Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of advertisement on the profit levels of businesess pdf reasearch
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
MEMO
To: Dr. Barksdale
From: Nancy Kim
Date: 28 November 2017
Re: Crescent Pure Case Exam
Recommendation
Portland Drake Beverages (PDB) should position Crescent Pure as an energy drink with focus of its organic attributes priced at $2.75 that will attract more consumers and maximize Crescent’s revenues during their soft launch in the three western states, California, Oregon, and Washington.
Rationale
1. The energy drink category has grown 40% during 2010-2012 and was estimated to be $8.5 billion in the United States in 2013 and projected to reach $13.5 billion by 2018. In contrast, the sport drinks category increased only 9% and was projected to reach $9.58 billion in 2017. The market size for energy drinks is rising at a faster rate
…show more content…
The increasing market for health, wellness, and natural products create a higher demand for the product thus providing the opportunity to gain a greater market share. Appx. 1-A
3. Launching the product as a healthier option by promoting its organic attributes at the affordable price of $2.75 will entice consumers to try the product at least once. The average price for an 8-oz. energy drink is currently $2.99.
4. Crescent’s organic certification and minimal caffeine content differentiates them from competitors who use artificial sweeteners and excessive levels of stimulants as a source of energy.
5. The $750,000 advertising budget will increase brand awareness and the establishment of Crescent Pure as an organic energy drink thus encouraging enough demand for the product to sell its capacity.
6. According to Appendix 3, Retailers would be more inclined to push this product since their gross margins almost double the amount the manufacturers make per can. Thus, creating an incentive for retailers to sell more of the product. Appx. 3
7. Crescent’s current 8 oz. size is one of the three popular sizes for energy drinks where as popular sport drinks’ sizes ranges from 12 oz. – 24
…show more content…
Wholesale Cost to Distributors per Can – Variable Costs per Can = Profit per Can
2. Profit per Can * 24 Cans per Case = Contribution Margin per Case
3. Advertising Budget (Fixed Costs) / Contribution Margin per Case = Breakeven Quantity in Cases / Year
4. Factory Capacity / year – Breakeven Quantity in Cases / year = # of Cases after Breakeven
5. # of Cases after Breakeven * Contribution Margin per Case = Profit after Breakeven
In order to breakeven with an advertising budget of $750,000, PDB will need to sell 142,046 cases in one year. The factory has the capabilities to produce 144,000 cases per year. On a monthly basis, PDB needs to sell 11,838 cases and has the capability to produce 12,000 per month.
Appendix 3 – Crescent Pure Energy Drink Margins per Can 1. Manuf. Selling Price – Manuf. Cost of Goods Sold = Manuf. Margin = $0.22
2. (Manuf. Margin / Manuf. Selling Price) * 100% = Manuf. Gross Margin % = 18%
3. Dist. Selling Price – Dist. Cost of Goods Sold = Dist. Margin = $0.41
4. (Dist. Margin /Dist. Selling Price) * 100% = Dist. Gross Margin % = 25%
5. Retail Selling Price – Retail Cost of Goods Sold = Retail Margin =
There are two solutions that provide the optimal profit given the current constraints under which JP Molasses operates. Under these conditions, the optimal profit is $63,571. This profit margin is achieved in both cases with revenue of $942,354 and cost of $412,333 for material purchased and $466,450 for fixed and variable costs in processing, for total cost of $878,783.
energy drink. In effect, it will help to freshen the brand image as well as creating entry barriers against other competitors (McDonalds, 2007). This strategy will eventually lead to the increase in market share and customer base.
In 2012 Macy’s had a gross profit margin and net income margin of 11148, and 1335 respectively. In 2013 Macy’s had a gross profit margin and net income margin of 11206, and 1486 respectively. In 2014 Macy’s had a gross profit margin and net income margin of 11242, and 1526 respectively ("Annual Reports/Fact Book -Macy 's Inc."). Gross profit and net income margin both show steady increases year over year, this data indicates Macy 's is continuing to grow at a sustainable rate. In 2013, Macy’s inventory turnover was 3.15, and decreased to 3.03 in 2014. Number of days sales in inventory in 2013 was 115.84 and 120.28 in 2014 ("Annual Reports/Fact Book -Macy 's Inc."). With the decrease in inventory turnover and conversely an increase in number of days sales in inventory Macy 's is showing a decrease in managing inventory, in other words this excess inventory is decreasing
Assume required profit is equal to selling, general and administrative expenses so after expenses they will breakeven.
As stated in the case, “the market for energy drinks was growing; between 2010 and 2012, the market for energy drinks had grown by 40%. It was estimated to be $8.5 billion in the United States in 2013 [and] forecasts projected that figure to reach $13.5 billion by 2018” (pg 5). However, much of this market’s revenue -- 85% in fact -- is dominated by five major brands, while the remaining 15% is split between approximately 30 regional and national companies. (pg. 5). With this saturated market, it might not be best for Crescent Pure to enter as a completely new product to the industry, as there is the possibility that it will be squeezed out of the profit shares by more established brands -- especially if it is not properly secure in its identity. In addition, while the market for energy drinks appeared to be growing at an exponential rate compared to the market for sports drinks -- which increased only 9% in five years and would be at approximately 60% of the rate for energy drinks in 2017 (pg 6) -- the consumers appeared to be wary of partaking in the market for several reasons, which would potentially harm the reach of Crescent Pure. These concerns included rising news reports discussing the safety of energy drinks (pg. 5). Taking into consideration the data provided in the case that concerns reasonings of why consumers choose specific drinks over others, there
In the 1970’s, one of the Hansen brothers decided to transition their beverage business into marketing ‘natural sodas’. This was the upturn of the company that led them to where they are today. Today, Monster Beverage Corp. has transformed into the largest energy drink company in Canada with sales of more than $ 2.1 billion in 2012.
