Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychoanalytic analysis essay of frankenstein
Frankenstein character development
Frankenstein character development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychoanalytic analysis essay of frankenstein
Creating an Instrument of Evil
(A discussion of how Victor Frankenstein is not a hero in Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley)
“To a large extent, the novel is a reflection of the concerns of the time when the natural world was in crisis” (Phillips). The natural world being in a crisis because technology was becoming available that was seen to beat death. Also, more than ever before humanity was starting to turn atheist. Importantly, when one messes with the natural, cyclical, cycle of life, evil can be created. Demonstrated when Victor Frankenstein discovers galvanism. In Frankenstein, the novel, by Mary Shelley, begins with a young man named Robert Walton, an English adventurer. Walton embarks on an expedition to the North Pole. Where he
…show more content…
Consequently, Victor was part of the murder and execution of innocents. After the creature became literate, the creature read Victor’s writings about him; Victor was ashamed and discontented with the horrific monster he gave life to. The monster in rebellion to his creators discontent, and disgust with him, decided, while passing through Victor’s homestead to murder Victor’s youngest brother, William. Not only did the monster murder William in cold blood, the monster also set-up Justine with the murder. Evidently, William is one innocent murdered. Then, after Justine is suspected with his murder and found with a piece of William, she is sentenced to death for her ‘crime’. Justine is soon executed by the time Victor finds out about the whole incident. Therefore, Victor is part of the death of two innocents, for creating such a beast. Victor’s guilty conscious is displayed in the following, “He beheld those he loved spend vain sorrow upon the grave of William and Justine, the first hapless victims to his hallowed arts” (Shelley 93). These arts of bringing his creature to life, without weighing out the consequences of his actions. Not only will Victor have to live with this for the rest of his natural life, but his family and community will have to mourn and live the consequences as well. Possibly, if Victor would have said something …show more content…
“‘Ineffectual Ideas, Violent Consequences: Vladimir Makanin’s Portrait of the Intelligentsia.’” Contemporary Literary Criticism, edited by Lawrence J. Trudeau, vol. 380, Gale, Farmington Hills, MI, 2015. Literature Resource Center, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/H1100119738/GLS?u=wylrc_wyomingst&sid=GLS&xid=3c6ea1d7. Accessed 2018.
Mitchell, Jesse. “Master of Doom by Doom Mastered: Heroism, Fate, and Death in the Children of Hurin.” Mythlore, vol. 29, no. 1-2, 2010, p. 87. Literature Resource Center, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A242509660/GLS?u=wylrc_wyomingst&sid=GLS&xid=afd1ba54. Accessed 2018.
Phillips, Bill. “Frankenstein and Mary Shelley's ‘Wet Ungenial Summer.’” Atlantis, Revista De La Asociación Española De Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos, vol. 28, no. 2, Dec. 2006, p. 59. Literature Resource Center, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A165578074/GLS?u=wylrc_wyomingst&sid=GLS&xid=918ec054. Accessed 2018.
Star, Alexander StarAlexander. “The Vulture of Narcissism.” The New Republic, vol. 205, no. 24, 9 Dec. 1991, p. 40. Literature Resource Center, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/H1420001790/GLS?u=wylrc_wyomingst&sid=GLS&xid=3b82b90e. Accessed 2018.
Leonard, Alison, et al. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. Ginn,
As a romantic, archetype and gothic novel, Victor is responsible for the monsters actions because Victor abandons his creation meaning the creature is dejected and ends up hideous and fiendish. It is unfair to create someone into this world and then just abandon it and not teach it how to survive. The quote from the creature “Why did you make such a hideous creature like me just to leave me in disgust” demonstrates how much agony the creature is in. He is neglected because of his creator. The monster says “The hateful day when I received life! I accurse my creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?” Victor is wholly at fault for his actions, image and evil.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein explores the downfall of certain human characteristics, set to the backdrop of creation, destruction, and preservation. The subtitle denoted by Shelly herself supports this idea, by relating the fact that the title can be viewed as either Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. One scholar, Marilyn Butler, also maintains this by noting, "It can be a late version of the Faust Myth"(302). Shelly uses the story of the main character, Victor Frankenstein, to produce the concept of a dooming human characteristic of which Frankenstein states, "I have . . . been blasted in these hopes"(Shelley, 152). The reader finds, as a result of his thirst for knowledge and infatuation with science, Victor creates a living being by whom he has "suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes"(Shelley, 17). Eventually, Victor realizes this self-destructive trait, but he is not able to save himself stating, "I have lost everything, and cannot begin life anew"(Shelley, 16). Although everything in his life that is dear has been lost, Victor is able to convince one in his same position--Robert Walton--to not "lead [his crew] unwillingly to danger"(Shelley, 151). While addressing the concept of characteristic and self-discovery, it is possible to realize that the monster also possesses the characteristics held by both Victor and Walton; except in his learning, the monster is driven to continue to cause destruction. Most important about the thirst for knowledge is that, as a form of human characteristic or downfall, it leads to large, critical pieces of self-discovery. In obtaining these critical pieces, Frankenstein finds satisfaction in j...
