Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral dilemmas in frankenstein
Moral dilemmas in frankenstein
Moral dilemmas in frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral dilemmas in frankenstein
Often times one may aspire to do something driven by emotion, but is halted by his knowledge of his moral duties. This creates the conflict of making a decision based on passion or based on responsibility. This conflict of passion versus responsibility is explored in Mary Shelley’s gothic novel, Frankenstein. Shelley uses the character of Victor Frankenstein to convey her message and to highlight this conflict in multiple cases throughout the novel. Victor’s internal struggle between what he desires to do and what he should do causes him suffering, pain, guilt and death.
The first time this conflict appears to Victor is early in the novel when Victor is studying in Ingolstadt. Victor obtains enough knowledge while studying that he believes
…show more content…
he can create a living being from inanimate body parts. Victor desires to create life for his own personal glory without considering whether or not he actually should. Victor focuses on what he can do to for his own personal gain. Victor begins his creation with hopes that “A new species would bless [him] as its creator” (Shelley 40). This shows the reader that Victor is inspired by his dreams of fame and glory. This introduces the reader to the passion driven aspect of Victor’s conflict. These aspirations that Victor has cause him to ignore his moral responsibility. Victor becomes so enamoured with the idea of fame that he does not even consider the effect his creation would have on the rest of the world and on the creature itself. When telling Walton of the time in which he was preparing to construct the creature, Victor recalls, “my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life” (Shelley 39). This proves that Victor’s longing for fame causes this exaltation of his imagination which, in turn, causes him to ignore any thoughts of doubt regarding his creation. In an article addressing the impact that the creation process has on Victor, David Seed states that Victor “sees his own guiding impulse as somehow autonomous, as independent as a natural process” (Seed). Through this Seed highlights Victor’s lack of awareness of his moral duties as a creator and his ignorance in believing his actions will not beckon any negative consequences. This ignorance that Victor displays while facing the conflict of passion versus responsibility results in Victor suffering the loss of his little brother. Victor’s unpreparedness to care for his creation indirectly leads to the creature seeking revenge, finding young William Frankenstein and murdering him. When Victor receives the letter detailing his brother’s demise, he “threw the letter on the table, and covered [his] face with [his] hands” (Shelley 60). The irony of this situation is that Victor’s obvious grief and frustration for his brother was cause by Victor himself. Although he was unaware of the identity of his brother’s true murder at this time, Victor is responsible for the death of his brother. This realization would later cause him much guilt. M. A. Goldberg describes the situation that Victor has put himself in by saying, “Though his inner-being longs for the compassion and sympathy that society affords, his guilt has already driven him out of love's garden” (Goldberg). Victor’s irresponsible abandonment of his creature proves that he is “a considerably flawed creator whose irresponsibility and short sightedness produce a creature who can't help but become evil.” (Soyka). This is the first of several situations in which Victor unitentionally causes himself pain because of the reckless decisions he makes when faced with the conflict of doing what he desires and doing what is right. The second instance of Victor’s inability to make wise decisions while facing this conflict is during Justine Moritz’s trial for the murder of William.