Starting with the product Clif Bar expanded its original energy bar into other products to fulfill customers’ needs and wants. They made Luna Bar for women, ZBar for children, and for those who want more energy they created Clif Shot to easily drink a small amount of energy on the go. Clif Bar promotes their products by sponsoring events; their latest event they sponsored was the 2016 Boston Marathon. Giving racers who need energy free samples to encourage them to finish the race. The prices for their products are relatively higher than their competitors due to their natural/ organic ingredients. But customers are willing to pay an extra dollar for quality ingredients. The places Clif Bar is available are Australia, Belgium, Japan, Italy, Portugal, and Spain just to name a few. The people in Clif Bar believe in their product. They are adventure goers who love to hike and be in the outdoors. They believe energy should be natural just like the great outdoors and that organic is the way to go. The process for Clif Bar is they distribute their products to local stores (Albertson’s, Ralphs, Vons, Target, and Walmart) they also sell them direct on their online store (clifbarstore.com). Physical evidence for Clif Bar is portrayed as an energy bar for active people. The website illustrates people on bikes, hiking, and running being happy and focused on their activities. All the factors of the marketing mix for Clif Bar revolve on their simple natural ingredients targeting active people on the
The term ‘product’ includes goods, services or ideas. Monster Energy drink is a tangible product (good) that is produced and marketed in such a way that helps to motivate consumer purchase. Attributes include product design, features, colour, packaging, warranty and service levels.
Our reverse income statement starts with a financial requirement to add 5% to CA Technologies’ current net income within two years. With CA Technologies’ current net income of $827 million , our 5% profit addition is equal to $41.35 million, as shown below (Figure 1). Given this, our necessary revenues to generate the required 10% sales margin are $413.5 million and our all...
Signode Industries Inc. - Providing Packaging Solutions Executive Summary SIGNODE INDUSTRY: DILEMMA AT HAND: Mr. Gary Reed, President of Signode Industries packaging division, is in a dilemma as what he should be his course of action to meet the 6.8% increase in price of cold rolled steel- the raw material used in manufacture of Signode’s primary product, steel strapping. There are few options given in the case: Increase Signode’s strapping prices to offset the increased price of cold – rolled steel. Maintain Signode’s current book prices as increasing prices would affect sales force morale. Introduce price-flex model as proposed by Jack Davis i.e. a kind of selective discounting or premium charging for customized services. Recommendations Reason: (All data in accordance to 1983) In accordance to Exhibit 1: Sales of Packaging Division of the company = $285,950 In accordance to Table A: Sales of Apex = 33.3% of $285,950 Sales of BBM = 26.8% of $285,950 Sales of HDM = 33.4% of $285,950 Sales of Customized Products = 6.5% of $285,950 In accordance to Exhibit 4: Similarly, For Apex: As it has a capacity utilization of 71% now, Suppose a sale is $100. Then contribution is $39.15 Therefore variable cost is $60.85. Now if we increase the capacity utilization to 100%, Sales becomes $ 141 since production increases by [(100-71)/71] * 100 = 41% Variable Cost = 141% of 60.85 = $85.8 Fixed Cost = 69.38% * 12.3 = $8.53 Total Cost = 85.8+8.53 = $94.33 EBIT = Sales – Variable cost – Fixed Cost = $46.67 % of EBIT = [(46.67/141) * 100] = 33.09% Suppose the company sales 100x units, the total cost was 69.38. Thus per unit cost was .6938. Now the company sells 141x units, the total cost...
Term “marginal” is extensively used and known with reference to the economics which means “extra”, whereas with economic view point the marginal cost is the cost of producing every extra unit; however the accounting terminology of “marginal” defines the cost incurred on production other than its fixed cost is the marginal cost. Simply, none of the technique is applied unless it serves the benefits and the marginal costing is used by the firms for its registered benefits. Among all its benefits the primary advantage it serves is its attempt to distinguish the fixed and variable costs, and the method only considers the related variable costs to be included in production cost and the fixed costs are thus later deducted out for ascertaining net profit. The inventory at the year-end is also valued on the bases of variable cost. With all these beneficial characteristics of the said system firms using marginal costing are clearly aware of its ...
Big global companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have introduced their own energy drink versions to their product base. Mother (by Coca Cola), Amp (Pepsi), V, Battery, 180, RedEye and Bennu being just some in the ever-growing energy drink market.
The contribution margin is the difference between sales and cost of goods sold; therefore, yields $5,141,000.
We know that it was going to be expensive to produce the product but we are confident that no matter the cost of production, our sales would greatly succeed the cost. The cost of producing a 5 oz. can was about 75 to 80 cents if they can produce 100,000 per month. If we were to produce 50,000 cans per month, that cost would rise by 5 to 10 cents per can. A 10 oz. can would cost about 25% more than a 5 oz. can would to produce. With those numbers, 100,000 5 oz. cans would cost us about $900,000-$960,000 per year to produce. 50,000 5 oz. cans would cost us $750,000. 100,000 10 oz. cans would cost us $1.125M-$1.2M a year...
Cosmo-cosmetics Co. uses $0.246 out of every sale dollar to cover variable expenses, leaving $0.753 as a contribution margin to cover fixed costs and make a profit. (Note: 75.3% is the contribution margin as a percentage of sales)