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
As a result of Victor’s secrecy, he becomes completely fixed on the creation of his creature, he does not inform anyone of the danger posed by the monster, and he is unable to tell anyone about the creature for fear of not being taken seriously. Victor’s secrecy during and after the creation of his monster indirectly causes several deaths. While the monster is primarily responsible for the deaths of his victims, Victor’s concealment allows the monster to commit and get away with his murders easily.
By the time of their death, both Victor and the creature has committed repugnant acts: Victor created a being out of corpses and then abandoned it and let it wreak havoc on the people he loved, the creature directly killed three people. But Victor tells Walton that, “During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blamable […] nor do I know where this thirst for vengeance may end” (269). Victor is not able to see past the metaphorical clouds that seem to shroud his mind from seeing the truth. Furthermore, Victor is not able to let go of his hate for the creature. In contrast, the creature admits, “But it is true that I am a wretch. I have murdered the lovely and the helpless” (275). The creature is able to recognize that he has made mistakes and as a result he loathes himself. He tells Walton that, “You hate me, but your abhorrence cannot equal that with which I regard myself” (275). Although no amount of regret or sorrow can bring back the people that he has killed, the creature does acknowledge the evil of his actions, which in turn allow him to make come to peace. He is able to reconcile his vengeful feelings towards his creator and praises Victor by calling him, “worthy of love and admiration among men” (275). Both Victor and the creature have done committed actions against each
Mary Shelley, the renowned author of Frankenstein, explores the consequences of man and monster chasing ambition blindly. Victor Frankenstein discovered the secret that allowed him to create life. His understanding of how bodies operated and the science of human anatomy enabled him to make this discovery and apply it to the creation of his monster. Walton wished to sail to the arctic because no sailor has ever reached it. The monster was created against his will, his ambition was to avenge his creation as a hideous outcast. These three characters were all driven by the same blind ambition.
Despite the rash actions that Victor takes, he ultimately does assume complete responsibility for the creature that he brought into being. After the monster murders William, Justine is then tried for the murder. Victor accepts that it was his fault even though he was not the one that actually murdered him: "But I, the true murderer, felt the never-dying worm alive in my bosom, which allowed of no hope or consolation" (74). Victor felt as if he had actually murdered both children because he had created the murderer. Even though in the end Justine took the official blame, Victor seized the responsibility so he took steps towards catching the monster and stopping him from killing anyone else. If he was not concerned with it being his fault one way or another he would not have continued to try to put the monster to rest. Later on, while Victor is creating a companion for the monster, he realizes the implications of a second creation: "Had I right, for my own benefit, t...
“Revenge alone endowed [him] with strength and composure; it modeled [his] feelings, and allowed [him] to be calculating and calm” (145). Victor gained new purpose and even on his deathbed holds to the principle that he is justified in desiring the death of his enemy. Moment before his death he turns to Captain Robert Walton and says, “I feel myself justified in desiring the death of my adversary. During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blamable” (156). He even begins to lose the small amount of compassion he had for the creature’s struggle. When visiting his family’s graves he cries that, “they were dead, and I lived; their murder also lived” (145). Previously in the novel he blamed himself for the deaths of Mathew, Justine, and Henry, claiming to be their murderer and lamenting on the evil he had set forth into the world. Victor now places the weight of these deaths solely on the monster’s shoulders and believes it is his god given burden to cleanse the world of this evil. He had been “assured that the shades of [his] murdered friends heard and approved [his] devotion… rage choked [him]”(146). The death of the monster would not even weigh on his conscience since it is god’s
In Frankenstein, Shelley creates two very complex characters. They embody the moral dilemmas that arise from the corruption and disturbance of the natural order of the world. When Victor Frankenstein is attending school, he becomes infatuated with creating a living being and starts stealing body parts from morgues around the university. After many months of hard work, he finishes one stormy night bringing his creation to life. However, “now that [Victor] had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled [his] heart” (Chambers). Right after Victor realizes what he has done, he falls into deep depression and must be nursed back to health by his friend. Victor spends the rest of the story facing consequences and moral problems from creating unnatural life. When he realizes that the ‘monster’ has killed his brother, even though no one believes him, he feels responsible for his brother’s murder because he was responsible for the existence of the ‘monster’. Also feeling responsible, Victor...
