Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Can a pedophile be treated
Psychology of pedophiles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Can a pedophile be treated
The theories described by Hirschi provide reasoning for why an individual would choose not to act upon their deviant sexual desires, but does not explain why one would. With all of the societal discouragement of the behaviour, why would a person choose to act? The Differential Association Theory by Edwin H. Sutherland and Donald R. Cressey attempts to explain why one would engage in deviant behaviour. The extensive theory has a few key points that are particularly relevant to pedophilia. Firstly, the authors argue that deviant behaviour is learned. This is certainly true in our society, especially in the case of ‘barely legal’ porn. The sexualization of youth, particularly young girls, is rampant in our society. This can be observed in clothing ads, where companies market lingerie lines specifically to pre-teens, or in film, where older, more developed women are often cast as high school girls. Another aspect of this theory is the idea that deviant behaviour is learned in interactions with others. This can also be applied to pedophilia. Sexual conversations about young girls and women, occasionally diminished as ‘locker-room talk’, describe girls as ‘jail-bait’, a term which is often used when an adult is attracted to a minor, and would otherwise act on this …show more content…
In relation to pedophilia, this would be learning the ways of satisfying pedophilic urges without being caught. This can incredibly detrimental, as it may delay the person seeking treatment for the disorder. Sutherland and Cressey also state that “differential associations may vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity” (Terrell et al, 2001, 147). In this sense, people suffering from pedophilia may not always recognize that their behaviours are wrong, and that this feeling of ‘wrongness’ may vary depending on a variety of internal and external
When a late adolescent or adult is primarily or exclusively attracted to a minor child sexually they become diagnosed with the psychiatric disorder pedophilia. Mostly a person is not diagnosed with this disorder unless they have had this attraction for six months or longer. This attraction can be in the form of fantasies which are sexually arousing to the perpetrator, or the urge to engage in sexual activities with a minor child. In addition, in order to be diagnosed the molester will have to have acted on these urges or suffered from some type of distress, which will be result from having these feelings. Also the molester should be at least sixteen years old with the victim being younger than them by a minimum of five years.
Many etiological theories exist attempting to explain the root causes of sexual offending. Although few provide substantial evidence and no definitive conclusions have been made, the social learning theory has been proposed to account for sex offending behaviors. Specifically, the social learning theory, or victim-to-victimizer theory, suggests sexually abused children learn these behaviors and are much more likely to perpetrate abuse when they’re older (Seto & Lalumiere, 2010). The following studies have provided substantial support for the social learning etiology. Through the use of a meta-analysis, Seto and Lalumiere (2010) concluded that sexual offending is tied to prior sexual abuse. Burton, Miller, and Shill (2002) discovered significant differences between sexual offending and nonsexual offending adolescents in the areas of sexual abuse. Lastly, Burton (2003) determined that sex offender’s methods of abuse mimicked that which was done to them. The introduction, method, results, and discussion of each study is addressed and the link between prior sexual abuse and future sex offending behaviors become apparent.
“...an individual with [pedophilia] has the same ingrained attraction that a heterosexual female may feel towards a male, or a homosexual feels towards their same gender.” (Johnston, Pg. 1). Pedophilia - “the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger” (American Psychiatric Association, p.1) - a word that holds multiple negative connotations, is often seen as aberrant thought process or behavior, and is under debate as to whether or not it’s a sexual orientation. But can it be considered a sexual orientation? As a member of the LGBT community, this issue has surfaced among us and shocked the majority.
This essay will discuss the many different types of sex offenses that are considering a crime. It will then talk about some of the historical sexual offenders laws that have shaped society as a whole. It will also define the role religion plays on the emergence of new Sex offender’s laws that we have in contemporary societies. And finally talk about the emergence of some currents sex offenses laws we have in our nation.
