriage all proved a woman to be honorable. Just like today, a personal reputation would be on the line if called a demoralizing name.
Women have been woman beaten and threatened for many centuries and surprisingly it has nothing to do with love or jealousy. It's all about power and control, and who has it, and who doesn't. There needs to be a stand against this violence.I would like to point the finger today at what we call our modern, computer smart, and highly even "Havard-ly" educated America. Our beautiful "land of the FREE." Free of what? Defiantly not free of violent acts. Gruesome murders of innocent women take place daily, and it's sad that mostly they go unnoticed. One example of this is the murder of a young mother; 26 year old Gina Marie Lupson-Holden-Young and her young sons three year old Shaun Edward Lupson-Holden and seven month old Joshua Lee Lupson-Young whom were murdered by fire June 9, 2013 in Jeannette, Pennsylvania. (1) Their trusted husband and father burned them all to death. This was the tragic conclusion of a doomed relationship with a history of domestic violence. What should have happened to the husband? To me, there is no question. He should die too. Why? It's simple to me. The law should be an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth (three in this case).
For women, honour and fidelity meant very different things to what it did for a man. In order for them to gain honour and fidelity, they had to do very things in order for it to be achieved. Women do not expect fidelity from men...
Sociologists try to explain it, so do criminologists, theologizes, politicians and world historians, but the resulting message is clear, and that message is that females are not alien to committing violent acts. In recent years, women have committed some of the most heinous crimes. Darlie Routier killed her two sons for reasons blamed on personal economics. Diane Downs killed one of her three children (she tried to kill all of them) in order to win back a lover who didn't want kids. Susan Smith drowned her boys in a neighborhood lake because her boyfriend did not want the responsibility of raising some other man's children. Karla Homolka and husband Paul Bernardo sexually assaulted, tortured and killed several young women for thrills.
While a culture doesn’t need to try and justify murder in the name of honor, it does show that they are devoted and centered around such concepts. If this is what a person views to be honor, the United States and most other western cultures are unhonorable. If the United States are to be viewed as honorable, it is only obtainable through militarily obtaining it in most cases. While most people might believe that American honor has no more than to do with the military, which makes sense provided all the evidence that there is that would point a person to this conclusion, others believe otherwise. These people hold firm to the idea that anyone can be considered honorable in their everyday lives by simply doing minor things. Simply put, these people don’t believe that you need to be a hero and serve your country through combat. Honor has been viewed diffurently by many different cultures and time periods, some even going to the quite extreme of killing either yourself or females in your family to keep honor, but one thing is certain, honor bears the simple principles of nobility and
From the start women who commit violent crimes are all ready in the spot-light. Society has grown quite accustomed to viewing the womens role in violent crimes as that of the victim. When the women is a violator it incites a gross media fascination as a novelty. Convicted women gain more notoriety then men who are found guilty of committing the same crime. In certain cases like Amy Fisher, Loren Bobbit and most recently Louise Woodward the media celebrate the violence of women. If it had been a man who shot his lovers mate in the head or slashed and dismembered their spouse or shook a baby to death things would be different. The media would not give as in depth of coverage to the trial and sentencing would be of a longer time. The media escalates these women to such extremes due to the fact that there are so few women who are tried for criminally violent acts. Society tends to be more sympathetic to women who commit violent crimes than men. To this day Americans are still reluctant to put women to death. The recent execution of Karla Faye Tucker had the country in an uproar. This is because women are seen as less scary and less dangerous then men.
Americans have argued over the death penalty since the early days of our country. In the United States only 38 states have capital punishment statutes. As of year ended in 1999, in Texas, the state had executed 496 prisoners since 1930. The laws in the United States have change drastically in regards to capital punishment. An example of this would be the years from 1968 to 1977 due to the nearly 10 year moratorium. During those years, the Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment violated the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. However, this ended in 1976, when the Supreme Court reversed the ruling. They stated that the punishment of sentencing one to death does not perpetually infringe the Constitution. Richard Nixon said, “Contrary to the views of some social theorists, I am convinced that the death penalty can be an effective deterrent against specific crimes.”1 Whether the case be morally, monetarily, or just pure disagreement, citizens have argued the benefits of capital punishment. While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that is capital punishment being used for vengeance or as a deterrent.
The Ethics of Capital Punishment Ethics is "the study of standards of right and wrong. " philosophy dealing with moral conduct, duty and judgement. ' [1] Capital Punishment is the death penalty for a crime. The word "capital" in "capital punishment" refers to a person's head as in the past. people were often executed by severing their heads from their bodies.
Violence against women is a global problem that affects people and countries everywhere in varying degrees. The World Health Organization (WHO) revealed, through
A contentious issue in current debate is the death penalty and its application in society. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, occurs when a individual is punished by execution as a consequence of an offence they committed (Taylor, 2014). Although Australia does not practice the death penalty, many countries continue to employ it as a means of justice and uphold its value in society. The death penalty debate is a multifaceted issue, encompassing many aspects of society including ethics and morality, the judicial system, and politics and the economy. It will be argued that the death penalty is a morally dubious and obsolete practice that is no longer relevant in modern judiciary, as it breaches the inviolable human right to life. Ethics and morality are primary arguments for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, as some individuals believe that the death penalty is a immoral practice and others consider that it can be morally justified when prolific crimes are committed. Punishment is fundamental element to any legal system as a means of justice and ensuing that the offender is unable to commit additional crimes; however, in the case of the death penalty there can be dire consequences if the legal system is wrong. Politics and the economy are also greatly influenced by the death penalty as they determine if the practice is maintained. The death penalty breaches a number of human rights laws and some individuals support that it is immoral; however, others consider it to be justifiable due to the heinous actions of the offender.
Violence against women appeared from a long time ago and happened in every country. It caused pain in both mental and physical for women. There were so many people trying to stop this problem but it was still not completely fixed. There are many reasons that lead to this issue all over the world. After many surveys and investigations, we realized that the main reason is Discrimination and Unequal power. Some legends and stories in the past made people think men’s role is more important than women’s role in society. And because men are stronger, more active than women so they can do more work. This also makes people think men deserve more rights than women. They soon forced on human’s mind that men are also...