The conflict arises because Victor knows his responsibility is to tell the truth, but his passion persuades him not to. In the novel, before Victor reaches Geneva, he acknowledges the fact that he knows the truth about his brother’s murder. When Victor finally sees his creature again, he knows that “He was the murderer! [Victor] could not doubt it.” (Shelley 63). This proves that Victor knew, without a doubt, that his creature was responsible for William’s death. However, Victor fails to provide this information during Justine’s trial because he is afraid of the consequences he would have to face. This emotion of fear convinces Victor to make another ill-advised decision that results in his own misfortune. Victor justifies his decision by saying that “such a declaration would have been considered as the ravings of a madman” (Shelley 68). This demonstrates that Victor did not want to tarnish his appearance. This decision causes Victor to suffer yet again. Victor later feels guilty about not telling the truth because he is now responsible for Justine’s death as well as William’s. Victor expresses his guilt by saying, “I, the true murderer, felt the never-dying worm alive in my bosom” (Shelley 74). This guilt that Victor has brought upon himself nearly drives him to the point of suicide. In an article arguing that all of …show more content…
Victor’s misguided decisions result in death, M. A. Goldberg states, “His labors have already denied him the sympathies of society in general; now, the monster succeeds in depriving him, one by one, of those whom he loves most dearly: first, his brother William, then innocent Justine” (Goldberg). This supports the claim that the cost of Victor’s choices often is death. By not telling the truth at Justine’s trial, Victor has created another scenario in which his decisions cause himself anguish. Another case in which Victor makes a poor decision based on his emotions is when he destroys the mate that his original creature requested for. Victor knows that he should create a female creature because it would make his first creature happy, but he decides to destroy her because he fears being responsible for a race of monsters. Victor fails to realize that creating a mate for his creature would be the responsible thing to do. When requesting for his creator to make him a companion, the creature begs, “Oh! my creator, make me happy” (Shelley 134). This shows the creature’s single request that would make him happy and end his violent behavior. However, Victor refuses the creature’s request in fear of creating “a race of devils” that “would be propagated upon the earth” (Shelley 153). This description that Victor gives of his potential created species accurately portrays the utter fear that Victor faces when considering the creation of the mate. While contemplating whether or not he should create the female Victor declares, “I shuddered when I thought of the possible consequences of my consent” (Shelley 134). This proves that Victor’s decision to destroy the female without finishing is a decision driven by passion and emotion. This decision again displays Victor’s ignorance to his moral responsibility. While comparing Victor’s awareness to that of his supposedly inferior creature, David Seed writes, “Ironically the creature proves to have more awareness than its maker” (Seed). This lack of awareness that Seed makes note of proves to cause even more death that Victor must suffer through Victor’s destruction of the female creature causes the creature to become angry with his creator for not keeping his word. This, in turn, results in the deaths of Victor’s best friend, Henry Clerval, Victor’s father, and most impactful to Victor, his wife, Elizabeth. After learning that Clerval was murdered, Victor describes his emotions by claiming, “The human frame could no longer support the agonies I endured” (Shelley 164). This proves how extensive Victor’s consequences are and how large of an impact they had on Victor emotionally and, in this case, physically.While discussing Victor’s destruction of the female creature, David Soyka asserts that “it is Frankenstein's refusal to create again that compounds the original evil of creation” (Soyka). Through this, Soyka is maintaining the idea that Victor worsens the situation that he drags himself into by destroying the female. This destruction of the female creature that indirectly causes the death of so many of Victor’s loved ones is yet another example of Victor suffering as a result of the decisions he makes, all of which are driven by passion instead of responsibility. The last situation in which Victor is influenced to make a decision founded upon his emotions is near the end of the novel when Victor decides to dedicate his life to the pursuit and destruction of the creature.
Victor’s passion is to kill the creature which is contradictory to his responsibility of caring for it. Victor’s irresponsible lust for revenge motivates him to pursue the creature across the world. Victor “desired and ardently prayed that [he] might have him within [his] grasp to wreak a great and signal revenge on his cursed head” (Shelley 186). This shows the reader how dedicated Victor is to killing the creature. Victor fails to recognize that the destruction of his creature will not bring a solution to his conflict. In fact, Victor’s failure to take responsibility for his actions only worsens his conflict. In this situation, it seems that Victor does not even realize what his moral responsibility is. When plotting his revenge, Victor says, “to destroy him I must drag out my weary existence” (Shelley 189). This proves that Victor believes his moral responsibility is to actually kill his creation rather than care for him. As in every other case that Victor makes a poor decision based on passion, Victor must suffer through death. However, this time the life he must mourn is his own. When Victor realizes that he is running out of time to live he tells Walton, “The task of his destruction was mine, but I have failed” (Shelley 204). The failure that Victor is
referring to is his own death coming prior to the death of his creature. Victor’s pursuit of the creature ultimately results in his death. This is the last instance for Victor in which his choice to make a decision that is influenced by emotion instead of responsibility. The struggle between making decisions based on what one wants to do and what one should do is a major thematic idea that Mary Shelley explores through the character of Victor in her novel, Frankenstein. Every time that Victor is unaware of or disregards his moral responsibility, he suffers through the death of someone he cares for. Victor irresponsibly creates the creature, hides the truth at Justine’s trial, destroys the female creature, and attempts to kill his creation. All of these actions result in the suffering, guilt and eventual death of Victor. The way Shelley uses the conflict of passion versus responsibility proves that when decisions are made solely based on emotion and passion, without taking moral duty into consideration, there will be consequences to pay.