Deviant behavior is sociologically defined as, when someone departs from the “norms”. Most of the time when someone says deviance they think against the law or acting out in a negative behavior. To sociologists it can be both positive and negative. While most crimes are deviant, they are not always. Norms can be classified into two categories, mores and folkways. Mores are informal rules that are not written; when mores are broken, they can have serious punishments and sanctions. Folkways are informal rules that are just expected to be followed, but have no real repercussions.
There are many topics nowadays that are still hard to talk about openly. Though we’ve opened the door on many controversies, some of the simplest parts of life can be the hardest to discuss. For most of us, sex in particular can be a taboo topic, which may be the reason why so many children and teens are misinformed on the inner workings of sexual relationships and how they develop as we grow and mature. For some adolescents, this can lead to an unhealthy fixation on the concept of sex, and in some cases, lead them to take action on a situation they do not fully understand. Sexual offenses are perceived as some of the most heinous crimes, but how could our views be affected if those acts were performed by a teenager? We may sometimes consider that they are the same as adult sex offenders; however our judgment can often be clouded by our lack of understanding. Adolescent sex offenders are different from adult sex offenders, are treated in a different way, and often have very different circumstances of their crime.
Pornography is nothing new to American society, so why would there be a problem with the merging of the internet and pornographic material? Why would it make a difference if the material is online or in a magazine? In this paper, the issue of internet porn will be discussed in terms of its relation to the addiction of online porn, desensitization to sexual violence and rape, encouragement of sexual violence, objectification of women, sexual compulsiveness, and the reshaping of expectations regarding sex and body images.
According to Rubin’s model, “good” sexual acts include heterosexual, married, monogamous, procreative, in private, and vanilla. Characteristics of “bad” sexual acts include homosexual, non-procreative, pornographic, and sadomasochistic. Only sex acts that are on the “good” side of the line are aligned with morality. This model assumes the domino theory of sexual peril, which is the belief that “the line between “good” and “bad” sex stand between sexual order and chaos” (Rubin 14). If certain aspects of “bad” sex are allowed to cross the erotic barrier, then other “reprehensible” acts would follow and chaos would ensue. The domino theory of sexual peril and this notion that some sex are moral while others are immoral further adds into the discourse of oppressive powers. “It grants virtue to the dominant groups, and relegates vice to the underprivileged” (15). This means that institutions of powers could be scapegoating sexual deviances as the problem while ignoring the real issues of society. One example of this was the anti-porn movement during the late 1970s. S/M porn was especially criticized because it is thought that
The issues of sexual ethics in relation to morality and perversion have been addressed in depth by each of the gentleman at this table. Sexual activity as described by Solomon and Nagle is comprised of a moral standard and ‘naturalness’ aspect. So, in claiming an act is perverted we must first examine it through a moral framework and understand how this interacts with the ‘naturalness’ of a particular act. Solomon makes the distinction as follows “Perversion is an insidious concept…To describe an activity as perverse is not yet a full blown moral condemnation, for it need not entail that one ought not to indulge in such activities.” Along with the examination of the nature of an act, there must be clear justification as to why sexual acts deserve special separate ethical principles. The question arises: does an act simply due to its sexual nature deserve a separate form of moral inquisition than other acts that occur in nature? In this essay I shall argue that perversion and immorality are not mutually exclusive. By this I mean that a sexual act that is, by my definition, immoral must also be perverted. It is also my contention that if an act is perverted we must also define it as immoral. This second part of the argument is contrary to what many of you have claimed. At the outset of this paper I would also like to state my support of Thomas Nagel’s argument holding that the connection between sex and reproduction has no bearing on sexual perversion. (Nagel 105)
It focuses on the role of cultural and societal norms, structure and messages. For instance, there are some theorists who hold that media such as video games or television contribute to escalation of this behavior by desensitizing messages of violence. On the other hand, there are some who hold that the ways in which children and women are sexualized and depicted as passive and submissive through films, advertisements or television programs might contribute to them being victims of sexual predators. There are also other theorists who believe that men are socialized to dominate, aggressive or conquer children and women leading to development of the behavior demonstrated by sexual predators (Aigner & Eher,
How do people satisfy curiosities? It used to be that people satisfied curiosities by asking other individuals about the topic, or even looking up the answer in a book. In today’s world, any curiosity can be entertained by performing a web search of the curiosity one has. This form of discovering something new is easy and fast. This method of accessing information sounds great, but what happens when an adolescent has a sexual curiosity? He or she will most likely type something sexually related into a search engine and very quickly encounter explicit content, which does more than just satisfy the individual’s sexual curiosity. This will arouse further interest in the content, and want to explore the uncensored world of pornography. This cascade effect results in exposure to forms of pornography, generally defined as anything that depicts sex, which are anything but related to real sex. Therefore, viewing pornography before having sex for the first time results in dissatisfaction with the sexual encounter, due to the fact that the individual was able to judge and compare the experience to previously viewed pornography, while someone who has never watched pornography is less likely to view his or her first sexual experience negatively, because there is no preconceived notion of what sex should be like.
