Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on assassination of Julius Caesar
Essay on assassination of Julius Caesar
Essay on assassination of Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on assassination of Julius Caesar
Assassinated, he was. It was a lukewarm spring day; it smelt of flowers and freshly plowed dirt. I was at a small senate meeting when I had overheard Cassius and Brutus talking, planning. They were planning to kill our beloved general, Julius Caesar. I had not noticed that I was staring at them as if they had just brutally murdered my parents in front of me. They took notice, and they started walking towards me. My palms became sweaty and I could feel my heart pounding through my chest, but I was ready to fight, ready to kill. I grabbed my small copper dagger, warm to the touch from being tucked in my toga. Then, Cassius spoke, “If you are so eager to fight, why don’t you help us do something, not just us, but Rome?” I was outraged I could …show more content…
not believe this fool was asking me to kill our general, and for what reason, if any at all? It was then that they convinced me to do so, Brutus finally spoke in a soft but bold tone, “We cannot kill him alone, we need strength in numbers, and I need you to help us.” I then asked for what reason did we need to kill the undefeated leader of Rome. In unison they answered, “He is becoming too powerful.” That night they had asked us to meet at a building; I suspected it to be one of the other conspirator’s houses. I did not know, and therefore I did not care. That night we had planned on how to kill the leader. We had discussed on how we would fulfill the deed. Some suggested that we kill him during a gladiatorial showing since brandishing broadswords and bastards would not be out of the normal. Others suggested killing him during the beautiful and flowery Sacred Walk, which was one of his favorite areas to stroll around, usually alone. Finally, I suggested that we kill him as he sat at senate since non-senate could not sit next to him. The majority of the conspirators agreed to my suggestion and we ended up falling through with the plan. About a week had passed since our last meeting, and today was the day; the day we killed the seemingly immortal Julius Caesar.
I had woken up ready, ready to lose my life it seemed. I was not afraid though. I trusted my fellow senate and myself. We were all ready. We had all decided to act as if a normal meeting was going to happen, but surely, this was not going to be normal. I had walked up to the large gray cement senate building, with pillars the size of one hundred year old trees. I saw the other conspirators arriving too. Then, I saw Julius. All of the senate seemed to have locked eyes with each other; we all knew what was going to happen. Caesar would soon be painted with wounds. Caesar was just about to sit down when one of the senators ran and stabbed him; he screamed in shock, his scream echoing, scratching my eardrums, you could see the terror in his eyes. Blood had immediately stained him and the other conspirator. It seemed as time had frozen. I was in shock but my instinct was to run and also do the same. All of the senate had the same instinct. Blood was everywhere, it stained our togas a crimson color, I actually did not mind the color it looked rather satisfying. I looked up and saw Brutus, and that is when Julius muttered, “You too, Brutus?” As he spoke one of the senate dropped his blade like a hammer on hot metal into the leader’s chest and that was it, he was finished,
dead. I had not notice but the crowd watching us was in shock, about unleash an attack. The crowd was so huge, like a sea beating against us the beach. We had killed their beloved leader. With little to no reason, it was then that I had realized what I had committed. It felt horrible, but I brushed it off, some of the conspirators told me this would happen. It was grief. I looked into the crowd. Some of the men were and women were on the brink of tears. We had left them in an eerie state of shock and awe. They did not seem to know what to do. Then, came the screams and shouts. The Roman people were outraged they hated us with a passion. I could not agree with them more, we had killed a great general. I thought this was to help the people, I thought. Brutus had broken a speech, to calm the crowd, which was roaring like a lion. He had told them that they were not real Roman people if they did not agree that Caesar was becoming too powerful for what we defined as a democracy. Our state was not meant to be ruled by one person but by the people. I agreed with Brutus, because he was right. It was then when Antony, Caesar’s right hand man, had walked in carrying the late leader. He stated, “He was too ambitious and suffered death because of it.”
Parenti’s examination of how “Gentlemen’s History” sheds light on socio-political realities in our own day. “On the fifteenth of March, 44 B.C., in a meeting hall adjacent to Pompey’s theater, the Roman Senate awaited the arrival of the Republic’s supreme commander, Julius Caesar…at a given signal, they began to slash at their prey with their knives, delivering fatal wounds” (Parenti). The assailants believed that they save the Roman Republic. The assassination of Julius Caesar marked a turning point in the history of Rome. “The Senate aristocrats killed Caesar because they perceived him to be a popular leader who threatened their privileged interests…an inquiry into this incident reveals something important about the nature of political rule, class power, and a people’s struggle for democracy and social justice—issues that are still very much with us” (Parenti). Caesar was killed due to the Senate aristocrats believing that Caesar threatened the aristocrats’ privileged interests. Parenti notes that “Historians are fond of saying that history reflects the age in which it is written…the history of seemingly remote events vibrate “to present needs and present situations.” History tends to repeat itself and history depends on the time or place that the history is happening. Parenti states that “My primary interest is not in Julius Caesar as an individual but in the issues of popular struggle and oligarchic power that were being played out decades before he was born, continuing into his life and leading to his death.” Parenti lets his audience know from the beginning of the book “The Assassination of Julius Caesar” is not a biography about Julius Caesar, but it is about the struggles and issues that occurred before Caesar was born and how it continued into his life and that lead to his death. To refer back to the hook, Parenti writes this because he wants to point out the way history
The book Julius Caesar is full of happiness, conspiracy, power, and betrayal. The people of Rome deeply loved julius Caesar and wished to make him their king. A group of senators however were not so fond of this idea and formed a conspiracy. The leader of this group was a man by the name of Cassius. In order to make sure that his scheme of killing Caesar would work and would look honorable he had to convince a senator by the name of Brutus to help. After being convinced that they had to kill Caesar to protect Rome from a tyrant Brutus joined the conspiracy and soon became the principal conspirator.On the day in which Caesar was to be crowned king he was on the way to the senate when he was stabbed by all the conspirators panic ensued and to convince Rome of their honorable intentions Brutus gave a funeral speech. Mark Antony, a very close friend of Caesar, gave his speech after Brutus had given his. Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive to the Roman people because of his outstanding use of pathos, sarcasm, and logos.