After abandoning the Creature, it vows “eternal hatred and vengeance to all mankind” which ends up being in direct correlation with Victor’s life (Shelley 143). The Creature is able to carry out this deed by not directly attacking his creator and abandoner, but the one’s of his creator’s affections. The Creature not only makes Victor feel pain through the killings, but also through the guilt that Victor experiences since he knows that he (Victor) is the reason that all the people are now dead. After all the killings had happened, “yet one duty” remained for Victor, to silence the Creature and all feelings of sorrow rooted from death (Shelley 176). This was Victor’s act of revenge in which only one of the two could live while the other was dead. Victor was so influenced by all the death he had experienced, that his revenge took him to his deathbed. The ending years of Victor’s life had been spent focusing and caring for the matters concerning the Creature and himself, which differs of how Zeus felt about his revenge, as it was only of current importance and had no impact on his
As a romantic, archetype and gothic novel, Victor is responsible for the monsters actions because Victor abandons his creation meaning the creature is dejected and ends up hideous and fiendish. It is unfair to create someone into this world and then just abandon it and not teach it how to survive. The quote from the creature “Why did you make such a hideous creature like me just to leave me in disgust” demonstrates how much agony the creature is in. He is neglected because of his creator. The monster says “The hateful day when I received life! I accurse my creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?” Victor is wholly at fault for his actions, image and evil.
Victor first becomes isolated when he allows himself to indulge in the writings of old philosophers, like Cornelius Agrippa, Paracelsus, and Magnus. The writings of these philosophers
He has come to believe that he had done the right thing in refusing the creatures request. The request which could of saved his friend and his wife's lives. Victor shows how selfish he can be, not taking responsibility and also believing that choosing the decision that ended his wife and friend's lives was the correct thing to choose. At this point and time, the readers are choosing who deserves the sympathy, Victor or the creature?
With nobody to reason with, Victor makes senseless decisions while he is alone. Victor begins this with his process of creating the monster. Nobody in the right mind would ever dig up graves, but that is just what victor goes and does. Once this creation is finally given life, which Victor has spent two years striving for, Victor foolishly abandons it. Victor comes to his senses to some degree after he brings life to the monster as he states, “‘now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream had vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 43). Had there been companions around Victor during this creation time, perhaps someone would have been able to guide Victor away from creating the “wretch” (Shelley 43) he so hopelessly conceived. As for the monster, he makes fairly good decisions even without guidance from anyone, including Victor, his creator. The monster has the desire to learn and gain knowledge as a genuine individual. As the monster is continuously rejected and shunned by mankind, his natural benevolence turns to malevolence. In his loneliness, the monster wrongly decides to declare “‘everlasting war against the species, and more than all, against him who had formed me and sent me forth to this insupportable misery’” (Shelley 126). Say the monster was able to have comrades of some kind around him, he would not have turned to this
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein shows readers how irresponsibility and the excessive need for knowledge can cause suffering among others as well as oneself. Victor never intends to cause such harm; however, he is not cautious and observant with his actions, which ultimately leads to his classification as a tragic hero. The desire to learn is most definitely a wonderful trait to have, as long as one’s knowledge doesn’t reach the extent that Victor Frankenstein’s unfortunately does.
...e all the evil things they have done. When he goes to Victor's coffin, the creature does the opposite of what a evil being would do. He grieves over Victor despite all the horrible things the creature has done to Victor. The creature even feels guilt over the innocent people he has killed and the torment he put his creator through. Despite Victor's actions leading the creature to commit evil deeds, the creature finds in himself to feel regret in the end.
