Cracker Barrel Case Study Solution

1148 Words3 Pages

In September of 2004, four months after the settlement of the justice Department’s lawsuit, Cracker Barrel reached a settlement in the lawsuits involving 42 plaintiffs, one of which was the NAACP. The allegations included, but were not limited to unwarranted extended wait times to be seated, segregated seating: in the back by the kitchen or in the smoking area, being served food out of the trash, racial slurs, and inferior service. These law suits resulted in several mandates being imposed by the U.S. Justice Department forcing Cracker Barrel to undergo and employ the necessary changes that they had been so resolutely avoiding.

OD EFFORTS ENFORCED UPON CRACKER BARREL

In 2004, a consent order required Cracker Barrel to hire an outside auditor to oversee the implementation of non-discrimination policies, procedures, and training programs. This was not a voluntary effort on behalf of the company. In the same year, the company agreed t change its training and management practices to prevent discrimination against African American customers, though the company denied the allegations (listed in the approximately 100 lawsuits) made …show more content…

has consistently been the subject of negative publicity for well over two decades. If reviewing the vision, mission, and information regarding Cracker Barrel’s internal structure and efforts, it appears that the company has a solid and sound internal structure. Reviewing external information such as complaints, court cases, and reports, however, provided a picture of a company with a severely debilitated organizational culture and structure desperately in need of Organization Development intervention. Cracker Barrel appears to have neglected some of the major fundamental components of a positive organization culture such as allowing employees to have an influence or impact on the organization and environment, and other humanistic vales that are the core concentration of Organization

Open Document