In both cases, the information that corrupts the characters was not meant for them to be discovered. When Frankenstein is discovered in the Arctic by a sailor named Walton, he is taken on board Walton’s boat. Frankenstein then tells Walton about his quest for information, and it changes Walton’s perspective on the pursuit of knowledge. Mary Shelley uses Victor Frankenstein’s and the creature’s pursuit of dangerous knowledge in Frankenstein to question the boundaries of human enlightenment. During Mary Shelley’s life in the early 1800s, galvanism was a popular area of study among some prominent scientists.
..., played God, abandoned his creation, and then hid any relation to the creature. Victor is quite at fault for the murders that take place in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. True, the monster does know right from wrong, the difference is he was not brought up by his parents that way. How to live life is something that is learned and imprinted through experience and guidance. The monster was never fully given the chance to live because upon the day he arrived he was instantly rejected. Victor created the monster physically and emotionally within himself and in turn died by it.
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley highlights on the experiences her characters undergo through the internal war of passion and responsibility. Victor Frankenstein lets his eagerness of knowledge and creating life get so out of hand that he fails to realize what the outcome of such a creature would affect humankind. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, highlights on how Frankenstein’s passion of knowledge is what ultimately causes the decline of his health and the death of him and his loved ones.
He possibly could have located the monster, with the help of others, in a timely fashion, thus averting the many calamities that followed. However, Victor chose to abandon his monster and not inform anyone of its creation, and ignore it for months (Shelly 56). When Victor finally sees the monster again, it is after the monster has killed his youngest brother, william. When an innocent woman is blamed for this crime, and Victor could testify and save her life, he takes no action, saying that he would be thought crazy for his tale (Shelly 66).This in and of itself is an insanely selfish thing to do, with minimal effort Victor could have saved another person's life but because it could jeopardize his own reputation, he chooses not to. Even after two people have perished due to his thoughtlessness, Victor still does not inform anyone of the monster which he has created and still allows it to run loose. Later in the novel, after Victor destroys the companion the monster asked him to build, the monster strangles Victor's innocent friend Henry (Shelley 166). Victor’s actions caused a number of deaths and endangered many people. Henry, Elizabeth, William, and Justine all had nothing to do with the creation and subsequent abandonment of the monster, and yet due to Victors irresponsibility, they paid the ultimate price. Williams death is a turning point in the novel, as it shows victor for the first time that his actions actually do have consequences “Nothing in the human shape could have destroyed that fair child. He was the murderer! I could not doubt it”, and yet he chooses to continue to make irresponsible choices that continue to endanger more people (Shelley
The conflict arises because Victor knows his responsibility is to tell the truth, but his passion persuades him not to. In the novel, before Victor reaches Geneva, he acknowledges the fact that he knows the truth about his brother’s murder. When Victor finally sees his creature again, he knows that “He was the murderer! [Victor] could not doubt it.” (Shelley 63). This proves that Victor knew, without a doubt, that his creature was responsible for William’s death. However, Victor fails to provide this information during Justine’s trial because he is afraid of the consequences he would have to face. This emotion of fear convinces Victor to make another ill-advised decision that results in his own misfortune. Victor justifies his decision by saying that “such a declaration would have been considered as the ravings of a madman” (Shelley 68). This demonstrates that Victor did not want to tarnish his appearance. This decision causes Victor to suffer yet again. Victor later feels guilty about not telling the truth because he is now responsible for Justine’s death as well as William’s. Victor expresses his guilt by saying, “I, the true murderer, felt the never-dying worm alive in my bosom” (Shelley 74). This guilt that Victor has brought upon himself nearly drives him to the point of suicide. In an article arguing that all of
Frankenstein is a revolutionary novel that represents the struggle between addiction, power, human nature, and nature itself. Throughout the novel, various themes, including acceptance, addiction, and fear are presented. Overall, the novel is classic literature that gives readers something to keep in the back of their heads.