Victor, at first sight of the Creature, abandons and leaves him to survive on his own. This is insignificant to the creature at the time, but later causes the Creature to have bitter feelings towards Victor. After the Creature discovers Victor’s notes, he becomes enraged, and incriminates Victor for the victimization that he faces; hence accusing him as a perpetrator of cruelty. Through the accusation of Victor one can see that the Creature believes that Victor should be held responsible, and owes the Creature a favor. Additionally, Victor double-crosses the Creature after obliging to create a mate for the Creature. These actions of betrayal demonstrate how Victor is a perpetrator of cruelty and how the Creature is his victim. Victor’s unintentional cruelty reveals how he only wanted what was best for himself and human kind. Victor’s betrayal is seen as an action of cruelty by the Creature, and consequently delivers the final blow that instigates the retaliation of the
By the time of their death, both Victor and the creature has committed repugnant acts: Victor created a being out of corpses and then abandoned it and let it wreak havoc on the people he loved, the creature directly killed three people. But Victor tells Walton that, “During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blamable […] nor do I know where this thirst for vengeance may end” (269). Victor is not able to see past the metaphorical clouds that seem to shroud his mind from seeing the truth. Furthermore, Victor is not able to let go of his hate for the creature. In contrast, the creature admits, “But it is true that I am a wretch. I have murdered the lovely and the helpless” (275). The creature is able to recognize that he has made mistakes and as a result he loathes himself. He tells Walton that, “You hate me, but your abhorrence cannot equal that with which I regard myself” (275). Although no amount of regret or sorrow can bring back the people that he has killed, the creature does acknowledge the evil of his actions, which in turn allow him to make come to peace. He is able to reconcile his vengeful feelings towards his creator and praises Victor by calling him, “worthy of love and admiration among men” (275). Both Victor and the creature have done committed actions against each
Victor Frankenstein, the monster’s creator, is the victim of his own pride. An ego unchecked is a dangerous thing. But in truth, it really just shows Victor’s humanity. He is privileged, educated, talented, loved, adored, but he is not perfect. His flaw is his own ego and pride. Without doubt, this is the result of a childhood where he was overindulged. Overindulged to the extent he was given a little girl “Elizabeth” as a “present”, whom he considered from childhood “mine only” (Shelley 21). Little wonder the twenty year old Victor would think he could create, control and command life. But Victor as with any indulged child did not take the time to learn much from his parents about parenting and fath...
In Frankenstein, Shelley creates two very complex characters. They embody the moral dilemmas that arise from the corruption and disturbance of the natural order of the world. When Victor Frankenstein is attending school, he becomes infatuated with creating a living being and starts stealing body parts from morgues around the university. After many months of hard work, he finishes one stormy night bringing his creation to life. However, “now that [Victor] had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled [his] heart” (Chambers). Right after Victor realizes what he has done, he falls into deep depression and must be nursed back to health by his friend. Victor spends the rest of the story facing consequences and moral problems from creating unnatural life. When he realizes that the ‘monster’ has killed his brother, even though no one believes him, he feels responsible for his brother’s murder because he was responsible for the existence of the ‘monster’. Also feeling responsible, Victor...
Many people know that Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, was part of a family of famed Romantic era writers. Her mother, Mary Wollstonecraft, was one of the first leaders of the feminist movement, her father, William Godwin, was a famous social philosopher, and her husband, Percy Shelley, was one of the leading Romantic poets of the time ("Frankenstein: Mary Shelley Biography."). What most people do not know, however, is that Mary Shelley dealt with issues of abandonment her whole life and fear of giving birth (Duncan, Greg. "Frankenstein: The Historical Context."). When she wrote Frankenstein, she revealed her hidden fears and desires through the story of Victor Frankenstein’s creation, putting him symbolically in her place (Murfin, Ross. "Psychoanalytic Criticism and Frankenstein.”). Her purpose, though possibly unconsciously, in writing the novel was to resolve both her feelings of abandonment by her parents, and fears of her own childbirth.
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley highlights on the experiences her characters undergo through the internal war of passion and responsibility. Victor Frankenstein lets his eagerness of knowledge and creating life get so out of hand that he fails to realize what the outcome of such a creature would affect humankind. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, highlights on how Frankenstein’s passion of knowledge is what ultimately causes the decline of his health and the death of him and his loved ones.
After leaving Geneva to pursue his own ambitions in creating “a new species [that] would bless me [Victor] as its creator,” Victor Frankenstein returns after successfully creating a bringing his creation alive (Shelly 46). Written during a retreat in Switzerland by Mary Shelley, the daughter of radicals Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, Frankenstein explores numerous observations about life and human nature. Observing that people are not inherently selfish and cruel but rather that these traits are products of circumstances, Shelly explores the how personal ambitions can disable strong morals and values of characters. Throughout Frankenstein, the consequences, often negative, of ambitions are explored thus making this 1818 novel a cautionary