Sexual deviance is any behavior with a sexual act that goes against the expectations of the society in which the act was performed. To be considered deviant, there are usually consent issues, the people or things involved create a deviant combination, the specific sexual act and anatomy is outside the realm of socially acceptable, or the place involved is unacceptable (Ritzer, 2007). In American society, it appears according to media accounts, billboard advertisements, and daily observation of the people passing by, sex is bought, sold, and traded in the open market; however, just because we see it everywhere, does not mean that it is socially acceptable. As we learned in the Tittle and Paternoster (2000) article, indiscretion is the deviance
“As I asked myself, is pornography a cause of crime? I was inclined to think so when I reflected on the ‘moors’ trail in which Ian Brady and Myra Hindley were found guilty of having murdered an adolescent boy and of having abused, tortured, and murdered a little girl aged ten and a boy age twelve years old. The motive was sexual gratification: the pair compelled the children to take obscene pictures and made a sexual recording of the children.” Van den Hagg, page 161. Pornography can lead to sexual crimes towards any person at any age and can be anywhere from human trafficking, sexual abuse, naked pictures posted on the web, or can even be a crime in itself by illegally posting videos without the woman’s or man’s consent. Some pornographies show that women enjoy being forced into sexual activity, that they enjoy being physically hurt, in sexual context, and that as a result a man who forces himself on a woman sexually is in fact trying to re-live some of the “real” wishes of the woman regardless of the extent to which she seems to resist. Whenever someone who is susceptible to the power of pornography consumes enough pornography to cause the viewer to rape a person, the viewer rapes a person. (Adams 3). Pornography can heighten self confidence in the viewer and this can lead to sexual assault. If the viewer feels confident enough, they will then act out towards others whether it be
When someone is young they are unaware of some of their decisions and are unaware of the things that will scar them for the rest of their lives. In the article by Margo Kaplan, she discusses what pedophilia actually is, the laws that are currently in place, and how a child’s wellbeing is at risk. This article is highly credible considering that the author is a well-known researcher in the field of criminal law with a concentration in sexual crimes. Pedophilia’s recursive nature is to perform harmful acts to children; while pedophiles can put a child in the physical harm they are also prone to psychological harm (Kaplan 43). Kids are the main victims of these heinous acts, but there is no precaution to those that cause the harm resulting in them hurting more children than necessary in the process. While the following article is not that credible seeing that there is no clear citing from where they acquired their research, they were able to assemble a valid point about pedophiles going against a kid’s desire (Duke 5). According to the author, Judith Levine, in the same article, parents have the proper say about whether a child is being molested or not. While this relates to the previous article by Kaplan, it does so in the nature that puts the
Deviance is the behaviour that moves away from typical norms and values in society, such as burping or spitting in public. According to Howard Becker, social groups create deviance by making rules whose infraction constitutes deviant behaviour and by giving these rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders. From this perspective, deviance isn't an action which the individual commits, but instead a consequence of application by others of the rules and sanctions to an offender. The deviant is someone to whom the label has successfully been applied; deviant behaviour is behaviour that individuals so label.