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
Julius Caesar is the leader of Rome and is seeking to become king in a matter of time. Though he is a good military strategist, he lacks knowledge in running government and is too greedy to have any concern for the peasants when he is alive. Caesar is all about conquering and power and he is afraid of nothing. Before he is murdered, he says “The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on my back. When they shall see the face of Caesar, they are vanished” (II, ii, 575). Th...
One friend kills another. Speeches are presented. A war breaks out. This is the story of Julius Caesar, the emperor of Rome who was killed by Brutus and a group of conspirators. Many argue that Brutus was a patriot, and many argue that he was a betrayer. People argue that he was a betrayer because he betrayed Caesar’s trust and gave a speech against him. However, when you think of Caesar’s personality, arrogant and slightly reckless, he could’ve made bad decisions and caused Rome a great deal of trouble. Brutus was a patriot to Rome since he did what was best for the country and even took his own life instead of running away. He put his own feelings aside to do what was right.
Julius Caesar was a great leader, strategist, and thinker. On the 15th of March, 44 B.C., he was stabbed by members of the roman senate and bled to death. This gruesome homicide has been reviewed by many historians, but the most famous account is “Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare. Throughout reading this play, the audience must make the hard decision between whether or not they believe Brutus’ motives were justifiable, or if Caesar was the victim of a cruel, heinous crime. This opens up the question, is murder ever justifiable?
Greed, ambition, and the possibility of self-gain are always constant in their efforts to influence people’s actions. In Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus, a venerable politician, becomes a victim of the perpetual conflict between power-hungry politicians and ignorant commoners. He is a man of honor and good intentions who sacrifices his own happiness for the benefit of others. Unfortunately, his honor is strung into a fine balance between oblivion and belief and it is ultimately the cause of his downfall. His apparent obliviousness leads him to his grave as his merciful sparing of Mark Antony’s life, much like Julius Caesar’s ghost, comes back to haunt him. Overall, Brutus is an honest, sincere man who holds the lives of others in high regard while he himself acts as a servant to Rome.
Many characters in Julius Caesar demonstrate qualities of contrasting ambitious objectives. Deception and manipulation appear to be two of the main qualities contributing to the plot for the assassination of Caesar. Although Brutus is seen as the leader of the conspirators Cassius established himself as a deceitful manipulator with an immoral agenda. Although seen throughout the play, Cassius’s soliloquy primarily demonstrates the immoral aspects of his character as he is driven by manipulating Brutus’s political position for personal advancement.
Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on the villains who killed his beloved Caesar. After Antony turns a rioting Rome on him and wages war against him and the conspirators, Brutus falls by his own hand, turning the very sword he slaughtered Caesar with against himself. Brutus is unquestionably the tragic hero in this play because he has an innumerable amount of character flaws, he falls because of these flaws, and then comes to grips with them as he bleeds on the planes of Philippi.
Alvin B. Kernan. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print.
After the murderous confrontation, it was not too late to prevent the anger of Caesar’s allies and the citizens or, even, to avoid future civil war. But it was here that Brutus made his second and third mistakes. Marcus Brutus rose before the Roman populace and attempted to offer a justification of Caesar’s murder. His flawed judgment came when he deemed Antony trustworthy and allowed him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus naively let Antony draw the mob in his favor. No one could dare refute Antony’s impassioned pleas in behalf of Caesar.
Caesar was the powerful ruler of Rome. One of his dearest friends was a man named Marcus Brutus. Brutus was a loyal friend, and was always true to his country. But when Brutus is facing a dilemma in which case he is torn between the life of his friend and what is better for the city of Rome. With Brutus being a true Roman he chooses the death of his friend. With Brutus joining the conspirators, who are plotting against Caesar, they are now even more powerful and can influence the people easier. While all the conspirators stab Caesar in the back, Brutus is the only one to stab Caesar face to face. Marc Antony, Ocatavius, and Lepidus take over the triumvirate. Brutus and Cuis Cassuis took their troops in against Antony and his troops. This will be where Brutus’ death and tragic flaw take place.
Rome is thought of as one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen. And the greatest ruler of the greatest empire, possibly the entire world, is Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar is known today to be a trustworthy, fair and brave leader, but you don’t become the greatest leader to ever live by not succeeding. He understood this and he was successful beyond measure.
He and behemoth took their seats as the far side of the large, royal family table, sitting away from the others. They weren't the last to breakfast, egyn hadn't arrived yet, and neither had Asriel, but that wasn't a big deal, those two always slept in, besides, it wasn't as if coming to breakfast was mandatory. No one cared. Iblis as always was full of energy, even in the morning and he contributed the most to the buzz of activity at the other end of the table, regaling his annoyed brother's with obviously made up tales of heroics and great feats.
Throughout history, the world has seen a copious amount of emperors, but Julius Caesar was a historic model to the society of Rome. According to McKay, Hill, Buckler, Crowston, Weisner- Hanks, and Perry, (2014), born in 100 B.C. to an honorable family, Caesar went to school and received an outstanding education, which he later advanced by studying in Greece with some of the famous Greek teachers we learn about today. Caesar’s first wife Cornelia was the daughter of the consul at the time, Lucius Cornelius Cinna. His original plans were to marry the daughter of a wealthy business class family, but considering he wanted to be the flamen he had to marry a patrician. Even though he fulfilled the requirements and married Cornelia, consul Cinna never